Defense & Military
Settlement Reached in 2021 Navy Helicopter Crash Lawsuit
Families of sailors killed in 2021 Navy helicopter crash settle lawsuit over design defects and maintenance issues with Sikorsky Aircraft.
Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Regarding Fatal 2021 Navy Helicopter Crash
On November 24, 2025, a significant legal development occurred regarding the tragic 2021 crash of a U.S. Navy MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter. The families of three sailors who lost their lives in the incident reached a confidential settlement with Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., a Lockheed Martin company. This agreement resolves a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, bringing a conclusion to the legal battle over allegations of design defects and negligence.
The lawsuit, originally filed in August 2023, centered on the mechanical failure that led to the loss of the aircraft, known by its call sign “Loosefoot 616.” The plaintiffs represented the estates of Petty Officer 2nd Class James Buriak, Petty Officer 2nd Class Sarah Burns, and Petty Officer 3rd Class Bailey Tucker. These sailors, along with Lt. Bradley Foster and Lt. Paul Fridley, perished when their helicopter experienced catastrophic vibrations and fell from the flight deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln into the Pacific Ocean.
This settlement marks the end of the civil litigation against the helicopter manufacturer for these specific families. While the financial terms remain undisclosed, the case has highlighted critical issues regarding military aircraft maintenance protocols, design safety, and the legal frameworks governing accidents at sea. We examine the details of the allegations, the technical findings of the Navy’s investigation, and the broader safety implications for the fleet.
Allegations of Design Flaws and Negligence
The core of the plaintiffs’ case against Sikorsky Aircraft rested on the assertion that the MH-60S helicopter contained a design flaw within its hydraulic hose assembly. According to court documents, the families argued that the hydraulic damper hoses were positioned too close to the main rotor attachment point. This proximity, they alleged, made the components highly susceptible to damage during routine maintenance operations.
Legal representatives for the families, specifically attorneys from Pilot Law, P.C., contended that the manufacturer failed to warn operators of this vulnerability. The lawsuit claimed that the design allowed for the steel braids inside the hose to be flattened or crushed without leaving visible external signs of damage. Consequently, maintenance crews could not detect the structural compromise through standard visual inspections, creating a latent hazard that could lead to catastrophic failure during flight operations.
The complaint was filed under the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA), a federal statute from 1920 that governs civil recovery for deaths occurring beyond three nautical miles from the shore of the United States. The plaintiffs sought to hold the manufacturer accountable for what they described as a preventable defect that directly contributed to the fatal sequence of events on August 31, 2021.
The lawsuit argued that the design allowed damage to occur easily and that the steel braids inside the hose could be flattened without being visible during visual inspections.
Investigation Findings and Technical Cause
A command investigation conducted by the U.S. Navy, released in 2022, largely corroborated the technical theories presented by the plaintiffs. The investigation identified the root cause of the crash as the in-flight failure of a main rotor damper hose. This failure resulted in a total loss of damping for the main rotor system. Upon landing on the flight deck, the aircraft immediately entered a state of violent “ground resonance”, severe lateral vibrations that caused the rotor blades to strike the deck and the aircraft to roll over into the sea.
The Navy’s inquiry pinpointed the likely mechanism of damage to the use of a specific maintenance tool known as a “spindle pry bar.” Investigators determined that if this tool was used incorrectly or without sufficient clearance, it could inadvertently kink or crush the damper hose. Because the internal damage was not visible to the naked eye, the compromised hose remained in service until it failed under the stress of operations.
Following these findings, the Navy took immediate remedial action to prevent a recurrence. In late 2021, an “Interim Support Equipment Change” was issued, directing the modification of the spindle pry bar. A “hard stop” was added to the tool to physically prevent it from contacting the damper hose. Furthermore, a “Rapid Action Change” ordered the fleet-wide inspection and replacement of damper hoses. A 2022 memo signed by Vice Admiral Steve Koehler formally acknowledged that these modifications were necessary to prevent damage, validating the concerns regarding the interface between the maintenance tools and the aircraft’s design.
