Regulations & Safety
DGCA Investigates Air India Airbus A320 Operating Without Valid Safety Certificate
DGCA launches probe into Air India after an Airbus A320 operated multiple flights without a valid Airworthiness Review Certificate amid fleet merger with Vistara.

DGCA Launches Investigation into Air India Safety Lapse
India’s aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has initiated a formal probe into Air India after the flag carrier operated a commercial aircraft with an expired safety certificate. According to reporting by Reuters, the airline flew an Airbus A320 on multiple revenue flights in late November 2025 without a valid Airworthiness Review Certificate (ARC), a mandatory document that validates an aircraft’s fitness to fly.
The incident has triggered immediate regulatory action, including the grounding of the specific aircraft and the de-rostering of engineering personnel responsible for the oversight. This development places renewed scrutiny on Air India’s safety protocols as the airline navigates a complex merger with Vistara.
Incident Timeline and Immediate Fallout
The violation involved an Airbus A320, registered as VT-TQN, which was reportedly one of the aircraft recently inducted into Air India’s fleet from Vistara. According to details summarized in reports by The Economic Times, the aircraft operated eight revenue flights over a two-day period between November 24 and November 25, 2025.
The lapse went undetected until November 26, when Air India’s internal checks identified the expired certificate. The airline subsequently informed the regulator voluntarily. In response, the DGCA ordered the aircraft to be grounded immediately. Both the airline and the regulator have launched separate investigations to determine how the aircraft was cleared for service.
In a statement regarding the incident, an Air India spokesperson acknowledged the failure:
“An incident involving one of our aircraft operating without an airworthiness review certificate is regrettable. As soon as this came to our notice, it was duly reported to the DGCA.”
The Role of the Vistara Merger
The operational oversight appears to be linked to the logistical challenges of merging Vistara’s fleet into Air India. Reports indicate that the aircraft in question was the final plane in a batch of 70 former Vistara aircraft undergoing induction. The ARC expired while the plane was grounded for a scheduled engine change. Once the maintenance was completed, engineering staff allegedly released the aircraft for flight without verifying that the ARC had been renewed, a critical step in the post-maintenance release process.
Understanding the Regulatory Violation
Under India’s Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), specifically Section 2, Series F, an Airworthiness Review Certificate (ARC) is non-negotiable for commercial operations. It functions as an annual “health check” that validates the aircraft’s Certificate of Airworthiness. Operating without this document is a violation of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, and technically renders the aircraft unairworthy for the duration of those flights.
The DGCA has taken a strict stance on such violations, viewing them as “Level 1” safety lapses because they bypass the fundamental checks and balances designed to ensure passenger safety.
Broader Safety Concerns
This incident is the latest in a series of regulatory hurdles for Air India. The airline has faced consistent scrutiny regarding its safety culture throughout 2024 and 2025. According to reporting by The Hindu, a major DGCA audit conducted in July 2025 flagged 51 safety lapses within the airline’s operations. These findings included deficiencies in pilot training, improper use of simulators, and issues with crew rostering that potentially contributed to fatigue.
The regulator has previously imposed financial penalties on the carrier for similar operational breaches, including fines for pilot qualification issues and violations of flight duty time limitations.
AirPro News analysis
While Air India has characterized this event as a regrettable error discovered through internal checks, the incident highlights a significant vulnerability in the airline’s transition phase. The integration of Vistara, a process involving the unification of fleets, personnel, and digital systems, creates a high-risk environment for administrative and operational slips.
The core issue here may not be solely human error but a failure of digital safeguards. In a robust safety management system, maintenance software should theoretically prevent an aircraft with an expired ARC from being rostered for revenue flights. The fact that the plane completed eight sectors suggests a potential gap in the digital “hard stops” that are supposed to prevent such regulatory breaches. As the DGCA investigation proceeds, the focus will likely shift from the individual engineers to the systemic safeguards that failed to catch the expiration.
Sources: Reuters, The Economic Times, The Hindu, DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements
Photo Credit: Air India
Regulations & Safety
NTSB Preliminary Report: Ryanair 737-800 Engine Failure
NTSB confirms fan-blade-out on Ryanair 737-800 shattered cabin window, partially ejecting a passenger during climb from Thessaloniki.

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.
This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.
On August 13, 2026, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued its preliminary report on a July 10 uncontained engine failure aboard a Ryanair Boeing 737-800, confirming that a fan-blade-out event shattered a cabin window and caused a rapid decompression. The incident resulted in a 61-year-old male passenger being partially pulled through the shattered window before being secured by fellow passengers.
The event occurred during climb out from Thessaloniki International Airport (SKG) in Greece. The flight, operated by Ryanair subsidiary Malta Air, was bound for Memmingen, Germany (FMM). The NTSB is currently investigating potential similarities between this event and a fatal 2018 engine failure, while the agency has also publicly addressed premature speculation regarding the cause by Ryanair leadership.
