Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

Ground Collision at Delhi Airport Involving SpiceJet and Akasa Air Boeing 737s

Two Boeing 737s from SpiceJet and Akasa Air collided on the ground at Delhi Airport on April 16, 2026, with no injuries reported.

Published

on

This article is based on official press releases and statements from SpiceJet, Akasa Air, and the DGCA.

On Thursday, April 16, 2026, a ground collision occurred at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI) involving two commercial Boeing narrowbody aircraft. According to official statements from the involved airlines and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), a taxiing SpiceJet aircraft made contact with a stationary Akasa Air plane at approximately 2:15 PM IST.

We can confirm that no passengers or crew members were injured during the event. Both aircraft sustained visible damage and were immediately removed from service pending thorough technical inspections and a formal regulatory probe.

Incident Details and Aircraft Damage

Sequence of Events

Based on preliminary reports and statements from the DGCA, the incident unfolded in the Terminal 1 apron area. SpiceJet Flight SG-124, operated by a Boeing 737-700 (registration VT-SLB), had recently arrived from Leh and was taxiing toward its assigned parking location, Bay No. 106. Concurrently, Akasa Air Flight QP-1406, a Boeing 737 MAX 8 bound for Hyderabad, had completed its pushback sequence and was holding stationary on the apron.

During the taxi maneuver, the SpiceJet aircraft’s right winglet struck the left horizontal stabilizer of the Akasa Air jet. Akasa Air representatives confirmed the sequence, noting that their aircraft was stationary when the contact occurred.

Immediate Aftermath and Passenger Safety

Following the collision, standard safety protocols were initiated. All passengers and crew on both flights were safely disembarked without reported injuries.

“Preliminary information indicated their aircraft was stationary when another airline’s aircraft made contact with it,” stated Akasa Air, emphasizing that passenger and crew safety remains their highest priority.

Akasa Air’s ground teams subsequently arranged alternative travel accommodations to ensure their passengers could continue their journey to Hyderabad. Both the SpiceJet Boeing 737-700 and the Akasa Air Boeing 737 MAX 8 remain grounded at Delhi Airport for comprehensive damage assessment and repairs.

Regulatory Response and Investigations

Personnel Off-Rostered

The DGCA has launched a formal investigation to determine the root cause of the ground collision. The regulatory body is expected to review standard operating procedures, airside safety compliance, and ground movement coordination at IGI Airport.

Pending the outcome of this probe, the Ministry of Civil Aviation and the DGCA have taken immediate administrative action. The SpiceJet pilots operating Flight SG-124 and the Air Traffic Control (ATC) officer responsible for the apron area have been off-rostered. This standard procedure ensures that the involved personnel are removed from active duty while investigators assess potential human error, spatial judgment, and the accuracy of ATC taxi instructions.

AirPro News analysis

This latest occurrence at Delhi Airport highlights an ongoing challenge regarding ground movement coordination in increasingly congested aviation hubs. We note that this incident follows a pattern of recent ground-related accidents at major Indian airports.

For instance, earlier this month, a catering vehicle collided with a parked IndiGo aircraft at Kolkata airport. Furthermore, on February 3, 2026, an IndiGo aircraft and an Air India plane made wingtip contact at Mumbai airport while both were carrying passengers. These repeated events underscore the critical need for stringent ground safety protocols, enhanced situational awareness, and potentially upgraded technological aids for pilots and ATC personnel navigating crowded apron environments.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

When and where did the collision occur?
The incident took place on April 16, 2026, at approximately 2:15 PM IST at Terminal 1 of Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport.

Which aircraft were involved?
A SpiceJet Boeing 737-700 (Flight SG-124) and an Akasa Air Boeing 737 MAX 8 (Flight QP-1406).

Were there any injuries?
No injuries were reported among passengers or crew on either aircraft.

What actions have been taken?
Both aircraft are grounded, the DGCA is investigating, and the involved SpiceJet pilots and ATC officer have been off-rostered pending the probe.

Sources: SpiceJet, Akasa Air, and DGCA Official Statements

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

Brazil ANAC Suspends Aircraft Certifications After Budget Freeze

Brazil’s ANAC halted all aircraft certifications and aviation exams after a federal budget freeze cut its funding by R$ 24 million.

Published

on

This article summarizes reporting by Bloomberg by Rachel Gamarski.

Brazil’s National Civil Aviation Agency (ANAC) has suspended all aircraft certification processes and aviation professional exams following a federal budget freeze, threatening to delay airline fleet expansions and exacerbate labor shortages.

The operational cuts, announced by the regulator on June 1, 2026, include an immediate 40 percent reduction in oversight and inspection activities. The reductions stem from Decree 12.990, published by the Brazilian Federal Government on May 29, 2026, which mandates an 18 percent linear reduction in the execution limits for federal agencies. Bloomberg reported on June 7, 2026, that the halt in approvals arrives just as carriers are attempting to meet high travel demand and resolve existing fleet constraints.

Impact on fleet expansion and airline operations

The suspension of aircraft certifications effectively blocks new airframes from entering the Brazilian civil aviation market. According to Bloomberg, the regulatory freeze threatens to delay the arrival of new aircraft and planned capacity expansions. Airlines operating in Brazil are currently working to address fleet shortages while managing robust passenger demand.

