Route Development
Dublin MetroLink Approved Connecting Airport to City Center
Dublin’s MetroLink project approved, promising fast airport-city rail link with 16 stations amid rising costs and major construction plans.

Dublin Airport Rail Link Receives Planning Approval: MetroLink Project Set to Transform Irish Public Transport
The long-awaited MetroLink rail project connecting Dublin Airport to the city center has finally received planning approval from An Coimisiún Pleanála, Ireland’s national planning commission. This marks a pivotal moment for Irish public transport infrastructure after more than two decades of delays and debates. The ambitious €9.5 billion underground metro system represents Ireland’s first metro railway and is projected to begin operations in the mid-2030s, promising to revolutionize connectivity between Dublin’s northern suburbs, the airport, and the city center. However, the project faces significant challenges, with recent cost estimates suggesting the final price tag could balloon to over €23 billion, making it one of the most expensive underground rail projects globally per mile. The planning approval comes at a critical time for Dublin Airport, which handled 34.6 million passengers in 2024 and faces capacity constraints due to planning restrictions, while Ireland remains one of the few EU capitals without a direct rail connection to its main airport.
This article examines the historical context, technical details, financial challenges, and broader implications of the MetroLink project, providing a comprehensive analysis of one of Ireland’s most significant infrastructure undertakings.
Historical Background and Evolution of Dublin’s Metro Ambitions
The concept of a metro rail system serving Dublin Airport and the northern suburbs has been under discussion for over three decades, making it one of Ireland’s most analyzed yet delayed infrastructure projects. The original proposal emerged in 2000 during Ireland’s economic boom, with the first iteration costing a modest €2.5 billion, comparable to major hospital projects at the time. The project gained formal recognition in the government’s 2005 Transport 21 plan under the name “Metro North.”
Ireland’s railway history provides important context for understanding the significance of this development. The country’s first railway opened in 1834 between Dublin and Kingstown (now Dún Laoghaire), making it one of the earliest dedicated commuter railways in the world. At its peak in 1920, Ireland had 5,600 kilometers of railway infrastructure, though this network has since been reduced by half. The current rail system is operated by Iarnród Éireann in the Republic of Ireland, with most routes radiating from Dublin, while no metro lines currently exist anywhere on the island.
The Metro North project initially received planning permission in 2011 but was subsequently cancelled due to the economic recession following the 2008 financial crisis. This cancellation was part of broader infrastructure cuts as Ireland grappled with one of Europe’s most severe economic downturns. The project was later revived and rebranded as “MetroLink” with updated plans and a more comprehensive scope.
Project Details and Technical Specifications
MetroLink represents a transformative piece of public transport infrastructure that will fundamentally alter Dublin’s connectivity landscape. The proposed system spans 18.8 kilometers, with approximately 11.7 kilometers running underground through advanced tunnel boring technology. The route will connect 16 stations from Estuary north of Swords to Charlemont in south Dublin city center, strategically linking major transport hubs and key destinations.
The technical specifications demonstrate the project’s ambitious scope and capacity. MetroLink will operate as a fully segregated and automated metro system, capable of carrying up to 20,000 passengers per hour in each direction. This capacity is 2.5 times greater than Dublin’s existing Luas Green Line, which can handle approximately 8,000-9,000 passengers per hour per direction. The system is designed to run every three minutes during peak periods, with the potential to increase frequency to every 90 seconds by 2060 if demand requires.
Journey times represent a significant improvement over existing transport options. The complete trip from Swords to Dublin city center will take approximately 25 minutes, while travel from the city center to Dublin Airport will require just 20 minutes. These travel times cannot be matched by alternative transport modes, including enhanced bus services or light rail extensions. The route will serve strategically important destinations beyond the airport connection, including Ballymun, the Mater Hospital, the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin City University, and Trinity College Dublin. The system will integrate with existing transport networks, connecting with Irish Rail, DART, Dublin Bus, and Luas services to create a fully integrated public transport network for the Greater Dublin Area.
“MetroLink will operate as a fully segregated and automated metro system, capable of carrying up to 20,000 passengers per hour in each direction, 2.5 times greater than Dublin’s existing Luas Green Line.”
Planning Approval and Recent Developments
The planning approval granted by An Coimisiún Pleanála on October 2, 2025, represents a crucial milestone after years of regulatory review. Transport Minister Darragh O’Brien welcomed the decision, describing it as “a hugely positive step for MetroLink, which is a key strategic project for the Government and Ireland.” The planning commission confirmed that they decided to grant permission “generally in accordance with the Inspector’s recommendation, subject to conditions.”
