Regulations & Safety
Alaska Airlines Deer Strike in Kodiak Highlights Aviation Wildlife Risks
Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 collided with deer during Kodiak landing, causing damage and flight disruptions with no injuries reported.
Alaska Airlines Plane Strikes Deer During Kodiak Landing: A Detailed Analysis
The collision of an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 with deer during a July 24, 2025, landing in Kodiak, Alaska, underscores the persistent challenge of wildlife strikes in aviation. While the incident caused no human injuries, it grounded the aircraft and disrupted flights, highlighting vulnerabilities at remote airports. This report examines the event’s context, data, recent trends, and broader implications for aviation safety.
Wildlife strikes are not isolated anomalies but rather recurrent threats to flight operations, especially in regions where airports are surrounded by natural habitats. This incident, while alarming, is part of a broader trend that aviation authorities and airlines continue to monitor and address through safety protocols and infrastructure upgrades.
Background on Wildlife Strikes in Aviation
Historical Context
Wildlife strikes, collisions between aircraft and animals, have been a documented aviation hazard for decades. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) began systematically tracking these events in the 1990s through the National Wildlife Strike Database. According to FAA data, the United States recorded 19,603 wildlife strikes in 2023, a 14% increase from 2022, largely attributed to increased air travel following the pandemic recovery period.
These strikes are not limited to birds. Terrestrial mammals, particularly deer, pose a significant threat due to their size and the damage they can inflict on aircraft. Unlike avian strikes, which typically occur during mid-air flight or approach, deer strikes usually happen during takeoff or landing, when aircraft are closer to the ground.
White-tailed deer are among the most dangerous species involved in wildlife strikes. Between 2010 and 2022, there were 379 recorded strikes involving this species, with 86.7% resulting in aircraft damage. The high damage rate is attributed to the animal’s mass and the kinetic energy involved during impact.
FAA Guidelines and Reporting
The FAA has issued comprehensive guidelines for airports to manage and report wildlife strikes. These include the Advisory Circular AC 150/5200-32C, which outlines procedures for documenting incidents and implementing mitigation strategies. However, reporting remains voluntary, which may lead to underreporting and data gaps.
Airports are encouraged to develop Wildlife Hazard Management Plans (WHMPs), particularly if they have experienced multiple strikes or are located near wildlife habitats. These plans often include habitat modification, perimeter fencing, and regular runway inspections to deter animal presence.
Despite these measures, the increasing number of wildlife strikes suggests that additional efforts are necessary, especially at airports with limited resources or high wildlife activity.
“White-tailed deer accounted for 379 strikes between 2010 and 2022, with 86.7% causing damage to aircraft.”, FAA Wildlife Strike Report
Key Incident Details and Data
Aircraft and Impact
On July 24, 2025, Alaska Airlines Flight 231, a Boeing 737-800, struck multiple deer during landing at Kodiak Airport (ADQ). The incident occurred on Runway 26 during the aircraft’s landing rollout. Reports indicate that between two and three deer were involved in the collision, resulting in significant damage to the aircraft’s main landing gear.
The aircraft was grounded immediately for inspection and repairs. No injuries were reported among the 124 passengers and crew onboard. However, all deer involved were killed upon impact.
The FAA has launched an investigation into the incident, focusing on the airport’s wildlife management protocols and runway surveillance systems.
Operational Disruptions
The incident led to the cancellation of five Alaska Airlines flights, AS232, AS88, AS89, AS177, and AS231, and one Island Air charter flight over the following two days. This caused travel disruptions for dozens of passengers, including residents and tourists.
Local reports highlighted the inconvenience caused to travelers, some of whom were stranded or forced to rebook through Anchorage or other connecting airports. Alaska Airlines provided accommodation and rebooking assistance to affected passengers.
Airport operations resumed the following day after a thorough runway inspection and clearance, although the damaged aircraft remained grounded for further maintenance.
Recent Trends and Developments
Trends in Deer Strikes
Deer-related aircraft collisions are not uncommon in the United States. According to FAA data, deer strikes tend to peak during October and November, coinciding with mating season and increased movement across open landscapes. However, incidents can occur year-round, especially at airports located near wooded or rural areas.
In 2023 alone, over 200 deer strikes were reported, with a significant proportion resulting in aircraft damage. These incidents often occur at regional or remote airports where wildlife fences may be absent or compromised.
