Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

Johnston Regional Airport Leads FAA Digital Remote Tower Adoption

Johnston Regional Airport seeks FAA approval for digital remote tower, addressing controller shortages and enhancing air traffic safety in North Carolina.

Published

on

The Digital Frontier: Johnston Regional’s Bid to Reshape Air Traffic Control

In the world of aviation, progress is measured in knots, altitudes, and increasingly, data packets. While the friendly voice of an air traffic controller guiding a pilot through the skies is a cornerstone of aviation safety, the physical towers they work from are facing a 21st-century challenge. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is grappling with a nationwide shortage of controllers, putting a strain on the system. This operational pressure is forcing a look at innovative solutions, and one North Carolina airport is stepping up, aiming to be a pioneer.

Johnston Regional Airport (JNX), located in Smithfield, has earned the distinction of being the busiest general aviation airport in North Carolina. With this high volume of traffic comes a pressing need for enhanced air traffic management. Rather than simply building a conventional brick-and-mortar tower, JNX leadership is looking toward the horizon, expressing a desire to be “first in flight” with the FAA’s next-generation digital remote tower system. This ambition places the bustling airport at the center of a national conversation about the future of air traffic control, balancing cutting-edge technology with the rigorous demands of aviation safety.

The move toward digital or remote towers is not just about new gadgets; it’s a potential paradigm shift. By replacing the out-the-window view with a high-fidelity digital feed, the system promises greater efficiency, lower costs, and a flexible solution to staffing shortages. However, the path to implementation in the United States has been anything but smooth. JNX’s pursuit is a compelling case study in the tension between technological promise and the realities of regulatory hurdles and logistical challenges that have grounded similar projects elsewhere.

A Growing Hub’s Need for a Watchful Eye

Johnston Regional Airport is not a sleepy, rural airstrip. It is a significant economic engine for its region, contributing an estimated $210 million to the local economy and supporting 1,100 jobs. Its status as the state’s busiest general aviation airport is a testament to its growth and strategic importance. This high level of activity, however, brings with it the complexities of managing a crowded airspace safely and efficiently. The need for a control tower is not just a matter of convenience but a critical step in ensuring the airport’s continued safe operation and growth.

The FAA has already recognized this need. Following a benefit-cost analysis, the agency confirmed that JNX qualifies for a Federal Contract Tower. This qualification is a formal acknowledgment that the volume and complexity of traffic at the airport warrant dedicated air traffic control services. The local aviation community has long been aware of the airport’s bustling nature, a sentiment echoed by leaders on the ground.

The Johnston County Airport Authority and the JNX Pilots and Tenants Association have both highlighted the necessity of managed growth and enhanced infrastructure. Their focus is on maintaining JNX’s position as a premier, accessible, and, most importantly, safe general aviation airport in the state. The question is no longer if a tower is needed, but what kind of tower will best serve the airport’s future.

“As the busiest general aviation airport in the State, we recognize the importance of managed growth and will continue to enhance our infrastructure to meet that demand. As we plan for the future of JNX, we also need to ensure we are the most accessible and safest general aviation airport in North Carolina.”

– Ken Starling, Chairman of the Johnston County Airport Authority

The Promise and Peril of the Remote Tower

What is a Digital Tower?

A remote or digital tower fundamentally changes how air traffic is monitored. Instead of controllers looking out of the glass windows of a traditional tower, the system uses a network of high-definition cameras and sensors mounted on a mast at the airfield. These instruments provide a seamless, panoramic view of the airport and its surroundings. This visual data is then streamed to a control room, which can be located on-site or even miles away.

The real power of this system lies in its ability to augment reality. Controllers view the airfield on high-resolution screens that can overlay critical information directly onto the video feed. This can include aircraft identification tags, speed, altitude, and tracking indicators, enhancing situational awareness beyond what the human eye can perceive alone. This fusion of live video with digital data provides controllers with a comprehensive and detailed operational picture.

This technology also offers unprecedented flexibility. A single controller could potentially be certified to manage traffic at multiple airports, plugging into the digital feed of whichever facility requires service at that time (though they would only control one at a time). This model is particularly beneficial for airports with fluctuating traffic levels or those in remote locations where staffing a traditional tower 24/7 is not feasible.

