Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

Boston Logan Airport Reopens Runway 9-27 After Safety Upgrade

Logan Airport’s busiest runway reopens after installing EMAS, enhancing safety with a $110M FAA-backed project near Boston Harbor.

Published

on

Logan Airport’s Busiest Runway Reopens After Major Safety Overhaul

Boston Logan International Airport, a critical hub for domestic and international travel, has reached a significant milestone in a multi-phase safety enhancement project. The airport’s busiest runway, Runway 9-27, is set to reopen following a 75-day closure that began on September 2, 2025. This undertaking is part of a larger, $110 million initiative aimed at bolstering airfield safety, specifically by installing an advanced Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) at the end of Runway 27. The project underscores a proactive approach to aviation safety, ensuring the infrastructure can mitigate potential runway overrun incidents, a critical consideration for an airport bordered by the Boston Harbor.

The closure, while temporary, had a noticeable impact on the airport’s operational capacity. With Runway 9-27 out of commission, the hourly flight capacity was reduced from a typical 50-55 flights to approximately 40. This reduction led to anticipated delays, averaging between 45 to 60 minutes, particularly during the peak hours of 1:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. The Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport), which operates the airport, worked closely with airlines to manage these disruptions. The scheduled completion of this first phase before the busy Thanksgiving holiday rush was a key logistical goal, aiming to restore full capacity during one of the year’s most demanding travel periods.

This project is not merely a routine upgrade but a complex engineering feat. A significant portion of the new safety infrastructure is being constructed on a pile-supported deck over the water, a testament to the unique geographical challenges of Logan Airport. The installation of the EMAS brings Logan in line with the highest Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety standards, enhancing protection for aircraft, passengers, and crew. This will be the third such system at the airport, with similar installations already in place at the ends of Runways 22R and 33L.

The Science of Safety: How EMAS Works

The core of the Runway 27 upgrade is the Engineered Material Arresting System. An EMAS is a sophisticated yet passive safety system designed to prevent catastrophic accidents in the event of a runway overrun. It consists of a bed of lightweight, crushable concrete blocks. If an aircraft overshoots the runway, its tires sink into these blocks, and the material’s controlled collapse creates a strong decelerating force, bringing the plane to a safe stop. The technology is often compared to a runaway truck ramp on a highway, providing a crucial safety net where runway safety areas are geographically constrained.

The material itself is a type of cellular cement that is designed to crush under the weight of an aircraft. This process absorbs the kinetic energy of the plane in a predictable and controlled manner, minimizing damage to the aircraft and preventing injuries to those on board. The effectiveness of EMAS has been proven in real-world scenarios. A recent incident in Roanoke, Virginia, saw a jet safely stopped by an EMAS after overshooting the runway, with no serious injuries reported. This and other successful deployments underscore the system’s value as a critical safety feature in modern aviation.

For an airport like Logan, situated in close proximity to water, the implementation of EMAS is particularly vital. The FAA mandates stringent Runway Safety Area (RSA) standards, and where physical space is limited, EMAS provides an approved and effective solution. The project at Logan will extend the runway safety area to a length of 650 feet from the end of the runway, all without altering the runway’s operational length or capacity. It is a targeted safety enhancement that addresses a specific risk profile associated with the airport’s unique location.

“EMAS is a vital safety system at Boston Logan and other airports located near water or ground elevation changes.” – Massport Representative

A Logistical Tap Dance: Construction Over Water

The execution of the Runway 27 EMAS installation is a complex logistical operation, made more challenging by the need to build over Boston Harbor. Construction crews have been working 24 hours a day, seven days a week to meet the tight 75-day deadline for the first phase. This round-the-clock effort involves a delicate coordination of land-based and water-based activities. Barges are used to transport pre-cast materials, while cranes operate from both the shore and the water, all scheduled around the natural rhythm of the tides.

This intricate process was described by one official as a “logistical tap dance,” highlighting the precision required to manage the numerous moving parts. The project is divided into two distinct 75-day closure periods to minimize long-term disruption. The first phase, now concluding, sets the stage for the second and final phase, which is scheduled to commence after July 1, 2026. This phased approach allows the airport to return to normal operations during peak seasons while still advancing this critical safety project.

While the construction is intensive, Massport has implemented measures to mitigate its impact on surrounding communities. Noisy work is restricted to specific hours: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on weekdays, 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturdays, and 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Sundays. This consideration for local residents is a key part of managing a large-scale infrastructure project in a densely populated urban environment. The entire $110 million project is a significant investment in the airport’s future, with a large portion of the funding provided by the FAA, reflecting its national importance.

Conclusion: A Safer Future for Logan Airport

The reopening of Runway 9-27 marks a successful first step in a crucial safety upgrade for Boston Logan International Airport. The installation of the EMAS technology is a forward-thinking measure that directly addresses the risks associated with the airport’s coastal location. By investing in this proven safety system, Massport and the FAA are enhancing the protection afforded to millions of passengers and crew members who travel through Boston each year. The project demonstrates a commitment to maintaining the highest safety standards in an ever-evolving aviation landscape.

