Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

Power Bank Safety on Aircraft: Lessons from the Air Busan Fire

Published

on

The Rising Concern Over Power Bank Safety on Aircraft

The recent fire on an Air Busan aircraft bound for Hong Kong has reignited concerns over the safety of power banks and other lithium-ion battery devices on flights. The incident, which occurred on January 28, 2025, at Gimhae International Airport in South Korea, injured seven people and forced the evacuation of 169 passengers and crew members. The suspected cause? A power bank stowed in an overhead locker. This event has prompted Air Busan to implement stricter regulations, banning the storage of power banks in overhead bins. But is this enough to ensure passenger safety, or is it merely a reactive measure?

Power banks have become an essential travel accessory, allowing passengers to charge their devices during long flights. However, their lithium-ion batteries pose significant safety risks, including the potential for overheating, short-circuiting, and even explosions. The aviation industry has long grappled with how to manage these risks, balancing convenience with safety. The Air Busan incident underscores the urgent need for stricter global standards and enforcement to prevent similar accidents in the future.

This article delves into the details of the Air Busan incident, explores the broader implications for the aviation industry, and examines expert recommendations for mitigating the risks associated with power banks on flights. We’ll also discuss the regulatory framework governing lithium-ion batteries on aircraft and the steps airlines can take to enhance passenger safety.

The Air Busan Incident: A Wake-Up Call

The fire on the Air Busan Airbus A321 was a stark reminder of the dangers posed by lithium-ion batteries. According to local media reports, the blaze was likely caused by a power bank stored in an overhead locker. The fire broke out just before takeoff, leading to the evacuation of all passengers and crew via inflatable slides. Seven people were injured, with one passenger remaining hospitalized. The incident has prompted Air Busan to ban the storage of power banks in overhead bins, requiring passengers to keep them in zipper storage bags under their seats or in seat pockets.

This measure, while precautionary, is more restrictive than existing international practices. Warren Chim Wing-nin, deputy chairman of the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers’ aircraft division, noted that the ban is a response to the recent accident but may not be necessary for all airlines. He emphasized the importance of further risk assessments by trade groups and carriers before expanding such measures globally.

The Air Busan incident is not an isolated case. In 2023, a power bank exploded on a Scoot Airlines flight from Singapore to Taipei, injuring two passengers. These incidents highlight the need for stricter safety protocols and better enforcement of existing regulations to prevent future accidents.

“Passengers should check their power banks to ensure they are in good condition and avoid bringing old ones on board. The internal insulator or wires inside older power banks could wear down over time, which could cause a short circuit and create a fire.” – Lo Kok-keung, retired engineering professor

Regulatory Framework and Industry Response

The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) have established guidelines for the safe transport of lithium-ion batteries on aircraft. Power banks are classified as “spare lithium batteries” and are prohibited from checked luggage. They must be carried on board, with specific restrictions based on their watt-hour (Wh) rating. For instance, power banks with a Wh rating exceeding 100Wh are subject to additional limitations.

Hong Kong carriers like Cathay Pacific Airways and HK Express allow up to 20 spare batteries under 100Wh on board, while devices between 100Wh and 160Wh are limited to two. However, the implementation and enforcement of these guidelines vary significantly between airlines and regions. The Air Busan incident has prompted calls for stricter global standards and better enforcement to ensure consistent safety measures across the industry.

In response to the incident, Air Busan has implemented stricter rules regarding the storage of power banks on its flights. Other South Korean airlines, such as Eastar Jet, have also banned the storage of battery packs in overhead bins. These measures are part of a broader trend towards stricter regulation and safety protocols for portable electronic devices on flights.

Expert Recommendations for Passenger Safety

Experts like Lo Kok-keung and Warren Chim Wing-nin have offered several recommendations for passengers to minimize the risks associated with power banks on flights. Passengers should ensure their power banks are in good condition and from reputable brands. Older power banks are more prone to internal wear and tear, which can lead to short circuits and fires. Passengers should also keep power banks in their possession rather than stowing them away and avoid using them during flights.

Choi In-chan, a safety expert, suggests that airlines should check for portable chargers at the check-in counter and provide passengers with plastic bags to store them. This would allow cabin crew to easily monitor the status of power banks during the flight. Additionally, airlines should keep a list of passengers with charging devices to ensure proper oversight and management.

These recommendations, if implemented, could significantly reduce the risks associated with power banks on flights. However, they also highlight the need for better education and awareness among passengers about the potential dangers of lithium-ion batteries.

