Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

FAA Issues Advisory on Venezuela Airspace Amid Rising Military Activity

FAA alerts U.S. civil aviation on heightened risks and stricter protocols flying over Venezuela due to increased military tensions and GPS interference.

Published

on

FAA Issues Urgent Security Advisory for Venezuela Airspace Amidst Rising Tensions

On November 21, 2025, the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a significant security advisory regarding civil aviation operations in the region surrounding Venezuela. Designated as NOTAM (Notice to Air Missions) KICZ A0012/25, this directive advises extreme caution for all U.S. civil aviation operators flying within the Maiquetía Flight Information Region (SVZM). This airspace covers the entirety of Venezuela’s landmass and extends approximately 350 miles into the Caribbean Sea, a critical corridor for international air traffic.

The issuance of this advisory comes at a time of distinct geopolitical friction. We are observing a marked escalation in military posturing in the region, described by the FAA as a “worsening security situation.” The advisory is effective immediately as of November 21, 2025, and is currently scheduled to remain in force until February 19, 2026. The primary concern cited is “heightened military activity,” which poses potential risks to aircraft across all phases of flight, including overflights, arrivals, departures, and operations on the ground.

This development is not merely a procedural update but reflects a complex operational environment in the Caribbean. With the advisory explicitly warning of threats at “all altitudes,” U.S. operators are now required to adhere to strict notification protocols. We see this as a clear signal that the safety buffer for civilian aircraft in this specific sector has diminished, necessitating a higher degree of vigilance and coordination between civil operators and federal authorities.

Operational Directives and Reporting Requirements

The core mandate of NOTAM KICZ A0012/25 places specific obligations on U.S. civil aviation. Operators planning to fly into, out of, within, or through the Maiquetía Flight Information Region must now provide at least 72-hour advance notice to the FAA. This notification must be directed to the FAA Watch officer and include specific flight details. This requirement allows federal authorities to track civilian movements in an airspace that is becoming increasingly congested with military assets.

Furthermore, the FAA has established a protocol for immediate incident reporting. Any U.S. operator that observes or experiences safety or security irregularities while operating in the affected airspace is instructed to contact the FAA’s Washington Operations Center. This feedback loop is essential for real-time threat assessment. It is important to note that while this NOTAM addresses safety and security, it operates alongside existing economic restrictions. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Order 2019-5-5 remains in effect, which already suspends direct commercial passenger and cargo flights between the United States and Venezuela. Therefore, the primary impact of this new advisory falls on private operators, charter services, and aircraft transiting through the airspace to other destinations.

The scope of the advisory is comprehensive. It applies to all U.S. civil aviation, which encompasses commercial air carriers, commercial operators, and airmen exercising the privileges of an airman certificate issued by the FAA. The warning emphasizes that the volatility of the situation requires caution at all flight levels, indicating that the threat is not limited to low-altitude operations but extends to cruising altitudes typically used by commercial jets.

“Operators are advised to exercise caution when operating in the Maiquetía Flight Information Region (SVZM FIR) at all altitudes due to the worsening security situation and heightened military activity in or around Venezuela,” FAA NOTAM KICZ A0012/25

Military Context and “Operation Southern Spear”

To understand the gravity of this advisory, we must look at the specific military developments triggering it. Reports indicate that in mid-November 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense initiated “Operation Southern Spear.” While officially characterized as a counter-narcotics mission, this operation represents the largest U.S. military buildup in the region in decades. The deployment includes the USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group, which entered the Caribbean on November 16, 2025. This brings advanced capabilities, including F-35C stealth fighters and sophisticated radar systems, into close proximity with Venezuelan airspace.

In response to these maneuvers, there has been a reciprocal mobilization by the Venezuelan military. Reports confirm the activation of advanced air defense systems, specifically Russian-made S-300 and Buk-M2 missile batteries. The FAA has warned that the engagement ranges of these systems exceed typical civil cruising altitudes, creating a scenario where misidentification becomes a critical risk. Additionally, the Venezuelan Air Force has conducted exercises involving Su-30MK2 fighters equipped with anti-ship missiles, significantly increasing the density and complexity of aerial traffic in the sector.

