Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

TWU Calls for Human Dispatchers and Airline Maintenance in AAM Sector

The Transport Workers Union demands certified dispatchers and strict maintenance for advanced air mobility at the upcoming congressional hearing.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from the Transport Workers Union (TWU) and supplementary data regarding the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee hearing. See the original release for full details.

TWU Demands Human Dispatchers and Airline-Grade Maintenance for AAM Sector

Ahead of a pivotal congressional hearing on the future of aviation, the Transport Workers Union (TWU) has issued a strong call for the Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) industry to adopt the rigorous safety and labor standards currently applied to commercial airlines. In a press release issued December 2, 2025, the union argued that the emerging sector, comprising electric air taxis and powered-lift aircraft, must not be permitted to bypass established safety protocols regarding aircraft maintenance and operational control.

The demands come just one day before the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee is scheduled to convene for the hearing titled “America Builds: The State of the Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) Industry.” With industry leaders from companies such as Wisk Aero and Beta Technologies set to testify, the TWU is positioning itself as a check against what it views as a potential erosion of safety standards in favor of automation and cost-cutting.

The Push for Certified Human Dispatchers

A central pillar of the TWU’s position is the requirement for certified aircraft dispatchers in AAM operations. Currently, many AAM operators are preparing to launch under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 135 rules, which govern commuter and on-demand operations. Unlike Part 121 rules, which govern major commercial airlines, Part 135 does not strictly mandate the use of certified dispatchers who share joint responsibility for a flight alongside the pilot.

According to the TWU statement, removing this layer of oversight introduces unnecessary risk into the national airspace. The union contends that dispatchers provide a critical “second set of eyes,” monitoring weather patterns, fuel calculations, and operational hazards independent of the flight crew.

“The TWU insists that AAM operations must utilize certified aircraft dispatchers to ensure a critical layer of safety in complex urban environments.”

This demand places the union in direct conflict with the business models of several AAM developers. Companies like Wisk Aero are pursuing fully autonomous aircraft that utilize ground-based “Multi-Vehicle Supervisors” rather than traditional dispatchers or onboard pilots. The TWU argues that replacing certified human professionals with automated systems or less-regulated oversight roles compromises the safety redundancy that the flying public expects.

Closing the Maintenance Loophole

Beyond operational control, the TWU is urging lawmakers to enforce strict maintenance standards for the AAM fleet. The union expressed concern that without explicit legislative guardrails, AAM operators might utilize third-party or foreign repair stations that lack the oversight required of major U.S. carriers.

The TWU supports the application of the Global Aircraft Maintenance Standards Act to the AAM sector. Their primary objectives include:

  • Mandatory Certification: Ensuring all mechanics working on AAM aircraft hold FAA Airframe & Powerplant (A&P) certifications.
  • Preventing Offshoring: Closing regulatory loopholes that could allow operators to outsource maintenance to facilities with lower safety and security standards.
  • Standardization: Importing Part 121 commercial airline maintenance standards rather than creating new, potentially more lenient categories for powered-lift aircraft.

Andre Sutton, the International Vice President and Air Division Director for the TWU, emphasized that the advancements in aviation technology should not come at the expense of the skilled labor and safety protocols that have made U.S. aviation the safest in the world.

Regulatory Context: The SFAR 120 Landscape

The timing of the TWU’s demands is significant. In late 2024, the FAA finalized the “Integration of Powered-Lift” Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR), also known as SFAR 120. This rule serves as the interim governing framework for AAM operations for the next decade, effective January 2025.

While SFAR 120 integrates powered-lift aircraft into the national airspace, it largely places them under Part 135 operational rules. This regulatory classification allows for more flexibility than the Part 121 rules used by major airlines like American or Southwest. By lobbying Congress during the “America Builds” hearing, the TWU appears to be seeking legislative intervention to “toughen” these requirements, effectively asking Congress to supersede the FAA’s recent regulatory framework.