Looking ahead, the completion of the second phase in 2026 will solidify Logan’s position as a leader in airport safety. The temporary disruptions and delays, while inconvenient, are a necessary trade-off for a long-term gain in operational security. As air travel continues to grow, investments in critical infrastructure like the Runway 27 EMAS will be essential to ensuring that safety remains the top priority. This project serves as a model for other airports facing similar geographical constraints, proving that with careful planning and complex engineering, safety can be enhanced even in the most challenging environments.

FAQ

Question: What is an EMAS?
Answer: An Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) is a bed of lightweight, crushable concrete installed at the end of a runway. It is designed to safely stop an aircraft that overshoots the runway by absorbing its energy.

Question: Why was the runway closed?
Answer: Runway 9-27 was closed to allow for the installation of the EMAS at the end of Runway 27. This is a major safety upgrade required to meet FAA standards.

Question: How long was the runway closed?
Answer: The project is divided into two 75-day closure periods. The first phase began on September 2, 2025, and concluded on November 15, 2025. A second 75-day closure is planned for after July 1, 2026.

Question: Did the project extend the runway?
Answer: No, the project does not extend the runway or change its operational capacity. It extends the runway’s safety area to a length of 650 feet.

Sources

WCVB

Photo Credit: Doc Build

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

Missouri Skydive Plane Crash Kills 12 at Butler Airport

A Pacific Aerospace 750XL crashed after takeoff from Butler Memorial Airport on June 14, 2026, killing a pilot and 11 skydivers.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This article summarizes reporting by CBS News, The Washington Post, SFGATE, KEYT, and Fox 10 Phoenix.

A Pacific Aerospace 750XL operated by Skydive Kansas City crashed shortly after takeoff from Butler Memorial Airport (BUM) on June 14, 2026, resulting in 12 fatalities.

The Missouri State Highway Patrol confirmed that the pilot and 11 skydivers died when the single-engine turboprop impacted a field adjacent to the airport and caught fire. The NTSB and the FAA have deployed investigators to the site, located approximately 65 miles south of Kansas City.

Accident sequence and emergency response

The aircraft departed BUM at approximately 11:20 a.m. local time. According to preliminary reports cited by SFGATE, the aircraft made a left turn shortly after takeoff. Emergency responders received a 911 call around 11:30 a.m. reporting that the aircraft had crashed into a field approximately 300 yards from the runway and was engulfed in flames.

Dennis Jacobs, acting airport manager and Bates County Emergency Management Agency director, told reporters that the aircraft appeared to lose power before stalling and impacting the ground nose first. The NTSB has not yet verified this sequence of events, and the official cause of the accident remains under investigation.

The Missouri State Highway Patrol, alongside the Butler Police Department and Bates County Sheriff’s Office, secured the scene. A statement from the highway patrol confirmed that all 12 occupants perished in the crash. The identities of the victims are being withheld pending family notification.

Aircraft and operator background

The aircraft involved was a Pacific Aerospace 750XL manufactured in 2010. The 750XL is a single-engine turboprop frequently utilized in commercial skydiving operations due to its climb rate and payload capacity. The flight was operated by Skydive Kansas City, a commercial skydiving center based at BUM.

This accident follows a previous skydiving-related aviation occurrence near the same airport. On May 25, 2024, a Cessna U206C experienced an in-flight emergency near BUM. In that incident, the pilot and six skydivers successfully evacuated the aircraft via parachute before it crashed into a hayfield, resulting in no fatalities.

AirPro News analysis

We note that the NTSB investigation will likely focus on engine performance, weight and balance, and environmental factors at the time of departure. The Pacific Aerospace 750XL is a specialized utility aircraft, and investigators will examine maintenance records and the operator’s procedures as part of their standard protocol. Until the NTSB releases its preliminary report, usually within 30 days, any statements regarding a loss of power remain unconfirmed eyewitness observations.

Sources: CBS News

Photo Credit: NZAero

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Investigates Southwest Airlines Near Miss at Nashville

Two Southwest Boeing 737s came within 500 vertical feet near Nashville on April 18, 2026, after an ATC error during a go-around.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This article summarizes reporting by CNN, Fox News, and The Washington Post.

Two Southwest Airlines (WN) Boeing 737 aircraft passed within 500 vertical feet of each other near Nashville International Airport (BNA) on April 18, 2026, after air traffic control instructions placed an aborting arrival into the path of a departing flight.

The incident, which occurred at approximately 5:30 p.m. local time, prompted both flight crews to execute evasive maneuvers following onboard Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) alerts. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has launched an investigation into the airspace separation loss, which highlights ongoing scrutiny over air traffic control protocols and collision avoidance effectiveness.