The geopolitical backdrop further complicates the safety landscape. On November 16, 2025, the U.S. State Department announced the designation of the “Cartel de los Soles” as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. This diplomatic move has heightened tensions, with Venezuelan officials accusing the U.S. of planning aggressive actions. Consequently, air defense systems in the region are reportedly on high alert. For civil aviation, the presence of “hair-trigger” military assets creates a risk environment similar to historical instances where civilian aircraft were tragically misidentified during periods of conflict.

Technical Risks: GNSS Interference and Misidentification

Beyond the kinetic risks of missiles and fighter jets, a significant technological threat has emerged: Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) interference. Since September 2025, with intensification in November, there have been widespread reports of GPS jamming and spoofing. This interference has been most acute near the northeastern coast of Venezuela and the waters surrounding Trinidad and Tobago, coinciding with the movement of U.S. naval assets.

The FAA notes that these jamming devices can affect aircraft systems up to 250 nautical miles away. The implications for flight safety are severe. GNSS spoofing can feed false location data to an aircraft’s navigation computer, potentially causing pilots to unknowingly drift off course. In a region defined by tense borders and restricted military zones, a navigational error caused by spoofing could lead a civilian aircraft into hostile airspace, increasing the probability of interception or engagement by air defense systems.

Furthermore, the interference poses a risk to Terrain Awareness and Warning Systems (TAWS), which rely on accurate GPS data to prevent accidents. The combination of electronic warfare, high-altitude military overflights, and the potential for kinetic strikes related to counter-narcotics operations creates a hazardous matrix for any civilian pilot. The FAA’s advisory highlights that these threats, misidentification, loss of control due to spoofing, and collateral damage, are active and present risks.

Conclusion

The issuance of NOTAM KICZ A0012/25 marks a critical juncture for aviation safety in the Caribbean and South American regions. By mandating a 72-hour advance notice and advising extreme caution, the FAA is acknowledging that the friction between U.S. military operations and Venezuelan defense measures has reached a threshold where civilian safety cannot be guaranteed without strict oversight. The convergence of “Operation Southern Spear,” the activation of Venezuelan S-300 batteries, and widespread electronic warfare creates a volatile environment that demands absolute adherence to these new protocols.

As we look toward the expiration date of February 19, 2026, the situation remains fluid. Operators must stay abreast of updates, as the geopolitical dynamics involving the U.S., Venezuela, and international actors like Russia and China continue to evolve. For now, the message from aviation authorities is unambiguous: the airspace surrounding Venezuela presents significant challenges that require careful planning, heightened situational awareness, and strict compliance with regulatory directives.

FAQ

Question: What is the primary reason for the FAA’s new advisory regarding Venezuela?
Answer: The advisory was issued due to a “worsening security situation” and “heightened military activity” in the region, specifically related to U.S. military operations known as “Operation Southern Spear” and the subsequent mobilization of Venezuelan air defense systems.

Question: Does this NOTAM ban all flights over Venezuela?
Answer: The NOTAM does not explicitly ban all flights but advises “extreme caution” and mandates a 72-hour advance notification to the FAA for any U.S. civil aviation operations in the Maiquetía Flight Information Region. However, a separate DOT order remains in effect that prohibits direct commercial flights between the U.S. and Venezuela.

Question: What specific technical risks are mentioned in the report?
Answer: The report highlights the risk of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) interference, including jamming and spoofing. This can affect aircraft systems up to 250 nautical miles away, potentially leading to navigation errors or misidentification by military air defense systems.

Sources

Photo Credit: FAA

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

NTSB Investigates UPS Flight 2976 Crash Engine Separation

NTSB holds hearings on UPS Flight 2976 crash caused by engine separation due to structural fatigue cracks in 2025, resulting in 15 fatalities.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release and event details from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), supplemented by comprehensive research data.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has convened a two-day investigative hearing in Washington, D.C., to examine the fatal crash of United Parcel Service (UPS) Flight 2976. According to the NTSB’s official event page, the fact-gathering proceedings are taking place on May 19 and May 20, 2026, aiming to determine the probable cause of the November 2025 tragedy and issue vital safety recommendations.