Legal Context and Future Implications
The resolution of this case draws attention to the legal complexities facing military families seeking redress for accidents at sea. Because the crash occurred approximately 60 nautical miles off the coast of San Diego, the case fell under the jurisdiction of the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA). Historically, DOHSA limits recovery strictly to “pecuniary loss,” which refers to the financial support the deceased would have provided to their dependents. It generally excludes damages for the families’ pain and suffering or the pre-death pain and suffering of the victims.
This legal limitation has been a subject of legislative debate. The “Fairness for Fallen Sailors Act,” introduced in the 2025-2026 Congress, aims to amend DOHSA to allow for non-pecuniary damages in non-commercial aviation accidents. While the bill had passed the House as of April 2025, it was still navigating the Senate at the time of this settlement. The existence of such legislation highlights the hurdles families face in securing what they view as comprehensive justice under current maritime law.
With the settlement now finalized, the civil litigation against Sikorsky regarding the “Loosefoot 616” crash is concluded for these plaintiffs. The case serves as a somber reminder of the critical importance of integrating human factors into aircraft design and the necessity of rigorous maintenance protocols. The modifications implemented by the Navy following the crash remain in effect, serving to protect current and future crews operating the MH-60S Sea Hawk.
FAQ
Question: Who were the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Sikorsky?
Answer: The lawsuit was filed by the families of Petty Officer 2nd Class James Buriak, Petty Officer 2nd Class Sarah Burns, and Petty Officer 3rd Class Bailey Tucker.
Question: What was the technical cause of the crash?
Answer: A U.S. Navy investigation determined the crash was caused by the failure of a main rotor damper hose, likely damaged during maintenance by a spindle pry bar, which led to severe vibrations upon landing.
Question: What is the Death on the High Seas Act (DOHSA)?
Answer: DOHSA is a 1920 federal law that governs wrongful death claims occurring more than three nautical miles from U.S. shores, typically limiting recovery to financial (pecuniary) losses rather than pain and suffering.
Sources
Photo Credit: US Navy MC Seaman Marco Villasana
Defense & Military
Boeing Validates Stealth Performance of MQ-28 Ghost Bat Drone
Boeing confirms the stealth capabilities of its MQ-28 Ghost Bat drone after extensive radar testing, marking a key milestone in its development.
This article is based on an official press release from Boeing.
On June 1, 2026, Boeing announced a major milestone for its uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program, successfully validating the stealth performance of the MQ-28 Ghost Bat. According to an official press release from the aerospace manufacturers, the validation took place at its facilities in Brisbane, Queensland, marking a critical step forward in proving the drone’s survivability in contested airspace.
We at AirPro News recognize this development as a significant indicator of the maturing CCA market. The MQ-28, designed to operate as a “loyal wingman” alongside crewed fighter jets, relies on its low-observable characteristics to perform high-risk missions without endangering human pilots. By confirming its stealth capabilities, Boeing provides military customers with the objective data needed to assess detection risks, support certification decisions, and guide future tactical choices.
Validating the Ghost Bat’s Stealth Capabilities
Radar Cross Section Testing
The recent validation was achieved through comprehensive Radar Cross Section (RCS) testing. According to the company’s announcement, Boeing engineers analyzed the aircraft’s radar detectability from multiple angles inside a specialized test chamber. This rigorous evaluation included measurements across elevation (pitch), azimuth (nose to tail), and roll (rotation around the aircraft).
While specific RCS figures and the radar bands utilized during the testing remain classified, Boeing noted that the confirmed low RCS effectively reduces the distance at which enemy radar systems can detect and engage the MQ-28. This capability is essential for the platform to operate effectively in highly contested environments.
“The combination of a highly capable platform, stealth features, advanced autonomy and artificial intelligence provides unprecedented ability for air forces to extend their mission effectiveness and operational flexibility.”
Program Milestones and Expanding Capabilities
Recent Flight and Weapons Tests
The MQ-28 program has advanced rapidly since its inaugural flight in February 2021. Based on historical program data and industry reports, the aircraft has accumulated over 150 test flights. The stealth validation follows a series of critical milestones achieved over the past year.
In early 2026, the MQ-28 completed its first operational flights outside of Australia. These tests took place over the Point Mugu Sea Range at Naval Base Ventura County in California, aiming to validate autonomous operations and demonstrate interoperability with allied forces. Prior to this, in December 2025, Boeing and the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) successfully completed an air-to-air weapon engagement, where an MQ-28 fired an AIM-120 missile to destroy a fighter-class target drone. Furthermore, operational viability demonstrations were completed in September 2025.
