Regulations & Safety
Alaska Receives 120 Million for Aviation Weather Infrastructure Upgrade
Alaska secures $120 million federal funding to improve aviation weather stations and safety infrastructure, enhancing connectivity for remote communities.
Alaska’s Historic $120 Million Investment in Weather Stations and Aviation Safety Infrastructure
The state of Alaska is poised to receive approximately $120 million in federal funding for a comprehensive overhaul of its aviation weather infrastructure, marking one of the most significant investments in the state’s aviation safety systems in decades. This substantial funding allocation, announced by U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan during an aviation roundtable at Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage, represents a transformative moment for Alaska’s aviation industry, which serves as a critical lifeline for the vast majority of the state’s communities. The investment comes as part of the federal budget reconciliation bill, colloquially known as the “Big Beautiful Bill,” and will support the installation of 174 new weather observer systems across the state, alongside critical upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure that has long plagued Alaska’s remote aviation operations. Industry experts, who have been advocating for expanded weather station coverage for years, view this development as a crucial step toward addressing Alaska’s aviation accident rate, which stands at 2.35 times higher than the national average. The funding represents not merely an infrastructure upgrade but a fundamental reimagining of how weather data can support safe aviation operations in one of the most challenging flying environments in the world, where 82 percent of communities remain accessible only by air.
The significance of this investment extends far beyond aviation. Reliable and expanded weather infrastructure will enhance the safety and reliability of essential services for rural Alaska, including healthcare, education, and economic development. For a state where aviation is not a luxury but a necessity, this funding represents a vital step toward bridging the gap between remote communities and the resources they need to thrive.
Alaska’s Unique Aviation Environment and Safety Challenges
Alaska’s vast and rugged landscape, coupled with its extreme weather patterns, creates unique aviation challenges not present elsewhere in the United States. The state covers nearly 600,000 square miles, more than twice the size of Texas, yet has the lowest population density in the country. With 14 major mountain ranges, rapidly shifting weather, and long periods of darkness in winter, pilots face a daunting array of risks each time they take to the skies. For many communities, air travel is the only reliable means of transportation due to the lack of road connections; 82% of Alaska’s communities are not connected by road.
The impact of these challenges is reflected in sobering statistics. According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Alaska’s aviation accident rate was 2.35 times higher than the rest of the nation from 2008 to 2017, and the fatal accident rate was 1.34 times higher than the national average. These elevated rates have prompted federal investigations and led to recommendations for a focused, Alaska-specific safety group within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
This dependence on aviation is further underscored by the number of airports and the frequency of flights. As of December 2020, Alaska had 396 public use airports, including 284 land-based facilities, 4 heliports, and 108 seaplane bases. Annual enplanements in Alaska are 7.1 times the state population, compared to 2.8 times in the contiguous U.S., highlighting the state’s extraordinary reliance on air travel for daily life and commerce.
The Critical Role of Weather Information in Alaska Aviation
In Alaska, accurate and timely weather information is often the difference between a safe flight and a potentially life-threatening situation. The state’s rapidly changing weather, limited visibility, and complex terrain mean that pilots must make real-time decisions based on the best available data. However, the infrastructure supporting these decisions has long lagged behind the needs of those who depend on it most.
Federal regulations require certified weather data for pilots to legally land in rural communities under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR). Yet, many communities lack such certified weather reporting, forcing pilots and airlines to develop makeshift solutions. For example, Grant Aviation, which serves over 60 communities, reports that only about 30% of its destinations have an Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) or similar system. In some cases, local agents relay weather conditions to pilots via radio or phone, a workaround that highlights the gaps in infrastructure.
These deficiencies can have serious consequences. Extended periods without reliable weather data can ground flights for days, isolating communities from medical care, food supplies, and other essentials. The new investment aims to address these gaps, ensuring that pilots have the information they need to make safe, informed decisions in Alaska’s challenging environment.
“The status quo is, frankly, unacceptable.” — NTSB Chairman Robert L. Sumwalt, on Alaska’s aviation safety record.
Current Weather Infrastructure Deficiencies and Systemic Problems
Alaska’s weather station network is significantly less dense and less reliable than those found in the lower 48 states. The state currently operates about 160 aviation-specific weather stations, leaving vast areas without coverage. In some regions, the nearest weather station can be more than 100 miles away, forcing pilots to rely on incomplete or outdated information.
