Defense & Military
South Korea Shifts Defense Strategy to Unmanned Systems
South Korea cancels $2.2B Apache helicopter deal, reallocating funds toward AI-powered drones and unmanned warfare systems amid evolving combat needs.
The Republic of Korea’s (ROK) decision to terminate its planned acquisition of 36 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters represents a pivotal shift in defense strategy, driven by converging factors of fiscal constraints, evolving battlefield threats, and technological transformation. This $2.2 billion deal cancellation, approved by the U.S. State Department in August 2024, would have doubled South Korea’s existing Apache fleet to 72 aircraft but was abandoned following a July 2025 supplemental budget that slashed funding from ₩100 billion to merely ₩300 million.
Primary catalysts include a 66% per-unit cost escalation compared to South Korea’s initial 2013 Apache purchase (rising from approximately $31 million to $52 million per helicopter), compounded by operational vulnerabilities exposed in Ukraine where Russian attack helicopters suffered heavy losses to low-cost drones and man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS). South Korea’s defense reallocation toward unmanned aerial systems (UAS), artificial intelligence, and “smart one-way attack weapons” reflects a broader global trend, evidenced by the U.S. Army’s 2024 cancellation of its Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) program and Japan’s similar pivot from manned helicopters to drone swarms. This strategic realignment underscores a fundamental reassessment of aerial combat doctrine in an era where autonomous systems offer cost-effective, resilient alternatives to traditional platforms.
The AH-64E Apache Guardian, developed by Boeing, is a fourth-generation attack helicopter equipped with advanced avionics, survivability systems, and multirole combat capabilities. It features a 30mm M230 chain gun, the ability to carry up to 16 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles, and the Longbow radar system for all-weather targeting. These capabilities provide robust firepower, situational awareness, and interoperability with allied forces.
With a maximum takeoff weight exceeding 10,000 kg and speeds of up to 300 km/h, the AH-64E offers both agility and endurance. Its enhancements over previous models include improved engines, composite rotor blades, and networking capabilities that allow it to control UAVs directly from the cockpit, making it a hybrid manned-unmanned command platform.
These attributes made the Apache a key component of South Korea’s strategy to counter North Korean armored threats and to support rapid response operations in the Korean Peninsula’s challenging terrain.
South Korea received its first batch of 36 AH-64E helicopters between 2016 and 2017 under a $1.6 billion agreement. These helicopters replaced aging AH-1S Cobras and became the backbone of the Army’s attack aviation division. The initial acquisition also included training, maintenance support, and armaments.
The second batch, approved by the U.S. in August 2024, was intended to bring the total Apache fleet to 72. This proposed deal included a comprehensive package: 456 AGM-114R2 Hellfire missiles, 152 AGM-179A Joint Air-to-Ground Missiles (JAGM), and advanced electronic warfare systems. The total estimated cost for this package was $3.5 billion.
Despite the strategic intent, the proposed expansion quickly encountered scrutiny due to rising costs and shifting defense priorities. The Defense Acquisition Program Administration cited inflation, technological upgrades, and supply chain constraints as reasons for the cost increase. One of the most significant drivers behind the cancellation was the dramatic increase in per-unit cost. The second batch of Apaches was priced at approximately $52 million per unit, compared to $31 million for the first batch, a 66% increase. This escalation would have consumed a disproportionate share of the Army’s annual procurement budget.
In July 2025, the National Assembly’s Defense Committee reduced the program’s budget allocation from ₩100 billion to just ₩300 million. This effectively halted the acquisition. Lawmakers cited more urgent needs and the opportunity cost of locking up funds in a single platform.
Analysts like Yang Uk from the Asan Institute emphasized that the budget decision reflected broader constraints and competing priorities within South Korea’s defense planning, especially as the country seeks to modernize across multiple domains.
Another influential factor was the performance of attack helicopters in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Numerous reports and battlefield data showed that helicopters, including Russia’s Ka-52 and Mi-28, suffered high losses due to MANPADS and small drones.
The vulnerability of low-flying, slow-moving helicopters in contested environments was starkly illustrated. These platforms were often unable to operate effectively without significant air superiority or electronic warfare support, conditions not guaranteed in a conflict on the Korean Peninsula.
South Korean lawmakers and military planners took note. As Representative Yoo Yong-weon stated, “Drones and smart systems are redefining modern battlefields.” This sentiment was echoed by global shifts in military doctrine, including the U.S. Army’s decision to cancel the FARA program in favor of unmanned systems.
