MRO & Manufacturing
Leggett & Platt Completes 250 Million Aerospace Divestiture
Leggett & Platt sells aerospace unit for $250M to reduce debt and focus on core business amid growing aerospace parts market.
Leggett & Platt’s $250 Million Aerospace Divestiture: Strategic Restructuring in a Dynamic Industrial Landscape
Leggett & Platt’s recent $250 million divestiture of its Commercial Aircraft Products Group marks a pivotal moment in the company’s 142-year corporate history and underscores the broader industrial trend of portfolio optimization. The sale, transferring seven manufacturing facilities and approximately 700 employees to Tinicum Incorporated’s affiliated funds, generated substantial after-tax proceeds that have been earmarked for immediate debt reduction. This move comes as Manufacturers across the aerospace sector seek to refocus on core competencies and strengthen balance sheets in response to evolving market pressures and opportunities.
The divestiture removes $190 million in annual sales from Leggett & Platt’s revenue base, prompting revised financial guidance and a more streamlined operational focus. At the same time, the transaction aligns with a wave of consolidation and specialization within the aerospace industry, where private equity firms are increasingly active in acquiring non-core corporate assets. The implications of this deal reach beyond Leggett & Platt, reflecting shifts in financial strategy, operational structure, and industry dynamics that are shaping the future of aerospace manufacturing.
Corporate Heritage and Strategic Evolution
Founded in 1883 by Joseph P. Leggett and Cornelius B. Platt in Carthage, Missouri, Leggett & Platt began as a manufacturer of steel coil bedsprings. This innovation addressed a practical need for improved sleep surfaces and set the stage for the company’s growth. Incorporated in 1901, the company steadily expanded its product offerings and geographic reach, evolving into a diversified manufacturer with global operations.
The company’s transformation accelerated under Harry M. Cornell Jr., who became president and CEO in 1960. Cornell’s leadership was marked by aggressive growth through both organic expansion and systematic acquisitions, guiding Leggett & Platt from a regional manufacturer to a global supplier of components for bedding, furniture, automotive, and, more recently, aerospace markets. This diversification strategy brought scale and resilience but also introduced operational complexity and capital allocation challenges.
Leggett & Platt’s entry into aerospace was a relatively recent diversification, focusing on highly engineered tube and duct assemblies for commercial and Military Aircraft. This business segment required unique technical and regulatory expertise, differentiating it from the company’s traditional consumer-oriented operations. Recent leadership changes, including the return of Karl Glassman as CEO, have further shaped the company’s strategic direction, emphasizing operational optimization and financial discipline amid a comprehensive restructuring plan.
Transaction Structure and Financial Architecture
The sale of the Aerospace Products Group to Tinicum Incorporated was announced in April 2025 and closed with after-tax proceeds of $250 million, exceeding initial estimates. The transaction involved seven manufacturing sites across the United States, United Kingdom, and France, and required careful coordination to address regulatory and operational complexities inherent in cross-border asset transfers.
Lazard served as exclusive financial advisor, while Freshfields provided legal counsel, underscoring the transaction’s complexity and the need for specialized expertise. The deal’s valuation, at approximately 1.3 times the business’s $190 million in 2024 sales, suggests a conservative approach, possibly reflecting the capital-intensive nature of aerospace manufacturing and the company’s strategic priority to expedite the sale for debt reduction.
Working capital and debt-type adjustments contributed to the favorable final outcome, with the transaction resulting in a $0.60 per share gain recognized in 2025 earnings. This gain provides a buffer as Leggett & Platt adjusts its operational scope and financial guidance to reflect the divestiture’s impact.
“This divestiture is a key step in our strategy to strengthen our balance sheet and refocus on core businesses where we have clear competitive advantages.”, Leggett & Platt Management Statement
Strategic Rationale and Balance Sheet Optimization
The decision to divest the aerospace business followed a strategic review evaluating operational synergies, capital requirements, and alignment with long-term corporate objectives. The aerospace segment’s specialized regulatory and technical demands contrasted with Leggett & Platt’s core operations, leading to operational inefficiencies and diluted management focus.
