Regulations & Safety
FAA Clarifies Role in Boeing 737 MAX 7 and 10 Certification Delays
FAA Administrator states certification delays for Boeing 737 MAX 7 and 10 depend on Boeing’s work, not FAA roadblocks, with certification targeted for 2026.

FAA Administrator Denies Agency is “Roadblock” to Boeing MAX 7 and 10 Certification
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Bryan Bedford has explicitly rejected the narrative that regulatory hurdles are the primary cause of delays for Boeing’s remaining 737 MAX variants. Speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C. on January 21, 2026, Bedford emphasized that the pace of certification for the MAX 7 and MAX 10 lies squarely with the manufacturer.
According to reporting by Reuters, the Administrator clarified that while the agency is heavily involved in the process, the timeline depends on Boeing completing the necessary engineering and safety documentation. The comments come as Boeing targets a 2026 certification window for both aircraft, following years of setbacks involving anti-icing systems and broader quality control reforms.
Clarifying the Regulatory Role
During the press briefing, Bedford addressed the ongoing delays that have kept the smallest and largest variants of the MAX family grounded. He pushed back against the idea that the FAA is holding up the process unnecessarily.
“I don’t think FAA is the roadblock on 7 and the -10 certification. We can only help get them there, but they have got to do the work, and they’re doing the work.”
, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford, via Reuters
Reuters reports that Bedford noted the agency has “devoted significant resources” to the certification campaigns. However, under the stricter regulatory regime adopted following the 2024 door-plug incident and earlier crashes, the FAA has moved away from delegating authority. Instead, the agency now requires direct inspection and verification of systems, placing the onus on Boeing to demonstrate full compliance before approvals are granted.
Certification and Production Status Updates
Despite the stern words regarding responsibility, progress is being made on the technical front. Industry information indicates that Boeing executives are still expecting to finalize certification for both jets within the current calendar year.
Flight Testing Milestones
According to recent data compiled in industry research reports, the MAX 10 has advanced into a critical stage known as Type Inspection Authorization (TIA). This phase marks the entry of FAA pilots and engineers into the flight test program to verify systems directly. Meanwhile, the MAX 7 remains uncertified, pending the resolution of documentation and design reviews that overlap with the MAX 10 requirements.
Production Rate Increases
Beyond certification, Boeing is slowly ramping up its industrial output. Following the strict production cap imposed after the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident, the FAA allowed Boeing to increase its monthly output. As of October 2025, the cap was raised to 42 jets per month.
Additionally, reporting by aviation intelligence outlet Leeham News indicates that Boeing is preparing to activate a new assembly line, dubbed the “North Line”, at its facility in Everett, Washington. While this line is eventually intended to support the high-demand MAX 10, it is expected to go live in mid-2026 building certified MAX 8 and MAX 9 models. This strategy aims to stabilize operations and train workforce teams before the MAX 10 enters full-rate production.
AirPro News Analysis
The Stakes of the 2026 Timeline
Administrator Bedford’s comments highlight a critical shift in the FAA-Boeing dynamic. By publicly stating that the FAA is not the “roadblock,” the agency is effectively insulating itself from blame should further delays occur. This places immense pressure on Boeing’s engineering teams to deliver flawless documentation.
For Boeing, the stakes of a 2026 certification are incredibly high. The MAX 10 is the company’s only direct competitor to the Airbus A321neo, which currently dominates the large narrowbody market. With a backlog of over 1,200 orders for the MAX 10 alone, further slips in the timeline could force major customers like United Airlines and Delta to reconsider their fleet strategies. The activation of the Everett North Line suggests Boeing is confident enough to invest in capacity, but that investment will only pay off if the FAA is satisfied with the safety data.
Frequently Asked Questions
When will the Boeing 737 MAX 10 be certified?
Boeing executives and industry forecasts currently target certification within 2026. The aircraft recently entered the Type Inspection Authorization (TIA) phase, a critical step toward final approval.
What is the “North Line”?
The North Line is a new 737 assembly line located in Everett, Washington. It is expected to activate in mid-2026 to help Boeing meet its production targets, initially building MAX 8 and 9 aircraft before transitioning to the MAX 10.
Why was the MAX 7 and 10 certification delayed?
Delays were caused by a combination of factors, including a redesign of the engine anti-ice system to prevent potential overheating, and a stricter FAA certification process implemented after the 2024 door-plug blowout incident.
Sources
Photo Credit: Boeing – Montage
Regulations & Safety
NTSB: Thermal Plugs Caused AA Flight 3023 Tire Failure
NTSB determines melted thermal relief plugs caused tire failure on American Airlines 737-8 at Denver, triggering emergency evacuation.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has determined that melted thermal relief plugs caused the left main landing gear tires to fail on an American Airlines Boeing 737-8 during a July 2025 takeoff roll at Denver International Airport (DEN), prompting a high-speed rejected takeoff and emergency evacuation.