Reliability is another major issue. FAA logs from 2023 show that one in three weather stations in Alaska experienced outages on any given day. Over a five-year period, 59% of AWOS and ASOS stations experienced full outages, and 77% had reduced-service outages. Some outages lasted for days or even months, with a few stations remaining offline for more than 150 days.
The causes of these outages are varied. Equipment failures accounted for about 47% of outages, while telecommunications issues made up 44%. Power failures and other factors comprised the remaining 9%. Many remote stations still rely on obsolete copper wire systems, and replacement parts are increasingly hard to find. Harsh weather, ranging from -60°F to over 90°F, further stresses equipment and complicates maintenance.
“On any given day, 10 to 15 percent of aviation weather stations across Alaska are down or not fully reporting, with the primary issue being telecommunications infrastructure.” — Rick Thoman, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Regional Impacts and Community Consequences
The effects of unreliable weather infrastructure are particularly acute in Western and Southwest Alaska, where outages can leave communities without critical flight services for extended periods. For example, the FAA weather station at Gambell on St. Lawrence Island has not reported reliably since late 2022, creating a dangerous gap in coverage for a key aviation corridor.
These outages not only disrupt passenger flights but also affect cargo deliveries, emergency medical evacuations, and essential service provision. Communities can be cut off for days or weeks, with cascading impacts on health, education, and economic activity.
The new federal investment specifically targets these underserved regions, aiming to close coverage gaps and improve the reliability of weather data transmission through modern telecommunications upgrades.
The $120 Million Federal Investment and Program Details
The $120 million allocation for Alaska’s weather infrastructure comes from the federal budget reconciliation bill, known as the “Big Beautiful Bill.” Announced in 2025, this funding is the result of years of advocacy by Alaska’s congressional delegation, particularly Senator Dan Sullivan. The program will more than double the number of weather stations in the state by installing 174 new observer systems.
The funding is not limited to weather stations. It also supports a broader modernization of telecommunications, radar, and air traffic control infrastructure. Nationwide, the Department of Transportation is replacing thousands of radios, switches, and radars, with Alaska receiving priority due to its unique needs.
The investment also includes upgrades to power supply systems and the adoption of advanced technologies such as the Visual Weather Observation System (VWOS), which integrates cameras and sensors to provide real-time data. These improvements are expected to dramatically enhance the safety and reliability of aviation operations statewide.
“We’ll also be installing 174 new weather stations in Alaska. Alaska is prime time for aviation needs.” — President Trump, on the federal investment.
Technical Solutions and Innovations
The FAA and industry partners are deploying a range of technical solutions tailored to Alaska’s environment. The VWOS, currently operational at four sites, combines sensor data with 360-degree camera imagery, providing pilots with a comprehensive view of conditions. The Montis Weather Observation System (MWOS) further enhances situational awareness by integrating ADS-B tracking and advanced analytics.
Camera-based weather reporting, pioneered in Alaska and now in use nationwide, is another key innovation. These systems provide visual confirmation of weather conditions, supplementing sensor data and aiding decision-making, especially at airports lacking certified weather stations.
The modernization effort also includes upgrades to telecommunications infrastructure, replacing outdated copper lines with fiber, wireless, and satellite systems. This is expected to significantly reduce outages and improve data reliability, particularly in remote regions.
Broader Economic and Community Impacts
The benefits of modernized weather infrastructure extend well beyond aviation safety. Aviation is a cornerstone of Alaska’s economy, supporting approximately 47,000 jobs and contributing $3.5 billion annually. Reliable flight operations are essential for the delivery of goods, medical care, education, and public safety services, especially in communities not connected by road.
Improved weather data will enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery, enabling timely medical evacuations and the transport of healthcare professionals to remote areas. The investment also supports educational access by ensuring that teachers, students, and supplies can reliably reach even the most isolated schools.
For Alaska Native communities and rural residents, reliable aviation means continued access to family, cultural events, and essential services. The new infrastructure will help ensure that no community is left behind, supporting social cohesion and economic resilience across the state.