“Rather than clinging to expensive legacy platforms, we must invest in capabilities that reflect the future of warfare.” , Representative Yoo Yong-weon
In response to both internal and external threats, South Korea established the Drone Operations Command in Pocheon in 2023. This move followed a 2022 incident in which North Korean drones penetrated South Korean airspace, exposing gaps in surveillance and air defense.
The new command is tasked with integrating unmanned systems across all branches of the military. It also serves as a central hub for training, doctrine development, and operational deployment of drones and robotic systems. Funding has been allocated for various drone categories, including anti-material strike drones, reconnaissance UAVs, and ground-based robotic platforms. These investments signal a long-term commitment to unmanned warfare capabilities.
South Korea is investing in AI-powered drone swarms, loitering munitions, and hybrid manned-unmanned teaming. These initiatives aim to enhance precision strike capabilities while reducing risks to personnel.
The integration of drones with existing platforms, such as the KAI Surion helicopter, is also underway. This manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) approach allows for more flexible mission execution and improved battlefield awareness.
Analysts note that these technologies offer scalable, cost-effective alternatives to traditional platforms. They also align with global trends in network-centric warfare and autonomous operations.
South Korea is not alone in reevaluating the role of attack helicopters. The U.S. Army canceled its FARA program in 2024, citing changing battlefield conditions and the growing importance of unmanned systems. Japan has also announced plans to phase out its Apache and Cobra helicopters in favor of drones.
These decisions reflect a broader shift in defense priorities. Manned helicopters, while still effective in certain roles, face increasing limitations in high-threat environments. The cost-benefit analysis increasingly favors unmanned alternatives.
Australia and European nations are similarly reassessing their rotary-wing fleets, signaling a potential decline in global demand for attack helicopters over the coming decade.
Manufacturers like Boeing may face challenges as militaries pivot away from traditional platforms. Although Boeing has defended the Apache’s role, citing its proven combat record, market dynamics are shifting rapidly. At the same time, drone manufacturers and AI-focused defense firms are experiencing increased investment. Companies like Lockheed Martin and KAI are expanding into collaborative combat aircraft and autonomous systems to remain competitive.
The transition presents both risks and opportunities. Legacy contractors must innovate, while new players with expertise in AI and robotics gain market share in a transforming defense landscape.
South Korea’s cancellation of the AH-64E Apache deal marks a significant moment in military procurement and strategy. Faced with rising costs, evolving threats, and technological change, the country has chosen to invest in unmanned systems and AI-driven capabilities.
This decision aligns with global trends and reflects a pragmatic approach to national defense. While challenges remain, particularly in maintaining near-term deterrence, the shift positions South Korea to lead in next-generation warfare. The implications extend beyond the peninsula, offering valuable insights for militaries worldwide navigating similar transitions.
Why did South Korea cancel its Apache helicopter deal? What will South Korea invest in instead of Apaches? Is this part of a global trend? Sources: The Defense Post, Reuters, Janes, Defense News, Army Technology
South Korea’s Cancellation of the AH-64E Apache Helicopter Deal: Strategic Pivot Toward Unmanned Systems in Modern Warfare
Background: The AH-64E Apache and South Korea’s Defense Modernization
Technical Capabilities of the AH-64E Platform
South Korea’s Initial Apache Acquisition
The Decision to Cancel: Factors and Immediate Context
Budget Constraints and Cost Escalation
Operational Lessons from Ukraine
South Korea’s Strategic Shift Toward Unmanned Systems
Creation of the Drone Operations Command
Technological and Tactical Innovations
Global Context and Industry Impact
International Trends in Defense Procurement
Implications for the Defense Industry
Conclusion
FAQ
Due to a 66% increase in per-unit cost, budget constraints, and a strategic shift toward unmanned systems.
Funds are being redirected toward drones, AI-powered systems, and loitering munitions.
Yes. The U.S., Japan, and other nations are also pivoting from manned attack helicopters to unmanned platforms.
Photo Credit: Defense Advancement
Defense & Military
Firehawk Aerospace Expands Rocket Motor Production in Mississippi Facility
Firehawk Aerospace acquires a DCMA-rated facility in Mississippi to boost production of solid rocket motors using 3D-printing technology.
This article is based on an official press release from Firehawk Aerospace.
