Connect with us

MRO & Manufacturing

AAR Corp to Close Indianapolis Maintenance Facility Impacting 329 Jobs

AAR Corp. will close its Indianapolis maintenance hub by 2027, laying off 329 employees following its HAECO Americas acquisition.

Published

on

This article summarizes reporting by IndyStar and official filings. The original report is paywalled; this article summarizes publicly available elements and public remarks.

AAR Corp. to Close Indianapolis Maintenance Hub, Impacting 329 Workers

AAR Corp. (NYSE: AIR) has confirmed plans to permanently shutter its airframe maintenance facility at the Indianapolis International Airport (IND), a move that will result in the layoff of approximately 329 employees. According to a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice filed with the Indiana Department of Workforce Development on December 22, 2025, the closure is scheduled to take place in phases over the next year.

The decision marks the end of a two-decade era for the facility under AAR’s management. Reporting by IndyStar indicates that the closure aligns with the expiration of the company’s lease and follows a significant strategic shift in AAR’s North American operations. The shutdown process is set to begin on February 15, 2026, and is expected to conclude by February 28, 2027.

Strategic Consolidation Following HAECO Acquisition

The closure of the Indianapolis site appears to be a direct consequence of AAR’s recent expansion efforts elsewhere. In November 2025, AAR finalized the acquisition of HAECO Americas for a reported $78 million. This transaction provided the aviation services company with two modern heavy maintenance facilities located in Greensboro, North Carolina, and Lake City, Florida.

According to industry analysis and financial reports, the HAECO acquisition included approximately $850 million in long-term contracts, effectively securing capacity at the newly acquired sites. Consequently, the Indianapolis facility, a legacy asset requiring a lease renewal, was deemed redundant within the optimized network.

Facility Condition and Lease Timing

The Indianapolis Maintenance Center, located at 2825 W. Perimeter Road, is a massive 1.6 million-square-foot complex originally constructed in the early 1990s. AAR leased approximately 367,000 square feet of this space. Reports suggest that the aging infrastructure of the facility, often described in local aviation circles as “legacy” compared to modern standards, played a role in the decision.

AAR’s lease with the Indianapolis Airport Authority (IAA) was approaching expiration. Rather than committing to a long-term renewal, the company signed a short-term extension through February 2027. This timeline mirrors the final closure date outlined in the WARN notice, signaling a deliberate exit Strategy rather than a sudden financial collapse.

Impact on Workforce and Local Economy

The primary impact of this consolidation will be felt by the local workforce. The WARN notice specifies that 329 employees will be separated from the company starting in mid-February 2026. AAR has stated that all affected employees are receiving at least 60 days’ notice, complying with federal requirements.

Advertisement

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development is expected to activate its “Rapid Response” team to assist displaced workers. This state-led initiative typically provides job placement assistance, resume workshops, and Training opportunities to help workers transition to new employment.

Historical Context of the Site

The Indianapolis Maintenance Center has a complex history tied to public investment. Originally built for United Airlines in 1994, the facility was supported by over $300 million in taxpayer incentives with the promise of thousands of jobs. However, United Airlines vacated the site in 2003 following bankruptcy proceedings.

AAR took over the facility in 2004, stabilizing the site and employing hundreds of mechanics for over 20 years. The upcoming departure leaves the Indianapolis Airport Authority with a significant vacancy, specifically 10 hangar bays, that has historically been difficult to fill.

Financial Health and Market Trends

Despite the closure, AAR Corp. remains in a strong financial position. Fiscal Year 2025 reports indicate a 20% revenue growth, reaching $2.8 billion. This growth has been driven largely by acquisitions and robust demand for aftermarket parts. The company’s stock performance has trended upward, with analysts interpreting the consolidation of operations into the HAECO facilities as a margin-positive move.

AirPro News Analysis

The closure of the Indianapolis facility underscores a broader trend in the MRO sector: the prioritization of owned, modern assets over leased legacy infrastructure. By acquiring HAECO, AAR not only gained capacity but also secured a workforce and facility footprint that likely offers better long-term economics than the aging Indianapolis site.

For the Indianapolis Airport Authority, this presents a familiar challenge. The facility was designed for a different era of aviation, where massive, single-tenant hubs were the norm. In today’s market, finding a single tenant to occupy such a vast space is increasingly difficult. We anticipate the IAA may need to subdivide the space or seek non-traditional tenants to utilize the hangars effectively once AAR departs in 2027.

