This article summarizes reporting by The Mirror.

Ryanair 737 MAX Involved in Ground Collision at Edinburgh Airport

A Ryanair flight preparing for departure at Edinburgh Airport (EDI) was forced to abort its journey on Monday morning, December 22, 2025, following a collision with a ground vehicle. According to reporting by The Mirror, the aircraft’s wingtip struck a fuel tanker while taxiing, leading to a significant emergency response but no reported injuries.

The incident involved flight FR5667, a Boeing 737 MAX scheduled to fly to Faro, Portugal. As detailed in incident reports, the collision occurred at approximately 10:00 AM GMT as the aircraft maneuvered toward the runway. While the collision caused visible damage to both the aircraft wing and the fuel truck’s cab, airport operations largely continued without widespread disruption.

Incident Details and Emergency Response

The Collision

Witnesses and verified reports indicate that the aircraft was moving at low speed on the taxiway when the impact occurred. Images circulating in the aftermath showed the wingtip of the Boeing 737 MAX wedged against the top of the fuel tanker’s cab.

According to The Mirror, emergency services, including the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, were immediately deployed to the scene. Fire crews remained on standby as a precaution due to the involvement of a fuel vehicle, though officials later confirmed there was no fire or fuel leak.

Official Statements

Ryanair confirmed the incident in a statement released shortly after the event. The airline emphasized that the safety of passengers was maintained throughout the ordeal.

“This flight from Edinburgh to Faro (22 Dec) was preparing for departure when the wing tip came in contact with the cab of a fuel truck.”

, Ryanair Official Statement

Edinburgh Airport also addressed the situation, confirming that while an “incident” had taken place, rumors of a fire were incorrect and there was “no impact” on wider airport operations.

Passenger Experience and Disruption

Evacuation and Delays

Following the collision, the aircraft was brought to a halt and passengers were disembarked. Reports from The Mirror and other local outlets describe the atmosphere onboard as “scary” for some holidaymakers. One passenger account noted that the pilot communicated the situation over the intercom to maintain calm.

Travelers were returned to the terminal to await a replacement aircraft. According to reports regarding the delay, passengers were provided with £3 vouchers for refreshments. The replacement flight eventually departed for Faro at approximately 12:40 PM, resulting in a delay of roughly 2.5 hours.

AirPro News analysis

Ground Handling Risks
While the headline “crashes” often evokes images of high-speed catastrophes, incidents like this are classified as “ramp accidents.” These events usually involve collisions between aircraft and Ground Support Equipment (GSE) such as fuel trucks, catering vehicles, or tugs. While they rarely pose a threat to life when they occur at taxi speeds, they are operationally expensive and require mandatory safety inspections, often grounding the airframe for days to check for structural stress on the wing spar.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was anyone injured in the Ryanair collision?
No. Official reports confirm there were no injuries to passengers, crew, or ground staff.

What caused the delay?
The aircraft had to be taken out of service for inspection after its wingtip struck a fuel truck. A replacement aircraft was arranged to transport passengers to Faro.

Did the collision cause a fire?
No. Despite early rumors, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service and airport officials confirmed there was no fire or fuel leak.

Sources:

• The Mirror
• Edinburgh Airport (via Incident Report)

This article summarizes reporting by KDVR and data from industry tracking services.

Historic First: Garmin Autoland Saves Lives in Colorado Emergency

In a landmark event for aviation Safety, a Beechcraft King Air B200 turboprop successfully executed an autonomous emergency landing at Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (RMMA) in Broomfield, Colorado, on Saturday, December 20, 2025. The incident occurred after the pilot suffered a medical emergency and became incapacitated mid-flight.

According to reporting by KDVR and flight tracking data, the aircraft, tail number N479BR, was brought safely to the ground by the Garmin Autoland system. This event marks the first confirmed real-world instance where the Autoland system has been used to save lives in a non-test emergency scenario since its certification.

Timeline of the Emergency

The flight, operated by Arkansas-based Buffalo River Aviation, departed Aspen-Pitkin County Airport (ASE) at 1:43 PM MST. Approximately 20 minutes into the flight, the pilot became unresponsive due to a medical issue. With the pilot unable to control the aircraft, the Garmin Autoland system was activated to manage the emergency.

