Defense & Military
USS Harry S. Truman Collision: Maritime Safety Concerns

USS Harry S. Truman Collision: A Detailed Analysis
The collision between the USS Harry S. Truman, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, and the merchant vessel Besiktas-M near Port Said, Egypt, has raised significant concerns about maritime safety and naval operations in congested sea lanes. This incident, which occurred on February 12, 2025, highlights the complexities of navigating high-traffic areas and the importance of stringent safety protocols. While no injuries or flooding were reported on the USS Harry S. Truman, the event has prompted discussions about the broader implications for naval operations and global maritime safety.
The Mediterranean Sea, particularly near the Suez Canal, is one of the busiest shipping routes in the world. The collision underscores the challenges faced by both military and commercial vessels in such densely trafficked waters. This article delves into the details of the incident, its immediate aftermath, and the potential long-term implications for naval operations and maritime safety.
Incident Details and Immediate Aftermath
The collision occurred at approximately 11:46 p.m. local time near Port Said, Egypt. The USS Harry S. Truman, a massive aircraft carrier measuring over 1,000 feet in length, collided with the Besiktas-M, a Panamanian-flagged bulk carrier. The merchant vessel had just transited the Suez Canal and was en route to the Black Sea port of Constanta, Romania. Despite the collision, there were no reports of flooding or injuries aboard the USS Harry S. Truman, and its propulsion plants remained unaffected and in a safe condition.
Initial reports suggest that the damage to the USS Harry S. Truman is above the waterline, and no aircraft on board were damaged. The Besiktas-M also sustained some damage, but none of its crew members were injured. The incident is currently under investigation, with more information expected to be released as it becomes available. The U.S. Navy has emphasized that the collision did not endanger the USS Harry S. Truman, and the vessel remains operational.
“The collision did not endanger the Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) as there are no reports of flooding or injuries. The propulsion plants are unaffected and in a safe and stable condition. The incident is under investigation. More information will be released as it becomes available.” – Cmdr. Timothy Gorman, U.S. 6th Fleet Spokesperson
Historical Context and Broader Implications
This incident is not the first of its kind. In 2017, the Navy destroyers USS Fitzgerald and USS John S. McCain were involved in collisions at sea, resulting in the deaths of 17 sailors. These incidents prompted a review of naval safety protocols and training procedures. The recent collision involving the USS Harry S. Truman has reignited concerns about the effectiveness of these measures and the challenges of operating in high-traffic maritime environments.
The Mediterranean Sea, particularly near the Suez Canal, is a critical artery for global trade. The collision highlights the need for enhanced navigation and communication systems to prevent such incidents in the future. The U.S. Navy has been working on implementing physical throttles on destroyers after touch-screen systems were found to have contributed to previous collisions. However, this incident suggests that more comprehensive measures may be necessary to ensure the safety of both military and commercial vessels in congested waters.
Furthermore, the incident underscores the importance of international cooperation in maritime safety. The Suez Canal is a vital route for global commerce, and incidents like this can have significant economic implications. Enhanced coordination between military and commercial shipping authorities could help mitigate the risks of collisions and ensure the safe passage of vessels through this critical waterway.
Conclusion
The collision between the USS Harry S. Truman and the Besiktas-M serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by naval and commercial vessels in high-traffic maritime environments. While the incident did not result in any injuries or significant damage to the USS Harry S. Truman, it has raised important questions about the effectiveness of current safety protocols and the need for enhanced navigation and communication systems.
Looking ahead, this incident could prompt further reviews of naval safety procedures and training programs. It also highlights the importance of international cooperation in ensuring maritime safety, particularly in critical waterways like the Suez Canal. As the investigation into the collision continues, it will be crucial to learn from this incident and implement measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
FAQ
Question: What caused the collision between the USS Harry S. Truman and the Besiktas-M?
Answer: The exact cause of the collision is still under investigation. Initial reports suggest that it occurred in a high-traffic area near Port Said, Egypt, but further details will be released as the investigation progresses.
Question: Was there any damage to the USS Harry S. Truman?
Answer: The USS Harry S. Truman sustained some damage above the waterline, but there was no flooding or injuries reported. The carrier’s propulsion plants remained unaffected and in a safe condition.
Question: What are the broader implications of this incident?
Answer: The incident highlights the challenges of operating in high-traffic maritime environments and underscores the need for enhanced safety protocols and international cooperation to prevent future collisions.
Sources: Task & Purpose, Air Force Times, USNI News
Defense & Military
GE Aerospace and Shield AI Complete X-BAT Engine Test
GE Aerospace and Shield AI complete AVEN thrust-vectoring nozzle testing on the F110-GE-129E, keeping X-BAT on track for late 2026 first flight.

GE Aerospace and Shield AI have successfully completed integration, actuation, and engine light-off testing of a multi-axis thrust-vectoring nozzle on an F110-GE-129E engine, clearing a major propulsion hurdle for the X-BAT vertical take-off and landing combat aircraft.
