Regulations & Safety
Boeing and Partners Launch Digital Airworthiness Certificate for Aircraft Parts
Boeing, Southwest Airlines, and Aeroxchange introduce the digital 8130 certificate to enhance aircraft parts authentication and aviation safety.
Boeing and Partners Set a New Digital Standard for Aircraft Parts Authentication
The aviation industry faces persistent threats from counterfeit and unapproved aircraft parts, which pose significant safety and operational risks. In response, Boeing, in collaboration with Southwest Airlines and Aeroxchange, has announced a groundbreaking initiative: the adoption of a fully digital airworthiness certificate for aircraft parts, known as the “digital 8130.” This development marks a pivotal shift in how the industry approaches parts authentication and supply chain integrity.
The move to digital documentation is not merely a technological upgrade; it is a direct answer to decades-long concerns about the infiltration of unapproved parts into the aviation supply chain. With advanced encryption and blockchain-ready features, the new standard aims to provide a more secure, verifiable, and efficient method for tracking the authenticity and airworthiness of critical aircraft components.
This article explores the significance of Boeing’s digital authentication initiative, the challenges it addresses, and the broader implications for aviation safety and supply chain management.
The Digital 8130: A New Era in Aircraft Parts Authentication
The digital 8130 certificate initiative represents a significant technological leap from the traditional paper-based FAA Form 8130-3, which has long served as the official airworthiness certificate for aircraft parts. Historically, these paper forms have been vulnerable to loss, damage, and, most critically, fraudulent replication, a weakness that has been exploited by bad actors to introduce unapproved or counterfeit parts into the supply chain.
On October 13, 2025, Boeing, together with Southwest Airlines and Aeroxchange, completed the industry’s first shipment of an aircraft part accompanied by a fully digital 8130-3 certificate. The milestone shipment involved a battery serviced at Boeing’s repair facility in Davie, Florida, and delivered to Southwest Airlines in Dallas. The digital certificate was transmitted securely through Aeroxchange’s eARC™ platform, allowing for immediate electronic verification of the part’s authenticity and airworthiness.
The technology behind the digital 8130 leverages advanced encryption methods, including public/private key infrastructure and X.509 security protocols. These measures ensure the identity of the signer is authenticated, and the document itself is immutable and resistant to tampering. The system is also described as “blockchain-ready,” indicating potential for future integration with distributed ledger technologies that could enable comprehensive lifecycle tracking of each part.
“This industry-first shipment reflects Boeing’s dedication to pursuing game-changing solutions through teamwork and partnership. Together with Southwest Airlines and Aeroxchange, we are transforming how the industry ensures part authenticity and supply chain security.”
– William Ampofo, Senior Vice President, Boeing Global Services
Industry Collaboration and Broader Adoption
The rollout of the digital 8130 certificate is not an isolated effort. It is supported by the Aviation Supply Chain Integrity Coalition (ASCIC), a cross-industry group that includes major stakeholders such as Boeing, Airbus, American Airlines, Delta, United, and Safran. The coalition’s involvement signals broad industry recognition of the urgent need to combat the risks posed by unapproved parts.
Boeing plans to expand the use of the digital certificate to all nine of its product repair service centers, pending the necessary FAA authorizations for electronic record-keeping. This phased implementation reflects both the scale of the change and the regulatory rigor required to ensure compliance and safety.
Southwest Airlines, a key partner in the pilot shipment, has emphasized the alignment of digital authentication with its safety-first culture. The ability to receive and verify airworthiness certificates electronically streamlines operations and reduces the administrative burden associated with paper documentation, while also enhancing security.
Technological Framework and Security
The digital 8130 system’s reliance on encryption and secure protocols addresses longstanding vulnerabilities. By authenticating the signer’s identity and ensuring the certificate cannot be altered, the system provides a significant deterrent to fraud. The blockchain-ready format, while not yet fully implemented, holds promise for further enhancing transparency and traceability in the future.
Expert opinions underscore the potential impact of this transition. Al Koszarek, President and CEO of Aeroxchange, described the event as a milestone in the industry’s efforts to prevent unapproved parts from entering the supply chain. The integration of secure digital certificates is seen as a foundational step toward a more resilient and trustworthy aviation ecosystem.