On December 19, 2025, Firehawk Aerospace announced a significant expansion of its manufacturing capabilities with the acquisition of a specialized defense facility in Crawford, Mississippi. The Dallas-based defense technology company has secured a 20-year lease on the 636-acre site, which was formerly operated by Nammo Talley.
This acquisition marks a strategic pivot for Firehawk as it moves to address critical shortages in the U.S. defense supply chain. By taking over a facility that is already rated by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), the company aims to bypass the lengthy construction and certification timelines typically associated with greenfield defense projects. The site will serve as a hub for the full-system integration of solid rocket motors (SRMs), complementing the company’s existing R&D operations in Texas and energetics production in Oklahoma.
The Crawford facility is located in Lowndes County within Mississippi’s “Golden Triangle” region. According to the company’s announcement, the site is a “turnkey” defense asset designed specifically for handling high-grade explosives and munitions. The infrastructure includes assembly bays protected by one-foot-thick concrete walls and safety “blowout” walls designed to contain accidental detonations.
Because the facility was previously used by Nammo Defense Systems for the high-volume assembly of shoulder-launched munitions, such as the M72 LAW and SMAW systems, it retains the necessary regulatory certifications to allow for rapid operational ramp-up. Firehawk Aerospace CEO Will Edwards emphasized the urgency of this expansion in a statement regarding the deal.
“This acquisition strengthens Firehawk’s ability to address one of the nation’s most urgent defense challenges: rebuilding munition inventories that have been drawn down faster than they can be replaced.”
, Will Edwards, Co-founder and CEO of Firehawk Aerospace
The acquisition comes at a time when the Western defense industrial base is grappling with a severe shortage of solid rocket motors, which power critical systems like the Javelin, Stinger, and GMLRS missiles. Traditional manufacturing methods, which involve casting propellant in large batches that take weeks to cure, have created production bottlenecks.
Firehawk Aerospace intends to disrupt this model by utilizing proprietary 3D-printing technology to manufacture propellant grains. According to the press release, this additive manufacturing approach reduces production times from weeks to hours. The company has explicitly stated that the new Mississippi facility is being designed to achieve a production tempo of “thousands of rockets per month,” a significant increase over legacy industry standards. “While the current industrial base is built to produce thousands of rockets per year, we are building this site… to operate at a much higher production tempo… designing for throughput measured in thousands per month, not years.”
, Will Edwards, CEO
The expansion is expected to bring skilled jobs to the Golden Triangle region, which is increasingly becoming a hub for aerospace and defense activity. Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves welcomed the investments, noting the dual benefits of economic growth and national security support.
“Their acquisition in Crawford will bring skilled jobs to the region while directly contributing to the production capacity our nation needs.”
, Tate Reeves, Governor of Mississippi
From R&D to Mass Production: This acquisition signals Firehawk’s transition from a development-focused startup to a volume manufacturer. By securing a pre-rated facility, Firehawk has effectively shaved 2–3 years off its timeline, the period typically required to build and certify a new explosives handling site. This speed is critical given the current geopolitical demand for tactical munitions.
Supply Chain Decentralization: The move also highlights a strategy of decentralization. By distributing operations across Texas (R&D), Oklahoma (Energetics), and now Mississippi (Integration), Firehawk is building a supply chain that may prove more resilient than centralized legacy models. This geographic diversity also allows the company to tap into distinct labor markets and state-level incentives, such as Mississippi’s aerospace initiatives.
What is the significance of the DCMA rating? How does Firehawk’s technology differ from traditional methods? What was the facility used for previously?
Firehawk Aerospace Acquires Mississippi Facility to Scale Rocket Motor Production
Strategic Asset Details
Addressing the “Rocket Motor Crisis”
Regional Economic Impact
AirPro News Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
A DCMA (Defense Contract Management Agency) rating verifies that a facility meets strict Department of Defense quality and safety standards. Acquiring a pre-rated facility allows Firehawk to begin production much faster than if they had to build and certify a new site from scratch.
Traditional solid rocket motors are cast in large batches, a process that requires weeks for the propellant to cure. Firehawk uses 3D-printing technology to print propellant grains, which allows for custom geometries and reduces the manufacturing time to mere hours.
The facility was formerly operated by Nammo Talley (now Nammo Defense Systems) for the assembly of shoulder-launched munitions, including the M72 LAW and SMAW systems.Sources
Photo Credit: Firehawk Aerospace
Defense & Military
20 Years of the F-22 Raptor Operational Capability and Upgrades
Lockheed Martin celebrates 20 years of the F-22 Raptor’s operational service, highlighting its stealth, combat roles, readiness challenges, and modernization.