The FAA has noted a steady increase in mammal strikes since 2010, driven by expanding deer populations and urban encroachment into wildlife habitats. This trend underscores the need for proactive wildlife management strategies at U.S. airports.
Similar Incidents in Alaska
Alaska’s unique geography and wildlife density make it particularly vulnerable to wildlife strikes. In November 2020, another Alaska Airlines 737 struck a brown bear during landing at Yakutat Airport, resulting in severe engine damage and the animal’s death. Fortunately, no human injuries occurred.
Kodiak Airport itself has a history of wildlife encounters. Surrounded by dense forests and open fields, it presents logistical challenges for implementing robust wildlife deterrent systems. The 2012 FAA Record of Decision for the airport recommended runway safety improvements, but wildlife incursions remain a recurring issue.
These incidents highlight the limitations of current mitigation measures and the need for ongoing investment in airport safety infrastructure, particularly in regions with high wildlife activity.
Expert Opinions and Mitigation Strategies
FAA Recommendations
The FAA recommends a multi-layered approach to wildlife hazard management. Key strategies include the installation of perimeter fencing, use of wildlife detection radar systems, and regular habitat assessments to reduce attractants near runways.
Additionally, the FAA encourages airports to collaborate with wildlife biologists to develop site-specific management plans. These plans should be dynamic, adapting to seasonal changes in wildlife behavior and population density.
For airports like Kodiak, the FAA advises additional surveillance measures, including motion-activated cameras and patrols during high-risk hours such as dawn and dusk.
Airport Safety Measures
Implementing FAA guidelines can be challenging for smaller or remote airports due to budget constraints and limited staffing. Kodiak Airport, for instance, may lack the resources for 24/7 wildlife monitoring or advanced deterrent technologies like pyrotechnics or acoustic repellents.
Instead, such airports often rely on passive measures like fencing and signage. While these can be effective, they are not foolproof. Gaps in fencing or seasonal breaches by animals can still lead to runway incursions.
Experts suggest that increased federal funding and technical support could help smaller airports implement more robust wildlife management systems, thereby reducing the risk of future incidents.
“Wildlife management is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Each airport must tailor its strategy to its unique ecological and operational context.”, FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5200-33C
Global and Industry Context
Comparative Data
While deer strikes are a primary concern in North America, other regions face different wildlife threats. In Europe, bird strikes, particularly involving geese, are more common, often resulting in engine ingestion incidents. In Africa, large mammals such as antelope pose runway incursion risks, especially at airstrips adjacent to game reserves.
These regional variations necessitate tailored mitigation strategies. For instance, European airports often use bird-detecting radar and falconry programs, while African airstrips may deploy fencing and community-based monitoring to deter large mammals.
Despite these efforts, wildlife strikes remain a global challenge, costing the aviation industry millions annually in aircraft repairs, delays, and insurance claims.
Industry-Wide Challenges
The effectiveness of wildlife strike mitigation is often limited by underreporting. Since the FAA’s Wildlife Strike Reporting System is voluntary, many minor incidents go unrecorded, skewing the data and hampering risk assessment efforts.
Moreover, climate change and urban sprawl are altering wildlife behavior and distribution, potentially increasing the frequency and severity of strikes. Airports must therefore adopt adaptive management practices that evolve with environmental changes.
Industry stakeholders, including airlines, airport authorities, and regulatory bodies, must collaborate to standardize reporting, invest in research, and share best practices globally to mitigate this persistent risk.
Conclusion
The Alaska Airlines deer strike at Kodiak Airport serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing conflict between aviation infrastructure and natural ecosystems. While no injuries occurred, the incident disrupted operations and highlighted the limitations of current wildlife management systems at remote airports.
As air travel continues to grow, the aviation industry must prioritize adaptive, location-specific strategies to mitigate wildlife risks. Enhanced funding, technology deployment, and inter-agency collaboration will be essential in ensuring safe skies and runways for all.
FAQ
What happened during the Alaska Airlines incident in Kodiak?
A Boeing 737 struck multiple deer during landing, damaging its landing gear and causing flight disruptions.
Are wildlife strikes common in aviation?
Yes, particularly in the U.S., where over 19,000 wildlife strikes were reported in 2023 alone.