Challenges on the American Horizon

Despite the clear benefits, the adoption of remote tower technology in the United States has been slow and fraught with difficulty. The FAA’s approach has been described as inconsistent, with evolving certification standards creating a challenging environment for airports and technology providers. This regulatory uncertainty has had real-world consequences, leading to the cancellation or suspension of several high-profile projects.

For instance, a remote tower project at Northern Colorado Regional Airport (FNL) was paused in 2023 after the technology provider ceased its work, citing a combination of factors including the pandemic, FAA travel restrictions, and the shifting certification landscape. A similar initiative at Leesburg Executive Airport (KJYO) in Virginia was also scrubbed that same year. These setbacks highlight the significant gap between the technology’s potential and the practical challenges of getting it approved and operational under the FAA’s stringent safety mandates.

Johnston Regional Airport’s ambition, therefore, is not just a local infrastructure project. It is an attempt to succeed where others have stumbled. If JNX can navigate the complex regulatory environment and successfully implement a digital tower, it could create a blueprint for other airports across the nation, potentially unlocking a key solution to the air traffic controller shortage and modernizing a critical piece of national infrastructure.

Conclusion

Johnston Regional Airport stands at a crossroads of growth and innovation. As the busiest general aviation hub in North Carolina, its need for an air traffic control tower is undisputed. The airport’s leadership, however, is aiming higher than a conventional solution, seeking to pioneer the implementation of a next-generation digital tower. This ambition aligns with a national need to address the shortage of air traffic controllers and modernize aviation infrastructure through cost-effective and efficient technology.

The path forward is lined with both promise and precedent for caution. The potential benefits of remote towers, enhanced safety, operational flexibility, and lower costs, are significant. Yet, the history of similar projects in the U.S. serves as a stark reminder of the immense regulatory and logistical hurdles involved. JNX’s journey will be closely watched by the aviation industry, as its success or failure could heavily influence the future trajectory of air traffic control technology across the country.

FAQ

Question: What is a remote or digital air traffic control tower?
Answer: A remote tower system replaces the traditional out-the-window view from a physical tower with a panoramic digital display. High-definition cameras and sensors at the airfield send a live feed to a control room, which can be located on-site or at a remote location. This feed can be enhanced with augmented reality overlays showing aircraft data.

Question: Why does Johnston Regional Airport need a control tower?
Answer: JNX is the busiest general aviation airport in North Carolina. Due to its high volume of air traffic, the FAA has officially qualified the airport for a Federal Contract Tower to ensure the safe and efficient management of its airspace.

Question: What are the main challenges facing the adoption of remote towers in the U.S.?
Answer: The primary challenges include navigating a complex and evolving regulatory environment with the FAA, which has been described as inconsistent. This has led to setbacks, with several remote tower projects at other U.S. airports being paused or canceled due to difficulties with the certification process.

Sources

Photo Credit: Hanson Professional Services

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

NTSB: Thermal Plugs Caused AA Flight 3023 Tire Failure

NTSB determines melted thermal relief plugs caused tire failure on American Airlines 737-8 at Denver, triggering emergency evacuation.

Published

on

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has determined that melted thermal relief plugs caused the left main landing gear tires to fail on an American Airlines Boeing 737-8 during a July 2025 takeoff roll at Denver International Airport (DEN), prompting a high-speed rejected takeoff and emergency evacuation.

The final aviation investigation report, published on August 26, 2026, officially closes the inquiry into American Airlines Flight 3023. The document details the mechanical sequence that led to the tire failure while highlighting significant passenger noncompliance during the subsequent evacuation, as travelers ignored crew commands and retrieved carry-on baggage.

Mechanical sequence and rejected takeoff

The incident occurred on July 26, 2025, involving a Boeing 737-8, registration N306SW, equipped with CFM International LEAP-1B28 engines. According to the NTSB, the flight experienced an approximate 25-minute delay while awaiting departure at runway 34L.

During the subsequent takeoff roll, as the aircraft reached an indicated airspeed between 90 and 100 knots, the captain reported hearing a loud pop accompanied by a noticeable bump. The flight crew initiated a rejected takeoff at speeds above 80 knots.