Robert L. Sumwalt, Executive Director at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, has highlighted the safety risks associated with unapproved parts in his recent writings, noting that their presence increases the safety risk factor for any aircraft. While not commenting directly on Boeing’s initiative, his perspective reinforces the critical importance of robust authentication measures.
“Anytime you are dealing with unapproved parts on an aircraft, you are increasing the safety risk factor.”
– Robert L. Sumwalt, Executive Director, Boeing Center for Aviation and Aerospace Safety at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Addressing the Challenge of Unapproved Parts
The aviation industry has grappled with the issue of unapproved and counterfeit parts for decades. These components can include counterfeit items, parts that have exceeded their approved service life, improperly returned-to-service components, or parts accompanied by fraudulent documentation. The economic incentives are clear: such parts are often cheaper to acquire and more profitable to sell, fueling a persistent black market.
The safety implications are severe. An FAA study from 1996 linked unapproved parts to 174 incidents, 39 injuries, and 17 fatalities between 1973 and 1996. More recently, the 2023 AOG Technics scandal, involving the alleged sale of thousands of engine parts with falsified documents, brought renewed attention to the vulnerabilities in the global aviation supply chain.
The traditional paper-based system for airworthiness certification has been a weak point, susceptible to both accidental loss and deliberate forgery. The move to a digital, encrypted platform directly addresses these vulnerabilities, offering a more robust and transparent means of ensuring that only approved, airworthy parts are installed on aircraft.
Regulatory and Industry Response
The adoption of the digital 8130 certificate aligns with recommendations from the ASCIC and reflects a consensus among industry leaders on the need for enhanced supply chain integrity. The FAA’s role in authorizing and overseeing the transition to electronic record-keeping is crucial, ensuring that safety and compliance standards are maintained throughout the process.
Industry collaboration is a defining feature of this initiative. By bringing together manufacturers, Airlines, technology providers, and regulatory bodies, the effort seeks to establish a new baseline for trust and accountability in the aviation parts ecosystem.
While the initial rollout is focused on Boeing’s repair centers and Southwest Airlines, the involvement of other major players through the ASCIC suggests that broader adoption across the industry is likely, particularly as the benefits of digital authentication become more widely recognized.
Future Implications and Technological Evolution
The introduction of digital authentication for aircraft parts is expected to catalyze further innovation in supply chain management and safety assurance. The blockchain-ready architecture hints at future possibilities, such as end-to-end lifecycle tracking of components, automated compliance checks, and real-time sharing of airworthiness data across the industry.
As digital standards become more entrenched, stakeholders anticipate improvements not only in safety and security but also in operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The reduction of paperwork, faster verification processes, and enhanced traceability all contribute to a more resilient supply chain.
Challenges remain, particularly around ensuring interoperability between different systems and securing regulatory approval for widespread adoption. However, the collaborative approach taken by Boeing and its partners provides a template for how the industry can collectively address these hurdles.
“The security benefit of electronic forms aligns to Southwest’s value of a Safety-first culture.”
– Landon Nitschke, Senior Vice President, Technical Operations at Southwest Airlines
Conclusion
Boeing’s launch of a digital airworthiness certificate, in partnership with Southwest Airlines and Aeroxchange, represents a transformative step in the battle against unapproved and counterfeit aircraft parts. By replacing vulnerable paper documentation with encrypted, blockchain-ready digital records, the initiative directly addresses critical safety and supply chain risks that have challenged the industry for decades.
Looking ahead, the digital 8130 standard is poised to become a cornerstone of aviation parts authentication, with the potential for industry-wide adoption and further technological integration. As the aviation sector continues to evolve, such collaborative innovations will be essential in safeguarding both flight safety and public trust.
FAQ
What is the digital 8130 certificate?
The digital 8130 certificate is an electronic version of the FAA Form 8130-3, used to certify the airworthiness and authenticity of aircraft parts. It employs encryption and secure protocols to prevent forgery and loss.
Why is digital authentication important for aircraft parts?
Digital authentication enhances security, reduces the risk of counterfeit or unapproved parts entering the supply chain, and streamlines the verification process for airlines and maintenance providers.
Who are the main partners in this initiative?