Financially, the company faced a debt-to-equity ratio of over 200% and total debt of $1.8 billion, constraining flexibility. The $250 million in proceeds from the sale provided an immediate opportunity to reduce leverage, with management emphasizing debt paydown as a primary objective. This aligns with broader efforts to improve financial health, including a $143 million debt reduction in Q2 2025 and a targeted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio of 3.5x.
The transaction also coincided with a broader restructuring plan expected to yield $60–$70 million in annualized EBIT benefits through facility consolidations and workforce optimization. Revised 2025 sales guidance of $3.9–$4.2 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.95–$1.15 reflect the removal of the aerospace business, while the transaction gain provides transitional support.
Industry Context and Aerospace M&A Dynamics
The aerospace and defense sector is experiencing a wave of consolidation, driven by technological change, defense spending, and the pursuit of operational efficiency. In the first half of 2025, global aerospace and defense deal value more than doubled year-over-year, with private equity playing a prominent role in acquiring specialized components businesses. This trend is exemplified by both Leggett & Platt’s divestiture and larger deals such as Boeing’s $10.5 billion sale of digital aviation solutions to Thoma Bravo.
Private equity’s interest is fueled by the sector’s high barriers to entry, predictable cash flows, and long product lifecycles. Regulatory requirements, particularly in defense and aerospace, favor established suppliers with proven quality systems, further enhancing the appeal for investors seeking stable returns. Tinicum’s acquisition of Leggett & Platt’s aerospace unit fits within a broader strategy of building integrated aerospace platforms through targeted acquisitions.
Defense budget increases in the US, Europe, and Asia are supporting demand for aerospace components, while commercial aviation’s recovery and fleet modernization efforts are driving sustained growth. Regulatory frameworks and certification requirements, such as those enforced by the FAA and EASA, continue to shape market dynamics and transaction structures.
“Private equity firms are targeting aerospace components businesses as part of a broader push to consolidate the supply chain and capitalize on long-term demand trends.”, PwC Aerospace M&A Report
Market Dynamics in Aerospace Parts Manufacturing
The global aerospace parts manufacturing market is projected to grow from $979.43 billion in 2025 to $1.53 trillion by 2032, a compound annual growth rate of 6.6%. Commercial aviation, representing about 45% of the market, is a major driver, with the global fleet expected to double over the next two decades. This growth underpins demand for specialized components such as tube and duct assemblies, the focus of the divested Leggett & Platt business.
The aircraft tube and duct assemblies market alone is forecast to expand from $1.1 billion in 2023 to $1.8 billion by 2033. North America remains the largest regional market due to its established manufacturing base and high defense spending. Wide-body aircraft, which require advanced tube and duct assemblies, account for the largest market share, reflecting ongoing demand for long-haul and cargo aircraft.
Material innovation, particularly the use of stainless steel and titanium, is shaping the competitive landscape. Suppliers with capabilities in advanced materials and geographic diversification are well-positioned to navigate supply chain disruptions and meet evolving customer needs. The former Leggett & Platt aerospace business’s international footprint enhances its resilience and attractiveness as part of Tinicum’s portfolio.
Private Equity Interest in Aerospace Assets
Private equity deal activity in aerospace and defense remains robust, with $7.7 billion in transactions in Q1 2025 despite macroeconomic headwinds. The focus is on businesses with stable aftermarket revenue, regulatory protection, and specialized capabilities. Tinicum’s acquisition strategy, including previous investments in aerospace manufacturing, highlights the sector’s appeal for platform-building and operational improvement.
Commercial aerospace parts businesses are particularly attractive due to production delays at major OEMs, which increase demand for replacement parts and maintenance services. Defense-oriented investments benefit from multiyear contracts and budget stability, though regulatory scrutiny can complicate deal structures.
Private equity ownership typically brings capital for technology upgrades, automation, and market expansion, leveraging management expertise to drive margin improvement. Exit options include sales to strategic buyers, IPOs, or secondary buyouts, supported by ongoing consolidation trends in the sector.
Future Outlook and Strategic Implications
Looking ahead, the aerospace components sector is poised for continued growth, supported by commercial fleet expansion, defense modernization, and technological innovation. The former Leggett & Platt business, now under Tinicum’s ownership, is well-positioned to capitalize on these trends, leveraging established customer relationships and a diversified manufacturing base.