The NTSB determined the probable cause of the incident was the melting of thermal relief plugs in the left main landing gear. This melting released tire pressure and caused the tires and wheels to fail during the takeoff roll. The agency noted that this failure resulted in abnormal airplane handling characteristics, which prompted the flight crew to reject the takeoff. Debris from the fractured wheels caused minor damage to the aircraft, including a three-inch dent on the lower skin of the left wing.

Emergency evacuation and passenger behavior

Following the rejected takeoff, the flight crew initially instructed the cabin to remain seated. Between 30 and 45 seconds later, after identifying smoke and fire originating from the left main landing gear, the crew ordered an emergency evacuation.

The aircraft carried 175 occupants, comprising 169 passengers and six crew members. The NTSB final report confirms that zero injuries occurred during the event. This official casualty figure supersedes preliminary media reports from July 2025 that had indicated minor injuries and hospital evaluations.

The investigation report draws specific attention to passenger behavior during the emergency egress. The NTSB stated that the cabin crew described the evacuation as rapid but hindered by significant passenger confusion and noncompliance. Despite flight attendants repeatedly commanding passengers to leave their belongings behind, multiple individuals retrieved their carry-on baggage. The NTSB concluded that this noncompliance directly slowed the flow of egress from the aircraft.

AirPro News analysis

The NTSB findings regarding American Airlines Flight 3023 add to a well-documented and growing safety concern within the commercial aviation sector. Passenger retrieval of carry-on baggage during emergency evacuations is a recurring issue that compromises the 90-second evacuation standard mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

When passengers stop to open overhead bins and carry luggage down escape slides, they not only slow the egress rate for those behind them but also introduce the risk of puncturing the evacuation slides or injuring fellow passengers. We continue to see official accident reports cite passenger noncompliance as a negative factor in evacuation efficiency. This recurring behavioral pattern has prompted safety advocates and lawmakers to question whether current FAA evacuation certification tests, which rely on compliant participants, accurately reflect real-world human behavior during an emergency.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

Marine One Loss of Separation at DCA: NTSB Preliminary Report

NTSB cites radio line-of-sight failure after Marine One and Envoy Air E-170 came within 0.82 NM at Reagan National.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.

A loss of separation occurred on August 4, 2026, between a Sikorsky VH-3D operating as Marine One and an Envoy Air Embraer E-170 departing Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). The incident took place approximately two miles north of the airport at 14:34 EDT and prompted an immediate Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) relocation of radio equipment after investigators identified a communication failure.

According to a preliminary report released on August 27, 2026, by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), air traffic controllers at DCA did not receive a required three-minute pre-departure warning from the helicopter. The event triggered a review of strict Safety protocols implemented following a fatal midair collision in the same airspace in January 2025.

Incident timeline and separation data

The loss of separation occurred when Marine One departed The Ellipse simultaneously with Envoy Air flight 3742 departing runway 1 at DCA. Preliminary FAA estimates indicate the aircraft came within 0.82 nautical miles (NM) laterally and 700 feet vertically. The NTSB is currently analyzing surveillance data to establish the exact closest point of approach.

President Donald Trump was on board the Sikorsky VH-3D at the time of the incident. In a statement provided to CBS News, White House spokesman Kush Desai confirmed the President was never in danger.

Marine One flights are piloted by the finest aviators in the world, and the White House maintains the utmost confidence in these patriots and other security officials who are responsible for ensuring the President’s safety.

No injuries were reported among the occupants of either aircraft, and both flights continued to their respective destinations without further incident.

Communication failure and FAA response

The NTSB preliminary report points to inadequate radio line-of-sight coverage between The Ellipse and the DCA tower as the primary factor in the missed pre-departure warning. A DCA tower controller reported that the transmission attempt from the helicopter was “broken and unreadable,” according to CBS News.

Following the August 4 incident, FAA technicians evaluated the infrastructure and confirmed the line-of-sight deficiency. To resolve the issue, the agency relocated the helicopter-control radio equipment to the top of the DCA control tower. Subsequent communication checks were successful.

CBS News also reported that recent construction at the White House may have contributed to the radio line-of-sight degradation, though the NTSB has not yet issued a final determination on the cause.