Lockheed Martin has launched a campaign commemorating the 20th anniversary of the F-22 Raptor achieving Initial Operational Capability (IOC). In December 2005, the 27th Fighter Squadron at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia became the first unit to field the fifth-generation fighter, marking a significant shift in global air superiority.
According to the manufacturer’s announcement, the aircraft continues to define the benchmark for modern air combat. In a statement regarding the milestone, Lockheed Martin emphasized the platform’s enduring relevance:
“The F-22 Raptor sets the global standard for capability, readiness, and mission success.”
While the airframe was designed in the 1990s and first flew in 1997, the F-22 remains a central pillar of U.S. air power. The fleet, which consists of approximately 185 remaining aircraft out of the 195 originally built, has evolved from a pure air superiority fighter into a multi-role platform capable of ground strikes and strategic deterrence.
Since its operational debut, the F-22 has maintained a reputation for dominance, primarily established through high-end military aircraft exercises rather than direct air-to-air combat against manned aircraft.
Data from the U.S. Air Force and independent observers highlights the discrepancy between the Raptor’s exercise performance and its real-world combat engagements. During the 2006 Northern Edge exercise, its first major test after becoming operational, the F-22 reportedly achieved a 108-to-0 kill ratio against simulated adversaries flying F-15s, F-16s, and F/A-18s.
Despite this lethality in training, the aircraft’s combat record is distinct. The F-22 made its combat debut in September 2014 during Operation Inherent Resolve, conducting ground strikes against ISIS targets in Syria. To date, the aircraft has zero confirmed kills against manned enemy aircraft. Its sole air-to-air victory occurred in February 2023, when an F-22 utilized an AIM-9X Sidewinder missile to down a high-altitude Chinese surveillance balloon off the coast of South Carolina.
The primary driver of the F-22’s longevity is its low observable technology. Defense analysts estimate the Raptor’s Radar Cross Section (RCS) to be approximately 0.0001 square meters, roughly the size of a steel marble. This makes it significantly stealthier than the F-35 Lightning II and orders of magnitude harder to detect than foreign competitors like the Russian Su-57 or the Chinese J-20.
While Lockheed Martin’s anniversary campaign highlights “readiness” as a key pillar of the F-22’s legacy, recent Air Force data suggests a more complex reality regarding the fleet’s health. We note that maintaining the world’s premier stealth fighter comes at a steep logistical cost. According to data published by Air & Space Forces Magazine regarding Fiscal Year 2024, the F-22’s mission capable (MC) rate dropped to approximately 40%. This figure represents a decline from roughly 52% in the previous fiscal year and indicates that, at any given time, fewer than half of the Raptors in the inventory are flyable and combat-ready.
This low readiness rate is largely attributed to the fragility of the aircraft’s stealth coatings and the aging avionics of the older airframes. The Air Force has previously attempted to retire 32 older “Block 20” F-22s used for training to divert funds toward newer programs, though Congress has blocked these efforts to preserve fleet numbers. The contrast between the jet’s theoretical dominance and its logistical availability remains a critical challenge for planners.
Contrary to earlier projections that might have seen the F-22 retired in the 2030s, the Air Force is investing heavily to keep the platform viable until the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter comes online.
In 2021, the Air Force awarded Lockheed Martin a $10.9 billion contract for the Advanced Raptor Enhancement and Sustainment (ARES) program. This decade-long modernization effort aims to update the fleet’s hardware and software.
According to budget documents for Fiscal Year 2026, the “Viability” upgrade package includes several key enhancements:
These investments suggest that while the F-22 is celebrating its past 20 years, the Air Force intends to rely on its capabilities well into the next decade.
Sources: Lockheed Martin, U.S. Air Force
Two Decades of the Raptor: Celebrating the F-22’s Operational Milestone
Operational History and Combat Record
Exercise Performance vs. Combat Reality
Stealth Capabilities
AirPro News Analysis: The Readiness Paradox
Modernization and Future Outlook
The ARES Contract and Upgrades
Sources
Photo Credit: Lockheed Martin
Defense & Military
U.S. Navy Zero-G Helmet System Completes Critical Design Review
Collins Elbit Vision Systems completes design review for the Zero-G Helmet Display, reducing pilot weight load and enhancing safety for Navy aircraft.
This article is based on an official press release from Collins Elbit Vision Systems (RTX).