Flight 1879 rapid decompression
According to the NTSB preliminary report, the Boeing 737-800 was climbing when the right-hand CFM56-7B engine experienced a fan-blade-out event. Debris from the engine struck the fuselage and shattered a window at row 11. The resulting rapid decompression pulled a passenger partially outside the aircraft. The passenger sustained neck and shoulder injuries as well as friction burns, but no fatalities occurred.
Reporting by The Air Current indicates the failure happened at an altitude of approximately 15,000 feet. Passengers described a sudden and violent disruption to the flight. A passenger told AP News that the cabin was quiet before a loud noise resembling a bursting tire occurred, adding that they knew immediately the aircraft had lost pressure due to the sudden loss of altitude.
Initial reports following the July 10 incident suggested the failure occurred in the airspace of the Republic of North Macedonia. However, flight path analysis confirmed the event took place in Greek airspace. The Hellenic Air and Rail Safety Investigation Authority officially delegated the investigation to the NTSB on July 16, 2026.
Maintenance history and preliminary findings
The NTSB preliminary report notes that bird remains were found inside the damaged engine. Flight crews had reported four suspected bird strikes to the aircraft’s number two engine in the 12 months preceding the accident. The report states that bird remains were found in two of those previous cases.
Maintenance records indicate that the fan blades on the failed right engine underwent ultrasonic inspections in November 2025 and May 2026. No damage was found during either inspection. The official cause of the July 10 failure remains under investigation by the NTSB, with participation from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Boeing, and CFM International, a joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran.
Regulatory protocols and historical precedent
The investigation has generated friction between the NTSB and Ryanair regarding public communications. On August 7, 2026, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy issued a letter to Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary after he told investors the investigation was focused on foreign object damage rather than aircraft age or maintenance. Homendy stated that the NTSB had made no such determination and noted that O’Leary’s comments violated International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 13 protocols governing accident investigations.
The aviation industry is closely monitoring the investigation due to the aircraft and engine types involved. The Air Current reported that the event closely mirrors the April 2018 Southwest Airlines flight 1380 uncontained engine failure, which also involved a Boeing 737-700 and a CFM56-7B engine. That incident resulted in one passenger fatality after a shattered window caused partial ejection, leading the FAA to mandate engine inlet redesigns by July 2028.
The NTSB addressed the historical context directly in its preliminary report:
The investigative team is aware of previous … events with similar engine models that resulted in damage to engine inlets or cowlings and fuselage structures. Determination of any relevant similarities or details between this accident and previous events remains under investigation.
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the public rebuke of a major airline CEO by the NTSB is a rare and significant enforcement of ICAO Annex 13 communication protocols. Operators typically defer entirely to the investigating authority to avoid compromising the integrity of an active probe. The NTSB’s swift correction underscores the agency’s zero-tolerance policy for operator speculation, particularly when an event involves high-profile safety concerns like uncontained engine failures.
The CFM56-7B is one of the most widely used commercial aviation engines in the world. Any investigation involving a fan-blade-out event on this powerplant will naturally draw intense regulatory scrutiny, especially given the precedent set by the 2018 Southwest Airlines accident. While the discovery of bird remains introduces foreign object damage as a variable, we expect investigators will rigorously examine the efficacy of the ultrasonic inspections conducted in November 2025 and May 2026 to understand how the blade failure propagated.
Sources: National Transportation Safety Board
Photo Credit: NTSB
Regulations & Safety
FAA Installs New Surface Radar at Newark Airport
The FAA unveiled a new SMR-4 radar at Newark Liberty as part of a $30 million infrastructure upgrade targeting runway safety.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Bryan Bedford unveiled a new Surface Movement Radar-Systems Model 4 (SMR-4) at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) on August 11, 2026, replacing a 30-year-old legacy system.
The installation is part of a broader $30 million infrastructure upgrade at the New Jersey hub designed to prevent runway incursions and reduce delays. According to the FAA press release, the SMR-4 allows air traffic controllers to track aircraft and ground vehicles across runways and taxiways in all weather and visibility conditions.
Newark’s infrastructure modernization
The $30 million funding allocation for EWR spans a three-year period and targets critical technological vulnerabilities. During the summer of 2025, the Airports experienced severe delays that prompted the FAA to deploy Software patches, expedite fiber deployment, and rebalance flight volumes. To date, 90% of the airport’s legacy copper wiring has been replaced with high-speed fiber.
“Since the start of this administration, we have been working towards building a modern system that will serve America’s skies for generations,” Duffy stated. “From replacing Newark’s ancient copper wire to investing $30 million into new infrastructure and bringing new radar online, we are delivering real safety and efficiency enhancements at one of our nation’s busiest airports.”