Implementation Challenges and Future Outlook
Despite the promise of the new investment, implementation will not be without challenges. Harsh weather, extreme temperatures, and remote locations complicate maintenance and increase operational costs. Power supply reliability is a particular concern, with some stations requiring hybrid energy solutions to ensure year-round functionality.
Training and retaining qualified technicians in rural areas is another hurdle. Regional maintenance hubs and remote diagnostic systems may help address these challenges, but sustained collaboration between federal, state, and local partners will be essential.
Looking ahead, Alaska’s experience could provide valuable lessons for other remote and Arctic regions facing similar challenges. The integration of advanced technologies, robust maintenance systems, and community involvement will be key to ensuring the long-term success of this historic investment.
“The reliability improvements enabled by modern weather infrastructure will support not only commercial aviation operations but also emergency medical services, public safety operations, and the personal travel that maintains social connections across Alaska’s vast geography.”
Conclusion
Alaska’s $120 million investment in weather stations and aviation safety infrastructure marks a pivotal step toward addressing long-standing challenges in one of the world’s most demanding aviation environments. This comprehensive initiative will more than double the state’s weather reporting capacity, modernize critical telecommunications and radar systems, and introduce cutting-edge technologies designed specifically for Alaska’s unique needs.
The implications for public safety, economic development, and community wellbeing are profound. As Alaska implements these upgrades, the state will not only enhance aviation safety but also strengthen the vital connections that sustain its remote communities. The lessons learned here may well inform similar efforts in other remote and challenging regions around the world.
FAQ
What is the purpose of Alaska’s $120 million weather infrastructure investment?
The funding aims to install 174 new weather observer systems, modernize telecommunications, and enhance aviation safety across Alaska, addressing long-standing gaps in weather data and infrastructure reliability.
Why is aviation weather infrastructure so important in Alaska?
With 82% of Alaska’s communities not connected by road, aviation is essential for transporting people, goods, and services. Accurate weather data is critical for safe and reliable flight operations.
What challenges does Alaska face in maintaining weather stations?
Harsh weather, remote locations, outdated telecommunications, and power supply issues make maintenance difficult and costly. The new investment includes solutions to address these challenges.
How does this investment benefit rural communities?
Improved weather infrastructure ensures more reliable access to healthcare, education, and essential services, reducing the risk of isolation during adverse weather or system outages.
Who advocated for this funding?
Alaska’s congressional delegation, especially Senator Dan Sullivan, played a key role in securing the funding as part of the federal budget reconciliation bill.
Sources: Alaska Public Media, NTSB, FAA, Alaska Airmen’s Association, Alaska Air Carriers Association
Photo Credit: Alaska Public
Regulations & Safety
US House Passes ALERT Act to Enhance Aviation Safety by 2031
The ALERT Act mandates collision-avoidance tech for aircraft near busy airports and military flights by 2031 after a fatal 2025 midair crash.
This article summarizes reporting by CBS News and journalists Caitlin Yilek and Olivia Rinaldi.
The U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency (ALERT) Act on Tuesday, April 14, 2026. The legislation aims to address critical safety gaps exposed by a tragic midair collision near Washington, D.C., early last year.
According to reporting by CBS News, the bill passed with a sweeping 396 to 10 vote under fast-track rules, which required a two-thirds majority for approval. The legislative push follows the deadliest U.S. plane crash in over two decades, an event that fundamentally shook the aviation industry and prompted intense scrutiny of air traffic control protocols and military flight transparency.
While the House victory marks a significant step forward, the ALERT Act faces a challenging path in the Senate. Lawmakers must now reconcile this new bill with previously stalled legislation, navigating intense pressure from victims’ families, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and the Pentagon.
The Catalyst for Legislative Action
The January 2025 Tragedy
The urgency behind the ALERT Act stems from the events of January 29, 2025. On that day, American Airlines Flight 5342 collided midair with a U.S. Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). Both aircraft crashed into the Potomac River, resulting in the deaths of all 67 people aboard, according to official incident reports.
Subsequent investigations by the NTSB determined that the probable cause of the crash involved poor helicopter route design, inadequate separation requirements, and an overreliance by air traffic controllers on pilots visually spotting other aircraft. A critical technological gap was also identified, the Army helicopter was not broadcasting its location data due to military policy, and the commercial airliner lacked the technology to receive such data.