Conclusion

The Air Busan incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks posed by power banks and other lithium-ion battery devices on aircraft. While the airline’s decision to ban the storage of power banks in overhead bins is a step in the right direction, it is not a comprehensive solution. The aviation industry must adopt stricter global standards and better enforcement of existing regulations to ensure consistent safety measures across all airlines.

Passengers also have a role to play in minimizing these risks. By following expert recommendations and being mindful of the condition and storage of their power banks, they can help prevent accidents and ensure a safer travel experience for everyone. As the use of portable electronic devices continues to grow, the industry must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing the safety challenges they present.

FAQ

Question: Why are power banks banned from checked luggage?
Answer: Power banks are classified as “spare lithium batteries” and are prohibited from checked luggage due to the risk of overheating, short-circuiting, and explosions. They must be carried on board to allow for quick detection and handling of any issues.

Question: What should passengers do to ensure their power banks are safe?
Answer: Passengers should ensure their power banks are in good condition, from reputable brands, and avoid bringing old ones on board. They should also keep power banks in their possession and avoid using them during flights.

Question: Are other airlines likely to adopt similar measures?
Answer: It depends on further risk assessments by trade groups and carriers. While Air Busan’s ban is a precautionary measure, other airlines may wait for more data before implementing similar restrictions.

Sources: South China Morning Post, Bangkok Post, Korea Herald, Aero News Journal, The Street

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

South Akron Plane Crash Kills Two Near Coventry Crossing Home

A 1963 Piper PA-28 crashed into a South Akron home on May 14, killing two aboard. The family inside escaped uninjured. Investigation ongoing by FAA and NTSB.

Published

on

This article summarizes reporting by WKYC and Dave DeNatale.

A tragic aviation incident occurred in South Akron on Thursday afternoon when a small aircraft crashed into a residential neighborhood, resulting in two fatalities. According to reporting by WKYC, the crash ignited a massive fire but miraculously spared the family of four who were inside the home at the time of the impact.

The incident, which took place on May 14, 2026, has prompted a multi-agency response involving local emergency services, state patrols, and federal aviation authorities. We are closely monitoring the developing details as investigators work to secure the scene and determine the underlying cause of the fatal crash.

Incident Details and Timeline

At approximately 3:45 p.m. local time, a 1963 single-engine Piper PA-28 Cherokee went down in the Coventry Crossing residential development. Based on the initial reports from WKYC and local authorities, the aircraft struck a home located on the 2200 block of Canterbury Circle.

The flight had recently departed from Akron Fulton Regional Airport, which is situated just three to four miles east of the crash site. Akron Fire Department crews responded to emergency 911 calls from neighbors describing a descending plane followed by loud explosions. Upon arrival, first responders encountered a fully engulfed structure and heavy black smoke, initially treating the scene as a severe house fire to prevent the flames from spreading to adjacent properties.

Casualties and Miraculous Escape

Authorities confirmed that the two occupants aboard the Piper PA-28 Cherokee perished in the wreckage. Their identities are currently being withheld pending notification of next of kin by the Summit County Medical Examiner’s office.

In a remarkable turn of events, the family residing in the primary home, a couple and their two children, escaped without physical harm. The Akron Fire Department confirmed that the residents were able to evacuate the burning structure safely.

“They were all home, and they were able to get out with no injuries, so we’re very fortunate,” stated District Fire Chief Sierjie Lash, according to WKYC reporting.

Property Damage and Neighborhood Impact

The impact of the aircraft and the subsequent explosion caused severe structural damage to the primary residence, completely destroying the home’s garage. An adjacent property also sustained fire damage, prompting emergency crews to execute a precautionary evacuation of at least two nearby homes. Chief Lash noted that while residents are being allowed back to their houses, the direct crash scene remains strictly secured.

Ongoing Investigation and Agency Response

A coalition of local, state, and federal agencies is currently managing the crash site. The Akron Police and Fire Departments handled the immediate emergency response, fire suppression, and initial perimeter security. The Ohio State Highway Patrol (OSHP) is taking a leading role in securing the site and coordinating state-level resources.

“The crash remains an active investigation, and troopers, local law enforcement, fire, and EMS personnel continue to assess the scene,” the OSHP noted in a public statement.

Federal authorities will take over the primary investigation. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is tasked with reviewing the flight history, pilot credentials, and air traffic communications. Concurrently, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will examine the aircraft’s mechanical integrity and flight data to determine the official cause of the crash.