The FAA has set a target deadline of summer 2027 for EWR to install new electronic information displays, upgraded voice switches, and a new long-range radar system.
National surface awareness rollout
The EWR installation is one of five SMR-4 systems deployed nationwide to date. The agency has accelerated its broader technological overhaul over the past year, replacing 60% of all copper wires in its national network and converting 363 radio sites. The FAA also transitioned 19 air traffic control towers to electronic flight strips and installed 151 IP voice switches at control towers across the country.
Bedford emphasized the operational volume driving the upgrades. “Newark sees well-over a thousand flights per day, and the new Surface Movement Radar will help controllers keep those flights safe at this major U.S. hub,” Bedford said, describing the deployment as a step toward modernizing the national airspace.
The push for enhanced surface surveillance follows a fatal runway incursion at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) on March 22, 2026. In that event, Air Canada (AC) Express Flight 8646, operated by Jazz Aviation using a Bombardier CRJ900, collided with an airport firefighting vehicle on Runway 4. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed two pilot fatalities and 39 injuries. The NTSB is leading the ongoing Investigation, and no official cause has been determined.
In response to surface safety concerns, the FAA has installed 96 new Surface Awareness Initiative systems nationwide over the past year to provide controllers with better situational awareness.
AirPro News analysis
The FAA’s rapid deployment of 96 Surface Awareness Initiative systems and the ongoing SMR-4 rollout represent a tangible shift toward proactive technological intervention in ground operations. While the NTSB has not yet concluded its investigation into the March 2026 LaGuardia runway incursion, the agency’s aggressive timeline for replacing legacy copper wiring and installing surface tracking tools indicates that regulators are prioritizing immediate situational awareness upgrades for air traffic controllers. We view the $30 million targeted investment at EWR as a template the FAA is likely to replicate at other high-density hubs where legacy infrastructure limits operational capacity during low-visibility conditions.
Sources: Federal Aviation Administration
Photo Credit: Federal Aviation Administration
Regulations & Safety
FAA Revises Takeoff Obstacle Notes in Terminal Procedures
The FAA updates its Terminal Procedures Publication to simplify IFR departure planning with new DER crossing altitudes.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is revising the presentation of takeoff obstacle notes within its Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP), offering pilots a simplified method to utilize standard climb gradients during Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) departures.
In a press release issued on August 5, 2026, the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) announced the charting updates. The revisions provide pilots with a specific Departure End of Runway (DER) crossing altitude, allowing them to safely clear low, close-in obstacles without calculating non-standard climb requirements for every individual threat.
Restructuring Obstacle Departure Procedures
Under the updated format, the FAA separates “Takeoff Minimums Obstacles” from “Low, Close-in Obstacles.” The agency defines low, close-in obstacles as those measuring 200 feet or less above the DER elevation.
Previously, pilots faced complex lists of individual obstacles during pre-flight planning. The new charting method consolidates these threats into distance groupings measured in quarter-mile increments from the DER. If a pilot meets the newly published DER crossing altitude, they can proceed using the standard IFR climb gradient of 200 feet per nautical mile (ft/NM) rather than a higher, non-standard gradient.
Industry advocacy and implementation timeline
The NBAA initially launched the effort to address the complexity of takeoff obstacle notes in 2015 during the FAA Aeronautical Charting Meeting. The resulting changes stem from collaboration between the FAA, the U.S. Instrument Flight Procedure Panel, and commercial charting providers including Jeppesen and Garmin.
While the FAA has officially adopted the new presentation standards, updating the entire National Airspace System will require a phased approach. The NBAA noted that the transition across all published procedures and commercial charts will take several years to complete.
AirPro News analysis
We view this charting revision as a practical step toward reducing pilot workload during IFR departure planning. By providing a clear DER crossing altitude that validates a standard 200 ft/NM climb, the FAA removes the ambiguity of evaluating multiple low, close-in obstacles individually. This change will be particularly beneficial for operators of aircraft with limited climb performance, allowing them to determine immediately if reported weather conditions permit visual obstacle avoidance when a higher climb gradient is unachievable.
Photo Credit: NBAA
-
Defense & Military5 days agoJoby Aviation Acquires Resonant Sciences for $500 Million
-
Technology & Innovation5 days agoHyde County EMS Deploys eVTOL for Live 911 Response
-
MRO & Manufacturing2 days agoSpirit Airlines Fleet Stripped as GTF Engine Values Surge
-
Defense & Military6 days agoRheinmetall and Boeing to Build MQ-28 Ghost Bat Hub in Germany
-
Regulations & Safety3 days agoNTSB Preliminary Report: Ryanair 737-800 Engine Failure