The initiative is led by Boeing, in partnership with Southwest Airlines and Aeroxchange, with support from the Aviation Supply Chain Integrity Coalition (ASCIC).
What are the future implications of this technology?
The digital 8130 is designed to be blockchain-ready, potentially enabling comprehensive lifecycle tracking and real-time data sharing for aviation parts in the future.
Sources
Photo Credit: Boeing
Regulations & Safety
2026 Aviation Industry Faces Safety and Financial Challenges
In early 2026, several regional and charter airlines lose licenses due to safety violations and financial struggles, including Starflite and Lufthansa CityLine.
The global aviation industry is currently navigating a severe contraction in early 2026, marked by a significant wave of operational suspensions, bankruptcies, and license revocations. Regional carriers and private charter Airlines are bearing the brunt of this downturn, facing intense regulatory scrutiny and mounting financial pressures.
According to reporting by Yahoo Finance and aviation intelligence firm ch-aviation, several boutique operators have recently lost their Air Operator’s Certificates (AOCs). An AOC is a mandatory license granted by national aviation authorities, proving an airline possesses the aircraft, qualified staff, safety systems, and financial resources required to transport paying passengers. Without an active AOC, an airline cannot legally operate or market flights.
The reasons for these recent shutdowns vary widely. While some carriers are buckling under the weight of post-pandemic recovery struggles and severe financial insolvency, others have been grounded due to egregious safety violations and fatal accidents. Regulators across the globe are demonstrating a zero-tolerance approach to compliance failures.
Regulatory Crackdowns and Safety Violations
Starflite Aviation Faces FAA Emergency Order
In the United States, Houston-based Part 135 charter operator Starflite Aviation had its AOC revoked via an emergency order from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in early 2026. The regulatory action effectively grounded the company’s entire fleet.
The FAA alleges that between November 2019 and November 2024, Starflite’s management knowingly falsified pilot training records for at least 10 pilots, including the chief pilot. According to the agency, fraudulent entries indicated that required check rides and competency checks were performed when they were not, resulting in unqualified pilots operating at least 170 flights.
The company demonstrated a “disregard for the safety of the flying public,” according to the FAA’s emergency order.
Harmony Jets Suspended Following Fatal Crash
In Europe, Malta-registered private jet charter Harmony Jets had its AOC and Certificate of Airworthiness suspended by Transport Malta in March 2026. This regulatory suspension follows a tragic accident on December 23, 2025, when a Dassault Falcon 50 operated by the airline crashed near Ankara, Turkey, shortly after takeoff.
The crash claimed the lives of all eight people on board, including Libyan Army Chief of Staff Mohammed Ali Ahmed al-Haddad and other senior officials. Prior to the crash, the pilot had reported an electrical malfunction and requested an emergency landing. Harmony Jets maintains that it has not permanently shut down, stating it has temporarily suspended charter operations to fully cooperate with ongoing investigations by Turkish and French authorities.
Financial Insolvency and Market Contraction
Boutique Charters and Regional Feeders Struggle
Financial pressures are also forcing closures across the sector. The United Kingdom’s Pen-Avia, a boutique charter airline based at London Luton Airport, currently has an inactive AOC, according to ch-aviation. The carrier retired its sole 19-passenger Gulfstream GVII-G60 in November 2025. While the airline has kept the possibility of restarting operations open, automated responses since late 2025 indicate no charter flights are currently running.
Larger regional networks are not immune to these financial headwinds. As highlighted by Yahoo Finance, Lufthansa announced the sudden and permanent discontinuation of its regional feeder brand, CityLine, in April 2026. The closure of the loss-making subsidiary resulted in the immediate cancellation of dozens of summer flights.
The Broader 2025–2026 Industry Fallout
The loss of AOCs is part of a broader contraction in the regional and charter aviation markets. Other recent casualties include Mexico’s Magnicharters, which canceled all flights until May 2026, and Italy’s GoTo Fly, a virtual carrier that discontinued all services in April 2026. Furthermore, Tailwind Air in the U.S. and Ecojet in the U.K. both filed for bankruptcy or liquidation in January 2026 after struggling to secure passenger volume and funding.
These closures follow a string of major bankruptcies in late 2025, including Spirit Airlines, Ravn Alaska, and Play Airlines, underscoring the fragile economic state of the broader aviation industry.