For Leggett & Platt, the divestiture strengthens the balance sheet and allows management to focus on core markets with greater operational synergies. The company’s restructuring plan and capital allocation discipline are expected to enhance profitability and strategic flexibility, providing a model for other diversified manufacturers navigating similar challenges.
Conclusion
Leggett & Platt’s $250 million aerospace divestiture illustrates the strategic importance of portfolio optimization in today’s industrial landscape. By selling a non-core business to a specialized private equity acquirer, the company has improved its financial flexibility and sharpened its strategic focus. The deal also reflects broader industry trends toward consolidation, specialization, and private equity investment in aerospace manufacturing.
As the aerospace components market continues to grow and evolve, both Leggett & Platt and Tinicum’s newly acquired business are positioned to benefit from favorable demand drivers and operational improvements. The transaction serves as a case study in the value that can be unlocked through disciplined strategic review and execution in a dynamic market environment.
FAQ
What did Leggett & Platt sell in its $250 million transaction?
The company sold its Aerospace Products Group, including seven manufacturing facilities and approximately 700 employees, to Tinicum Incorporated’s affiliated funds.
How will Leggett & Platt use the proceeds from the sale?
The $250 million in after-tax proceeds will be used primarily to reduce company debt and strengthen the balance sheet.
What impact does the sale have on Leggett & Platt’s financial guidance?
The company revised its 2025 sales guidance to $3.9–$4.2 billion and adjusted EPS to $0.95–$1.15, reflecting the removal of $190 million in annual sales from the divested aerospace business.
Why are private equity firms interested in aerospace components businesses?
Aerospace components offer stable cash flows, high barriers to entry, and long product lifecycles, making them attractive for private equity investment and platform-building strategies.
What are the growth prospects for the aerospace parts manufacturing market?
The market is projected to grow at a 6.6% compound annual rate, reaching $1.53 trillion by 2032, driven by commercial fleet expansion and defense spending.
Sources:
Wikipedia: Leggett & Platt
Photo Credit: Leggett & Platt – Montage
MRO & Manufacturing
Honeywell Unveils New Brands Ahead of 2026 Aerospace Spin-Off
Honeywell announces Honeywell Technologies and Honeywell Aerospace as independent firms post June 29, 2026 spin-off, focusing on AI and aviation.
On June 1, 2026, Honeywell officially unveiled the new brand identities for its automation and aerospace businesses, marking the final stages of a historic corporate restructuring. The two new entities, Honeywell Technologies and Honeywell Aerospace, will operate as independent, publicly traded companies following the aerospace division’s official spin-off scheduled for June 29, 2026.
According to the company’s press release, this announcement dismantles the 140-year-old conglomerate into focused, pure-play businesses. The strategic pivot aligns with broader Wall Street trends that increasingly favor specialized operations over sprawling industrial giants, allowing each new company to target specific global megatrends without competing for internal capital.
The New Brands: Technologies and Aerospace
Following the June 29 separation, the two resulting companies will operate with distinct strategic focuses and market identities. Industry research indicates that the automation business, now branded as Honeywell Technologies, will retain the legacy Nasdaq ticker “HON.” This entity is positioned to lead the industrial transition from automation to autonomy, focusing heavily on artificial intelligence-led industrial systems, building automation, and mission-critical software.
Conversely, the aviation business will launch as Honeywell Aerospace and trade on the Nasdaq under the new ticker “HONA.” Operating as one of the largest publicly traded, pure-play aerospace suppliers, Honeywell Aerospace will target the future of aviation. According to industry data, the division currently generates approximately $15 billion in annual sales and will focus its independent efforts on aircraft electrification, autonomous flight, and defense applications.
Leadership Perspective
Company leadership emphasized that the rebranding is designed to respect the conglomerate’s extensive history while pivoting toward modern technological demands. In the official press release, Honeywell Chairman and CEO Vimal Kapur highlighted the significance of the transition.
“Today marks another defining moment in our transformation into two independent, focused companies. Drawing on Honeywell’s century-long legacy, these new brand identities honor our history while reflecting the bold vision and strategic focus that will define Honeywell Technologies and Honeywell Aerospace as standalone companies.”
