Commercial Aviation
Turkish Airlines Airbus A330 Landing Gear Fire in Kathmandu May 2026
Turkish Airlines flight TK726 experienced a landing gear fire on May 11, 2026, at Kathmandu’s Tribhuvan International Airport with safe evacuation of all onboard.

This article summarizes reporting by Reuters. Additional details are sourced from official aviation authority statements and public remarks.
On Monday, May 11, 2026, a Turkish Airlines Airbus A330 experienced a minor fire in its landing gear upon arriving in Kathmandu, Nepal. According to reporting by Reuters, the incident forced a temporary closure of the airport, but all individuals on board were safely evacuated without serious injury.
The flight, operating as TK726 from Istanbul, was carrying 277 passengers and 11 crew members when the emergency occurred at Tribhuvan International Airport (TIA). Emergency responders quickly contained the situation, preventing a major disaster at Nepal’s primary international gateway.
We are closely monitoring the ongoing technical inspections and the cascading flight disruptions resulting from the runway closure. The swift action by airport fire crews ensured that the situation was neutralized rapidly, with only minor injuries reported during the emergency slide evacuation.
Incident Details and Evacuation
Emergency Response on the Runway
The incident unfolded at approximately 6:45 AM local time. As the Airbus A330-300 touched down on the runway, ground observers and airport officials noted thick grey smoke and visible flames emanating from the right rear landing gear and tyres. Airport security and fire services were immediately dispatched to intercept the aircraft.
SP Rajkumar Silawal of the Airport Security Office confirmed the rapid deployment of emergency services to the scene, noting that the runway was temporarily closed for technical inspection.
“Using the fire engine, it has been contained. All the passengers are safely evacuated,”
, SP Rajkumar Silawal, Airport Security Office
The evacuation process utilized the aircraft’s emergency deployment slides. While all 288 people on board escaped the aircraft safely, authorities noted that a few passengers sustained minor hand injuries during the rapid descent. The passenger manifest notably included four children and several United Nations officials traveling to the capital. Additionally, officials confirmed the aircraft’s cargo hold was transporting human remains alongside standard baggage.
Official Statements and Technical Assessments
Airline and Authority Perspectives
The Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN) provided immediate updates on the aircraft’s status following the evacuation. CAAN spokesperson Gyanendra Bhul stated that the fire in the right rear tyre was successfully doused and the aircraft was subsequently towed to a taxiway, where it remains grounded for a thorough inspection.
Turkish Airlines also addressed the malfunction promptly. Yahya Ustun, the airline’s Senior Vice President of Communications, released a statement on the social media platform X. He noted that smoke was observed in the landing gear while taxiing and that technical inspections had been initiated immediately.
“Initial assessments indicate that the smoke was caused by a technical malfunction in a hydraulic pipe,”
, Yahya Ustun, Turkish Airlines SVP of Communications
Ustun further confirmed that the airline is organizing an additional flight to accommodate passengers who were scheduled for the return leg from Kathmandu to Istanbul.
Operational Impact and Historical Context
Flight Disruptions at Tribhuvan International
The emergency response necessitated the closure of TIA’s sole runway for approximately one hour. This shutdown caused significant cascading delays across the region’s airspace. Incoming flights from carriers such as Air India, Air Arabia, Drukair, flydubai, and Nepal Airlines were either placed in holding patterns in Kathmandu airspace or diverted to alternate airports until the runway was cleared.
AirPro News analysis
We note that Nepal’s mountainous terrain and unpredictable weather already make Tribhuvan International Airport a highly challenging environment for commercial aviation. This incident adds to a recent pattern of operational challenges for Turkish Airlines in the South Asian region. In February 2026, another Turkish Airlines flight departing Kathmandu suffered an engine fire, forcing an emergency landing in Kolkata, India.
Furthermore, aviation observers will recall a high-profile March 2015 incident where a Turkish Airlines jet skidded off the runway at TIA in dense fog. While there were no injuries in that event, it closed the airport for several days, and the stranded aircraft was eventually converted into an aviation museum. The swift containment of this latest landing gear fire highlights significantly improved emergency readiness and ground response at the airport, preventing a repeat of the prolonged 2015 operational shutdown.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
When did the Turkish Airlines fire in Kathmandu occur?
The incident occurred on the morning of Monday, May 11, 2026, at approximately 6:45 AM local time.
Were there any casualties on Flight TK726?