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the current wave of AOC revocations highlights a critical “safety versus survival” dilemma in the charter aviation sector. Industry experts note that operating on tight profit margins often precedes severe regulatory crackdowns, as seen in the allegations against Starflite Aviation. It is becoming increasingly difficult for boutique airlines to offset the soaring costs of aviation maintenance, fuel, and staffing without a consistent base of high-earning clients.
Furthermore, aviation authorities, including the FAA, Transport Malta, and the UK Civil Aviation Authority, are increasingly utilizing emergency revocations rather than progressive enforcement. This zero-tolerance approach indicates a shifting regulatory landscape where financial vulnerability and safety lapses are met with immediate operational freezes. The domino effect of a single fatal incident, as seen with Harmony Jets, can trigger a total operational freeze, cutting off a charter airline’s revenue stream and pushing them to the brink of collapse.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is an Air Operator’s Certificate (AOC)?
An AOC is a mandatory license granted by national aviation authorities (such as the FAA or EASA) that proves an airline has the necessary aircraft, qualified staff, safety systems, and financial resources to legally transport paying passengers.
Why did Starflite Aviation lose its license?
The FAA issued an emergency revocation of Starflite Aviation’s AOC after alleging the company falsified pilot training records for at least 10 pilots over a five-year period, allowing unqualified pilots to operate passenger flights.
What happened to Lufthansa CityLine?
In April 2026, Lufthansa announced the permanent discontinuation of its regional feeder brand, CityLine, citing the need to stop financial losses at the subsidiary. This resulted in the cancellation of numerous scheduled flights.
Sources: Yahoo Finance
Photo Credit: Pen-Avia
Regulations & Safety
FAA Mandates Inspections for Converted Boeing 747-400 Freighters Over Fire Risk
FAA requires immediate inspections on Boeing 747-400 freighters converted by Israel Aerospace Industries due to fire hazards from oxygen hose and wiring issues.
This article is based on an official directive from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and related industry data.
FAA Mandates Immediate Inspections for Converted Boeing 747-400 Freighters Over Fire Risk
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an immediate Airworthiness Directive (AD 2026-08-06) for a specific subset of converted Boeing 747-400 freighters due to a severe fire hazard. Published on April 22, 2026, the rule mandates inspections prior to any subsequent flights after its effective date of May 7, 2026.
The directive specifically targets passenger aircraft converted to freighters by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). Factory-built Boeing 747-400F aircraft are not affected by this mandate. According to the FAA document, the issue stems from a ruptured crew oxygen hose and electrical arcing caused by chafing against an adjacent cargo-aircraft loading system wire harness.
Due to the severe risk of fire and the potential loss of crew oxygen supply, the FAA bypassed standard public comment periods to adopt this emergency mandate, which was originally identified by Israeli aviation authorities.
The Root Cause and Safety Risks
The safety concern was initially flagged by the Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), the primary aviation authority overseeing IAI’s conversion programs. Maintenance crews discovered a ruptured flexible crew oxygen bottle hose (Boeing P/N 96431-2) alongside heat and arcing damage on an adjacent ANCRA Cargo Loading System wire harness (P/N W9914-301-12) near station (STA) 680 of the aircraft.
The CAAI determined that incorrect installation during the passenger-to-freighter conversion process led to the oxygen hose chafing against the wire harness.
Immediate Fire Hazard
The combination of a leaking oxygen supply line and electrical arcing presents a critical safety threat. If left unaddressed, sparks from the chafed wiring could ignite in the oxygen-rich environment. This creates a severe fire hazard while simultaneously depriving the flight crew of their emergency oxygen supply.
Regulatory Action and Compliance Requirements
The FAA’s April 2026 directive serves as the U.S. regulatory adoption of the CAAI’s Emergency Airworthiness Directive (AD ISR I-35-26-01-01), which was issued on January 1, 2026. Operators of the affected aircraft must conduct detailed visual inspections to check for wear, chafing, or arcing damage.
Furthermore, mechanics are required to verify a minimum clearance of two inches between the crew oxygen bottle flexible hose and adjacent wire harnesses, in accordance with Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. Service Bulletin 366-35-157, dated January 2026.