The planning board emphasized the project’s strong policy support, stating that “the Commission considers that the proposed Metrolink development enjoys very strong support at national, regional and local levels in terms of planning, transport and climate policy.” This approval follows the submission of Railway Order proposals by Transport Infrastructure Ireland in September 2022, initiating a complex regulatory review process.
Dublin Airport Authority (daa) has been particularly vocal in supporting the project’s expedited delivery, emphasizing the airport’s role as “the island’s main gateway to the rest of the world” and calling for MetroLink as “a key element of the growth of Dublin Airport beyond 40 million passengers per annum.” The airport operator committed to continuing collaboration with Transport Infrastructure Ireland on coordinating the development within the Dublin Airport campus.
Cost Analysis and Financial Concerns
The financial aspects of MetroLink have generated significant concern and debate, with costs experiencing dramatic escalation since the project’s initial conception. The original 2000 proposal carried a price tag of €2.5 billion, which has now increased by nearly four times to the current estimate of €9.5 billion. However, even more alarming projections suggest the project could ultimately cost over €23 billion, representing 3.9% of Ireland’s nominal GDP.
A comprehensive cost analysis reveals multiple factors contributing to these increases. According to a Department of Public Expenditure and Reform estimate, construction costs have increased by 30% since a 2021 report, with the cost ballooning from between €7.1 billion and €12.2 billion to the current projections. The escalation can be attributed to inflation, changing economic circumstances, rising steel costs due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the ongoing German economic recession.
International comparisons highlight the project’s exceptional expense. According to a Britain Remade study, MetroLink’s estimated cost of £697 million per mile places it among the world’s most expensive underground rail projects. This cost exceeds the UK average of £676 million per mile and is significantly higher than European peers, being twice as expensive as projects in Italy or France, three times more expensive than Germany, and six times more expensive than Spain. The financial challenges are compounded by Ireland’s lack of experience with underground metro construction, with officials struggling to provide accurate cost estimates, and projections increasing from €3 billion in 2018 to €9.5 billion by 2022.
“MetroLink’s estimated cost of £697 million per mile places it among the world’s most expensive underground rail projects, exceeding the UK average and far ahead of continental European norms.”
Expert Analysis and Industry Perspectives
Academic and industry experts have provided nuanced analysis of MetroLink’s necessity and challenges. Professor Brian Caulfield from Trinity College Dublin, a leading transport policy researcher, argues that MetroLink represents much more than simply an “airport train.” His research team’s 2011 study in the Journal of Transport Policy examined several alternatives to the original Metro North project, including a DART spur line, a Luas line to the airport, and enhanced bus services via the Port Tunnel. The findings demonstrated that none of these alternatives could provide the capacity proposed by the metro project.
Professor Caulfield’s findings demonstrated that none of these alternatives could provide the capacity proposed by the metro project. The Luas Green Line’s capacity of approximately 8,000 passengers per hour in each direction pales in comparison to MetroLink’s proposed capacity of 20,000 passengers per hour. Furthermore, the MetroLink travel time of 25 minutes from Swords to the city center cannot be matched by any alternative transport mode.
Independent Senator Michael McDowell has offered critical perspectives on the project’s financial management. McDowell expressed concern that the €23 billion price tag has been reached “without a shovel being placed in the ground,” and noted the irony that London’s Elizabeth Line, covering a greater distance than MetroLink, ultimately cost less than current MetroLink projections. Industry perspectives highlight the project’s employment potential and economic benefits, with MetroLink officials projecting the system will support approximately 8,000 direct construction jobs, plus an additional 2,500 to 3,000 indirect supply chain and support-related positions annually during construction.
Economic and Strategic Implications
MetroLink’s economic implications extend far beyond transport connectivity, positioning the project as strategic infrastructure for Ireland’s economic development. The 2021 detailed business case, spanning thousands of pages and peer-reviewed by international experts, projects transport benefits of €15.6 billion over 60 years. This analysis does not include wider economic benefits such as improved air quality, reduced emissions, or safety impacts.