What measures are in place to prevent such incidents?
The FAA recommends fencing, habitat management, and wildlife monitoring systems at airports.
Sources:
KMXT News,
FAA Wildlife Strike Reporting Guidelines,
FAA Wildlife Strike Database,
AviationA2Z,
FAA Kodiak Runway Safety Improvements,
Wichita State University Wildlife Strike Analysis
Photo Credit: AirPro News – Montage
Regulations & Safety
2026 Aviation Industry Faces Safety and Financial Challenges
In early 2026, several regional and charter airlines lose licenses due to safety violations and financial struggles, including Starflite and Lufthansa CityLine.
The global aviation industry is currently navigating a severe contraction in early 2026, marked by a significant wave of operational suspensions, bankruptcies, and license revocations. Regional carriers and private charter Airlines are bearing the brunt of this downturn, facing intense regulatory scrutiny and mounting financial pressures.
According to reporting by Yahoo Finance and aviation intelligence firm ch-aviation, several boutique operators have recently lost their Air Operator’s Certificates (AOCs). An AOC is a mandatory license granted by national aviation authorities, proving an airline possesses the aircraft, qualified staff, safety systems, and financial resources required to transport paying passengers. Without an active AOC, an airline cannot legally operate or market flights.
The reasons for these recent shutdowns vary widely. While some carriers are buckling under the weight of post-pandemic recovery struggles and severe financial insolvency, others have been grounded due to egregious safety violations and fatal accidents. Regulators across the globe are demonstrating a zero-tolerance approach to compliance failures.
Regulatory Crackdowns and Safety Violations
Starflite Aviation Faces FAA Emergency Order
In the United States, Houston-based Part 135 charter operator Starflite Aviation had its AOC revoked via an emergency order from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in early 2026. The regulatory action effectively grounded the company’s entire fleet.
The FAA alleges that between November 2019 and November 2024, Starflite’s management knowingly falsified pilot training records for at least 10 pilots, including the chief pilot. According to the agency, fraudulent entries indicated that required check rides and competency checks were performed when they were not, resulting in unqualified pilots operating at least 170 flights.
The company demonstrated a “disregard for the safety of the flying public,” according to the FAA’s emergency order.
Harmony Jets Suspended Following Fatal Crash
In Europe, Malta-registered private jet charter Harmony Jets had its AOC and Certificate of Airworthiness suspended by Transport Malta in March 2026. This regulatory suspension follows a tragic accident on December 23, 2025, when a Dassault Falcon 50 operated by the airline crashed near Ankara, Turkey, shortly after takeoff.
The crash claimed the lives of all eight people on board, including Libyan Army Chief of Staff Mohammed Ali Ahmed al-Haddad and other senior officials. Prior to the crash, the pilot had reported an electrical malfunction and requested an emergency landing. Harmony Jets maintains that it has not permanently shut down, stating it has temporarily suspended charter operations to fully cooperate with ongoing investigations by Turkish and French authorities.
Financial Insolvency and Market Contraction
Boutique Charters and Regional Feeders Struggle
Financial pressures are also forcing closures across the sector. The United Kingdom’s Pen-Avia, a boutique charter airline based at London Luton Airport, currently has an inactive AOC, according to ch-aviation. The carrier retired its sole 19-passenger Gulfstream GVII-G60 in November 2025. While the airline has kept the possibility of restarting operations open, automated responses since late 2025 indicate no charter flights are currently running.
Larger regional networks are not immune to these financial headwinds. As highlighted by Yahoo Finance, Lufthansa announced the sudden and permanent discontinuation of its regional feeder brand, CityLine, in April 2026. The closure of the loss-making subsidiary resulted in the immediate cancellation of dozens of summer flights.
The Broader 2025–2026 Industry Fallout
The loss of AOCs is part of a broader contraction in the regional and charter aviation markets. Other recent casualties include Mexico’s Magnicharters, which canceled all flights until May 2026, and Italy’s GoTo Fly, a virtual carrier that discontinued all services in April 2026. Furthermore, Tailwind Air in the U.S. and Ecojet in the U.K. both filed for bankruptcy or liquidation in January 2026 after struggling to secure passenger volume and funding.