No fatalities or serious injuries occurred. All 277 passengers and 11 crew members were safely evacuated. A few individuals sustained minor injuries, such as scraped hands, while using the emergency evacuation slides.
What caused the fire on the Airbus A330?
According to statements from Turkish Airlines, initial technical assessments suggest the smoke and fire were caused by a malfunction in a hydraulic pipe near the right rear landing gear.
Sources
- Reuters
- Official statements from the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN)
- Public remarks from Turkish Airlines Communications
Photo Credit: X
Commercial Aviation
ACIA Aero Leasing Closes Sale and Leaseback Deal with Braathens
ACIA Aero Leasing completed a sale and leaseback deal with Braathens for two ATR 72-600 aircraft operating regional routes for SAS in Northern Europe.

This article is based on an official press release from ACIA Aero Leasing.
ACIA Aero Leasing Closes Sale and Leaseback Deal with Braathens for Two ATR 72-600s
On May 7, 2026, ACIA Aero Leasing announced the successful closing of a sale and leaseback (SLB) transaction with Braathens Regional Airlines. The agreement covers two ATR 72-600 passenger turboprop aircraft. According to the official press release, these aircraft are currently deployed on regional routes across Sweden and Northern Europe, operating exclusively on behalf of Scandinavian Airlines (SAS).
This transaction provides Braathens with capital liquidity while allowing the carrier to retain uninterrupted use of the aircraft. We note that this financial maneuver follows a period of profound transformation for Braathens, which recently restructured its business to operate as a dedicated wet-lease provider for SAS.
The deal not only bolsters Braathens’ balance sheet but also expands ACIA Aero Leasing’s footprint in the Nordic regional aviation market, reinforcing the lessor’s commitment to fuel-efficient turboprop operations.
Transaction Details and Fleet Impact
Expanding the ACIA and Braathens Partnership
The sale and leaseback agreement involves two specific ATR 72-600 aircraft, identified by Manufacturer Serial Numbers (MSNs) 1348 and 1357. By selling these assets to ACIA and immediately leasing them back, Braathens unlocks capital without sacrificing the operational capacity required to fulfill its network obligations to SAS.
According to the press release, this transaction increases ACIA’s leased fleet with Braathens to three aircraft. Furthermore, it brings ACIA’s total global ATR portfolio to 38 aircraft. Industry data indicates that ACIA, headquartered in Ireland, manages a broader global portfolio of nearly 70 regional passenger and freighter aircraft across more than 22 countries, while Braathens operates a core fleet of 17 ATR 72-600s.
Company leadership from both organizations highlighted the collaborative nature of the agreement. Mick Mooney, Chief Executive Officer of ACIA Aero Leasing, emphasized the lessor’s commitment to the airline’s ongoing transition:
“We are delighted to strengthen our relationship with Braathens through this SLB transaction on two ATR 72-600s. The transaction further demonstrates our support for Braathens as they continue to transform their business.”
Mia Jakobsson, Head of Fleet Management & PMO at Braathens, echoed this sentiment, pointing to the importance of lessor support during the airline’s recent operational shifts:
“We greatly appreciate ACIA’s continued support throughout the changes Braathens has undergone in recent times. These transactions are a testament to the strong cooperation between our teams, and we value the partnership as our joint business continues to grow.”
Braathens’ Strategic Pivot and Restructuring
Transition to a Pure ACMI Model
The context surrounding this SLB transaction is rooted in Braathens’ recent strategic overhaul. Industry research shows that in September 2024, Braathens announced it would cease its own scheduled passenger operations out of Stockholm Bromma by the end of that year, citing a sluggish post-pandemic domestic market. In its place, the airline secured a seven-year, SEK 6 billion (approximately $590 million) ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) contract with SAS, which took effect on January 1, 2025. Under this arrangement, Braathens utilizes its ATR fleet to feed major SAS hubs, primarily Stockholm Arlanda and Copenhagen Kastrup.
However, transitioning to a pure ACMI model required significant financial maneuvering. Between late 2025 and early 2026, Braathens initiated a court-supervised financial reorganization for its parent company and its ATR operating subsidiary to reduce debt and renegotiate existing contracts. During this same period, its Airbus subsidiary, Braathens International Airways, filed for bankruptcy.
To ensure the stability of its vital regional feeder network, SAS stepped in with a financial lifeline. In February 2026, SAS provided Braathens with a SEK 50 million (approximately €4.75 million) loan, securing exclusive access to Braathens’ ATR capacity and aiding the regional carrier through its restructuring process.