The Technology Gap: ADS-B Out vs. ADS-B In
At the time of the crash, most commercial planes were equipped with “ADS-B Out,” a system that broadcasts their location to air traffic control. However, they lacked “ADS-B In,” a collision-avoidance technology that allows pilots to receive data about nearby aircraft directly in the cockpit. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy stated during the investigation that if Flight 5342 had been equipped with ADS-B In, the tragedy could have been prevented.
Inside the ALERT Act and the Legislative Battle
Key Provisions of H.R. 7613
Introduced by Representatives Sam Graves (R-Mo.) and Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), the ALERT Act of 2026 mandates that all aircraft flying near busy airports install safety instruments capable of receiving location data from nearby traffic. Furthermore, the bill requires military aircraft to install collision-prevention technologies by 2031. However, it includes notable exemptions for fighters, bombers, drones, and other special mission aircraft. The legislation also overhauls helicopter routes near major airports and mandates improvements to air traffic control training.
The ROTOR Act and Pentagon Pushback
The passage of the ALERT Act follows a contentious battle over a competing Senate bill known as the ROTOR Act (S. 2503). In December 2025, the Senate unanimously passed the ROTOR Act, which included stricter mandates for safety technology. However, the Pentagon reversed its initial endorsement of the bill days before a scheduled House vote.
According to legislative records, the Pentagon claimed the ROTOR Act would create significant budgetary burdens and operational security risks. Due to this opposition, the ROTOR Act failed in the House in February 2026 by a vote of 264-133, falling short of the two-thirds majority required under fast-track rules. This defeat deeply angered the families of the crash victims and set the stage for the compromise ALERT Act.
Stakeholder Reactions and Senate Outlook
Families and Safety Advocates Respond
The NTSB, which has recommended ADS-B In technology since 2008, initially criticized early drafts of the ALERT Act. However, after House lawmakers amended the bill, the agency stated that the legislation now adequately addresses its safety recommendations.
Despite the bill’s passage, families of the 67 victims remain highly critical of the compromises made. In a joint statement, the families expressed concern over the military exemptions and the readiness of the mandated systems:
“The collision prevention technologies ALERT relies upon are not market ready and could take years to become widely available.”
The families argue that allowing military flights to continue operating without broadcasting their locations during routine training leaves a dangerous loophole in the airspace.
Senate Resistance
The ALERT Act faces a tough road in the Senate. Senate Commerce Committee Leaders Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) previously released a bipartisan statement arguing the ALERT Act lacks a clear requirement for the implementation of ADS-B technology. Following the House vote, Senator Cruz reiterated that the Senate’s ROTOR Act remains the superior option, warning that without installation-ready technology, the aviation industry will likely request broad waivers, pressuring Congress to delay compliance.
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the core conflict in this legislative saga centers on balancing national security with civilian airspace safety. The Pentagon’s desire for operational secrecy and budget control directly conflicts with the NTSB’s push for total airspace transparency. The distinction between broadcasting location (ADS-B Out) and receiving it (ADS-B In) is the technical crux of this debate. Until both chambers of Congress can align on strict timelines without excessive loopholes, the aviation industry remains in a state of regulatory uncertainty. The House’s willingness to grant military exemptions through 2031 suggests that a swift compromise with the Senate, which favors the stricter ROTOR Act, will be difficult to achieve.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ALERT Act?
The Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency (ALERT) Act is a House-passed aviation safety bill that mandates the installation of collision-avoidance technology (ADS-B In) for aircraft operating near busy airports and overhauls helicopter routing and air traffic control training.
What is the difference between ADS-B Out and ADS-B In?
ADS-B Out is a technology that broadcasts an aircraft’s location to air traffic controllers and other receivers. ADS-B In allows an aircraft to receive that broadcasted data, giving pilots a real-time view of nearby traffic in their cockpit to prevent collisions.
Why did the previous safety bill, the ROTOR Act, fail?
The ROTOR Act failed in the House in February 2026 after the Pentagon withdrew its support, citing operational security risks and budgetary concerns regarding the strict technology mandates for military aircraft.