These closures follow a string of major bankruptcies in late 2025, including Spirit Airlines, Ravn Alaska, and Play Airlines, underscoring the fragile economic state of the broader aviation industry.
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the current wave of AOC revocations highlights a critical “safety versus survival” dilemma in the charter aviation sector. Industry experts note that operating on tight profit margins often precedes severe regulatory crackdowns, as seen in the allegations against Starflite Aviation. It is becoming increasingly difficult for boutique airlines to offset the soaring costs of aviation maintenance, fuel, and staffing without a consistent base of high-earning clients.
Furthermore, aviation authorities, including the FAA, Transport Malta, and the UK Civil Aviation Authority, are increasingly utilizing emergency revocations rather than progressive enforcement. This zero-tolerance approach indicates a shifting regulatory landscape where financial vulnerability and safety lapses are met with immediate operational freezes. The domino effect of a single fatal incident, as seen with Harmony Jets, can trigger a total operational freeze, cutting off a charter airline’s revenue stream and pushing them to the brink of collapse.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is an Air Operator’s Certificate (AOC)?
An AOC is a mandatory license granted by national aviation authorities (such as the FAA or EASA) that proves an airline has the necessary aircraft, qualified staff, safety systems, and financial resources to legally transport paying passengers.
Why did Starflite Aviation lose its license?
The FAA issued an emergency revocation of Starflite Aviation’s AOC after alleging the company falsified pilot training records for at least 10 pilots over a five-year period, allowing unqualified pilots to operate passenger flights.
What happened to Lufthansa CityLine?
In April 2026, Lufthansa announced the permanent discontinuation of its regional feeder brand, CityLine, citing the need to stop financial losses at the subsidiary. This resulted in the cancellation of numerous scheduled flights.
Sources: Yahoo Finance
Photo Credit: Pen-Avia
Regulations & Safety
FAA Mandates Inspections for Converted Boeing 747-400 Freighters Over Fire Risk
FAA requires immediate inspections on Boeing 747-400 freighters converted by Israel Aerospace Industries due to fire hazards from oxygen hose and wiring issues.
This article is based on an official directive from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and related industry data.
FAA Mandates Immediate Inspections for Converted Boeing 747-400 Freighters Over Fire Risk
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an immediate Airworthiness Directive (AD 2026-08-06) for a specific subset of converted Boeing 747-400 freighters due to a severe fire hazard. Published on April 22, 2026, the rule mandates inspections prior to any subsequent flights after its effective date of May 7, 2026.
The directive specifically targets passenger aircraft converted to freighters by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). Factory-built Boeing 747-400F aircraft are not affected by this mandate. According to the FAA document, the issue stems from a ruptured crew oxygen hose and electrical arcing caused by chafing against an adjacent cargo-aircraft loading system wire harness.
Due to the severe risk of fire and the potential loss of crew oxygen supply, the FAA bypassed standard public comment periods to adopt this emergency mandate, which was originally identified by Israeli aviation authorities.
The Root Cause and Safety Risks
The safety concern was initially flagged by the Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI), the primary aviation authority overseeing IAI’s conversion programs. Maintenance crews discovered a ruptured flexible crew oxygen bottle hose (Boeing P/N 96431-2) alongside heat and arcing damage on an adjacent ANCRA Cargo Loading System wire harness (P/N W9914-301-12) near station (STA) 680 of the aircraft.
The CAAI determined that incorrect installation during the passenger-to-freighter conversion process led to the oxygen hose chafing against the wire harness.
Immediate Fire Hazard
The combination of a leaking oxygen supply line and electrical arcing presents a critical safety threat. If left unaddressed, sparks from the chafed wiring could ignite in the oxygen-rich environment. This creates a severe fire hazard while simultaneously depriving the flight crew of their emergency oxygen supply.
Regulatory Action and Compliance Requirements
The FAA’s April 2026 directive serves as the U.S. regulatory adoption of the CAAI’s Emergency Airworthiness Directive (AD ISR I-35-26-01-01), which was issued on January 1, 2026. Operators of the affected aircraft must conduct detailed visual inspections to check for wear, chafing, or arcing damage.
Furthermore, mechanics are required to verify a minimum clearance of two inches between the crew oxygen bottle flexible hose and adjacent wire harnesses, in accordance with Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. Service Bulletin 366-35-157, dated January 2026.