, Vimal Kapur, Chairman and CEO of Honeywell
The Road to the Spin-Off
The dissolution of the Honeywell conglomerate has been a multi-year process driven by internal strategic reviews and external market pressures. In November 2024, Elliott Investment Management acquired a $5 billion stake in the company, publishing a letter that urged the board to simplify its structure to unlock shareholder value. By February 2025, Honeywell’s Board of Directors formalized the plan to separate into three independent companies: Automation, Aerospace, and Advanced Materials.
The first phase of this massive restructuring was completed in October 2025, when Honeywell successfully spun off its Advanced Materials business. That entity now operates as a standalone public company named Solstice Advanced Materials, trading under the ticker “SOLS.”
Financial Implications
Prior to the upcoming aerospace spin-off, Honeywell’s total market value is estimated at approximately $150.72 billion, with an estimated brand value of $18 billion built over 140 years of operation. Financial analysts at Wolfe Research have previously projected that a “sum-of-the-parts” valuation for the post-split entities could reach a significant premium over Honeywell’s historical trading range, drawing comparisons to the highly lucrative 2024 spin-off of GE Vernova.
AirPro News analysis
We view Honeywell’s breakup as a definitive marker in the ongoing $1.2 trillion U.S. industrial divestiture trend. By following the blueprint laid out by General Electric and Johnson & Johnson, Honeywell is positioning its aerospace and automation divisions to be significantly more agile. As separate entities with distinct balance sheets, both Honeywell Technologies and Honeywell Aerospace can more easily pursue targeted mergers and acquisitions. Without the burden of competing for internal capital, Honeywell Aerospace is now uniquely positioned to aggressively fund the electrification of aircraft, while Honeywell Technologies can double down on artificial intelligence and industrial autonomy.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When does the Honeywell Aerospace spin-off take effect?
The aerospace division will officially spin off into an independent, publicly traded company on June 29, 2026.
What will the new stock tickers be?
Honeywell Technologies (the automation business) will retain the legacy ticker “HON,” while Honeywell Aerospace will trade under the new ticker “HONA.”
What happened to Honeywell’s Advanced Materials business?
The Advanced Materials division was successfully spun off in October 2025 as Solstice Advanced Materials, which currently trades under the ticker “SOLS.”
Sources
Photo Credit: Honeywell
MRO & Manufacturing
Sopra Steria to Acquire Daher’s Aerospace Manufacturing Unit in 2026
Sopra Steria plans to acquire Daher’s Manufacturing Engineering business to expand aerospace production capabilities and strengthen Airbus collaboration.
This article is based on an official press release from Sopra Steria.
On May 28, 2026, European technology and consulting major Sopra Steria announced it has entered into exclusive negotiations to acquire the Manufacturing Engineering business of Daher Industrial Services, a subsidiary of the French aerospace conglomerate Group Daher. According to the official press release, the proposed acquisition aligns with Sopra Steria’s broader strategy to build comprehensive technological and engineering capabilities across the European aerospace sector.
The targeted unit specializes in optimizing aerospace production processes and has served as a strategic partner to Airbus since 1995. Industry research reports indicate that the unit generated more than €42 million in revenue in 2025 and employs over 360 people, primarily based in France. The financial terms of the transaction have not been publicly disclosed.
Subject to customary regulatory approvals and consultations with employee representative bodies, the companies expect to finalize the transaction in the second half of 2026. We view this development as a significant indicator of ongoing consolidation within the aerospace digital engineering space.
Strategic Expansion in Aerospace Engineering
Sopra Steria, which reported a global revenue of €5.6 billion in 2025 and employs approximately 51,000 people across nearly 30 countries, has been actively expanding its footprint in the aerospace and defense sectors. The company previously acquired CS Group to bolster its secure infrastructure and engineering programs, and this latest move signals a continued focus on industrial optimization.
Deepening the Airbus Partnership
The acquisition is designed to elevate Sopra Steria’s aerospace business by expanding its capacity in critical Manufacturing engineering processes. According to industry research, the Daher unit focuses on two vital phases of aerospace manufacturing: the pre-production preparatory phase and production ramp-up efficiency. By integrating these capabilities, Sopra Steria aims to offer end-to-end skills to major European aerospace programs.
“The acquisition allows the company to offer comprehensive, end-to-end skills to major European aerospace programs,” notes recent industry research analyzing the deal.