The project’s strategic importance is underscored by Dublin Airport’s growth trajectory and capacity constraints. Dublin Airport handled 34.6 million passengers in 2024, representing a 3.3% increase from 2023, with the airport managing more than 100,000 passengers daily on 171 days throughout the year. These figures demonstrate operational capacity to handle 36 million passengers annually, approaching the current 32 million passenger planning cap that has created significant operational challenges.
MetroLink’s potential to enable housing development represents another significant economic dimension. Minister O’Brien noted that the project “will enable the construction of tens of thousands of new homes,” addressing Ireland’s acute housing shortage. The improved transport connectivity could unlock development potential in north Dublin and surrounding areas currently constrained by transport accessibility. Environmental and climate policy considerations add another layer of economic relevance, supporting both economic growth and emission reduction objectives, though critics note the carbon intensity of underground construction.
International Comparisons and Context
International benchmarking reveals both the exceptional nature of MetroLink’s costs and the broader context of metro construction globally. The Britain Remade study provides crucial comparative data, examining underground rail projects across multiple countries and revealing significant cost variations. UK projects average £676 million per mile, behind only Canada and the United States, and British projects typically cost twice as much as those in Italy or France, three times more than German projects, and six times more than Spanish developments.
The Elizabeth Line in London provides a particularly relevant comparison. Approved in 2007, construction began in 2009, and services commenced in 2022, requiring the lifetime of four British governments for completion. Despite covering a greater distance than MetroLink, the Elizabeth Line ultimately cost less than current MetroLink projections. This comparison underscores both the complexity of major urban rail projects and the particular challenges facing MetroLink.
Spain’s experience offers insight into the efficiencies possible with established metro construction expertise. Spanish projects benefit from extensive experience delivering underground rail developments, achieving far greater cost efficiencies than countries undertaking their first major metro projects. This experience factor partially explains MetroLink’s higher costs, as Ireland lacks the institutional knowledge and supply chain efficiencies developed through multiple projects.
Timeline and Construction Challenges
The construction timeline for MetroLink reflects both the project’s complexity and the extended planning process that has characterized its development. Current projections suggest construction could begin as early as 2027 or 2028, with the planning approval now secured. However, the construction phase itself is expected to require between 6-8 years to complete, potentially extending to 9 years according to some estimates.
The phased approach to construction will create significant urban disruption across Dublin. Construction activities are planned for 11 hours daily, 5.5 days per week, with extended hours for concrete pouring and special deliveries conducted at night. The most complex construction will occur at Glasnevin Station, identified as the biggest and most challenging station construction. The project will require extensive temporary infrastructure, including bridge construction over the Royal Canal and significant street closures.
Integration with other major transport projects adds coordination challenges. MetroLink development will occur alongside DART West and DART South projects, as well as BusConnects changes to the Ballymun/Finglas and Blanchardstown bus corridors. This concurrent development of multiple major transport infrastructure projects will test Dublin’s capacity to manage simultaneous construction activities across the metropolitan area.
Conclusion
The approval of planning permission for Dublin’s MetroLink represents a watershed moment for Irish public transport infrastructure, finally advancing a project that has been under discussion for over three decades. The €9.5 billion investment will create Ireland’s first metro system, connecting Dublin Airport to the city center with 16 stations across 18.8 kilometers of track, much of it underground. The project promises transformative improvements in connectivity, with journey times of 25 minutes from Swords to the city center and capacity for 20,000 passengers per hour in each direction.
However, significant challenges remain that will test the project’s ultimate success. Cost escalation concerns are paramount, with estimates suggesting the final price could exceed €23 billion, making it one of the world’s most expensive underground rail projects per mile. International comparisons reveal costs significantly above European norms, reflecting Ireland’s inexperience with metro construction and extended development timeline. The project’s complexity will require 6-8 years of construction involving significant urban disruption across Dublin. The strategic importance of MetroLink extends beyond transport connectivity to encompass economic development, housing policy, and Ireland’s international competitiveness. The project’s success will ultimately depend on effective cost management, construction delivery, and integration with Dublin’s broader transport network.
FAQ
Q: When will MetroLink be operational?
A: MetroLink is projected to begin operations in the mid-2030s, with construction expected to take 6-8 years after commencement.
Q: How much will MetroLink cost?
A: The current official estimate is €9.5 billion, but some projections suggest costs could reach over €23 billion.
Q: How many stations will MetroLink have?
A: MetroLink will have 16 stations, connecting Estuary north of Swords to Charlemont in south Dublin city center.