In an official statement, ANAC emphasized the severity of the situation.

“Without certification, there is no operation of new aircraft in the Brazilian civil aviation market.”

The budget freeze also halts exams for pilots and flight attendants. This suspension is expected to restrict the pipeline of new aviation professionals, compounding existing labor pressures within the sector. Flying clubs, maintenance workshops, and parts manufacturers are broadly affected by the reduction in regulatory services.

Broader regulatory and economic consequences

The ANAC budget reduction totals R$ 24 million and is part of a larger fiscal austerity initiative by the Brazilian government. The broader measure freezes approximately R$ 24 billion across various public administration sectors to meet 2026 fiscal targets. This includes a R$ 300 million cut distributed across Brazil’s 11 regulatory agencies.

Beyond the suspension of certifications, ANAC has been forced to dismiss outsourced workers, halt information technology investments, and cancel its participation in international forums and institutional safety events.

The Committee of Federal Regulatory Agencies (COARF) issued a statement on June 2, 2026, expressing deep concern over the budget cuts. The committee warned that the reductions threaten the legal security of investments and the regulatory stability required for economic growth, particularly as the government pursues an infrastructure concession agenda.

ANAC noted that budget freezes impacting core regulatory activities cause direct harm to society and lead to a drop in revenue, specifically citing the suspension of certification actions as a primary driver of these financial losses.

AirPro News analysis

The suspension of ANAC certification activities creates an immediate bottleneck for Brazilian operators relying on new aircraft deliveries to modernize fleets and expand route networks. Carriers such as Azul, Gol, and LATAM Airlines Brasil depend on a steady flow of regulatory approvals to induct new Airbus, Boeing, and Embraer aircraft into commercial service.

A prolonged freeze on certifications and professional exams will likely force airlines to extend the leases of older, less efficient aircraft to maintain capacity. This dynamic could increase operating costs and place upward pressure on ticket prices in a market already sensitive to fuel and currency fluctuations. The disruption to pilot and flight attendant credentialing also risks creating a medium-term staffing deficit, limiting the ability of airlines to scale operations once the budget impasse is resolved.

Sources: Bloomberg, Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (ANAC)

Photo Credit: Elza Fiúza – ABr

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

Iberia A350 Winglet Damaged in Guayaquil Water Salute Incident

An Iberia A350-941 struck a fire vehicle during a water cannon salute at Guayaquil Airport, grounding the aircraft and cancelling Flight IB132.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This article summarizes reporting by Agencia EFE, Primicias, and Ecuavisa.

An Iberia Airbus A350-941 sustained damage to its left winglet on June 4, 2026, after striking a fire department vehicle during a ceremonial water cannon salute at José Joaquín de Olmedo International Airport (GYE) in Guayaquil, Ecuador, forcing the cancellation of its scheduled transatlantic flight.

The incident occurred at 16:56 UTC (11:56 local time) as the widebody aircraft was preparing to operate Flight IB132 to Madrid. According to reporting by Agencia EFE and local Ecuadorian outlets, the water salute was arranged to mark a temporary equipment upgrade on the route, with the Airbus A350-900 replacing the Airbus A330-200 typically used by the Spanish flag carrier.

Ground collision during ceremonial salute

Terminal Aeroportuaria de Guayaquil S.A. (TAGSA), the airport operator, confirmed the sequence of events in an official statement. According to Primicias, TAGSA reported that during taxi, the tip of the aircraft’s wing made contact with the extension arm and turret of a fire engine belonging to the airport’s Fire Extinguishing Service (SEI).

Following the collision, the flight crew interrupted the departure sequence and returned the aircraft to the apron for a technical inspection. Agencia EFE reported that no injuries occurred among the passengers or crew. The aircraft, registered as EC-NXD, was grounded pending a full damage assessment, and passengers were subsequently rebooked on alternative flights.

Regulatory oversight and fleet implications

The Dirección General de Aviación Civil (DGAC) of Ecuador has initiated an investigation into the ground collision. The regulatory authority will examine the coordination between the flight crew, air traffic control, and the SEI personnel conducting the water arch maneuver. No official cause has been determined.

The grounding of the Airbus A350-941 disrupts Iberia’s planned capacity increase for the Guayaquil market. The aircraft swap from the Airbus A330-200 was intended to provide additional seats and cargo volume on the direct route to Spain. The airline has not yet specified how long the damaged airframe will remain out of service while repairs are evaluated and executed.

AirPro News analysis

Water cannon salutes are a long-standing aviation tradition used to celebrate inaugural flights, retiring captains, and new aircraft types. However, we note that these ceremonial events carry inherent operational risks. Positioning heavy fire apparatus near active taxiways and maneuvering large aircraft through restricted clearances requires precise coordination. While relatively rare, ground collisions during these salutes highlight the tension between marketing traditions and the strict safety margins required in commercial aviation operations. The resulting damage to a high-value asset like an Airbus A350 underscores the financial and operational exposure operators face during non-standard ground maneuvers.