Aircraft Specifications and Role
Developed primarily by Boeing Australia in partnership with the RAAF, the MQ-28 is the first military-aircraft to be designed, engineered, and manufactured in Australia in over 50 years. The aircraft measures 38 feet (11.7 meters) in length and boasts a range of over 2,000 nautical miles.
It features a modular “missionized” nose, allowing ground crews to rapidly swap payloads based on mission requirements. Its primary roles include intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), electronic warfare, and tactical early warning, complementing existing crewed assets like the F/A-18F Super Hornet and E-7A Wedgetail.
AirPro News analysis
The defense aviation sector is currently experiencing a massive shift toward autonomous and semi-autonomous uncrewed systems. As next-generation crewed fighter jets become increasingly expensive to produce and maintain, global air forces are prioritizing “affordable combat mass.”
We observe that drones like the MQ-28 Ghost Bat offer a highly cost-effective method to multiply force capabilities and increase fleet size. By absorbing risks in dangerous environments, these platforms protect human pilots while maintaining air superiority. The recent testing in California, combined with this newly validated stealth performance, strongly positions the MQ-28 for the international export market. It presents a compelling option for allied nations seeking to modernize their air combat strategies with interoperable, low-observable drone technology.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the MQ-28 Ghost Bat?
The MQ-28 Ghost Bat is an uncrewed Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) developed by Boeing Australia and the Royal Australian Air Force. It is designed to act as a “loyal wingman,” flying alongside and supporting crewed military aircraft using advanced autonomy and artificial intelligence.
Why is stealth validation important for the MQ-28?
Stealth validation, achieved through Radar Cross Section (RCS) testing, confirms the aircraft’s low-observable design. This reduces the distance at which enemy radar can detect the drone, significantly enhancing its survivability in hostile and contested airspace.
What are the specifications of the MQ-28?
The aircraft is 38 feet (11.7 meters) long, has a range exceeding 2,000 nautical miles, and features a modular nose for rapid payload swapping to suit various mission profiles.
Sources
Photo Credit: Boeing
Defense & Military
USAF Launches EPAWSS Speedline to Accelerate F-15E Modernization
The USAF establishes an EPAWSS Speedline at Warner Robins to rapidly upgrade F-15E Strike Eagles with advanced electronic warfare systems starting June 2026.
This article is based on an official press release from the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.
Air Force Launches EPAWSS Speedline to Accelerate F-15E Modernization
On May 26, 2026, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) announced the establishment of a dedicated “Speedline” facility at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex (WR-ALC) in Georgia. This new initiative is designed to rapidly accelerate the installation of the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) on the U.S. Air Force’s F-15E Strike Eagle fleet.
According to the official press release, the Speedline facility is slated to receive its first F-15E aircraft for installation in June 2026. By decoupling these critical electronic warfare upgrades from standard Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) schedules, the Air Force aims to field advanced defensive capabilities much faster than previously possible.
We note that this shift in maintenance strategy allows the military to upgrade jets up to five to seven years ahead of their routine maintenance cycles. This collaborative effort between the AFLCMC’s F-15 System Program Office and the WR-ALC is expected to significantly boost fleet readiness against modern electromagnetic threats.
Breaking the Maintenance Bottleneck
Operational Independence
Historically, major system upgrades for fighter aircraft have been tied to their routine depot maintenance schedules, which can create bottlenecks for fielding urgent technology. The AFLCMC’s new Speedline operates entirely independently of the standard PDM line.
This operational independence provides the F-15 System Program Office and WR-ALC the flexibility to install the EPAWSS on aircraft that are not due for routine maintenance for another five to seven years. By treating the electronic warfare upgrade as a standalone priority, the Air Force can modernize its fleet at a pace dictated by tactical necessity rather than logistical routine.
Understanding the EPAWSS Upgrade
Replacing Cold War-Era Technology
The Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System is a next-generation, all-digital electronic warfare suite. Based on the provided research data, it is designed to replace the legacy Tactical Electronic Warfare System (TEWS), which relies on Cold War-era analog equipment.