Q: Will MetroLink only serve Dublin Airport?
A: No, MetroLink will serve key destinations including Ballymun, Mater Hospital, Dublin City University, and Trinity College Dublin, in addition to the airport.
Q: Why is MetroLink so expensive compared to other European metro projects?
A: Factors include Ireland’s lack of experience with underground metro construction, inflation, complex urban conditions, and extended planning and design periods.
Sources:
BBC News
Photo Credit: MetroLinkWeb
Route Development
Long Beach Airport Begins $37M Concourse Upgrade for 2028 Olympics
Long Beach Airport launches a $37 million concourse enhancement project funded largely by FAA grants, aiming for completion by summer 2027 ahead of the 2028 Olympics.

This article is based on an official press release from the City of Long Beach.
Long Beach Airport (LGB) has officially commenced construction on a comprehensive $37 million Passenger Concourse Enhancement Project. According to an official press release from the City of Long Beach, the groundbreaking ceremony took place on April 24, 2026. The project is strategically timed to modernize the airport’s post-security passenger concourse and upgrade critical infrastructure well ahead of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic and Paralympic Games.
City officials project that the enhancements will be completed by the summer of 2027. The phased construction plan ensures that the airport will maintain full operations, with no anticipated impacts to commercial flights or gate access during the build period.
We recognize that LGB has built a strong reputation as a relaxed, open-air travel hub in Southern California. This modernization effort aims to preserve that boutique appeal while making necessary updates to a concourse that has accommodated millions of passengers since it originally opened in 2012.
Passenger Experience and Design Upgrades
Enhancing the Southern California Vibe
The modernization effort focuses heavily on improving passenger circulation, comfort, and clarity. Based on the project overview provided by the city, the remodel will encompass the existing 11 gate areas, introducing modernized gate podiums and updated seating configurations featuring integrated electrical charging options.
To further reduce congestion, the airport is updating its queuing layouts, expanding wayfinding signage, and installing new flight information displays. Travelers will also see new flooring and fully updated restrooms throughout the concourse.
Emphasizing the airport’s indoor-outdoor connection, the design includes the creation of new open-air garden areas outside the north and south concourses. The existing central garden will also receive improvements, including additional hardscape, shaded seating, and canopies. Furthermore, the exterior pedestrian canopy will be extended to Pad 11, and a dedicated Service Animal Relief Area will be added to the facility.
“This project represents an important investment in Long Beach’s future and the millions of travelers who choose our award-winning Airport each year. As we prepare to welcome the world for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, we are ensuring LGB continues to deliver a modern, comfortable and uniquely Southern California travel experience,” stated Long Beach Mayor Rex Richardson in the press release.
Financial Backing and Economic Impact
Federal Funding Secures the Project
A notable aspect of the $37 million enhancement project is its funding structure, which relies heavily on federal grants rather than local tax dollars. According to the city’s financial breakdown, $24.3 million is funded through the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Infrastructure Grant program, a component of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The remaining costs will be covered directly by airport revenue.
“As the former Mayor of Long Beach, I know firsthand how important our airport is to the city and our local economy. This federal investment is going to make our world-class airport even better,” noted U.S. Congressman Robert Garcia, who strongly advocated for the federal funding.
Local Job Creation
The economic footprint of the project extends directly into the local community. City estimates indicate that the enhancement project will generate over 190 local construction jobs. This adds to the broader economic impact of the Long Beach Airport Complex, which currently generates an estimated $9 billion in annual economic output and supports approximately 42,000 jobs across the region.
Infrastructure and Sustainability Goals
Building for the Future
Behind the scenes, the project includes comprehensive mechanical, electrical, and plumbing upgrades. Aging air-conditioning components will be replaced, and a new back-up generator will be installed to improve the facility’s operational resilience.
Sustainability is a core focus, with the project establishing a LEED Silver foundation. Upgrades include the conversion to energy-efficient LED lighting throughout the concourse and a strict requirement that 95% of all construction debris be recycled or reused.
The architectural design is being led by PGAL, while PCL Construction Services, Inc. was awarded the $28 million construction contract, which the Long Beach City Council approved on October 14, 2025.
“This refresh is not just aesthetic, it’s about expanding LGB’s reputation as a premier airport that offers travelers an experience that is distinctly Long Beach,” said Fifth District Councilwoman Megan Kerr in the official release.