Based on the provided research report, the McDonnell Douglas MD-11F Cargo-Aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff from Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport, resulting in 15 fatalities and over 20 injuries on the ground. The Investigation has centered on the catastrophic separation of the aircraft’s left engine and pylon during the takeoff rotation sequence.

NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy opened the hearing, emphasizing that the primary purpose of these proceedings is to improve aviation Safety and prevent future disasters. The crash currently stands as the deadliest accident in UPS Airlines history, heavily impacting the local Louisville community and the broader aviation industry.

Accident Background and Mechanical Findings

The Tragic Events of November 4, 2025

According to the accident background data, UPS Flight 2976 was a scheduled domestic cargo flight bound for Daniel K. Inouye International Airport in Honolulu, Hawaii. On November 4, 2025, at approximately 5:14 p.m. EST, the 34-year-old MD-11F (Registration N259UP) experienced a catastrophic failure. The research report notes that the flight crew was originally assigned a different aircraft, but a fuel leak discovered during pre-flight inspection prompted a last-minute swap to the accident aircraft.

Seconds after liftoff from Runway 17R, airport surveillance video confirmed that the aircraft’s left engine and pylon separated from the wing, flying up and over the fuselage and immediately igniting a fire. The aircraft reached an altitude of only about 30 feet before crashing into an industrial recycling area. The resulting impact and fireball killed all three crew members on board and 12 people on the ground. An additional 22 to 23 individuals sustained injuries, according to the compiled data.

Structural Fatigue and Prior Warnings

Preliminary reports and January 2026 investigative updates from the NTSB revealed critical mechanical failures at the heart of the crash. Investigators discovered fatigue cracks on the spherical bearing assembly of the left pylon’s aft mount bulkhead. The spherical bearing race, which is normally a single piece housed within the lugs of the aft mount, was found fractured into forward and aft pieces.

Crucially, the NTSB noted that the specific spherical bearing that cracked on Flight 2976 had failed four previous times on other aircraft. In 2011, Boeing warned aircraft owners about the issue and updated the MD-11 service manual to include visual inspections of the bearing. However, the Manufacturers did not believe it posed a severe threat to flight safety at the time, according to the research report.

The Investigative Hearing Agenda

Day 1: Fleet Safety Processes

The NTSB conducts these public hearings to gather sworn testimony and uncover facts. The first day of the hearing, May 19, 2026, focused heavily on what the NTSB agenda terms:

Fleet Safety Processes

This segment includes deep dives into maintenance reporting, quality assurance, and the handling of safety communications after mechanical problems are discovered. Key witnesses called by the NTSB include technical experts and representatives from UPS, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Boeing Commercial Airplanes, ST Engineering San Antonio Aerospace, and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters – Airline Division.

Day 2: Pylon Design Requirements

The second day of the proceedings, scheduled for May 20, is expected to delve into:

Pylon Design Requirements

According to the NTSB’s published schedule, this portion of the hearing will focus on structural engineering and will likely address the physical vulnerabilities of the engine mounting assembly that led to the catastrophic separation.

Industry Impact and Historical Parallels

Echoes of American Airlines Flight 191

Aviation experts and NTSB investigators have drawn direct comparisons between the UPS Flight 2976 crash and the 1979 crash of American Airlines Flight 191 in Chicago. Flight 191, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10, the predecessor to the MD-11, also crashed after its left engine and pylon detached during takeoff rotation due to maintenance-induced structural damage, as detailed in the historical context of the report.

Fleet Retirements and Legal Actions

Following the November 2025 crash, both UPS and FedEx temporarily grounded their MD-11 fleets out of an abundance of caution, pending FAA safety reviews. By January 2026, UPS officially retired its remaining MD-11 fleet. Meanwhile, families of the victims are attending the hearings in Washington, D.C., with many viewing the proceedings from a private grieving room. Wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits have already been filed in Kentucky, with aviation law firms conducting independent investigations alongside the NTSB to uncover the truth behind the engineering failures.