The final aviation investigation report, published on August 26, 2026, officially closes the inquiry into American Airlines Flight 3023. The document details the mechanical sequence that led to the tire failure while highlighting significant passenger noncompliance during the subsequent evacuation, as travelers ignored crew commands and retrieved carry-on baggage.
Mechanical sequence and rejected takeoff
The incident occurred on July 26, 2025, involving a Boeing 737-8, registration N306SW, equipped with CFM International LEAP-1B28 engines. According to the NTSB, the flight experienced an approximate 25-minute delay while awaiting departure at runway 34L.
During the subsequent takeoff roll, as the aircraft reached an indicated airspeed between 90 and 100 knots, the captain reported hearing a loud pop accompanied by a noticeable bump. The flight crew initiated a rejected takeoff at speeds above 80 knots.
The NTSB determined the probable cause of the incident was the melting of thermal relief plugs in the left main landing gear. This melting released tire pressure and caused the tires and wheels to fail during the takeoff roll. The agency noted that this failure resulted in abnormal airplane handling characteristics, which prompted the flight crew to reject the takeoff. Debris from the fractured wheels caused minor damage to the aircraft, including a three-inch dent on the lower skin of the left wing.
Emergency evacuation and passenger behavior
Following the rejected takeoff, the flight crew initially instructed the cabin to remain seated. Between 30 and 45 seconds later, after identifying smoke and fire originating from the left main landing gear, the crew ordered an emergency evacuation.
The aircraft carried 175 occupants, comprising 169 passengers and six crew members. The NTSB final report confirms that zero injuries occurred during the event. This official casualty figure supersedes preliminary media reports from July 2025 that had indicated minor injuries and hospital evaluations.
The investigation report draws specific attention to passenger behavior during the emergency egress. The NTSB stated that the cabin crew described the evacuation as rapid but hindered by significant passenger confusion and noncompliance. Despite flight attendants repeatedly commanding passengers to leave their belongings behind, multiple individuals retrieved their carry-on baggage. The NTSB concluded that this noncompliance directly slowed the flow of egress from the aircraft.
AirPro News analysis
The NTSB findings regarding American Airlines Flight 3023 add to a well-documented and growing safety concern within the commercial aviation sector. Passenger retrieval of carry-on baggage during emergency evacuations is a recurring issue that compromises the 90-second evacuation standard mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
When passengers stop to open overhead bins and carry luggage down escape slides, they not only slow the egress rate for those behind them but also introduce the risk of puncturing the evacuation slides or injuring fellow passengers. We continue to see official accident reports cite passenger noncompliance as a negative factor in evacuation efficiency. This recurring behavioral pattern has prompted safety advocates and lawmakers to question whether current FAA evacuation certification tests, which rely on compliant participants, accurately reflect real-world human behavior during an emergency.
Sources: National Transportation Safety Board
Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board
Regulations & Safety
Marine One Loss of Separation at DCA: NTSB Preliminary Report
NTSB cites radio line-of-sight failure after Marine One and Envoy Air E-170 came within 0.82 NM at Reagan National.

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.
This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.
A loss of separation occurred on August 4, 2026, between a Sikorsky VH-3D operating as Marine One and an Envoy Air Embraer E-170 departing Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). The incident took place approximately two miles north of the airport at 14:34 EDT and prompted an immediate Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) relocation of radio equipment after investigators identified a communication failure.
According to a preliminary report released on August 27, 2026, by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), air traffic controllers at DCA did not receive a required three-minute pre-departure warning from the helicopter. The event triggered a review of strict Safety protocols implemented following a fatal midair collision in the same airspace in January 2025.
Incident timeline and separation data
The loss of separation occurred when Marine One departed The Ellipse simultaneously with Envoy Air flight 3742 departing runway 1 at DCA. Preliminary FAA estimates indicate the aircraft came within 0.82 nautical miles (NM) laterally and 700 feet vertically. The NTSB is currently analyzing surveillance data to establish the exact closest point of approach.
President Donald Trump was on board the Sikorsky VH-3D at the time of the incident. In a statement provided to CBS News, White House spokesman Kush Desai confirmed the President was never in danger.
Marine One flights are piloted by the finest aviators in the world, and the White House maintains the utmost confidence in these patriots and other security officials who are responsible for ensuring the President’s safety.
No injuries were reported among the occupants of either aircraft, and both flights continued to their respective destinations without further incident.
Communication failure and FAA response
The NTSB preliminary report points to inadequate radio line-of-sight coverage between The Ellipse and the DCA tower as the primary factor in the missed pre-departure warning. A DCA tower controller reported that the transmission attempt from the helicopter was “broken and unreadable,” according to CBS News.
Following the August 4 incident, FAA technicians evaluated the infrastructure and confirmed the line-of-sight deficiency. To resolve the issue, the agency relocated the helicopter-control radio equipment to the top of the DCA control tower. Subsequent communication checks were successful.
CBS News also reported that recent construction at the White House may have contributed to the radio line-of-sight degradation, though the NTSB has not yet issued a final determination on the cause.