AirPro News analysis
The impending 2028 Los Angeles Olympic and Paralympic Games are acting as a major catalyst for infrastructure improvements across Southern California’s aviation sector. By completing these upgrades by the summer of 2027, LGB is strategically positioning itself as a highly attractive, low-stress alternative gateway to the much larger and busier Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).
While LGB consistently ranks high for its passenger experience, the current concourse has been heavily trafficked for over a decade. We view these mechanical and spatial upgrades as essential preventative measures. They will allow the airport to handle modern travel demands and larger crowds without sacrificing the boutique appeal that defines its brand.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the construction impact my flight out of Long Beach Airport?
According to airport officials, construction will be phased to maintain full airport operations. No impacts to commercial flights are expected, and gate access will be fully accommodated throughout the build.
When will the concourse enhancements be completed?
The project is targeted for completion in the summer of 2027, well ahead of the anticipated surge in travel for the 2028 Olympics.
Are local tax dollars funding this project?
No. The $37 million project is heavily subsidized by a $24.3 million FAA grant, with the remaining balance covered directly by airport revenue.
Sources
Photo Credit: City of Long Beach
Route Development
San Francisco and Oakland Settle Oakland Airport Trademark Dispute
San Francisco and Oakland resolve trademark dispute allowing Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport to keep its name, supporting regional transit and economy.

This article is based on an official press release from Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport (OAK).
The City and County of San Francisco and the Port of Oakland have officially resolved their ongoing trademark dispute regarding the renaming of Oakland’s primary airport. According to an official press release published on April 28, 2026, the two parties have reached a settlement that allows the East Bay transit hub to retain its new title.
The press release confirms that the facility will continue to operate under the name “Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport.” The resolution brings an end to the legal friction that began when Oakland officials moved to incorporate “San Francisco Bay” into the airport’s branding to better reflect its geographic location and improve visibility among travelers.
The formal terms of the settlement have been documented and made available to the public on the respective websites of both Airports, as stated in the official announcement. This agreement marks a significant milestone for regional transit authorities, ensuring that both major Bay Area airports can move forward without the looming threat of prolonged trademark litigation.
Resolution of the Trademark Dispute
The core of the conflict centered on the Port of Oakland’s decision to rebrand its aviation facility, a move that prompted immediate legal pushback from San Francisco officials who cited trademark concerns. In a company press release, Oakland airport representatives confirmed that the lawsuit has been fully resolved.
Retaining the New Name
Under the terms of the newly announced agreement, Oakland will not be required to revert to its former branding. The facility will permanently keep the “Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport” designation. The official statement noted the finality of the decision:
“The City and County of San Francisco and the Port of Oakland have agreed to resolve a trademark lawsuit over the Oakland airport’s official name…”
, Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport Press Release
Both municipalities have published the formal settlement document online, ensuring transparency regarding the specific terms and conditions that led to the resolution, according to the airport’s release.
Oakland Airport’s Role in the Bay Area
The rebranding effort was largely driven by Oakland’s desire to highlight its proximity to the broader San Francisco Bay Area. The official release notes that the airport is the closest aviation hub to most Bay Area employers.
Supporting the Local Economy
Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport serves as the primary aviation hub for the East Bay, which the press release describes as the most populated area in the metropolitan region. According to the press release, the Port of Oakland, which manages the airport, the seaport, and 20 miles of waterfront, plays a massive role in the local economy.
The Port’s official figures indicate that the organization and its business partners support over 98,000 jobs across the region. Furthermore, the press release states that the Port generates an estimated $174 billion in economic impact, underscoring the high stakes involved in the airport’s marketing and operational Strategy.
AirPro News analysis
We view this settlement as a pragmatic conclusion for both San Francisco and Oakland. Prolonged trademark litigation between two neighboring municipal entities would have likely resulted in mounting legal fees and unnecessary public friction. By allowing Oakland to retain the “San Francisco Bay” identifier, the Port of Oakland secures a crucial marketing victory that could help attract more Airlines and passengers. Meanwhile, the swift resolution suggests that San Francisco officials were satisfied with the negotiated terms, likely securing necessary assurances regarding brand distinction. Ultimately, this agreement allows both airports to refocus their resources on passenger experience and regional transit development rather than courtroom battles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the new name of the Oakland airport?
Following the settlement announced in the press release, the facility will officially remain named the “Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport.”
Why did San Francisco sue Oakland?