AirPro News analysis

As aviation safety observers, we note that incidents involving general aviation aircraft in densely populated residential areas often lead to rigorous scrutiny of local flight paths and zoning regulations. The proximity of the Coventry Crossing development to Akron Fulton Regional Airport, just a few miles away, highlights the critical phase of flight (takeoff and initial climb) where pilots have limited time and altitude to react to mechanical failures. The NTSB’s forthcoming preliminary report will likely focus heavily on any distress communications made by the pilot and the engine’s performance in the moments immediately following departure.

Frequently Asked Questions

When and where did the Akron plane crash occur?

The crash occurred on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at approximately 3:45 p.m. local time in the Coventry Crossing neighborhood of South Akron, specifically on the 2200 block of Canterbury Circle.

What type of aircraft was involved?

Authorities identified the aircraft as a 1963 single-engine Piper PA-28 Cherokee.

Were there any survivors?

The family of four inside the home escaped uninjured. Tragically, the two occupants aboard the aircraft were killed in the crash.

Sources

Photo Credit: News Channel3 NOW

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Awards RTX $438M Contract to Modernize US Airspace Radars

RTX receives $438M FAA contract to supply advanced radars and expands Largo, Florida facility to meet 2028 airspace modernization goals.

Published

on

The U.S. National Airspace System is facing unprecedented congestion, currently managing approximately 45,000 flights per day. According to an official press release from RTX, this volume is projected to double by 2040, necessitating a massive overhaul of the aging ground-based Radar-Systems infrastructure that was never designed for today’s complex mix of aircraft.

To meet this challenge, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is accelerating its radar replacement program. In January 2026, the agency awarded major Contracts to modernize the surveillance backbone of the airspace. Collins Aerospace, an RTX business, secured a $438 million contract to supply next-generation radar systems, alongside a $342 million contract awarded to Indra Air Traffic, according to government statements.

Now, RTX is ramping up its domestic Manufacturing capabilities to meet strict federal deadlines. On May 11, 2026, the company announced a $26.5 million Investments to expand its Largo, Florida facility, aiming to centralize production, create 100 new jobs, and expedite the delivery of these critical systems by late 2026.

The FAA’s Push for Airspace Modernization

Replacing Outdated Infrastructure

The current U.S. airspace is a highly complex environment that must safely integrate commercial flights, manned military aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and commercial space launches. The FAA has acknowledged that the existing radar network is outdated, with many units operating well beyond their intended service life. This aging infrastructure has become increasingly expensive to maintain and difficult to support.

“Our radar network is outdated and long overdue for replacement. Many of the units have exceeded their intended service life, making them increasingly expensive to maintain and difficult to support. We are buying radar systems that will bring production back to the U.S. and provide a vital surveillance backbone to the National Airspace System.”

, Bryan Bedford, FAA Administrator

The radar replacement is a foundational component of the Department of Transportation’s multi-billion dollar initiative to overhaul the entire U.S. Air Traffic Control (ATC) infrastructure. The FAA’s objective is to replace up to 612 primary and secondary surveillance radars by June 2028.

“We are moving at Trump Speed to install new radars, rip up old copper telecoms lines, and transition to new radios. Domestic and foreign partners are investing in America like never before to support our efforts.”

, Sean P. Duffy, U.S. Transportation Secretary

RTX and the Next-Generation Radars

Condor Mk3 and ASR-XM Technologies

Under the $438 million contract awarded earlier this year, Collins Aerospace is tasked with delivering two advanced radar systems that have already met FAA certification requirements through prior test-site evaluations. These systems are designed to provide air traffic controllers with real-time, pinpoint-accurate data.

The first system, the Condor Mk3, is a secondary, cooperative surveillance radar. According to RTX, it communicates directly with aircraft transponders to provide precise identification, altitude, and tracking data. The second system, the ASR-XM, is a primary, non-cooperative radar that detects aircraft using reflected signals. This primary radar is essential for tracking targets that may not have active transponders, offering enhanced weather detection, cyber resilience, and high performance in cluttered environments.

Expanding Domestic Production in Florida

The $26.5 Million Largo Investment

To meet the aggressive June 2028 replacement deadline, RTX is shifting its production strategy. According to the company’s recent announcements, RTX is investing $26.5 million to expand its 450,000-square-foot facility in Largo, Florida. This expansion will transition the Largo site into the primary production hub, responsible for 60% of the overall volume for the new FAA radars.