AirPro News Analysis: The Labor vs. Automation Clash

The conflict between the TWU and the AAM industry represents a fundamental divergence in vision for the future of flight. For AAM developers, the economic viability of “air taxis” relies heavily on high-frequency, low-cost operations. Business models from companies like Joby Aviation and Archer Aviation depend on keeping operating costs significantly lower than traditional helicopters or regional jets. Adding the regulatory burden of Part 121, including certified dispatchers and strictly domestic, unionized maintenance crews, could threaten the projected margins of these early-stage companies.

Furthermore, the presence of Wisk Aero at the December 3 hearing highlights the industry’s long-term goal of removing the pilot entirely. The TWU’s insistence on human-centric roles (dispatchers and mechanics) serves a dual purpose: it acts as a safety argument in the public eye while simultaneously attempting to secure future jurisdiction for union labor in a sector designed to minimize headcount. As the industry moves toward autonomy, we expect this friction between legacy labor standards and novel operational concepts to intensify.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between Part 135 and Part 121 operations?
Part 121 governs scheduled air carriers (major airlines) and requires the highest level of safety, including certified dispatchers and strict maintenance schedules. Part 135 governs commuter and on-demand flights (like private jets and air taxis), allowing for more flexible operational control and maintenance rules.

Why does the TWU want certified dispatchers for air taxis?
The TWU argues that dispatchers provide essential independent oversight, monitoring weather and logistics, that enhances safety. They believe removing this role to save costs increases risk, especially in dense urban airspace.

Who is testifying at the December 3 hearing?
Witnesses scheduled to appear before the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee include Kyle Clark (CEO of Beta Technologies), Tyler Painter (CFO of Wisk Aero), Robert Rose (CEO of Reliable Robotics), and Gregory Pecoraro (CEO of NASAO).

What is the Global Aircraft Maintenance Standards Act?
It is legislation supported by the TWU intended to close loopholes that allow U.S. airlines to outsource maintenance to foreign repair stations that may not meet the same security and drug-testing standards as U.S. facilities.

Sources

Photo Credit: The Transport Workers Union of America

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

NTSB Preliminary Report: Ryanair 737-800 Engine Failure

NTSB confirms fan-blade-out on Ryanair 737-800 shattered cabin window, partially ejecting a passenger during climb from Thessaloniki.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.

On August 13, 2026, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued its preliminary report on a July 10 uncontained engine failure aboard a Ryanair Boeing 737-800, confirming that a fan-blade-out event shattered a cabin window and caused a rapid decompression. The incident resulted in a 61-year-old male passenger being partially pulled through the shattered window before being secured by fellow passengers.

The event occurred during climb out from Thessaloniki International Airport (SKG) in Greece. The flight, operated by Ryanair subsidiary Malta Air, was bound for Memmingen, Germany (FMM). The NTSB is currently investigating potential similarities between this event and a fatal 2018 engine failure, while the agency has also publicly addressed premature speculation regarding the cause by Ryanair leadership.

Flight 1879 rapid decompression

According to the NTSB preliminary report, the Boeing 737-800 was climbing when the right-hand CFM56-7B engine experienced a fan-blade-out event. Debris from the engine struck the fuselage and shattered a window at row 11. The resulting rapid decompression pulled a passenger partially outside the aircraft. The passenger sustained neck and shoulder injuries as well as friction burns, but no fatalities occurred.

Reporting by The Air Current indicates the failure happened at an altitude of approximately 15,000 feet. Passengers described a sudden and violent disruption to the flight. A passenger told AP News that the cabin was quiet before a loud noise resembling a bursting tire occurred, adding that they knew immediately the aircraft had lost pressure due to the sudden loss of altitude.

Initial reports following the July 10 incident suggested the failure occurred in the airspace of the Republic of North Macedonia. However, flight path analysis confirmed the event took place in Greek airspace. The Hellenic Air and Rail Safety Investigation Authority officially delegated the investigation to the NTSB on July 16, 2026.