Sources: CBS News
Photo Credit: Envato
Regulations & Safety
Emergency Landing of Vintage Plane on Busy Phoenix Street Investigated
A Republic RC-3 Seabee made an emergency landing on a Phoenix street after engine failure; FAA and NTSB investigate with no serious injuries reported.
This article summarizes reporting by 12News and local Phoenix authorities.
A vintage amphibious aircraft made a highly unusual emergency landing on a busy central phoenix street on Sunday afternoon. According to reporting by 12News, the incident occurred near the intersection of 7th Street and Missouri Avenue, bringing traffic to a halt but miraculously resulting in no serious casualties.
Despite descending into a densely populated urban corridor, the pilot successfully avoided vehicles, pedestrians, and surrounding buildings. All three occupants on board the small aircraft walked away with only minor injuries, refusing transportation to a local hospital after being evaluated by emergency crews.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) have launched official investigations into the mid-flight engine failure that prompted the sudden urban landing.
The Incident and Immediate Aftermath
The emergency landing took place at approximately 2:37 p.m. local time on Sunday, April 12, 2026. Flight tracking data and local reports indicate the aircraft experienced severe engine problems mid-flight, forcing the pilot to navigate the plane down into the active traffic lanes of 7th Street.
While the aircraft managed to dodge power lines and civilian vehicles, it did strike a shut-off fire hydrant during the landing sequence. According to the Phoenix Fire Department, this collision ruptured a water main, causing localized flooding that city crews were immediately dispatched to resolve.
Eyewitness and Official Reactions
First responders and bystanders alike expressed shock at the successful outcome of the forced landing in such a bustling area, which is typically crowded with cars, cyclists, and pedestrians.
Captain D.J. Lee of the Phoenix Fire Department described the landing as “100% a miracle” and “remarkable,” crediting the pilot’s extensive experience for avoiding a disaster.
Witnesses on the ground echoed this sentiment. One bystander recounted watching the plane fall in what felt like slow motion, expressing disbelief that the aircraft landed perfectly without injuring anyone on the ground. Another witness who rushed to the scene to check on the occupants noted that everyone appeared completely fine following the impact.
Aircraft Details and Pilot Experience
The aircraft involved in the incident has been identified as a privately-owned Republic RC-3 Seabee, bearing the tail number N6518K. According to historical data from the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, the Seabee is a four-seat amphibious plane introduced shortly after World War II, originally designed to operate on both land and water.
Local authorities reported that the flight originated from Hangar Haciendas Airpark, a private residential airpark located in Laveen, southwest of Phoenix.
Decades of Aviation Experience
Authorities highlighted that the pilot possesses 40 years of aviation experience. This extensive background was cited by emergency responders as a critical factor in the successful navigation of the vintage aircraft. The pilot’s ability to find a clear pocket on a busy city street prevented what could have been a catastrophic urban accident.
Ongoing Investigations
Following the crash, authorities closed 7th Street between Missouri Avenue and Coulter Street for several hours. This closure allowed emergency responders to secure the scene, repair the ruptured water main, and permit federal investigators to begin their preliminary assessments.
Both the FAA and the NTSB are actively probing the incident. The NTSB has indicated that a preliminary report detailing the exact circumstances of the engine failure will be released within 30 days.
AirPro News analysis
At AirPro News, we note that emergency landings in densely populated urban environments are exceedingly rare and carry a high risk of mass casualties and infrastructure damage. The successful outcome of this event underscores the paramount importance of rigorous pilot training and situational awareness. Furthermore, the involvement of a vintage post-WWII aircraft like the Republic RC-3 Seabee adds a unique layer of complexity to the upcoming NTSB investigation, as maintenance protocols and parts sourcing for such historical airframes differ significantly from modern general aviation aircraft.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Were there any injuries in the Phoenix plane crash?
The three people on board the aircraft sustained minor injuries and were evaluated at the scene, but they refused hospital transport. No pedestrians or drivers on the ground were injured.
What type of plane landed on 7th Street?
The aircraft was a Republic RC-3 Seabee, a vintage four-seat amphibious plane introduced shortly after World War II.
What caused the emergency landing?
Preliminary reports from local authorities indicate the aircraft suffered mid-flight engine problems, forcing the pilot to make an emergency landing. The NTSB is currently investigating the exact cause.