Accelerated Timeline
Due to the severity of the risk, the FAA bypassed the standard Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The agency requires that inspections and necessary repairs be completed on a highly accelerated schedule.
…before further flight…
According to the FAA directive, this strict compliance window takes effect immediately following the May 7, 2026, effective date. The FAA is allowing a single special ferry flight to a maintenance facility, provided a preliminary check shows no existing signs of wear or chafing. Retroactive public comments on the rule will be accepted until June 8, 2026.
Fleet Implications and Industry Impact
It is crucial to note that this directive does not affect factory-built Boeing 747-400F aircraft. It is strictly isolated to airframes converted under FAA Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) ST01676SE or ST01706SE, known as the IAI/Bedek Special Freighter program.
Industry estimates indicate that approximately 29 Boeing 747-400s were converted under this specific program. While the fleet size is relatively small, these aircraft are operated by several global airlines and leasing companies. Known operators include Atlas Air, One Air (UK), Aerotranscargo, Terra Avia, ROMCargo Airlines, and Saudia Cargo.
AirPro News analysis
At AirPro News, we assess that while the immediate compliance mandate will cause temporary groundings for the affected operators, the long-term supply-chain disruption will likely be minimal. Aviation maintenance data suggests that the required physical fix, adjusting the clearance to the mandated two inches and replacing any damaged hoses or wires, is a straightforward procedure.
Furthermore, this incident highlights the efficacy of the global aviation safety network. A localized maintenance discovery in Israel swiftly translated into a worldwide protective mandate, demonstrating how international regulatory bodies collaborate to protect flight crews and the public.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Are all Boeing 747-400 freighters affected? No. Only passenger aircraft converted to freighters by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) under specific STCs are affected. Factory-built freighters are exempt.
- What is the deadline for compliance? Operators must comply before further flight after the directive’s effective date of May 7, 2026.
- What exactly needs to be fixed? Mechanics must inspect for chafing and ensure a minimum clearance of two inches between the crew oxygen hose and the cargo loading system wire harness.
Sources: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Document Number 2026-07808
Photo Credit: Rob Finlayson
Regulations & Safety
SWISS A330 Engine Fire Triggers Emergency Evacuation in Delhi
SWISS flight LX 147 aborted takeoff at Delhi after left engine fire. Six passengers injured during evacuation; runway briefly closed.
SWISS A330 Evacuated in Delhi Following Engine Fire
A SWISS International Air Lines flight bound for Zurich was forced to abort its takeoff and evacuate passengers on the runway at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) early Sunday morning following an engine fire. According to reporting by the Times of India and journalist Saurabh Sinha, the incident resulted in the hospitalization of six passengers who sustained injuries during the emergency evacuation.
The aircraft, a widebody Airbus A330, experienced a severe failure in its number one engine during the takeoff roll, prompting the flight crew to initiate a high-speed rejected takeoff. As reported by the Times of India, the sudden engine issue and subsequent fire scare led to a full emergency declaration at India’s busiest aviation hub, temporarily halting operations on the affected runway.
Details of the Rejected Takeoff
Flight LX 147 was scheduled to operate a routine long-haul sector from New Delhi to Zurich on Sunday, April 26, 2026. According to the Times of India, the Airbus A330-300, registered as HB-JHK, was accelerating down Runway 28 at approximately 1:08 a.m. local time when the left engine suffered a critical malfunction.
Flight tracking data from Flightradar24, cited in the original reporting by Saurabh Sinha, indicates that the aircraft had reached a speed of 104 knots when the engine failure occurred. The flight crew immediately aborted the takeoff procedure, applying maximum braking and reverse thrust on the operational engine to bring the heavy aircraft to a safe halt on the runway before ordering an emergency evacuation.
The sudden deceleration and the presence of smoke and fire on the left side of the aircraft created a highly stressful environment for the occupants. The Times of India reports that there were 232 passengers on board the flight, including four infants, alongside the operating flight crew.
Emergency Evacuation and Passenger Injuries
With smoke and fire reported near the left engine, the captain ordered an immediate evacuation. The crew deployed the aircraft’s emergency escape slides to facilitate a rapid egress.