Sources: @AviacionGYE (X)

Photo Credit: AviacionGYE – X

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

NTSB Reports United Airlines Flight 169 Newark Approach Incident

NTSB preliminary report details United Airlines Flight 169 striking a light pole at Newark due to low airspeed and gusty winds during approach.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

On June 4, 2026, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released its preliminary report detailing the May 3 accident involving United Airlines Flight 169 at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR). The incident highlights the operational challenges of landing heavy widebody aircraft during gusty conditions on constrained runways.

The Boeing 767-400ER, arriving from Venice, Italy, struck a light pole on the New Jersey Turnpike while on short final approach. According to the NTSB’s factual findings, the aircraft crossed the busy highway at an altitude of just 19 feet above the ground after its airspeed decayed during the descent.

The collision caused substantial damage to the aircraft and resulted in minor injuries to a commercial truck driver on the ground. The NTSB has officially classified the event as an accident, prompting immediate safety reviews and procedural updates from the airline.

Flight Details and the Approach

According to the NTSB preliminary report (DCA26FA194), United Airlines Flight 169 was operating from Venice Marco Polo Airport to Newark on May 3, 2026. The 23-year-old Boeing 767-424ER (registration N77066) was carrying 231 individuals, comprising 220 passengers, three flight crew members, and eight cabin crew members.

The flight proceeded normally until the descent phase. The NTSB notes that the flight crew initially planned to land on Runway 4R. However, air traffic control changed the runway assignment twice due to challenging weather conditions. Winds were reported at 19 knots and gusting up to 30 knots, leading controllers to ultimately clear the aircraft for Runway 29.

Cockpit Dynamics and Warnings

The NTSB report provides critical insight into the cockpit environment during the final moments of the flight. The captain was the pilot flying, while the first officer monitored the flight instruments.

As the aircraft descended toward the runway, its airspeed began to decay. The first officer issued verbal warnings to the captain regarding the aircraft’s energy state.

“hey you are slow… you are still slow and a little low”

According to the NTSB, the captain acknowledged hearing the “airspeed slow” callout but stated he felt the airplane remained in a safe position to continue the landing.

The Collision and Aftermath

The decaying airspeed and low glide path culminated in the aircraft crossing the New Jersey Turnpike at an altitude of just 19 feet above the ground. During this low pass, the aircraft’s landing gear and underside struck a light pole located on the highway.

The NTSB report states that the captain recalled hearing a “thump” just before touchdown, while the first officer felt a “mild jolt” as they neared the runway threshold. Despite the impact, the Boeing 767 landed safely and taxied to the gate under its own power.

Ground Impact and Injuries

Debris from the severed light pole fell onto the southbound lanes of the turnpike, striking a commercial tractor-trailer operated by Baltimore-based H&S Bakery, as well as a Jeep traveling on the highway.

While no passengers or crew members on the aircraft were harmed, the NTSB confirmed that the truck driver, Warren Boardley, sustained minor injuries from shattered glass. He was treated at a local hospital and subsequently released. The truck sustained damage to its windshield and aluminum siding.

Post-flight inspections of the Boeing 767 revealed substantial damage, including three punctures on the fuselage and slash marks on one of the landing gear tires. This damage led the NTSB to officially classify the event as an accident.

Industry Response and Safety Measures

Following the accident, United Airlines took immediate administrative and procedural actions. The airline removed the involved flight crew from service pending an internal safety review.

Furthermore, United Flight Operations issued an Operations Alert to its pilots regarding arrivals at EWR’s Runway 29. The alert emphasized the importance of relying on visual glideslope indicators (VGSI/PAPI) to ensure safe obstruction clearance. A subsequent Pilot Bulletin was also issued regarding short runway landing guidance.

AirPro News analysis

We note that Runway 29 is the shortest runway at Newark Liberty International Airport, measuring 6,725 feet. It features a displaced threshold designed specifically to provide a safety buffer from the adjacent, highly congested Interstate 95. Aircraft landing on this runway routinely pass at low altitudes over the highway.

Aviation analysts frequently point out that the Boeing 767-400ER’s extended fuselage can create visual illusions for pilots during the landing flare. Because the pilot’s eye level sits high in the cockpit while the main landing gear hangs significantly lower, precise glide path management is absolutely critical to ensure obstacle clearance. The combination of gusty winds, a late runway change, and the specific ergonomics of the 767 likely compounded the difficulty of this approach.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Was anyone injured in the United Airlines Flight 169 accident?
No passengers or crew members on the aircraft were injured. However, a truck driver on the New Jersey Turnpike sustained minor injuries from shattered glass when debris from a struck light pole hit his vehicle.

What caused the aircraft to fly so low?
The NTSB’s preliminary report indicates that the aircraft’s airspeed decayed during a gusty approach, leading to a low glide path. The first officer warned the captain that they were “slow and a little low.” The investigation is still ongoing to determine the official probable cause.

What is the current status of the investigation?
The NTSB has released its preliminary report (DCA26FA194) and officially classified the event as an accident due to substantial aircraft damage. A final report detailing the probable cause will be released at a later date.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)

Photo Credit: NTSB

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News