Accelerated Timeline
Due to the severity of the risk, the FAA bypassed the standard Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The agency requires that inspections and necessary repairs be completed on a highly accelerated schedule.
…before further flight…
According to the FAA directive, this strict compliance window takes effect immediately following the May 7, 2026, effective date. The FAA is allowing a single special ferry flight to a maintenance facility, provided a preliminary check shows no existing signs of wear or chafing. Retroactive public comments on the rule will be accepted until June 8, 2026.
Fleet Implications and Industry Impact
It is crucial to note that this directive does not affect factory-built Boeing 747-400F aircraft. It is strictly isolated to airframes converted under FAA Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) ST01676SE or ST01706SE, known as the IAI/Bedek Special Freighter program.
Industry estimates indicate that approximately 29 Boeing 747-400s were converted under this specific program. While the fleet size is relatively small, these aircraft are operated by several global airlines and leasing companies. Known operators include Atlas Air, One Air (UK), Aerotranscargo, Terra Avia, ROMCargo Airlines, and Saudia Cargo.
AirPro News analysis
At AirPro News, we assess that while the immediate compliance mandate will cause temporary groundings for the affected operators, the long-term supply-chain disruption will likely be minimal. Aviation maintenance data suggests that the required physical fix, adjusting the clearance to the mandated two inches and replacing any damaged hoses or wires, is a straightforward procedure.
Furthermore, this incident highlights the efficacy of the global aviation safety network. A localized maintenance discovery in Israel swiftly translated into a worldwide protective mandate, demonstrating how international regulatory bodies collaborate to protect flight crews and the public.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Are all Boeing 747-400 freighters affected? No. Only passenger aircraft converted to freighters by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) under specific STCs are affected. Factory-built freighters are exempt.
- What is the deadline for compliance? Operators must comply before further flight after the directive’s effective date of May 7, 2026.
- What exactly needs to be fixed? Mechanics must inspect for chafing and ensure a minimum clearance of two inches between the crew oxygen hose and the cargo loading system wire harness.
Sources: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Document Number 2026-07808
Photo Credit: Rob Finlayson
Regulations & Safety
SWISS A330 Engine Fire Triggers Emergency Evacuation in Delhi
SWISS flight LX 147 aborted takeoff at Delhi after left engine fire. Six passengers injured during evacuation; runway briefly closed.
SWISS A330 Evacuated in Delhi Following Engine Fire
A SWISS International Air Lines flight bound for Zurich was forced to abort its takeoff and evacuate passengers on the runway at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) early Sunday morning following an engine fire. According to reporting by the Times of India and journalist Saurabh Sinha, the incident resulted in the hospitalization of six passengers who sustained injuries during the emergency evacuation.
The aircraft, a widebody Airbus A330, experienced a severe failure in its number one engine during the takeoff roll, prompting the flight crew to initiate a high-speed rejected takeoff. As reported by the Times of India, the sudden engine issue and subsequent fire scare led to a full emergency declaration at India’s busiest aviation hub, temporarily halting operations on the affected runway.
Details of the Rejected Takeoff
Flight LX 147 was scheduled to operate a routine long-haul sector from New Delhi to Zurich on Sunday, April 26, 2026. According to the Times of India, the Airbus A330-300, registered as HB-JHK, was accelerating down Runway 28 at approximately 1:08 a.m. local time when the left engine suffered a critical malfunction.
Flight tracking data from Flightradar24, cited in the original reporting by Saurabh Sinha, indicates that the aircraft had reached a speed of 104 knots when the engine failure occurred. The flight crew immediately aborted the takeoff procedure, applying maximum braking and reverse thrust on the operational engine to bring the heavy aircraft to a safe halt on the runway before ordering an emergency evacuation.
The sudden deceleration and the presence of smoke and fire on the left side of the aircraft created a highly stressful environment for the occupants. The Times of India reports that there were 232 passengers on board the flight, including four infants, alongside the operating flight crew.
Emergency Evacuation and Passenger Injuries
With smoke and fire reported near the left engine, the captain ordered an immediate evacuation. The crew deployed the aircraft’s emergency escape slides to facilitate a rapid egress.
During the high-stakes evacuation, several occupants sustained injuries. According to Saurabh Sinha’s reporting, six passengers were transported to Medanta Hospital for medical evaluation and treatment. Injuries during slide evacuations are common, often resulting from the steep angle of descent and passengers colliding at the bottom of the slide.