Sequence of events and evasive maneuvers

According to statements provided to CNN and Fox News, Southwest Airlines Flight 507 was arriving from Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, when the flight crew initiated a precautionary go-around due to gusty wind conditions at BNA. During this maneuver, air traffic controllers instructed the crew to turn right.

The FAA confirmed in a statement that these instructions placed Flight 507 directly into the departure path of Southwest Airlines Flight 1152, which was taking off from a parallel runway bound for Knoxville, Tennessee. As the aircraft converged, TCAS resolution advisories activated in both cockpits. Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 indicates the two Boeing 737s came within 500 vertical feet of one another before the crews successfully altered their trajectories.

Both aircraft continued to safe landings without further incident. Flight 507 completed its arrival into Nashville on a subsequent approach, while Flight 1152 proceeded to its destination in Knoxville.

Regulatory investigation and safety context

The FAA is currently investigating the circumstances that led to the loss of separation. Southwest Airlines issued a statement emphasizing that the pilots of Flight 507 were complying with air traffic control directives when the conflict occurred, and that the crews responded professionally to the onboard traffic alerts to maintain safety.

The Nashville incident occurs against a backdrop of heightened national attention on mid-air collision risks. The Washington Post notes that aviation safety systems have faced intense public and regulatory scrutiny following a January 29, 2025, collision between an American Airlines aircraft and a military helicopter near Washington, D.C., which resulted in 67 fatalities. While the circumstances of the two events differ, the 2025 accident has amplified focus on the reliability of TCAS and air traffic control coordination in congested airspace.

AirPro News analysis

The activation of TCAS resolution advisories in this incident demonstrates the critical role of automated safety nets when procedural separation fails. While the FAA investigation will ultimately determine the root cause of the controller instructions, the event underscores the vulnerability of the go-around phase. Go-arounds are dynamic maneuvers that rapidly alter an aircraft’s energy state and expected flight path. These maneuvers require immediate and precise coordination between the flight deck and air traffic control, particularly when parallel runway operations are active.

Sources: CNN (via KESQ)

Photo Credit: Flightradar24 – Google Earth via CNN Newsource

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Investigates Southwest Airlines Ground Collision at PVD

Two Southwest Boeing 737s collided during pushback at Rhode Island T.F. Green Airport on June 11, 2026. FAA investigation opened.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This article summarizes reporting by WPRI, NBC 10, Daily Voice, and CBS News Baltimore.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has opened an investigation after two Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 aircraft collided during pushback at Rhode Island T.F. Green International Airport (PVD) late on June 11, 2026.

The ground collision resulted in no reported injuries but forced the cancellation of both flights and the grounding of the involved aircraft for mandatory safety inspections. According to reporting by the Daily Voice and NBC 10, the incident highlights ongoing operational challenges on airport ramps, occurring just weeks after a similar event involving the same carrier at another East Coast facility.

Details of the ground collision

At approximately 10:45 p.m. local time, Southwest Airlines Flight 3515, bound for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA), was pushing back from its gate. During the maneuver, the aircraft’s wing made contact with the tail of Southwest Airlines Flight 3409, which was scheduled to depart for Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW).

Both aircraft returned to their respective gates following the contact, allowing passengers to deplane normally. Southwest Airlines confirmed that no injuries occurred among passengers or crew members. The carrier subsequently canceled both flights and reaccommodated the affected travelers.

“Southwest Airlines is aware of an incident involving two of our aircraft at Rhode Island T. F. Green International Airport. We are investigating further and will be thoroughly inspecting the two aircraft,”

the airline stated in remarks provided to local media, adding that safety remains its highest priority.

Local media outlets, including NBC 10, reported passenger accounts suggesting that Flight 3515 continued to move briefly after the initial impact. These accounts claim passengers verbally alerted the flight crew to the collision. Neither Southwest Airlines nor the FAA has officially verified these specific passenger narratives, and the official sequence of events remains under investigation.

Regulatory response and recent precedent

The FAA confirmed on June 12, 2026, that it is investigating the circumstances surrounding the collision. Ground operations during pushback rely heavily on coordination between flight crews and ground personnel, particularly in ramp areas where air traffic controllers do not maintain direct communication with the aircraft.

This event follows a comparable occurrence on May 4, 2026, at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI). In that instance, two Southwest Airlines Boeing 737s clipped wings during pushback operations. The FAA investigated the BWI incident, noting the specific communication dynamics between ground crews and the flight deck in non-controlled ramp sectors.

AirPro News analysis

We note that while ground collisions during pushback rarely pose a severe threat to passenger safety, they represent a significant operational and financial burden for carriers. Ramp incidents require immediate grounding of the involved airframes, triggering mandatory structural inspections and potential repairs. The recurrence of pushback-related contact within a single airline’s network over a short period may prompt internal reviews of ground handling procedures, wingwalker positioning, and ramp communication protocols. Until the FAA concludes its investigation, the specific cause of the PVD collision remains undetermined.

Sources: WPRI

Photo Credit: Zachary Reis

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News