Maintenance history and preliminary findings

The NTSB preliminary report notes that bird remains were found inside the damaged engine. Flight crews had reported four suspected bird strikes to the aircraft’s number two engine in the 12 months preceding the accident. The report states that bird remains were found in two of those previous cases.

Maintenance records indicate that the fan blades on the failed right engine underwent ultrasonic inspections in November 2025 and May 2026. No damage was found during either inspection. The official cause of the July 10 failure remains under investigation by the NTSB, with participation from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Boeing, and CFM International, a joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran.

Regulatory protocols and historical precedent

The investigation has generated friction between the NTSB and Ryanair regarding public communications. On August 7, 2026, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy issued a letter to Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary after he told investors the investigation was focused on foreign object damage rather than aircraft age or maintenance. Homendy stated that the NTSB had made no such determination and noted that O’Leary’s comments violated International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 13 protocols governing accident investigations.

The aviation industry is closely monitoring the investigation due to the aircraft and engine types involved. The Air Current reported that the event closely mirrors the April 2018 Southwest Airlines flight 1380 uncontained engine failure, which also involved a Boeing 737-700 and a CFM56-7B engine. That incident resulted in one passenger fatality after a shattered window caused partial ejection, leading the FAA to mandate engine inlet redesigns by July 2028.

The NTSB addressed the historical context directly in its preliminary report:

The investigative team is aware of previous … events with similar engine models that resulted in damage to engine inlets or cowlings and fuselage structures. Determination of any relevant similarities or details between this accident and previous events remains under investigation.

AirPro News analysis

We observe that the public rebuke of a major airline CEO by the NTSB is a rare and significant enforcement of ICAO Annex 13 communication protocols. Operators typically defer entirely to the investigating authority to avoid compromising the integrity of an active probe. The NTSB’s swift correction underscores the agency’s zero-tolerance policy for operator speculation, particularly when an event involves high-profile safety concerns like uncontained engine failures.

The CFM56-7B is one of the most widely used commercial aviation engines in the world. Any investigation involving a fan-blade-out event on this powerplant will naturally draw intense regulatory scrutiny, especially given the precedent set by the 2018 Southwest Airlines accident. While the discovery of bird remains introduces foreign object damage as a variable, we expect investigators will rigorously examine the efficacy of the ultrasonic inspections conducted in November 2025 and May 2026 to understand how the blade failure propagated.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: NTSB

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Installs New Surface Radar at Newark Airport

The FAA unveiled a new SMR-4 radar at Newark Liberty as part of a $30 million infrastructure upgrade targeting runway safety.

Published

on

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Bryan Bedford unveiled a new Surface Movement Radar-Systems Model 4 (SMR-4) at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) on August 11, 2026, replacing a 30-year-old legacy system.

The installation is part of a broader $30 million infrastructure upgrade at the New Jersey hub designed to prevent runway incursions and reduce delays. According to the FAA press release, the SMR-4 allows air traffic controllers to track aircraft and ground vehicles across runways and taxiways in all weather and visibility conditions.

Newark’s infrastructure modernization

The $30 million funding allocation for EWR spans a three-year period and targets critical technological vulnerabilities. During the summer of 2025, the Airports experienced severe delays that prompted the FAA to deploy Software patches, expedite fiber deployment, and rebalance flight volumes. To date, 90% of the airport’s legacy copper wiring has been replaced with high-speed fiber.

“Since the start of this administration, we have been working towards building a modern system that will serve America’s skies for generations,” Duffy stated. “From replacing Newark’s ancient copper wire to investing $30 million into new infrastructure and bringing new radar online, we are delivering real safety and efficiency enhancements at one of our nation’s busiest airports.”

The FAA has set a target deadline of summer 2027 for EWR to install new electronic information displays, upgraded voice switches, and a new long-range radar system.