Frequently Asked Questions

When will the layoffs begin?
According to the WARN notice, the first separations are scheduled to begin on February 15, 2026.

Is AAR Corp. in financial trouble?
No. Financial reports show AAR is growing, with a 20% revenue increase in FY2025. The closure is a strategic move to consolidate operations following the acquisition of HAECO Americas.

Advertisement

What will happen to the facility?
The facility will revert to the control of the Indianapolis Airport Authority after the lease expires in February 2027. The IAA has not yet announced specific plans for the site.

Sources

Photo Credit: AAR Corp

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

MRO & Manufacturing

Boeing Advances Safer Paint Stripping to Prevent Fuselage Pitting

Boeing develops pH-neutral benzyl alcohol paint strippers to eliminate fuselage pitting and improve safety in aircraft maintenance.

Published

on

This article is based on internal communications and an official press release from Boeing (Boeing News Network).

Commercial aircraft undergo rigorous and highly regulated maintenance routines, a critical part of which involves completely stripping the aircraft’s paint. According to internal communications recently highlighted on the Boeing News Network (BNN), aerospace engineers have successfully implemented advanced, environmentally friendly chemical paint stripping formulas designed to solve a persistent and dangerous maintenance issue: fuselage pitting.

Historically, the aviation industry has relied on harsh, highly toxic chemicals to remove tough aerospace coatings. While these legacy chemicals were effective at breaking down heavy polyurethane and epoxy paints, they often caused localized corrosion on the aircraft’s aluminum skin and high-strength steel components. By transitioning to pH-neutral and alkaline-activated formulas, engineers are extending aircraft lifespans while simultaneously protecting worker health and the environment.

The Hidden Danger of Fuselage Pitting

Why Aircraft Shed Their Skin

To understand the significance of this engineering achievement, we must look at the routine maintenance cycle of commercial fleets. Aircraft are not simply stripped of their paint for cosmetic rebranding. According to industry maintenance standards, commercial aircraft must be stripped of their paint every five to six years to fulfill strict regulatory requirements. Removing the paint allows safety inspectors to examine the bare metal fuselage for micro-fractures, metal fatigue, and structural flaws that would otherwise remain hidden beneath layers of epoxy.

The Chemical Catalyst for Corrosion

During these routine stripping processes, aircraft are vulnerable to fuselage pitting. Pitting is a highly localized form of corrosion that creates microscopic cavities or “holes” in the metal substrate. In aviation, pitting is incredibly dangerous. These microscopic cavities act as stress concentrators, which can eventually lead to stress corrosion cracking and severe metal fatigue under the extreme pressurization and depressurization cycles of flight.

While pitting can occur naturally due to environmental moisture and salt exposure, a major historical cause during maintenance was the use of highly acidic chemical paint strippers. These chemicals would inadvertently etch and corrode the aluminum cladding of the fuselage while removing the paint.

Transitioning Away from Legacy Chemicals

Environmental and Health Hazards

For decades, the industry standard for removing tough aerospace coatings was Methylene Chloride (DCM) combined with phenol activators. However, methylene chloride is a highly volatile and toxic solvent. Due to severe health risks to maintenance workers, including respiratory failure and nervous system damage, agencies such as the EPA and OSHA have heavily restricted its use.

Furthermore, to accelerate the stripping process, many legacy formulas were highly acidic. Evaluations conducted by NASA and the Department of Defense (DoD) found that these legacy acidic strippers actively promoted pitting, localized attacks on non-clad aluminum substrates, and hydrogen embrittlement in high-strength steel components.

Advertisement

“The latest engineering breakthrough involves the use of pH-neutral or alkaline-activated benzyl alcohol formulas… eliminating chemically-induced fuselage pitting, improving aircraft lifespan, and protecting worker health.”

, Industry research summary on aerospace chemical engineering

The Engineering Solution: Benzyl Alcohol Formulas

How the New Gels Work

To resolve both the environmental hazards and the structural threats posed by legacy chemicals, aerospace engineers and chemical manufacturers developed a new generation of paint strippers. According to the engineering data surrounding the Boeing announcement, these new formulas primarily utilize benzyl alcohol activated by hydrogen peroxide or alkaline agents. Benzyl alcohol serves as a non-toxic, environmentally friendly solvent.