In a public statement released following the incident and quoted by the Times of India, the airline confirmed the sequence of events and the crew’s decision-making process.
“The crew rejected the takeoff and, following an assessment of the situation, decided as a precaution to evacuate the aircraft,” SWISS stated.
The airline further noted that local teams were immediately deployed to assist stranded passengers. SWISS confirmed that they were working intensively to arrange hotel accommodations and rebooking options for those affected by the aborted flight. Furthermore, the airline announced that technical specialists would be dispatched to Delhi to inspect the damaged Airbus A330 and investigate the root cause of the engine failure.
Airport Response and Operational Impact
The aborted takeoff triggered an immediate and massive response from the airport’s rescue and firefighting services. A full emergency was declared at IGIA, with multiple fire tenders dispatched to Runway 28 to secure the aircraft, extinguish any remaining fire, and assist with the passenger evacuation process.
According to supplementary reporting by The Tribune, the fire department was alerted to a full hydraulic emergency, prompting a rapid deployment of emergency vehicles to the tarmac. The Times of India noted that Runway 28 was temporarily closed to allow emergency crews to manage the scene, treat the injured, and safely tow the disabled Airbus A330 from the active runway area.
Despite the closure of Runway 28, Delhi Airport officials released a statement confirming that overall airport operations remained largely unaffected, with air traffic being routed to the airport’s other available runways.
AirPro News analysis
We note that high-speed rejected takeoffs (RTOs) are among the most critical and demanding maneuvers in commercial aviation. At 104 knots, the SWISS Airbus A330 was traveling at a significant velocity, though we assess it was likely still below V1, the critical decision speed at which a takeoff can no longer be safely aborted. The successful deceleration of the heavy widebody aircraft underscores the rigorous simulator training flight crews undergo for engine-out scenarios during the takeoff roll.
Evacuation injuries, such as the six hospitalizations reported in this incident, are unfortunately a standard risk when deploying emergency slides. The steep angle of widebody aircraft slides, combined with the urgency and panic of a fire-related evacuation, frequently results in minor to moderate injuries. However, we believe the swift and decisive actions of the SWISS flight crew undoubtedly prevented a more severe outcome by ensuring all 232 passengers exited the potentially compromised airframe within the mandated 90-second safety margin.
Furthermore, the dispatch of SWISS technical specialists to Delhi highlights the seriousness of uncontained or fire-producing engine failures. We expect investigators will likely focus on the engine’s maintenance history, potential foreign object debris (FOD) ingestion, and the performance of the aircraft’s internal fire suppression systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
What flight was involved in the Delhi airport incident?
The incident involved SWISS International Air Lines flight LX 147, which was operating a scheduled passenger service from New Delhi (DEL) to Zurich (ZRH) on April 26, 2026.
What caused the emergency evacuation?
The Airbus A330 experienced a severe engine failure and subsequent fire on its number one (left) engine during the takeoff roll, prompting the crew to abort the takeoff and evacuate the aircraft.
How fast was the aircraft traveling when the takeoff was aborted?
According to flight tracking data cited by the Times of India, the aircraft had reached a speed of 104 knots when the engine failure occurred.
Were there any injuries during the incident?
Yes. According to reporting by the Times of India, six passengers were hospitalized with injuries sustained during the emergency slide evacuation.
Did the incident close Delhi Airport?
While Runway 28 was closed to handle the emergency and remove the disabled aircraft, Delhi Airport officials stated that overall airport operations remained unaffected.
Sources
Sources: Times of India
Photo Credit: X
-
Technology & Innovation6 days agoNASA Releases LAVA Software for US Aerospace Industry Simulations
-
Training & Certification4 days agoAirbus Flight Test School Trains Elite Pilots and Engineers in Toulouse
-
Regulations & Safety4 days agoSWISS A330 Engine Fire Triggers Emergency Evacuation in Delhi
-
Regulations & Safety7 days agoNTSB Preliminary Report on Fatal LaGuardia Runway Collision
-
Regulations & Safety3 days agoFAA Mandates Inspections for Converted Boeing 747-400 Freighters Over Fire Risk