National surface awareness rollout

The EWR installation is one of five SMR-4 systems deployed nationwide to date. The agency has accelerated its broader technological overhaul over the past year, replacing 60% of all copper wires in its national network and converting 363 radio sites. The FAA also transitioned 19 air traffic control towers to electronic flight strips and installed 151 IP voice switches at control towers across the country.

Bedford emphasized the operational volume driving the upgrades. “Newark sees well-over a thousand flights per day, and the new Surface Movement Radar will help controllers keep those flights safe at this major U.S. hub,” Bedford said, describing the deployment as a step toward modernizing the national airspace.

The push for enhanced surface surveillance follows a fatal runway incursion at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) on March 22, 2026. In that event, Air Canada (AC) Express Flight 8646, operated by Jazz Aviation using a Bombardier CRJ900, collided with an airport firefighting vehicle on Runway 4. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed two pilot fatalities and 39 injuries. The NTSB is leading the ongoing Investigation, and no official cause has been determined.

In response to surface safety concerns, the FAA has installed 96 new Surface Awareness Initiative systems nationwide over the past year to provide controllers with better situational awareness.

AirPro News analysis

The FAA’s rapid deployment of 96 Surface Awareness Initiative systems and the ongoing SMR-4 rollout represent a tangible shift toward proactive technological intervention in ground operations. While the NTSB has not yet concluded its investigation into the March 2026 LaGuardia runway incursion, the agency’s aggressive timeline for replacing legacy copper wiring and installing surface tracking tools indicates that regulators are prioritizing immediate situational awareness upgrades for air traffic controllers. We view the $30 million targeted investment at EWR as a template the FAA is likely to replicate at other high-density hubs where legacy infrastructure limits operational capacity during low-visibility conditions.

Sources: Federal Aviation Administration

Photo Credit: Federal Aviation Administration

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Revises Takeoff Obstacle Notes in Terminal Procedures

The FAA updates its Terminal Procedures Publication to simplify IFR departure planning with new DER crossing altitudes.

Published

on

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is revising the presentation of takeoff obstacle notes within its Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP), offering pilots a simplified method to utilize standard climb gradients during Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) departures.

In a press release issued on August 5, 2026, the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) announced the charting updates. The revisions provide pilots with a specific Departure End of Runway (DER) crossing altitude, allowing them to safely clear low, close-in obstacles without calculating non-standard climb requirements for every individual threat.

Restructuring Obstacle Departure Procedures

Under the updated format, the FAA separates “Takeoff Minimums Obstacles” from “Low, Close-in Obstacles.” The agency defines low, close-in obstacles as those measuring 200 feet or less above the DER elevation.

Previously, pilots faced complex lists of individual obstacles during pre-flight planning. The new charting method consolidates these threats into distance groupings measured in quarter-mile increments from the DER. If a pilot meets the newly published DER crossing altitude, they can proceed using the standard IFR climb gradient of 200 feet per nautical mile (ft/NM) rather than a higher, non-standard gradient.

Industry advocacy and implementation timeline

The NBAA initially launched the effort to address the complexity of takeoff obstacle notes in 2015 during the FAA Aeronautical Charting Meeting. The resulting changes stem from collaboration between the FAA, the U.S. Instrument Flight Procedure Panel, and commercial charting providers including Jeppesen and Garmin.

While the FAA has officially adopted the new presentation standards, updating the entire National Airspace System will require a phased approach. The NBAA noted that the transition across all published procedures and commercial charts will take several years to complete.

AirPro News analysis

We view this charting revision as a practical step toward reducing pilot workload during IFR departure planning. By providing a clear DER crossing altitude that validates a standard 200 ft/NM climb, the FAA removes the ambiguity of evaluating multiple low, close-in obstacles individually. This change will be particularly beneficial for operators of aircraft with limited climb performance, allowing them to determine immediately if reported weather conditions permit visual obstacle avoidance when a higher climb gradient is unachievable.

Sources: National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)

Photo Credit: NBAA

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News