Regulatory context and prior airspace changes

The airspace surrounding DCA operates under highly specific procedural rules designed to deconflict fixed-wing airline traffic from frequent VIP helicopter movements. These procedures were significantly tightened following a fatal midair collision on January 29, 2025, involving an airliner and an Army Black Hawk helicopter near the airport.

Following the 2025 accident, regulators instituted a requirement for a ground stop at DCA anytime a Helicopters passes on a conflicting route. The failure of the three-minute warning on August 4 prevented controllers from initiating this required ground stop for the Envoy Air departure.

Air traffic controllers and Marine One pilots had previously met on July 28, 2026, exactly one week prior to the incident, to discuss ongoing communication challenges in the sector.

AirPro News analysis

The August 4 loss of separation highlights the fragility of procedural deconfliction in the Washington, D.C. airspace. While the FAA characterized the event as a momentary loss of separation, the failure of a critical communication link reveals a single point of failure in the safety protocols established after the 2025 collision. We note that the rapid relocation of the radio equipment by the FAA demonstrates an acknowledgment of the infrastructure gap. As the NTSB continues its Investigation, we will monitor the docket for potential systemic recommendations regarding how VIP helicopter movements integrate with high-volume Commercial-Aircraft traffic at DCA, particularly concerning redundant communication systems.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

FAA Moves to Fire Two LaGuardia Controllers After Fatal Collision

FAA initiates termination proceedings against two LaGuardia controllers for early shift departures on the night of the March 22, 2026 runway collision.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This article summarizes reporting by Reuters by David Shepardson and Doyinsola Oladipo.

The FAA has initiated termination proceedings against two air traffic controllers accused of leaving their shifts early on the night of a fatal runway collision at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) in March 2026. The agency is classifying the unauthorized early departures as timecard fraud amid a broader national crackdown on the practice.

The disciplinary action follows the March 22, 2026, accident in which Air Canada Express Flight 8646, operated by Jazz Aviation LP, collided with an aircraft rescue firefighting (ARFF) vehicle while landing on Runway 4. According to Reuters, the two controllers allegedly departed the facility approximately one hour before their scheduled shifts ended, a practice colloquially known as an “early shove.”

Disciplinary actions and union response

The FAA stated its commitment to holding employees accountable, emphasizing that it will not compromise the safety or efficiency of the national airspace system. U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy condemned the practice, stating that while most controllers complete their full shifts, the department will not tolerate fraud from individuals who unfairly burden their colleagues and impact the airspace.

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) confirmed it is actively discussing the allegations with FAA leadership. The union indicated that these internal discussions are the appropriate forum for addressing the matter. Reuters reports that the FAA is currently conducting a nationwide enforcement effort targeting employees who leave on break at the end of their shifts and fail to return.

The March 22 collision and investigation

The NTSB continues to investigate the March 22 collision under investigation ID DCA26MA161. The official cause of the accident remains undetermined. The aircraft involved was an MHI RJ Aviation CRJ-900, and the ground equipment was an Oshkosh Striker 1500 ARFF vehicle.

Official NTSB figures confirm that 76 people were on board the aircraft, including 72 passengers, two flight attendants, and two pilots. The captain and first officer sustained fatal injuries. Thirty-nine individuals were transported to local hospitals, with six reported to have serious injuries.

It remains unverified whether the controllers’ early departure directly influenced the events leading to the collision. Speaking in March 2026, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy noted that operating with two controllers in the tower cab during a midnight shift is common practice across the national airspace system, suggesting the facility may have been operating at standard staffing levels at the time of the accident.

Regulatory response to surface safety

Following the LaGuardia accident, the FAA accelerated initiatives to improve surface visibility at airports. On May 13, 2026, the agency announced a $16.5 million investment to equip all airport vehicles with transponders.

These vehicle movement area transponders (VMATs) are designed to provide ATC with better situational awareness of ground equipment operating on runways and taxiways.

AirPro News analysis

We note that the FAA’s decision to pursue termination for timecard fraud rather than operational errors highlights a strict administrative approach to facility management. By focusing on the unauthorized absence, the agency addresses the “early shove” culture directly without preempting the NTSB’s ongoing safety investigation into the collision’s root causes. The distinction between administrative violations and operational fault will likely remain a focal point as NATCA engages with FAA leadership.

Sources: Reuters, NTSB

Photo Credit: Mike Segar – Reuters

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News