Announced in a July 20, 2026, press release, the testing took place at GE Aerospace’s operations site in Peebles, Ohio. The campaign represents the first fully integrated test of the Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhaust Nozzle (AVEN) hardware and control systems since its original development in the 1990s. The successful light-off keeps the X-BAT program on schedule for a planned first flight in late 2026.
Resurrecting thrust vectoring for vertical flight
The AVEN system pivots engine exhaust in three dimensions, providing the precise directional control required for the aircraft to balance on its tailpipe during vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) maneuvers. Originally designed in the 1990s, the AVEN program accumulated 73 hours of ground testing and 135 flight hours across 95 flights on an experimental F-16 before being shelved.
Shield AI and GE Aerospace are now adapting that legacy hardware to meet the demands of modern autonomous flight. The integration requires the nozzle to execute rapid, coordinated movement sequences driven by Shield AI’s flight control software.
“The AVEN is what makes vertical flight possible on a platform this size and this capable. We’re applying it differently than it was ever used before. Vertical flight requires fast gimbaling to maintain attitude control, a demand the original program never had to meet,” said Armor Harris, Senior Vice President of Aircraft Engineering at Shield AI.
Harris noted that utilizing hardware with a proven track record allowed the engineering teams to bypass the initial stages of clean-sheet development. The next phase of the program will focus on iterating the propulsion approach to reduce weight and increase speed for future variants.
Scaling the X-BAT for contested environments
Shield AI unveiled the X-BAT in Washington, D.C., on October 21, 2025. The aircraft is designed as a Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) capable of operating independently or as a drone wingman in contested airspace. By November 5, 2025, Shield AI and GE Aerospace had signed a Memorandum of Understanding to collaborate on the platform’s propulsion, selecting the F110-GE-129 engine paired with the AVEN system.
The aircraft relies on Shield AI’s Hivemind autonomy software to conduct missions without traditional runway infrastructure. According to reporting by Tectonic Defense, the X-BAT measures 26 feet in length and features a 39-foot wingspan. Naval News estimates the platform will achieve a range exceeding 2,000 nautical miles and an operational ceiling of 50,000 feet, positioning it for both austere land bases and potential naval integration.
Amy Gowder, President and CEO of Defense & Systems at GE Aerospace, stated that pairing the company’s propulsion scaling experience with Shield AI’s vehicle development allows the program to move rapidly from concept to fielded capability.
AirPro News analysis
We view the successful light-off of the AVEN-equipped F110 as a validation of Shield AI’s strategy to integrate mature subsystems rather than developing bespoke hardware. The GE Aerospace F110 engine family has accumulated 11 million flight hours. By pairing a highly reliable, mass-produced core engine with a previously flight-tested 3D vectoring nozzle, the X-BAT program significantly reduces its technical risk profile.
The primary challenge moving forward will be software integration. While the AVEN hardware is proven, the 1990s-era actuators were not designed for the continuous, high-frequency gimbaling required to stabilize a tail-sitting VTOL aircraft in turbulent conditions. Shield AI’s Hivemind system will need to manage these actuation limits carefully to prevent mechanical fatigue while maintaining attitude control during the critical transition between vertical and forward flight.
Sources: GE Aerospace
Photo Credit: GE Aerospace
Defense & Military
Pratt Whitney Completes 3D-Printed TJ150 Turbojet Demo Test
Pratt & Whitney validates additive manufacturing for the TJ150, consolidating 50+ hot section parts into 3D-printed components.

Pratt & Whitney has successfully completed demonstration testing of an additively manufactured TJ150 turbojet engine, a process that consolidated more than 50 individual hot section components into a small number of 3D-printed parts.
The RTX Corporation subsidiary announced the milestone on July 20, 2026, during the Farnborough International Airshow in London. The test results validate the manufacturer’s strategy to use additive manufacturing to simplify design and accelerate production for expendable military propulsion systems.
Consolidating hot section components
According to the press release, nearly 60 percent of the TJ150 engine’s volume was produced using additive manufacturing. This volume includes major static and rotating hardware. By utilizing 3D printing technologies, engineers reduced the complexity of the engine’s hot section and replaced over 50 traditional parts with a handful of consolidated components.
The TJ150 is a 150-pound thrust class turbojet designed for single-use applications.
“For expendable engines like the TJ150, where missions can last minutes or hours, simplifying the design and scaling production quickly is essential to meeting rising demand,” said Jill Albertelli, President of Military Engines at Pratt & Whitney.
Integration with cruise missiles and decoys
The successful demonstration of the 3D-printed TJ150 follows recent contract awards and integration announcements for the engine platform. On March 10, 2026, Pratt & Whitney secured a follow-on contract from Leidos Dynetics to supply TJ150 engines for the AGM-190A small cruise missile.
In a separate announcement on July 15, 2026, Raytheon confirmed plans to prioritize the TJ150 engine for the initial production of the Miniature Air-Launched Decoy (MALD). Raytheon noted that utilizing the existing engine platform keeps restart timelines short while the company explores additively manufactured engines for longer-term opportunities.