Unlike their acidic predecessors, these new formulas are engineered to be pH-neutral or slightly alkaline. Extensive testing has demonstrated that alkaline and neutral strippers produce zero visible etching, pitting, or corrosion on aluminum aircraft skins. Furthermore, engineers have formulated these new strippers as high-viscosity gels. This thick consistency allows the chemical to cling to the vertical sides of the fuselage for hours without evaporating or running off. The extended dwell time gives the gentler chemicals enough time to break the chemical bonds of the paint without requiring aggressive mechanical scraping, which is another common cause of mechanical pitting.

Meeting Strict Aerospace Standards

The internal BNN article highlights Boeing’s rigorous internal engineering efforts and approvals regarding these new formulas. Boeing maintains strict engineering standards for any chemical applied to its aircraft, most notably the Boeing D6-17487 standard for chemical paint strippers. To meet this standard, a new formula must definitively prove that it does not cause hydrogen embrittlement, does not corrode magnesium or aluminum, and leaves no residue behind.

Boeing’s Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) engineering teams continuously test new chemical blends to find the perfect operational balance: a formula strong enough to strip cross-linked epoxy paints efficiently, yet gentle enough to guarantee zero pitting on the fuselage.

AirPro News analysis

At AirPro News, we view the transition away from Methylene Chloride as a critical milestone for the aerospace Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) sector. Passengers generally only see the cosmetic result of a newly painted plane, completely unaware of the complex chemical engineering required to safely remove old paint without dissolving the airplane’s skin. This development is not merely a cosmetic fix; it is a fundamental structural safety measure. By eliminating toxic legacy solvents, aerospace manufacturers are achieving a dual victory: protecting their maintenance workforce from hazardous fumes and preventing microscopic structural failures at high altitudes. This aligns perfectly with the industry’s broader push toward sustainable and safe operational practices.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • What is fuselage pitting?
    Fuselage pitting is a localized form of corrosion that creates microscopic cavities in the metal of an aircraft. These cavities can act as stress concentrators, leading to metal fatigue and cracking under the pressure changes of flight.
  • Why do commercial airplanes need to be stripped of their paint?
    Aircraft are stripped of their paint every five to six years to comply with regulatory safety inspections. Removing the paint allows engineers to inspect the bare metal for micro-fractures and structural flaws.
  • What makes the new paint stripping formulas better?
    The new formulas use pH-neutral or alkaline-activated benzyl alcohol instead of toxic Methylene Chloride. They are formulated as high-viscosity gels that cling to the aircraft, safely breaking down paint without chemically etching the aluminum or harming worker health.

Sources:
Boeing News Network (BNN)

Photo Credit: Boeing

Continue Reading

MRO & Manufacturing

Delta TechOps Expands CFM LEAP Engine Overhaul Capabilities

Delta TechOps becomes the first North American MRO to fully support CFM LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B engines, expanding its maintenance services.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from Delta Air Lines.

Delta TechOps Expands CFM LEAP Engine Capabilities

Delta TechOps has officially become the first and only North American airline maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) provider licensed to support both the CFM LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B engines. According to a recent press release from Delta Air Lines, the company has added full overhaul capabilities for the LEAP-1A model, expanding its existing engine maintenance portfolio.

This development positions Delta TechOps to service a rapidly growing segment of the global narrowbody fleet. The LEAP engine family, manufactured by CFM International, is a critical component of modern commercial aviation, powering some of the most widely used next-generation aircraft in the world.

By securing full capability for both engine variants, Delta aims to solidify its standing as a premier MRO partner. The move reflects a broader industry trend of airlines investing heavily in in-house and third-party maintenance infrastructure to meet surging demand for narrowbody jet operations and aftermarket support.

Strategic Growth in the MRO Market

Strengthening the CFM Partnership

Delta TechOps and CFM International share a collaborative history spanning more than 40 years. The airline’s MRO division has extensive experience transitioning from the legacy CFM56 engines to the advanced LEAP family. In 2022, Delta TechOps achieved a significant milestone when it was named a CFM Premier MRO provider for LEAP-1B engines, becoming the first North American MRO to earn that specific designation.

The addition of the LEAP-1A overhaul capability further deepens this relationship. CFM International leadership emphasized the importance of an open MRO ecosystem to support global operators.