The City and County of San Francisco filed a trademark lawsuit over concerns that adding “San Francisco Bay” to Oakland’s airport name infringed on the San Francisco International Airport (SFO) trademark and could cause passenger confusion.
Where can the public view the settlement?
As noted in the official statement, the formal settlement document is available to read on the official websites of both airports.
Sources
Photo Credit: Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport
Route Development
Alaska Airlines Launches First Nonstop Seattle to Rome Flight
Alaska Airlines begins daily nonstop seasonal service connecting Seattle and Rome, enhancing transatlantic and Hawai‘i-Europe travel options.

This article is based on an official press release from Alaska Airlines.
Alaska Airlines has officially commenced its inaugural nonstop service connecting Seattle and Rome. According to a recent company press release, this milestone route marks the first-ever direct flight linking the Emerald City with the Eternal City.
The introduction of this transatlantic service represents a significant development for the carrier, signaling its formal expansion into the European market. By establishing this direct connection, Alaska Airlines aims to solidify its position as a global carrier and further elevate Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) as a premier international gateway.
Flight Schedule and Seasonal Operations
The new daily nonstop service to Leonardo da Vinci Rome Fiumicino Airports (FCO) will operate on a seasonal basis. Based on the airline’s official announcement, these flights are scheduled to run through October 23, providing the only daily nonstop option from Seattle to Rome during this period.
The eastbound flight is scheduled to depart Seattle at 5:30 p.m., arriving in Rome at 1:15 p.m. the following day. This schedule is designed to offer travelers a full afternoon to begin exploring Italy upon arrival. For the return journey, westbound flights will leave Rome at 3:25 p.m. and touch down in Seattle at 5:45 p.m., allowing European visitors convenient access to the Pacific Northwest.
Strategic Network Connectivity
Beyond connecting the Pacific Northwest directly to Italy, the route offers strategic advantages for broader network connectivity. The press release highlights that the new service facilitates streamlined, one-stop travel between Hawai‘i and Europe via the Seattle hub.
This routing is positioned to benefit Hawai‘i-based passengers seeking easier access to Europe, while simultaneously creating a new, efficient access point for European tourists traveling to the Hawaiian Islands.
Corporate Strategy and Growth
The launch of this European service aligns closely with broader corporate objectives for Alaska Air Group. Company leadership emphasized the strategic importance of this new route in expanding their global footprint and enhancing the utility of their primary hub.
“Launching our first flight to Europe is a significant step in executing our long–term growth strategy. Service to Rome expands how we connect our guests to the world, strengthens Seattle’s role as a global gateway and is made possible by our people who deliver safety, care and performance with every flight. Andiamo!”
AirPro News analysis
We note that Alaska Airlines’ foray into direct European flights from its Seattle hub represents a notable evolution in its traditional route network, which has historically focused heavily on North and Central America, as well as transpacific partnerships. By leveraging its Seattle hub for its own transatlantic service, the airline is maximizing the utility of its fleet and hub infrastructure during the peak summer travel season.
Furthermore, the specific emphasis on Hawai‘i-to-Europe connectivity underscores a strategic effort to capture long-haul leisure traffic. By offering a seamless one-stop product, Alaska Airlines is positioning itself to compete for passengers that might otherwise route through competing hubs or rely entirely on alliance partners for transatlantic segments.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does the seasonal Seattle to Rome service end?
The seasonal service is available through October 23, according to the airline’s press release.
What are the flight times for the new route?
Eastbound flights depart Seattle at 5:30 p.m. and arrive in Rome at 1:15 p.m. Return westbound flights leave Rome at 3:25 p.m. and arrive in Seattle at 5:45 p.m.
Does this flight offer connections to other destinations?
Yes, the airline notes that the Seattle hub provides convenient one-stop connectivity for travelers flying between Hawai‘i and Europe.
Sources
Photo Credit: Alaska Airlines
-
Regulations & Safety3 days agoNTSB Releases Flight Data on China Eastern Flight 5735 Crash
-
Airlines Strategy5 days agoSpirit Airlines to Shut Down After Bailout Deal Fails in 2026
-
Business Aviation3 days agoAtlantic Aviation Opens Sustainable Executive Terminal at Napa County Airport
-
Regulations & Safety5 days agoCessna 421C Crash Near Wimberley Texas Kills Five Adults
-
MRO & Manufacturing6 days agoEuropean Commission Approves Airbus and Air France-KLM A350 Joint Venture