Regulatory context and prior airspace changes
The airspace surrounding DCA operates under highly specific procedural rules designed to deconflict fixed-wing airline traffic from frequent VIP helicopter movements. These procedures were significantly tightened following a fatal midair collision on January 29, 2025, involving an airliner and an Army Black Hawk helicopter near the airport.
Following the 2025 accident, regulators instituted a requirement for a ground stop at DCA anytime a Helicopters passes on a conflicting route. The failure of the three-minute warning on August 4 prevented controllers from initiating this required ground stop for the Envoy Air departure.
Air traffic controllers and Marine One pilots had previously met on July 28, 2026, exactly one week prior to the incident, to discuss ongoing communication challenges in the sector.
AirPro News analysis
The August 4 loss of separation highlights the fragility of procedural deconfliction in the Washington, D.C. airspace. While the FAA characterized the event as a momentary loss of separation, the failure of a critical communication link reveals a single point of failure in the safety protocols established after the 2025 collision. We note that the rapid relocation of the radio equipment by the FAA demonstrates an acknowledgment of the infrastructure gap. As the NTSB continues its Investigation, we will monitor the docket for potential systemic recommendations regarding how VIP helicopter movements integrate with high-volume Commercial-Aircraft traffic at DCA, particularly concerning redundant communication systems.
Sources: National Transportation Safety Board
Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board
Regulations & Safety
FAA Moves to Fire Two LaGuardia Controllers After Fatal Collision
FAA initiates termination proceedings against two LaGuardia controllers for early shift departures on the night of the March 22, 2026 runway collision.

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.
This article summarizes reporting by Reuters by David Shepardson and Doyinsola Oladipo.
The FAA has initiated termination proceedings against two air traffic controllers accused of leaving their shifts early on the night of a fatal runway collision at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) in March 2026. The agency is classifying the unauthorized early departures as timecard fraud amid a broader national crackdown on the practice.
The disciplinary action follows the March 22, 2026, accident in which Air Canada Express Flight 8646, operated by Jazz Aviation LP, collided with an aircraft rescue firefighting (ARFF) vehicle while landing on Runway 4. According to Reuters, the two controllers allegedly departed the facility approximately one hour before their scheduled shifts ended, a practice colloquially known as an “early shove.”
Disciplinary actions and union response
The FAA stated its commitment to holding employees accountable, emphasizing that it will not compromise the safety or efficiency of the national airspace system. U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy condemned the practice, stating that while most controllers complete their full shifts, the department will not tolerate fraud from individuals who unfairly burden their colleagues and impact the airspace.
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) confirmed it is actively discussing the allegations with FAA leadership. The union indicated that these internal discussions are the appropriate forum for addressing the matter. Reuters reports that the FAA is currently conducting a nationwide enforcement effort targeting employees who leave on break at the end of their shifts and fail to return.
The March 22 collision and investigation
The NTSB continues to investigate the March 22 collision under investigation ID DCA26MA161. The official cause of the accident remains undetermined. The aircraft involved was an MHI RJ Aviation CRJ-900, and the ground equipment was an Oshkosh Striker 1500 ARFF vehicle.
Official NTSB figures confirm that 76 people were on board the aircraft, including 72 passengers, two flight attendants, and two pilots. The captain and first officer sustained fatal injuries. Thirty-nine individuals were transported to local hospitals, with six reported to have serious injuries.
It remains unverified whether the controllers’ early departure directly influenced the events leading to the collision. Speaking in March 2026, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy noted that operating with two controllers in the tower cab during a midnight shift is common practice across the national airspace system, suggesting the facility may have been operating at standard staffing levels at the time of the accident.
Regulatory response to surface safety
Following the LaGuardia accident, the FAA accelerated initiatives to improve surface visibility at airports. On May 13, 2026, the agency announced a $16.5 million investment to equip all airport vehicles with transponders.
These vehicle movement area transponders (VMATs) are designed to provide ATC with better situational awareness of ground equipment operating on runways and taxiways.
AirPro News analysis
We note that the FAA’s decision to pursue termination for timecard fraud rather than operational errors highlights a strict administrative approach to facility management. By focusing on the unauthorized absence, the agency addresses the “early shove” culture directly without preempting the NTSB’s ongoing safety investigation into the collision’s root causes. The distinction between administrative violations and operational fault will likely remain a focal point as NATCA engages with FAA leadership.
Photo Credit: Mike Segar – Reuters
-
MRO & Manufacturing7 days agoBoeing SPEEA Engineers Reject Contract, Authorize Strike
-
Business Aviation7 days agoFTAI Aviation Closes $2B Warehouse Financing for 2026 SPV
-
Defense & Military5 days agoBoeing Wins $131B IDIQ Contract for F-15 Eagle Crest Program
-
Space & Satellites5 days agoSpaceX Commits $100B to Starbase Louisiana Spaceport
-
Defense & Military5 days agoSikorsky Names First EU Black Hawk Parts Distribution Center