AirPro News analysis

We note that the revelation of Boeing’s 2011 warning regarding the spherical bearing assembly will likely become a central focal point for liability and regulatory oversight in the coming months. The fact that a known vulnerability, even one previously deemed a non-severe threat, culminated in a catastrophic failure raises significant questions about the efficacy of visual inspections versus mandatory part replacements in aging legacy fleets. The eerie similarities to the 1979 DC-10 crash further underscore the critical need for rigorous, evolving maintenance protocols as aircraft designs age. Accountability will likely hinge on how maintenance teams interpreted and executed the 2011 service manual updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused the UPS Flight 2976 crash?
Preliminary NTSB findings indicate that the aircraft’s left engine and pylon separated during takeoff due to structural fatigue cracks on the spherical bearing assembly of the left pylon’s aft mount bulkhead.

When and where is the NTSB hearing taking place?
The investigative hearing is being held on May 19–20, 2026, at the NTSB Boardroom and Conference Center in Washington, D.C.

How many casualties resulted from the crash?
The crash resulted in 15 fatalities, including all three crew members and 12 people on the ground. An additional 22 to 23 people on the ground sustained injuries.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)

Photo Credit: NTSB

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Launches Pilot Program to Convert Contract Towers to FAA Operation

FAA begins pilot program transitioning select contract towers at Bozeman and Phoenix-Mesa into FAA-operated facilities to address controller shortages.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

On May 18, 2026, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced the launch of a new pilot program designed to transition select high-activity Federal Contract Towers (FCTs) into fully FAA-owned and operated facilities. Currently staffed by private-sector employees, these towers will be integrated directly into the federal system in an effort to standardize air traffic controller training and fortify the national controller workforce pipeline.

According to the FAA’s official press release, the first two candidate airports selected for this transition are Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (Montana) and Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport (Arizona). Both represent highly active, rapidly growing regional hubs that have experienced increasing airspace complexity in recent years.

The initiative arrives as the aviation industry continues to grapple with a nationwide shortage of air traffic controllers. By absorbing qualified contract tower controllers into the federal workforce, the FAA aims to maintain safety standards while building a more robust and flexible staffing model for the future.

The Pilot Program and Legislative Mandate

The transition of these contract towers is not merely an internal policy shift; it is a legally required initiative. According to the provided research data, the program is mandated by Section 625 of the 2024 FAA Reauthorization Act, which was enacted in May 2024 to address vulnerabilities in the national airspace system.

Funding and Timeline

To support the transition, the Fiscal Year 2026 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (T-HUD) Appropriations Act provided $6 million in funding for the pilot program. The FAA estimates that the entire transition process for the selected towers will take between 29 and 44 months to successfully complete.

The agency is utilizing a phased approach to ensure there are no disruptions to operational continuity. Furthermore, the FAA is required to submit a congressionally mandated Safety Analysis Report within six months of the operational transition for the candidate towers. This report will detail findings and insights from the conversion process, which will be used to assess the feasibility of converting other high-activity contract towers in the future.

Candidate Airports: Bozeman and Phoenix-Mesa

The FAA prioritized contract towers that met specific operational and passenger enplanement criteria. The selection of Bozeman and Phoenix-Mesa highlights the agency’s focus on airports facing unique growth and infrastructure demands.

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN)

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport serves as the busiest commercial airport in Montana and acts as a primary gateway to Yellowstone National Park and the Big Sky Resort. In recent years, BZN has faced significant staffing challenges at its contract tower. According to the provided background report, the airport authority has historically had to use its own funds to pay for additional contract controllers to extend tower operating hours and manage peak traffic.

The selection of BZN follows heavy lobbying from Montana’s congressional delegation. In March 2026, U.S. Senators Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy, along with Representative Ryan Zinke, sent a formal letter to the FAA strongly urging the airport’s inclusion in the pilot program.

“The FAA is now well positioned to move forward expeditiously in carrying out the program and we believe BZN should be one of the first airports selected for consideration,” the Montana Congressional Delegation stated in their March 2026 letter.