During the high-stakes evacuation, several occupants sustained injuries. According to Saurabh Sinha’s reporting, six passengers were transported to Medanta Hospital for medical evaluation and treatment. Injuries during slide evacuations are common, often resulting from the steep angle of descent and passengers colliding at the bottom of the slide.
In a public statement released following the incident and quoted by the Times of India, the airline confirmed the sequence of events and the crew’s decision-making process.
“The crew rejected the takeoff and, following an assessment of the situation, decided as a precaution to evacuate the aircraft,” SWISS stated.
The airline further noted that local teams were immediately deployed to assist stranded passengers. SWISS confirmed that they were working intensively to arrange hotel accommodations and rebooking options for those affected by the aborted flight. Furthermore, the airline announced that technical specialists would be dispatched to Delhi to inspect the damaged Airbus A330 and investigate the root cause of the engine failure.
Airport Response and Operational Impact
The aborted takeoff triggered an immediate and massive response from the airport’s rescue and firefighting services. A full emergency was declared at IGIA, with multiple fire tenders dispatched to Runway 28 to secure the aircraft, extinguish any remaining fire, and assist with the passenger evacuation process.
According to supplementary reporting by The Tribune, the fire department was alerted to a full hydraulic emergency, prompting a rapid deployment of emergency vehicles to the tarmac. The Times of India noted that Runway 28 was temporarily closed to allow emergency crews to manage the scene, treat the injured, and safely tow the disabled Airbus A330 from the active runway area.
Despite the closure of Runway 28, Delhi Airport officials released a statement confirming that overall airport operations remained largely unaffected, with air traffic being routed to the airport’s other available runways.
AirPro News analysis
We note that high-speed rejected takeoffs (RTOs) are among the most critical and demanding maneuvers in commercial aviation. At 104 knots, the SWISS Airbus A330 was traveling at a significant velocity, though we assess it was likely still below V1, the critical decision speed at which a takeoff can no longer be safely aborted. The successful deceleration of the heavy widebody aircraft underscores the rigorous simulator training flight crews undergo for engine-out scenarios during the takeoff roll.
Evacuation injuries, such as the six hospitalizations reported in this incident, are unfortunately a standard risk when deploying emergency slides. The steep angle of widebody aircraft slides, combined with the urgency and panic of a fire-related evacuation, frequently results in minor to moderate injuries. However, we believe the swift and decisive actions of the SWISS flight crew undoubtedly prevented a more severe outcome by ensuring all 232 passengers exited the potentially compromised airframe within the mandated 90-second safety margin.
Furthermore, the dispatch of SWISS technical specialists to Delhi highlights the seriousness of uncontained or fire-producing engine failures. We expect investigators will likely focus on the engine’s maintenance history, potential foreign object debris (FOD) ingestion, and the performance of the aircraft’s internal fire suppression systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
What flight was involved in the Delhi airport incident?
The incident involved SWISS International Air Lines flight LX 147, which was operating a scheduled passenger service from New Delhi (DEL) to Zurich (ZRH) on April 26, 2026.
What caused the emergency evacuation?
The Airbus A330 experienced a severe engine failure and subsequent fire on its number one (left) engine during the takeoff roll, prompting the crew to abort the takeoff and evacuate the aircraft.
How fast was the aircraft traveling when the takeoff was aborted?
According to flight tracking data cited by the Times of India, the aircraft had reached a speed of 104 knots when the engine failure occurred.
Were there any injuries during the incident?
Yes. According to reporting by the Times of India, six passengers were hospitalized with injuries sustained during the emergency slide evacuation.
Did the incident close Delhi Airport?
While Runway 28 was closed to handle the emergency and remove the disabled aircraft, Delhi Airport officials stated that overall airport operations remained unaffected.
Sources
Sources: Times of India
Photo Credit: X
-
Technology & Innovation4 days agoNASA Releases LAVA Software for US Aerospace Industry Simulations
-
Training & Certification2 days agoAirbus Flight Test School Trains Elite Pilots and Engineers in Toulouse
-
Route Development7 days agoUK CAA Draft Approves Heathrow £320M Early Expansion Cost Recovery
-
Regulations & Safety4 days agoNTSB Preliminary Report on Fatal LaGuardia Runway Collision
-
Regulations & Safety2 days agoSWISS A330 Engine Fire Triggers Emergency Evacuation in Delhi