The global aerospace industry is currently facing immense pressure to accelerate aircraft production to meet post-pandemic travel demand. Sopra Steria is positioning itself as a vital technological partner to help manufacturers, particularly Airbus, meet these accelerating production paces and exacting industrial standards.
Daher’s Strategic Realignment
For Group Daher, the divestment of its Manufacturing Engineering unit represents a strategic realignment toward its core competencies. While the company is stepping away from this specific engineering niche, it remains heavily invested in aerospace logistics and its own aircraft manufacturing operations, which include the TBM and Kodiak aircraft families.
Focus on Logistics and Aircraft Manufacturing
Divesting the engineering unit is expected to allow Daher to concentrate capital on massive logistics and manufacturing scale-ups. In early 2026, Daher renewed and expanded a significant logistics contract with Airbus Atlantic. According to industry data, this contract runs from 2026 to 2031 and involves managing the West Hub in Montoir-de-Bretagne. Daher aims to triple logistics volumes at this site to support the production ramp-up of the Airbus A320, A330, and A350 programs.
Aggressive M&A and Financial Health
The proposed acquisition of Daher’s engineering unit is not an isolated event for Sopra Steria. The announcement follows closely on the heels of another strategic move. Industry research highlights that Sopra Steria recently entered exclusive negotiations to acquire Digital Product Simulation (DPS), a Paris-based digital engineering consulting firm.
DPS, which generated approximately €12 million in revenue in 2025, is being acquired through Sopra Steria’s subsidiary, CIMPA. Alongside these aggressive Mergers and Acquisitions activities, Sopra Steria recently announced a €40 million share buyback program. This follows a previous €150 million buyback concluded in January 2025, signaling strong financial health and a commitment to shareholder returns.
AirPro News analysis
We observe that IT and digital consulting firms like Sopra Steria are increasingly encroaching on traditional industrial engineering spaces. As the aerospace industry grapples with supply chain bottlenecks and ambitious production targets, digitizing and optimizing the factory floor has become a critical prerequisite for success. By acquiring established engineering units with deep-rooted OEM relationships, such as the 30-year partnership between Daher’s unit and Airbus, tech firms are effectively buying their way into the heart of the aerospace supply chain. This multi-pronged consolidation strategy, evidenced by the concurrent moves for Daher’s unit and DPS, suggests that the lines between digital IT consulting and physical manufacturing engineering will continue to blur.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is the acquisition expected to close?
According to the press release, the transaction is expected to be finalized in the second half of 2026, pending Regulations and employee consultations.
How large is the business being acquired?
Industry research indicates the Manufacturing Engineering business of Daher Industrial Services employs over 360 people and generated more than €42 million in revenue in 2025.
Why is Daher selling this unit?
Daher is divesting this unit to focus on its core competencies, specifically its massive aerospace logistics contracts and its own aircraft manufacturing operations (TBM and Kodiak).
Sources
Photo Credit: Sopra Steria
MRO & Manufacturing
Stratasys to Acquire Markforged for $42.5 Million Expanding 3D Printing Tech
Stratasys announces acquisition of Markforged for $42.5M to enhance aerospace and defense 3D printing capabilities, closing in late 2026.
This article is based on an official press release from Stratasys.
On May 27, 2026, Stratasys Ltd. announced a definitive agreement to acquire Markforged, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nano Dimension, in an all-cash transaction valued at $42.5 million. According to the company’s press release, the acquisitions is strategically designed to bolster Stratasys’s capabilities within the aerospace, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors.
The deal will see Stratasys integrate Markforged’s advanced composite 3D printing technologies and its comprehensive software ecosystems. Included in the acquisition are Markforged’s polymer, composite, and metal extrusion portfolios, its proprietary Continuous Carbon Fiber (CCF) technology, and “The Digital Forge” software platform. Notably, Nano Dimension will retain Markforged’s Metal Binder Jetting product line.
Subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, the transaction is projected to close in the second half of 2026. This move marks a significant step in the ongoing consolidation of the additive manufacturing industry, leveraging Stratasys’s strong balance sheet to expand its technological footprint.
Strategic Expansion in Aerospace and Defense
According to the official announcement, Stratasys expects the integration of Markforged’s Continuous Carbon Fiber (CCF) technology to directly support high-requirement use cases in aerospace and defense. CCF technology enables manufacturers to produce parts that are significantly lighter and stronger than traditional Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) alternatives. Stratasys highlighted that these capabilities are particularly suited for tooling, fixtures, ground support equipment, and select production parts.