Developed by prime contractor BAE Systems, with Boeing serving as the prime contractor for integration, EPAWSS provides fully integrated radar warning, geolocation, situational awareness, and self-protection solutions. The system allows the aircraft to detect, identify, and defeat surface and airborne threats in highly contested, dense signal environments.
Financial and Production Milestones
The U.S. Air Force officially cleared EPAWSS for full-rate production in early 2025. Concurrently, the Air Force awarded a $615.8 million contract to Boeing to cover the installation of these systems. Shortly after this award, the first fully equipped F-15E was delivered to the 48th Fighter Wing at RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom, marking a major milestone in the modernization of the 4th-generation fleet.
Strategic Importance and Lethality
Expanding the F-15E’s Capabilities
The integration of EPAWSS is not merely a defensive measure; it is a comprehensive upgrade to the aircraft’s survivability and lethality. In the official AFLCMC release, military leadership emphasized the strategic necessity of the system.
“The F-15E Strike Eagle remains a cornerstone of our tactical airpower and deep strike capabilities. The integration of advanced electronic warfare suites, such as the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, ensures the F-15E will not just survive, but actively disrupt and dismantle adversary kill chains in the most highly contested, electromagnetically dense environments.”
, Lt. Col. Matthew Heil, F-15 Program Office, EPAWSS Materiel Leader
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the creation of the EPAWSS Speedline reflects a broader Department of Defense trend toward agile logistics and sustainment. By separating critical combat upgrades from time-consuming depot maintenance, the military is demonstrating a commitment to fielding new technologies to the warfighter at a much faster pace.
Furthermore, as the U.S. Air Force continues to develop and field 5th-generation fighters like the F-35 and F-22, alongside future 6th-generation platforms, maintaining the survivability of 4th-generation “workhorse” aircraft is a strategic priority. EPAWSS ensures that older airframes like the F-15E can safely and effectively operate alongside stealth fighters in modern, highly contested combat scenarios, bridging the gap between legacy platforms and future air dominance initiatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the EPAWSS Speedline?
The EPAWSS Speedline is a dedicated installation facility at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex designed to rapidly equip F-15E Strike Eagles with the new Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, independent of standard maintenance schedules.
When will the first aircraft be upgraded at the Speedline?
According to the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, the facility is slated to receive its first F-15E aircraft for installation in June 2026.
Who are the primary contractors for EPAWSS?
BAE Systems is the prime contractor that developed the EPAWSS, while Boeing serves as the prime contractor for the system’s integration and installation on the F-15E.
Sources
Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Codie Trimble
Defense & Military
Final A-10 Engine Build Marks End of Davis-Monthan Maintenance Era
Davis-Monthan AFB completes last A-10 engine build as USAF extends aircraft service life through 2030, ending a 50-year maintenance mission.
This article is based on an official press release from Air Combat Command.
On May 21, 2026, Airmen at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona officially completed their final A-10 Thunderbolt II engine build. According to an official release from Air Combat Command, this milestone marks the end of a decades-long maintenance mission for the 355th Component Maintenance Squadron (CMS) and serves as a symbolic closing chapter for the base’s 50-year legacy with the iconic close-air-support aircraft.
While the U.S. Air-Forces recently announced a partial extension of the A-10’s operational life through 2030, the formal training and heavy maintenance pipelines, including the dedicated Davis-Monthan engine shop, are officially shutting down. As the military transitions to future platforms, the completion of this final General Electric TF34 turbofan engine represents the end of an era for the maintainers who kept the “Warthog” flying.
We at AirPro News have reviewed the official military releases and supplementary research to provide a comprehensive look at what this final build means for the U.S. Air Force, the maintainers on the ground, and the future of the A-10 fleet.
A Historic Final Build for the 355th CMS
A standard A-10 engine build is a rigorous, multi-stage operation that typically takes 30 days to complete. The process involves meticulous inspection, repair, rebuilding, and testing of the General Electric TF34 turbofan engines that power the A-10C Thunderbolt II. According to military reports, a single crew of five maintainers usually handles the entire process for a given engine.
Hands-On Participation
For this historic final build, the 355th CMS broke from tradition. Every member of the shop participated, ensuring that all personnel had the opportunity to put their hands on the final engine throughout its diagnostic runs and final inspection. The final engine test was successfully conducted in the test cell on April 30, 2026, verifying its performance and flight readiness.