Collins Elbit Vision Systems (CEVS), a joint venture between RTX’s Collins Aerospace and Elbit Systems of America, has officially announced the completion of the Critical Design Review (CDR) for the Zero-G Helmet Mounted Display System+ (HMDS+). This milestone, finalized on December 12, 2025, marks a pivotal step in the U.S. Navy’s Improved Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (IJHMCS) program.
The successful CDR effectively freezes the system’s design, confirming that the helmet meets the Navy’s rigorous requirements for safety, performance, and platform integration. With the design locked, the program now transitions into the airworthiness testing and integration phase, bringing the system closer to deployment aboard the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler fleets.
According to the press release, the Zero-G HMDS+ is engineered to address long-standing physiological challenges faced by naval aviators while introducing “6th-generation” digital capabilities to existing 4.5-generation aircraft.
The Zero-G HMDS+ represents a significant departure from legacy analog systems. While previous iterations required pilots to physically attach heavy Night Vision Goggles (NVGs) for low-light operations, the new system integrates digital night vision directly into the visor. This integration streamlines cockpit operations and reduces the physical burden on the aircrew.
A primary driver for the Zero-G’s development is the reduction of head-borne weight. High-G maneuvers in fighter aircraft place immense strain on a pilot’s neck and spine, a hazard exacerbated by heavy, unbalanced legacy helmets. CEVS reports that the Zero-G system is more than 25 percent lighter than current market alternatives. Its name is derived from its optimized center of gravity, designed to minimize fatigue and long-term injury risks.
Capt. Joseph Kamara, the U.S. Navy Program Manager for Naval Aircrew Systems (PMA-202), emphasized the safety implications of the new design in a statement:
“Aircrew health and safety is our number one priority. The Zero-G being integrated through our IJHMCS program promises to relieve aircrew of neck and back strain and greatly improve ejection safety.”
Beyond ergonomics, the helmet utilizes a binocular waveguide display system. Unlike monocular reticles used in older models, this technology projects high-definition color symbology and video into both eyes, creating a fully immersive 3D view of the battlespace. The system is capable of “sensor fusion at the edge,” processing mission data and weapon information directly on the helmet to act as a primary flight instrument. Luke Savoie, President and CEO of Elbit Systems of America, highlighted the strategic necessity of this upgrade:
“Zero-G is providing sensor fusion at the edge… As fighter aircraft level-up, the HMDs of those systems need to as well.”
The Zero-G HMDS+ program has moved rapidly since CEVS was awarded a $16 million contract by the U.S. Navy in September 2023 for development and test support. Following the successful CDR in December 2025, the program is scheduled to undergo flight testing and Avionics integration throughout 2026 and 2027.
The U.S. Navy projects Initial Operational Capability (IOC) for the system in 2027. Once fielded, it is expected to equip aviators across the entire fleet of U.S. Navy and Royal Australian Air Force Super Hornets and Growlers, totaling more than 750 aircraft.
The completion of the CDR signals a critical maturity point for the Navy’s effort to modernize the human-machine interface in its tactical fleet. While much industry attention is focused on future platforms like NGAD (Next Generation Air Dominance), the Zero-G program illustrates the military’s commitment to maintaining the lethality and survivability of its existing backbone fleet.
By adapting technology originally matured for the F-35 Gen III helmet, CEVS is effectively retrofitting advanced situational awareness tools onto older airframes. This approach not only extends the combat relevance of the Super Hornet but also addresses the acute retention issue of pilot physical health. The shift to digital night vision and balanced weight distribution suggests that the Navy views pilot longevity as a critical component of fleet readiness.
Critical Design Review Completed for Navy’s Next-Gen Helmet
Technical Leap: The Zero-G HMDS+
Weight Reduction and Pilot Safety
Advanced Display Capabilities
Program Timeline and Deployment
AirPro News Analysis
Sources
Photo Credit: RTX
-
Commercial Aviation6 days agoVietnam Grounds 28 Aircraft Amid Pratt & Whitney Engine Shortage
-
Business Aviation2 days agoGreg Biffle and Family Die in North Carolina Plane Crash
-
Defense & Military4 days agoFinland Unveils First F-35A Lightning II under HX Fighter Program
-
Business Aviation3 days agoBombardier Launches Smart Router for Next-Gen Aircraft Connectivity
-
Business Aviation3 days agoDassault Falcon 10X Prototype Begins Ground Tests in Bordeaux