“Both CFM and Delta are deeply committed to an innovative and open MRO ecosystem. Delta was one of our first and remains one of our biggest customers, and we are forever linked in history,” stated Gaël Méheust, president and CEO of CFM International, in the press release.

Meeting Narrowbody Demand

The CFM LEAP engine family is central to the future of narrowbody aviation. The LEAP-1A variant powers the Airbus A320neo family, while the LEAP-1B serves as the exclusive powerplant for the Boeing 737 MAX 10. Delta Air Lines has a vested interest in the latter, having ordered 100 Boeing 737 MAX 10 aircraft, with deliveries pending certification.

As the global fleet expands, the operational footprint of the LEAP line continues to scale rapidly. According to the Delta press release, the engine line has accumulated over 95 million flight hours and 41 million flight cycles across more than 150 customers worldwide. Furthermore, cumulative deliveries of installed and spare LEAP engines surpassed 8,000 units as of February 2026.

Advertisement

“With LEAP engines now representing a significant and fast growing share of the global narrowbody fleet, adding full capability on both 1A and 1B models positions Delta TechOps squarely at the center of where the market is headed,” noted Alain Bellemare, President of Delta International and chairman of Delta TechOps.

AirPro News analysis

What This Means for the Industry

We view Delta TechOps’ expansion into full LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B overhaul capabilities as a strategic maneuver to capture a larger share of the lucrative third-party MRO market. As supply chain constraints and maintenance backlogs continue to challenge the aviation sector, having a North American provider with dual-capability offers a vital relief valve for operators.

Furthermore, Delta’s investment in servicing the engines that power both the Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX families ensures long-term revenue streams independent of its own fleet operations. With over 8,000 LEAP engines delivered globally, the aftermarket demand for maintenance and overhauls will only intensify over the next decade.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What makes Delta TechOps’ new capability significant?

Delta TechOps is now the first and only North American airline MRO provider licensed to offer full support and overhaul capabilities for both the CFM LEAP-1A and LEAP-1B engines.

Which aircraft use the CFM LEAP engines?

The CFM LEAP-1A engine powers the Airbus A320neo family, while the LEAP-1B is the exclusive engine for the Boeing 737 MAX series, including the MAX 10.

How large is the CFM LEAP engine fleet?

According to Delta’s press release, as of February 2026, more than 8,000 installed and spare LEAP engines have been delivered globally, accumulating over 95 million flight hours.

Sources

Photo Credit: Delta TechOps

Continue Reading

MRO & Manufacturing

Daher and Hexcel Fast Cure RTM Cuts Aerospace Lead Times

Daher and Hexcel demonstrate Fast Cure RTM process reducing aerospace composite part production lead times from 19 to 8 days with rapid-curing resins.

Published

on

This article is based on an official press release from Daher.

The commercial aviation sector is currently facing a massive backlog of aircraft orders, placing unprecedented pressure on the supply chain to produce composite parts faster than ever before. On March 3, 2026, French aerospace manufacturers Daher announced a significant industrial breakthrough designed to address this exact bottleneck. Through a collaborative trial with advanced composites company Hexcel, Daher successfully demonstrated a “Fast Cure” Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) process that drastically accelerates production rates.

According to the official press release, this new methodology allows aerospace-grade composite parts to be manufactured at high speeds without the traditional requirement of multiplying expensive, large-scale manufacturing equipment. By shifting the focus from expanding physical infrastructure to accelerating the chemical curing process, the partnership has provided a viable pathway for scaling up production for next-generation Short and Medium Range (SMR) aircraft.

The results of the trial are striking. Daher reports that the Fast Cure process can reduce series production lead times for specific components from 19 days down to just eight days, fundamentally altering the industrial math for aerospace Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs).

The Aerospace Production Bottleneck

The Demand for Composites

The aerospace industry relies heavily on composite materials, such as carbon fiber, to reduce overall aircraft weight, improve fuel efficiency, and lower carbon emissions. However, traditional composite manufacturing processes are notoriously slow and resource-intensive. Standard Resin Transfer Molding (RTM), which involves injecting liquid resin into a closed mold containing a dry fiber preform and heating it to polymerize, provides excellent automation and complex geometric capabilities, but it struggles to meet modern volume demands.