Sources
Photo Credit: X
Regulations & Safety
FAA to Transition to Modern NOTAM Management Service on April 18
FAA will replace the legacy US NOTAM System with the NOTAM Management Service on April 18, improving safety alert infrastructure and ensuring continuous access during the switch.
This article is based on an official press release from NBAA.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is preparing to shut down its legacy US NOTAM System (USNS) and transition to the modernized NOTAM Management Service (NMS) on Saturday, April 18. The cutover marks a significant milestone in the agency’s ongoing efforts to overhaul the critical safety alert infrastructure used by pilots and air traffic controllers.
Scheduled to take place between midnight and 4 a.m. EDT, the transition is designed to be seamless for the aviation community. According to an official press release from the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA), the FAA has structured the maintenance window to ensure continuous access to vital flight information.
The upgrade follows years of development, which were heavily accelerated after a major system failure in early 2023 highlighted the fragility of the aging USNS architecture.
The April 18 Cutover Process
Maintaining Access During the Transition
During the four-hour maintenance window on April 18, any NOTAMs that were active prior to the shutdown will remain accessible through all normal distribution channels. To ensure operators receive the most accurate and timely information, the FAA recommends utilizing the FNS NOTAM search tool during this period.
Once the clock strikes 4 a.m. EDT, the new system will officially take over. From that point forward, NOTAMs obtained through the FNS page and third-party providers will be routed directly through the NMS. Despite the backend overhaul, the NBAA notes that operators should not notice any immediate differences in how they receive data.
“The cutover and transition are expected to be completely transparent to operators. We don’t anticipate hiccups.”
Addressing Past Vulnerabilities
The 2023 Outage Catalyst
While the FAA has been working to upgrade the NOTAM system for several years, the urgency of the project increased dramatically following a severe system outage in January 2023. That incident grounded morning departures for 90 minutes across the entire National Airspace System, exposing critical vulnerabilities in the legacy framework.
Launched in early 2025, the development of the NMS focused on performance-based solutions rather than just a broad technical overhaul. The FAA actively solicited user feedback to identify and resolve specific pain points within the system.
Future Capabilities and Formatting
Although NOTAMs will continue to be presented in their current, traditional format immediately following the NMS cutover, the new infrastructure lays the groundwork for future improvements. According to the NBAA, the upgraded system offers the capability to eventually present NOTAMs in a more accessible, easier-to-understand layout.
“Ultimately, these changes are for the good of the system, because we need redundancy and resiliency. That is what the NMS provides above all else.”
AirPro News analysis
The transition to the NOTAM Management Service represents a critical shift from reactive patching to proactive infrastructure management for the FAA. The January 2023 ground stop served as a wake-up call for the aviation industry, demonstrating the catastrophic potential of a single point of failure in legacy systems. By prioritizing redundancy and resiliency, the NMS should provide a much-needed safety net. Furthermore, while pilots have long complained about the cryptic and outdated formatting of NOTAMs, establishing a robust backend is the necessary first step before the FAA can roll out the modernized, plain-language layouts that the industry has been requesting for decades.
Frequently Asked Questions
When will the FAA switch to the new NOTAM system?
The transition from the USNS to the new NMS will occur on Saturday, April 18, between midnight and 4 a.m. EDT.
Will pilots lose access to NOTAMs during the transition?
No. According to the FAA, NOTAMs active prior to the maintenance window will remain available via normal distribution channels, and the agency recommends using the FNS NOTAM search tool during the cutover.
Will the format of NOTAMs change on April 18?
Not immediately. NOTAMs will continue to be presented in their current format, but the new NMS infrastructure will allow for easier-to-understand layouts in the future.
Sources
Photo Credit: NBAA
-
Electric Aircraft4 days agoElysian Aircraft Advances E9X Electric Airliner Design for Regional Flights
-
Commercial Aviation3 days agoAvion Express Cuts 15 Aircraft Amid European Aviation Cost Pressures
-
Commercial Aviation2 days agoAirbus Unveils New First Class Concept for A350-1000 Aircraft
-
MRO & Manufacturing7 days agoAero Accessories Expands MRO Services with Miami Acquisitions
-
Regulations & Safety3 days agoJet2 Contractor Seriously Injured After Fall at Manchester Airport