Previously, RTX had been delivering initial units from facilities in Canada and Scotland. By bringing production, integration, and testing under one roof in Florida, the company aims to avoid international shipping complexities and accelerate delivery timelines. The new production area is expected to be fully operational by late 2026.

“We’ve made some really targeted investments, and this expansion in Florida is one of those to drive our ability to [bring] production, integration, and testing under one roof. It also helps us accelerate the delivery timelines because you’re not dealing with some of the other complexities of shipping from international sites.”

, Nicole White, General Manager of Connected Aviation at RTX Collins

The expansion will also create 100 new high-skilled engineering and manufacturing jobs, adding to RTX’s existing footprint of over 7,000 employees across eight major facilities in Florida.

“As global airspace becomes more congested and contested, customers need secure, interoperable systems for seamless coordination. This expansion strengthens our ability to deliver critical capabilities that keep airline passengers safe and military operators mission-ready, faster.”

, Nate Boelkins, President of Avionics at Collins Aerospace

AirPro News analysis

The FAA’s aggressive timeline to replace up to 612 radars by June 2028 represents a significant logistical and manufacturing challenge for the aerospace sector. RTX’s decision to onshore the majority of its radar production to Florida is a strategic move that mitigates global supply chain risks and aligns with broader federal mandates to invest in domestic infrastructure. By eliminating the complexities of international shipping from its Canadian and Scottish facilities, RTX is positioning itself to meet the strict delivery schedules required by the Department of Transportation. Furthermore, the FAA’s dual-contract approach, awarding substantial funds to both RTX and Indra Air Traffic, demonstrates a calculated strategy to diversify the supplier base and ensure redundancy in this critical national security and modernization effort.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many flights does the U.S. airspace handle daily?

The U.S. airspace currently handles approximately 45,000 flights per day. Industry projections expect this traffic volume to double by the year 2040.

What is the value of the FAA radar replacement contracts?

In January 2026, the FAA awarded a $438 million contract to RTX’s Collins Aerospace and a $342 million contract to Indra Air Traffic to replace up to 612 surveillance radars by June 2028.

What specific radars is RTX supplying to the FAA?

RTX is supplying the Condor Mk3, a secondary/cooperative radar that communicates with aircraft transponders, and the ASR-XM, a primary/non-cooperative radar that detects aircraft using reflected signals.

Where will the new RTX radars be manufactured?

While initial units were produced in Canada and Scotland, RTX is investing $26.5 million to expand its facility in Largo, Florida. This site will become the primary production hub, handling 60% of the overall volume for the new FAA radars.


Sources: RTX Press Release

Photo Credit: RTX

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Launches $16.5M Airport Vehicle Tracking Initiative After LaGuardia Crash

FAA invests $16.5 million to equip 1,900 airport vehicles with tracking tech following a fatal LaGuardia collision exposing safety gaps.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

FAA Accelerates $16.5 Million Airport Vehicle Tracking Initiative Following LaGuardia Tragedy

On May 13, 2026, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced a comprehensive $16.5 million initiative designed to equip approximately 1,900 airport vehicles with advanced tracking technology. According to the agency’s official press release, this nationwide rollout will deploy Vehicle Movement Area Transmitters (VMATs) across the country’s busiest runways and taxiways, allowing air traffic controllers to precisely monitor the movements of ground support and emergency vehicles.

The funding for this critical safety upgrade is sourced from President Donald J. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” as noted in the provided research report. The FAA’s decision to accelerate the deployment of these transponders comes in the direct aftermath of a fatal runway collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport (LGA) earlier this year, which exposed severe visibility gaps in existing ground surveillance systems.

By mandating and funding the installation of VMATs on its own fleet, the FAA aims to prevent future runway incursions. Furthermore, the agency is strongly urging local airport authorities and private airlines to utilize federal grant money to upgrade their respective vehicle fleets, signaling a unified push toward comprehensive surface awareness.

The Catalyst: Tragedy at LaGuardia

A Fatal Collision

The urgency behind the FAA’s latest safety mandate stems from a devastating incident on March 22, 2026. According to the incident background provided in the research report, Air Canada Express Flight 8646, a Bombardier CRJ-900 operated by Jazz Aviation, was landing on Runway 4 at LaGuardia Airport at approximately 11:37 PM EDT. Upon touchdown, the passenger jet collided with a Port Authority Oshkosh Striker 1500 Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) vehicle, identified as Truck 1 / Rescue 35.