Scaling Challenges

Industry estimates indicate that some aircraft OEMs are targeting unprecedented production rates, occasionally aiming for up to 100 aircraft per month. Scaling up a standard RTM process to meet these high rates typically requires a brute-force industrial approach: investing in dozens of molds and multiple large heating ovens or massive autoclaves. This traditional method creates severe production bottlenecks and requires massive capital expenditure.

Daher and Hexcel’s “Fast Cure” Innovation

Accelerating the Chemistry

To break the cycle of simply buying more equipment to build more parts, Daher shifted its engineering focus to the manufacturing cycle itself. At the end of 2025, the company temporarily diverted production preforms and injection tooling from their standard serial production flow to test two specialized “Fast Cure” resins developed by Hexcel. According to the provided research data, Hexcel has spent recent years refining these rapid-cure, all-liquid format resins specifically to reduce takt time in high-rate aerospace manufacturing.

The trial utilized two specific Hexcel materials:

Advertisement
  • HiFlow HF640F-2: A resin featuring a 15-minute polymerization (curing) time.
  • HiFlow HF610F-2: A resin featuring a 30-minute polymerization time.

The Isothermal Process

The technological enabler of this successful trial was the implementation of isothermal injection. Daher’s engineers injected the resin at a constant temperature of 180 °C, followed immediately by a short curing phase and hot demolding. Hot demolding allows the composite part to be removed from the mold quickly, facilitating a rapid sequencing of operations that standard processes cannot match.

“By utilizing hot demolding and rapid curing, it becomes possible to process thermoset composites with the speed and agility typically reserved for thermoplastic materials.”
, Industry research summarizing the philosophical shift in Daher’s manufacturing approach.

Hard Data: Proving Industrial Scalability

Trial Results and Quality Assurance

Daher’s official release notes that the trial resulted in the successful manufacturing of six “production-type” parts, five utilizing the HF640 resin and one utilizing the HF610 resin. During the process, resin injection times were successfully kept below two minutes.

Crucially, speed did not compromise quality. The demonstrator parts were reintegrated into the plant’s standard downstream processes. Subsequent machining, ultrasonic non-destructive inspection, and geometric conformity checks revealed that the Fast Cure parts were entirely equivalent in quality to those manufactured using the slower, reference process.

Equipment and Lead Time Reductions

The most compelling data points from the trial relate to industrial scalability. At very high production rates, Daher projects that a standard process would require over 30 molds and five ovens. By implementing the Fast Cure process, tooling requirements could be divided by eight, requiring only two molds and two mini-presses to achieve the same output.

Furthermore, the overall lead time for series production of these components could be slashed from 19 days at full rate under the standard process to just eight days using the Fast Cure methodology.

AirPro News analysis

We view this development as a critical enabler for the broader aerospace supply chain. The global Resin Transfer Molding in Aerospace market was valued at approximately $1.73 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.2% through 2033, according to industry market-analysis. This growth is heavily dependent on the exact type of cost-efficient, high-performance manufacturing processes that Daher and Hexcel are pioneering.

Beyond raw speed, the Fast Cure process offers a vital strategic advantage: flexibility. Because the process relies on smaller, less permanent infrastructure, such as mini-presses rather than massive, fixed ovens, manufacturers gain the agility to reallocate equipment to different aircraft programs as market demands fluctuate. While the parts produced in this specific trial were non-airworthy demonstrators, this successful proof of concept lays the necessary groundwork for official certification and widespread industry adoption in the coming years.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is Resin Transfer Molding (RTM)?

RTM is a manufacturing process where liquid resin is injected into a closed mold containing dry fibers (like carbon fiber). The mold is then heated to cure the resin, creating a strong, lightweight composite part commonly used in aerospace.

How much faster is Daher’s Fast Cure process?

According to Daher’s trial data, the Fast Cure process reduces the series production lead time for specific components from 19 days to 8 days, while utilizing resins that cure in as little as 15 to 30 minutes.

Advertisement

Are these Fast Cure parts currently flying on commercial aircraft?

Not yet. The parts produced in this trial were non-airworthy demonstrators used to prove the industrial viability of the process. This successful trial paves the way for future official qualification for flight.


Sources:
Daher Official Press Release: Fast Cure & Furious
AirPro News Industry Research & Market Context Report

Photo Credit: Daher

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News