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport (IWA)

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport is the second-busiest FAA Contract Air Traffic Control Tower in the United States and a massive economic driver for its region, generating an estimated $1.8 billion in annual economic impact.

The airport is already well-equipped for the federal transition. In August 2022, Mesa Gateway dedicated the new $30 million John S. McCain III Air Traffic Control Tower. The 199-foot-tall structure features a 550-square-foot cab with eight controller positions, built specifically to handle the airport’s rapid growth and complex airspace.

Addressing the National Controller Shortage

The FAA Contract Tower Program was originally established to allow the agency to contract out air traffic control services at airports that have significant traffic but may not meet the threshold for a fully FAA-staffed tower. These towers operate under strict FAA safety standards but are staffed by employees of private companies, such as Serco.

Transitioning the Workforce

Under the new pilot program, qualified contract tower controllers currently working at BZN and IWA will transition to become FAA-trained and operated employees. This move is part of a broader strategy to address the nationwide controller shortage. Section 625 of the 2024 FAA Reauthorization Act also mandated minimum staffing levels, requiring at least two controllers per shift, at small and medium hub contract towers.

In the official press release, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford emphasized the administration’s commitment to workforce development.

“This is another step the Trump Administration is taking to add qualified air traffic controllers to our workforce and ensure the safety and efficiency of our National Airspace System,” Bedford stated. “As air traffic demand continues to grow, this program will help ensure the FAA has the experienced workforce needed to manage complex operations at these towers.”

AirPro News analysis

We note that this pilot program aligns seamlessly with the broader administrative goals of FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford. Confirmed in July 2025, Bedford is an aviation industry veteran with over 35 years of experience, including a 26-year tenure as the CEO of Republic Airways. During his time in the private sector, Bedford heavily focused on workforce development, notably launching the LIFT Academy, an airline-owned training facility.

His current push to standardize training and absorb contract controllers into the federal pipeline demonstrates a continuation of his career-long focus on solving aviation staffing bottlenecks. By bringing private-sector controllers under the federal umbrella, the FAA is not only relieving local airport authorities of financial burdens, as seen in Bozeman, but also creating a more standardized, flexible federal workforce capable of being deployed where the national airspace system needs them most.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the FAA Contract Tower (FCT) Program?
The FCT Program allows the FAA to contract out air traffic control services to private companies at airports that have significant traffic but do not meet the threshold for a fully FAA-staffed tower. These facilities still operate under strict federal safety standards.

How long will the transition take for the selected airports?
The FAA estimates that the pilot program will take between 29 and 44 months to successfully complete the transition of the selected towers to full FAA operation.

Will current contract controllers lose their jobs?
No. According to the FAA, qualified contract tower controllers currently working at the selected facilities will transition to become FAA-trained and operated federal employees.

Sources

Photo Credit: Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

DFW Airport Opens New East ARFF Station in $130M Upgrade

Dallas Fort Worth International Airport opens a new $130 million East ARFF Station featuring hybrid-electric fire trucks and enhanced emergency infrastructure.

Published

on

On May 11, 2026, Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) officially opened its new East Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Station. According to an official press release from the airport, this facility serves as a cornerstone of a $130 million modernization program aimed at overhauling the airport’s emergency response infrastructure. The new station replaces aging facilities that have been in continuous operation since the airport first opened in 1974.

The ARFF modernization is a critical safety component of the broader “DFW Forward” capital improvement plan. Airport officials note that this historic initiative, estimated to cost between $9 billion and $12 billion, marks the largest expansion in DFW’s history. By consolidating four legacy fire stations into two centralized, state-of-the-art facilities, the airport aims to significantly improve response times across its massive 27-square-mile campus.

With DFW ranking as the fourth busiest commercial airport globally in 2025, handling 85.6 million passengers and over 743,000 flight operations, the scale of this safety infrastructure upgrade is substantial. The airport’s leadership emphasizes that these investments are necessary to prepare for a projected 100 million annual passengers by the end of the decade.