Flight data indicates that the system immediately stabilized the aircraft and calculated a route to the nearest suitable airport, which it determined to be RMMA. The system communicated with Air Traffic Control (ATC), broadcasting a “Mayday” distress call and squawking the emergency transponder code 7700.

Witnesses and local reports confirm that the aircraft flew a precision approach to Runway 30 at RMMA. It landed, applied brakes, and came to a complete stop on the runway centerline at 2:19 PM MST without any human input. The engines were automatically shut down, allowing emergency responders to safely approach the vessel. No injuries were reported among the passengers.

Understanding Garmin Autoland

The technology responsible for this safe outcome is designed specifically as a “safety of last resort” for general aviation aircraft, particularly those flown by a single pilot. Unlike standard autopilots found in commercial airliners, which require human monitoring, Garmin Autoland is capable of complete flight management from activation to engine shutdown.

System Activation and Sequence

The system can be triggered manually by a passenger via a guarded red button or automatically if the software detects a lack of pilot interaction or uncorrected emergency descent parameters. Once active, the system performs the following actions:

• Stabilization: Levels the wings and maintains a safe airspeed.
• Navigation: Analyzes terrain, weather, fuel range, and runway length to select the optimal airport.
• Passenger Interface: Flight displays switch to a simplified interface, providing passengers with arrival times and instructions on how to speak with ATC.
• Landing: The system configures flaps and landing gear, executes the descent, and brakes upon touchdown.

“Garmin Autoland… is designed specifically for general aviation aircraft flown by a single pilot.”

, Industry Report Summary

Regulatory Context and Significance

While Garmin Autoland has been certified on airframes such as the Piper M600 and Cirrus Vision Jet since approximately 2020, its availability for the King Air 200 series is a more recent development. Garmin announced the Certification for the King Air retrofit in July 2023, making the technology available for older airframes like N479BR.

AirPro News Analysis

The Validation of Autonomous Safety Nets

This incident serves as a critical proof-of-concept for autonomous safety systems in general aviation. While the industry often discusses autonomy in the context of pilotless cargo or air taxis, the N479BR event demonstrates the immediate value of “human-centric autonomy,” systems designed to back up, rather than replace, human pilots.

We anticipate that this successful save will accelerate the adoption of similar retrofit solutions for legacy aircraft. Furthermore, insurance underwriters may begin to view such systems not just as luxury add-ons, but as essential risk-mitigation tools, potentially influencing premiums for high-performance single-pilot turboprops.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the passengers have to fly the plane?
No. Once the system was activated, it handled all flying, navigation, and communications. The passengers only needed to remain calm and follow the instructions on the display.

Can this system take off autonomously?
No. Garmin Autoland is strictly an emergency landing system. It does not taxi, take off, or fly routine missions without a pilot.

Is this the same as the autonomous cargo planes being tested?
No. Companies like Reliable Robotics are testing fully autonomous gate-to-gate cargo flights. The Garmin system used in this incident is a backup safety feature for human-piloted flights.

Sources

• KDVR
• Garmin Press Room
• FlightAware

Boeing Seeks FAA Waiver to Sell 35 Additional 777 Freighters Amid Certification Delays

Boeing has formally petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from upcoming emissions regulations, seeking permission to sell 35 additional 777 Freighters (777F) beyond the regulatory deadline of January 1, 2028. As reported by Reuters, the aerospace giant filed the request in December 2025, citing significant delays in the certification of its next-generation replacement aircraft.

The request highlights a critical “freighter gap” facing the U.S. manufacturer. With the successor 777-8F now delayed until at least 2029, Boeing argues that failing to grant this waiver would sever a vital supply line for global logistics and inflict billions of dollars in damage to the U.S. export economy.

The Regulatory Hurdle: The 2028 Emissions Deadline

At the center of Boeing’s petition is a carbon emissions standard adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in 2017 and subsequently enforced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the FAA. These regulations prohibit the production of aircraft that do not meet specific fuel-efficiency benchmarks after January 1, 2028.