The process officially concluded on May 21, 2026, when Tech. Sgt. Logan Lamb, a 355th Maintenance Group quality assurance inspector, stamped the final inspection form. Wing leadership and the 355th CMS gathered to celebrate the completion, reflecting on the gravity of their work.
“Some, if not all these engines have saved lives on the ground through close air support missions, and some have carried pilots home while the other engine was damaged. All members of the shop put eyes and hands on this engine throughout the build, testing, diagnostic runs and final inspection. Typically, only one crew of five would work on any one engine, but this engine has been touched by everyone.”
The Warthog’s Legacy and Future Operations
Davis-Monthan AFB has served as the primary hub for A-10 operations and training for nearly 50 years. However, the base began divesting its A-10 fleet in February 2024, sending the first aircraft to the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group, commonly known as the “Boneyard.” On April 3, 2026, the 357th Fighter Squadron at Davis-Monthan graduated its final class of A-10 pilots, permanently closing the formal training pipeline for the aircraft.
Service Extension Through 2030
Despite the closures at Davis-Monthan, the A-10 will continue to fly. On April 20, 2026, Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink announced that the Air Force will extend the service life of the remaining A-10 fleet through 2030, reversing a previous plan to retire the aircraft by 2029. According to defense reports, this decision was heavily influenced by the A-10’s recent combat performance in Operation Epic Fury, a U.S. campaign against Iran in late March and April 2026, where the aircraft successfully struck naval vessels and provided critical close air support.
AirPro News analysis
The decision to extend the A-10’s service life through 2030 while simultaneously closing its primary heavy maintenance and training facilities presents a unique logistical scenario. The Air Force is utilizing what it calls a “fleet management strategy.” Because the Davis-Monthan engine shop and the pilot “schoolhouse” are now closed, operational squadrons at bases like Moody AFB and Whiteman AFB will be operating on borrowed time. They will have to rely entirely on existing experienced personnel, stockpiled parts, and the durability of engines like the one just completed by the 355th CMS to sustain operations until the final retirement date. This strategy underscores the military’s confidence in the robust engineering of the TF34 engines and the meticulous groundwork laid by aerospace Propulsion Airmen over the past decades.
The Unsung Heroes of Aerospace Propulsion
The longevity and survivability of the A-10 Thunderbolt II are directly tied to the expertise of aerospace propulsion Airmen. These maintainers are responsible for ensuring the aircraft remains lethal and capable of returning pilots home safely, even after taking heavy fire.
Their daily responsibilities include conducting borescope inspections to identify internal engine issues early and prevent catastrophic failures. They also manage test cell operations, running the engines in a controlled environment while monitoring critical readings from a control cab to verify performance before the engine is ever attached to an airframe.
“I think the legacy of the A-10 is going to be remembered for generations. The A-10 will be missed here in Arizona.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What engine does the A-10 Thunderbolt II use?
The A-10 is powered by twin General Electric TF34 turbofan engines. These engines are renowned for their durability and ability to sustain damage while still bringing pilots home safely.
Why is the A-10’s service life being extended to 2030?
Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink announced the extension on April 20, 2026, following the aircraft’s highly successful combat performance during Operation Epic Fury in early 2026. The extension reverses previous plans to retire the fleet by 2029.
Is Davis-Monthan AFB still training A-10 pilots?
No. The 357th Fighter Squadron at Davis-Monthan graduated its final class of A-10 pilots on April 3, 2026, officially closing the formal training pipeline for the aircraft.
Sources: Air Combat Command
Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christopher Ornelas Jr.
-
Space & Satellites5 days agoUS Space Force Awards SpaceX $2.29B Contract for Military Satellite Network
-
Regulations & Safety6 days agoNTSB Urges FAA to Update Runway Condition Assessment Matrix for Heavy Rain
-
Space & Satellites5 days agoFAA Orders SpaceX Investigation After Starship Flight 12 Booster Mishap
-
Space & Satellites3 days agoBlue Origin’s New Glenn Rocket Explodes During Test at Cape Canaveral
-
Route Development6 days agoHong Kong International Airport Opens Expanded Terminal 2 for Departures