The fire truck was part of an emergency convoy responding to a separate incident involving a United Airlines flight. The collision resulted in the deaths of the 26-year-old captain and the first officer of the Air Canada Express aircraft. Additionally, 39 individuals, including passengers, flight attendants, and two ARFF crew members, were transported to local hospitals with injuries.

NTSB Preliminary Findings

On April 23, 2026, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a preliminary report that highlighted a cascade of systemic failures leading up to the crash. Crucially, the NTSB found that the responding fire trucks lacked transponders. Without these digital beacons, LaGuardia’s Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X (ASDE-X) ground collision prevention system could not uniquely identify the emergency vehicles or reliably track their movements.

Because the automated system lacked transponder data, it failed to correlate the track of the landing Bombardier CRJ-900 with the track of the lead fire truck. Consequently, air traffic controllers did not receive an imminent collision alarm. The NTSB also noted a severe communication breakdown: simultaneous radio transmissions obscured the lead fire truck’s initial request to cross the runway. Permission was eventually granted a mere 20 seconds before impact, while the landing jet was only 130 feet above the ground.

“We rarely, if ever, investigate a major accident where it was one failure. Our aviation system is incredibly safe because there are multiple, multiple layers of defense built in to prevent an accident. So when something goes , that means many, many things went wrong… Truck One however did not have a transponder.”

— Jennifer Homendy, NTSB Chairwoman, speaking on the LGA crash

Accelerating Technology Deployment

How VMATs Close the Visibility Gap

To address the vulnerabilities exposed by the NTSB, the FAA is immediately equipping roughly 1,900 of its vehicles with VMATs. These transmitters act as digital beacons, broadcasting a vehicle’s identity and call sign directly onto the screens of air traffic controllers. This ensures that even in heavy rain, dense fog, or nighttime conditions, tower personnel have a precise, real-time map of all moving assets on the airfield.

“Vehicle Movement Area Transmitters (VMATs) help prevent dangerous runway incidents and by accelerating the deployment of this technology, we’re closing critical visibility gaps on our nation’s runways and taxiways. This initiative is yet another example of our commitment to proactive safety improvements and strong collaboration across the aviation community.”

— Bryan Bedford, FAA Administrator, via the agency’s press release

Expanding the Safety Net

The FAA’s rollout strategy targets airports that already possess the infrastructure to utilize VMAT data. According to the agency, the transponders will be deployed at 44 airports currently utilizing ASDE-X and Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) systems. Furthermore, the technology will be integrated into 220 airports that currently have, or are slated to receive, Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) surveillance systems.

Recognizing that federal vehicles make up only a fraction of airfield traffic, the FAA is actively encouraging the broader aviation industry to follow suit. The agency has reminded airport operators that federal grant money is available to fund the installation of transponders on local fleets, including baggage carts, fuel trucks, and municipal emergency vehicles. Early indicators suggest strong industry reception, with over 50 airports having already expressed interest in the upgrade.

AirPro News analysis

We view the FAA’s accelerated VMAT deployment as a textbook response to the “Swiss cheese model” of accident causation, a concept frequently cited by safety regulators like the NTSB. In the LaGuardia tragedy, the holes in the system aligned perfectly: obscured radio communications, a high-stress emergency response environment, and a critical lack of digital visibility. By mandating VMATs, the FAA is effectively plugging the technological hole in that model. While human error and radio congestion may still occur, providing automated ground collision systems with the data they need to trigger alarms serves as an essential, fail-safe layer of defense. The true test of this initiative’s success, however, will be the adoption rate among local airport authorities and private contractors, whose vehicles constitute the vast majority of ground traffic.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vehicle Movement Area Transmitter (VMAT)?

A VMAT is a digital transponder installed on ground vehicles. It broadcasts the vehicle’s exact location, identity, and call sign to air traffic control systems, allowing controllers to track the vehicle on a digital map alongside aircraft.

Why didn’t the LaGuardia fire truck have a transponder?

Prior to this new FAA initiative, transponders were not universally mandated or funded for all municipal and port authority emergency vehicles operating on airfields. The lack of this equipment prevented the airport’s automated safety systems from tracking the truck.

How is the FAA funding this $16.5 million initiative?

According to the provided research data, the $16.5 million investment is being sourced from President Donald J. Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill.”

Sources: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Photo Credit: AFP

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News