Beyond hardware, the acquisition brings “The Digital Forge” into the Stratasys portfolio. This integrated software platform offers complementary capabilities, including advanced simulation, part management, and automated print optimization, which are critical for secure remote printing and rigorous part inspection in highly regulated industries.
Financial Synergies and Market Reach
Industry data indicates that Markforged generated approximately $70 million in revenue in 2025, a figure that includes the Metal Binder Jetting line being retained by Nano Dimension. Stratasys stated in its release that it expects the acquisition to be accretive to gross margins and to deliver meaningful cost synergies. The company projects a positive adjusted EBITDA contribution from the acquisition within the first year following the close of the transaction.
“This acquisition further advances our capabilities to meet customers’ growing needs in critical areas such as defense and aerospace at a time when additive manufacturing continues to displace traditional manufacturing for high requirement applications in production,” said Dr. Yoav Zeif, CEO of Stratasys, in the press release. “We believe that our teams can immediately reinvigorate revenue growth by adding Markforged, Inc.’s products and software systems as we leverage our leading partner networks.”
Industry Consolidation and Restructuring
For Nano Dimension, the divestiture serves primarily as a strategic cost-reduction measure. The company expects the sale to reduce its annualized cash burn by approximately $15 million through direct operating savings and indirect cost reductions. The transaction also highlights the steep valuation adjustments occurring within the 3D printing sector; Nano Dimension originally acquired Markforged in April 2025 for $116 million.
In a statement regarding the sale, Nano Dimension leadership emphasized that the move aligns with their broader corporate restructuring efforts.
“We are pleased to have reached an agreement with Stratasys that we believe positions MarkForged for continued growth and success under its ownership,” stated David Stehlin, CEO of Nano Dimension. “This transaction represents a deliberate step in advancing Nano Dimension’s three phase strategic plan and accelerating Phase 3 execution.”
AirPro News analysis
We observe a profound historic role reversal in this transaction. In 2023, Nano Dimension launched multiple unsolicited, hostile takeover bids to acquire Stratasys, all of which ultimately failed. Today, the negotiating power has entirely shifted. Stratasys recently reported holding $270 million in cash with zero outstanding debt, positioning it as a primary consolidator in the market. By contrast, Nano Dimension has been forced to aggressively divest and restructure, particularly following the July 2025 bankruptcy of Desktop Metal, another major acquisition it had made for $179.3 million.
Stratasys is clearly utilizing its robust balance sheet to capitalize on distressed valuations across the sector. Having recently acquired Nexa3D’s IP portfolio and remaining hardware assets, Stratasys is systematically absorbing complementary technologies at a fraction of their historical market premiums. We anticipate this trend of well-capitalized legacy players absorbing the assets of over-extended newer entrants will continue to define the additive manufacturing landscape through the end of the decade.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much is Stratasys paying for Markforged?
Stratasys is acquiring Markforged in an all-cash transaction valued at $42.5 million, subject to customary adjustments.
Are all Markforged assets included in the sale?
No. While Stratasys is acquiring the polymer, composite, and metal extrusion portfolios, as well as “The Digital Forge” software, Nano Dimension will retain Markforged’s Metal Binder Jetting product line.
When is the acquisition expected to close?
The deal is projected to close in the second half of 2026, pending regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
Why is Nano Dimension selling Markforged?
The sale is part of Nano Dimension’s strategic restructuring to reduce costs. The company expects the divestiture to reduce its annualized cash burn by approximately $15 million.
Sources
Photo Credit: Markforged
-
Regulations & Safety6 days agoNTSB Urges FAA to Update Runway Condition Assessment Matrix for Heavy Rain
-
Space & Satellites5 days agoFAA Orders SpaceX Investigation After Starship Flight 12 Booster Mishap
-
Space & Satellites5 days agoUS Space Force Awards SpaceX $2.29B Contract for Military Satellite Network
-
Space & Satellites3 days agoBlue Origin’s New Glenn Rocket Explodes During Test at Cape Canaveral
-
Route Development5 days agoHong Kong International Airport Opens Expanded Terminal 2 for Departures