Modernizing Emergency Infrastructure

Consolidation and Resilient Design

The $130 million ARFF modernization program strategically consolidates operations into an East and a West station, with the West facility scheduled to open later in 2026. According to the project details released by DFW, the design-build partnership was led by JE Dunn Construction and PGAL. The initiative was heavily supported by federal grants, securing more than $75 million through the FAA Airport Improvement Program and other federal sources.

The newly opened East ARFF Station features 10 apparatus bays equipped with high-speed, multi-fold doors designed to open in seconds, allowing for simultaneous vehicle deployment. The facility also includes 21 dorm rooms, dedicated fitness and training spaces, and specialized areas for hazardous materials and decontamination. Highlighting a focus on disaster resiliency, the station is built to ICC-500 standards and features an F5-rated storm shelter to ensure operations remain uninterrupted during extreme weather events.

“We have better positioning and the ability to move multiple units concurrently, which means faster deployment to any number of airfield emergencies.”

Daniel White, Chief of DFW Fire-Rescue, in the official release

Next-Generation Fleet and Technology

Hybrid-Electric Firefighting Vehicles

Alongside the new building, DFW announced the deployment of a next-generation fleet. The airport is now the largest U.S. operator of the Oshkosh Striker Volterra 6×6 Electric ARFF vehicles. The official specifications provided by the airport indicate that these hybrid-electric fire trucks feature a proprietary electric powertrain, enabling zero-emissions operation during station entry and standby.

Despite their environmental benefits, the vehicles offer enhanced performance. DFW reports that the Striker Volterra can accelerate from 0 to 50 mph in under 21 seconds, 28 percent faster than fully loaded diesel models, while carrying a 3,000-gallon water tank and a 420-gallon foam tank.

Advanced Mobile Command

To coordinate complex emergency responses, DFW also unveiled a new 40-foot Mobile Command Post. Costing nearly $3 million, the custom-built vehicle is equipped with advanced cameras, satellite connectivity, and multi-agency radio interoperability. According to the airport’s release, the mobile unit is capable of operating independently for approximately two days.

“Coordination is just as important as capability. DFW has invested in leading-edge technology and enhancements to ensure we are built to respond at the speed, scale and complexity required to support an airfield of this magnitude.”

Jerome Woodard, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, DFW

Preparing for Historic Growth

The operational statistics provided by DFW illustrate the immense economic and logistical footprint of the airport. Contributing more than $78 billion annually to the North Texas economy and supporting over 680,000 jobs, the airport’s safety infrastructure must scale alongside its commercial growth.

“As we approach serving 100 million passengers annually by the end of the decade, this investment ensures our teams can respond immediately, operate safely, and meet the demands of a high‑volume, global airport.”

Chris McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer, DFW Airport

AirPro News analysis

We observe that DFW’s transition to hybrid-electric emergency vehicles and its preparation for fluorine-free firefighting foams reflect a major, necessary shift in the global aviation industry. Airports worldwide are facing increasing pressure to reduce their carbon footprints and eliminate toxic “forever chemicals” (PFAS) traditionally found in aviation fire suppressants. By integrating the Striker Volterra vehicles, DFW is not only reducing emissions but also significantly limiting first responders’ exposure to harmful diesel exhaust inside the fire station.

Furthermore, the inclusion of an F5-rated storm shelter built to ICC-500 standards highlights a growing trend in critical infrastructure design. As severe climate events become more frequent, particularly in regions like North Texas, ensuring that emergency response capabilities remain hardened and uninterrupted is becoming a baseline requirement for modern airport planning.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the “DFW Forward” plan?
    It is a $9 billion to $12 billion capital improvement program at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, encompassing over 180 projects, including the ARFF modernization, the reconstruction of Terminal C, and the construction of a new Terminal F.
  • How much did the new fire stations cost?
    The total ARFF modernization program, which includes the new East Station and the upcoming West Station, costs $130 million. It is supported by over $75 million in federal funding.
  • What makes the new fire trucks special?
    DFW is utilizing Oshkosh Striker Volterra 6×6 Electric ARFF vehicles. These hybrid-electric trucks allow for zero-emissions standby and are 28% faster to accelerate than traditional diesel models.

Sources

Photo Credit: Dallas Fort Worth International Airport

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News