According to the filing details summarized by Reuters, the current 777F, powered by older GE90 engine technology, does not meet these stricter 2028 limits. Without a waiver, Boeing would be legally barred from selling these widebody freighters to U.S. carriers or international operators adhering to FAA standards.

Boeing’s proposed solution is a capped exemption. Rather than an open-ended rollback of the rules, the company is asking for authorization to produce exactly 35 additional units of the legacy freighter to bridge the gap until the new technology is ready.

Delays and Economic Consequences

The primary driver for this request is the slippage in the timeline for the 777-8F, the modern freighter based on the 777X airframe. Originally intended to enter service before the 2028 deadline, the 777-8F has faced certification hurdles similar to the passenger variant.

According to Reuters, Boeing confirmed in October 2025 that the 777-8F entry into service (EIS) had slipped to 2029 or potentially 2030. This creates a multi-year period where Boeing would have no large freighter product to offer customers if the legacy 777F line is forced to close.

The $15 Billion Risk

Boeing’s petition leans heavily on the economic implications of a denial. The manufacturer asserts that widebody freighters are a cornerstone of U.S. trade infrastructure. Data cited in the report indicates that each 777F carries an export value of approximately $440 million.

If the FAA blocks the sale of these 35 aircraft, Boeing estimates the total economic fallout could be substantial.

“Blocking these 35 sales could cost the U.S. economy roughly $15 billion,” the report notes, citing Boeing’s projections.

Furthermore, the company argues that the global air cargo market is already facing a capacity shortage. With major carriers like FedEx and UPS retiring aging MD-11 fleets, the demand for reliable widebody lift is acute. Boeing contends that the 777F remains the most fuel-efficient option currently available until the next generation of aircraft can be delivered.

Competitive Landscape and Precedents

The request does not occur in a vacuum. In 2024, Congress granted a statutory exemption for the Boeing 767 Freighter, allowing that aircraft, which also fails the 2028 emissions standards, to remain in production through 2033. This legislative move set a significant precedent for prioritizing economic stability and logistics continuity over immediate adherence to the 2028 timeline.

However, the competitive pressure is mounting. Airbus is developing the A350F, a direct competitor that complies with the new emissions standards. While the A350F has also experienced delays, pushing its entry to the 2026/2027 timeframe, a denial of Boeing’s waiver could theoretically hand Airbus a monopoly in the large freighter segment for several years.

AirPro News Analysis

The Tension Between Climate Policy and Industrial Strategy

Boeing’s request places the FAA and the current administration in a difficult bind. On one hand, the 2028 deadline was established nearly a decade ago to force the aviation industry toward greener technology. Granting another waiver, following the 767 exemption, could be viewed by environmental groups as “backsliding” on climate commitments. Organizations like the Sierra Club have historically opposed such exemptions, arguing they undermine the efficacy of international agreements.

On the other hand, the “35 aircraft” cap is a strategic calculation by Boeing. By framing the request as a limited, temporary bridge rather than an indefinite extension, they are attempting to minimize political blowback while protecting a massive revenue stream. We believe the FAA’s decision will likely hinge on whether the administration views the risk of ceding market share to European competitors as a greater threat than the incremental emissions of 35 legacy aircraft.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Boeing need a waiver for the 777F?

The current 777 Freighter engines do not meet international carbon emissions standards that take effect on January 1, 2028. Boeing needs a waiver to continue selling the jet until its replacement, the 777-8F, is certified.

When will the FAA make a decision?

Boeing has requested a decision by May 1, 2026, to maintain its production schedule and secure supply chain commitments.

What is the alternative to the 777F?

The direct successor is the Boeing 777-8F, but it is delayed until at least 2029. The primary competitor is the Airbus A350F, which meets emissions standards but is also not yet in service.

Has this happened before?

Yes. In 2024, the U.S. Congress granted a similar waiver for the Boeing 767 Freighter, allowing it to be produced until 2033 despite not meeting the new emissions rules.

Sources

• Reuters