Expanding additive manufacturing applications
Pratt & Whitney plans to apply the manufacturing techniques validated during the TJ150 demonstration to other propulsion programs. Albertelli stated that additive manufacturing helps the company move designs from concept to capability faster. She confirmed that the manufacturer is leveraging the TJ150 learnings to benefit other systems, including the Pratt & Whitney Valox engine family.
AirPro News analysis
The successful test of a heavily 3D-printed TJ150 highlights a critical shift in defense aerospace manufacturing. As military operators demand higher volumes of autonomous systems, decoys, and tactical missiles, traditional supply chains for small turbine engines face significant bottlenecks. Casting and machining conventional hot-section components requires extensive tooling and long lead times. By consolidating dozens of parts into a few additively manufactured pieces, we see manufacturers directly addressing the need for rapid scalability.
Expendable engines operate for very short durations, meaning they do not require the same long-term durability as commercial or manned military turbofans. This specific operational profile makes them ideal candidates for additive manufacturing, allowing producers to prioritize production speed and cost reduction over thousands of hours of time-on-wing reliability.
Photo Credit: RTX
Defense & Military
GE Aerospace and Magellan Sign F414 MRO MOU for Canada
GE Aerospace and Magellan Aerospace signed an MOU at Farnborough to establish a Canadian F414 engine MRO center if Canada selects the Gripen E.

GE Aerospace and Magellan Aerospace Corporation signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on July 22, 2026, at the Farnborough International Airshow to establish a Canadian MRO center for the F414-GE-39E engine. The agreement is entirely contingent on the Government of Canada selecting the Saab JAS 39 Gripen E for its future fighter fleet.
Announced in a GE Aerospace press release, the proposed MRO work would take place at Magellan’s facility in Mississauga, Ontario. The partnership aims to position Magellan as Canada’s domestic center of excellence for F414 engine sustainment, guaranteeing sovereign support capabilities for the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) if the Gripen E is acquired.
Industrial offsets and the Gripen E campaign
The MOU represents a calculated component of a broader industrial offset campaign by Saab AB and its suppliers to secure a portion of Canada’s fighter procurement contract. The Canadian government is currently reviewing its fighter jet strategy. While Ottawa previously committed to purchasing a fleet of 88 Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II Military-Aircraft, the government is evaluating a potential mixed fleet that could include domestically built Gripen E fighters.
To strengthen the Gripen’s bid, Saab has been securing agreements with Canadian aerospace firms to promise domestic job creation and technology transfer. This engine sustainment agreement follows a similar MOU signed on July 17, 2026, between Saab and Canadian aviation training firm CAE Inc. to cooperate on advanced fighter pilot Training.
Engine sustainment and domestic capabilities
The F414 engine family has accumulated more than 5 million flight hours globally. The new agreement builds on a 60-year working relationship between GE Aerospace and Magellan Aerospace Corporation.
Paul Ferraro, Vice President of Defense Engines & Services at GE Aerospace, stated that the agreement spans both military and commercial engines and will ensure the RCAF has in-country access to sustainment services to maintain F414 readiness.
Haydn Martin, Vice President of Business Development, Marketing, and Contracts at Magellan Aerospace Corporation, emphasized the operational benefits of the proposed partnership.
“Should the Saab JAS 39 Gripen E aircraft be selected, Magellan Aerospace will be ready to provide world-class engine maintenance, repair and overhaul services that enhance operational readiness for the Royal Canadian Air Force while maintaining highly skilled Canadian jobs, developing advanced technical expertise, and strengthening Canada’s long-term defence industrial capacity,” Martin said.
AirPro News analysis
We view this MOU as a clear signal that the competition for Canada’s fighter fleet remains highly active despite the initial F-35A selection. By lining up domestic heavyweights like Magellan and CAE, Saab is directly addressing Ottawa’s stringent Industrial and Technological Benefits (ITB) policy requirements. If the Government of Canada opts for a mixed fleet, establishing sovereign MRO capabilities for the F414 engine will be a critical factor in mitigating supply chain risks and ensuring RCAF operational independence. Until a formal procurement decision is finalized, these agreements remain strategic positioning rather than guaranteed Contracts.
Sources: GE Aerospace
Photo Credit: GE Aerospace
-
Aircraft Orders & Deliveries2 days agoPhilippine Airlines Orders Up to 20 Boeing 787-10 Dreamliners
-
Defense & Military1 day agoBombardier Defense Signs 10-Year Support Deal With Sweden
-
Aircraft Orders & Deliveries2 days agoAerCap Orders 15 Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners at Farnborough 2026
-
Aircraft Orders & Deliveries2 days agoRiyadh Air Orders 31 A350-1000s and 67 Boeing 787s
-
Defense & Military1 day agoGE Aerospace and Magellan Sign F414 MRO MOU for Canada