AirPro News analysis
We view this sale and leaseback transaction as a textbook example of how airlines utilize asset financing to navigate complex corporate restructurings. SLB transactions are a vital financial tool; by monetizing owned assets, airlines like Braathens can generate immediate cash flow to cover operational costs or service debt without disrupting their flight schedules or jeopardizing major contracts, such as the lucrative SAS ACMI agreement.
Furthermore, this deal underscores two broader trends in the European aviation sector. First, there is a clear move toward regional aviation consolidation and outsourcing. Major flag carriers like SAS are increasingly relying on specialized wet-lease partners to operate lower-demand regional routes, optimizing operating costs while maintaining network breadth. Second, the transaction highlights the enduring resilience of the turboprop market. The ATR 72-600 burns up to 40% less fuel and emits 40% less CO2 compared to similar-sized regional jets. In the Scandinavian market, where environmental regulations are stringent and sustainability goals are paramount, the operating economics and environmental profile of the ATR 72-600 make it a highly attractive asset for both operators and lessors.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Sale and Leaseback (SLB) transaction?
A sale and leaseback is a financial transaction where an airline sells an aircraft it owns to a leasing company and immediately leases it back. This allows the airline to free up capital tied up in the asset while continuing to operate the aircraft without interruption.
Why did Braathens restructure its business?
Facing a slow recovery in the domestic market, Braathens discontinued its independent scheduled passenger flights in late 2024. The airline pivoted to a wet-lease (ACMI) model, signing a major contract to operate flights exclusively for SAS. The costs associated with this transition led to a court-supervised financial reorganization in late 2025 and early 2026.
Sources
- ACIA Aero Leasing Press Release
- Industry Research Data
Photo Credit: Braathens
Commercial Aviation
US Airlines Face Historic Fuel Cost Surge in March 2026
US airlines spent $5.06 billion on fuel in March 2026, driven by a 31% rise in cost per gallon due to the 2026 Iran War and Strait of Hormuz closure.

This article is based on an official press release from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
U.S. scheduled service airlines experienced a historic surge in aviation fuel costs during March 2026, driven by a combination of increased seasonal consumption and a severe spike in the cost per gallon. According to an official press release from the Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), total fuel expenditures for the month eclipsed $5 billion.
This dramatic 30.9 percent month-over-month increase in fuel prices is directly linked to the outbreak of the 2026 Iran War in late February. The resulting closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted approximately 20 percent of global oil supplies, sending shockwaves through the global aviation industry.
As airlines grapple with these sudden operational cost increases, the ripple effects are already being felt across passenger airfares, global air cargo demand, and the strategic procurement of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF).
March 2026 Fuel Data Breakdown
Expenditure and Consumption
The BTS reports that U.S. airlines spent $5.06 billion on fuel in March 2026. This figure represents a staggering 56.4 percent increase from February 2026, when expenditures totaled $3.23 billion, and a 30.4 percent increase from March 2025 ($3.88 billion).
Fuel consumption also saw a notable rise. Airlines consumed 1.615 billion gallons of fuel in March 2026, which is 19.5 percent more than the 1.352 billion gallons consumed in February 2026, and a slight 0.4 percent increase compared to March 2025 (1.609 billion gallons).
Cost Per Gallon Surge
The most significant metric driving the expenditure spike is the average cost per gallon. According to the BTS, the average cost reached $3.13 in March 2026. This marks a jump of 74 cents, or 30.9 percent, from February 2026 ($2.39), and a 72-cent increase (29.9 percent) from March 2025 ($2.41).
Geopolitical Drivers: The 2026 Middle East Energy Crisis
The Strait of Hormuz Closure
The dramatic rise in domestic fuel costs is a direct consequence of global geopolitical events. In late February 2026, military conflict escalated in the Middle East, leading to the restriction of nearly all maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
This critical chokepoint normally handles about 20 percent of the world’s seaborne oil supply. The International Energy Agency (IEA) highlighted the severity of the situation in a recent assessment of the crisis:
The situation represents the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.
Consequently, Brent crude prices surged by 46 percent in March 2026. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) reported that global jet fuel prices rose 106.6 percent year-over-year in March, alongside a massive 320 percent surge in refining margins.
Industry Impact: Fares, Cargo, and Retail Spikes
Rising Airfares and Surcharges
Jet fuel is typically the single largest operating expense for airlines, accounting for 20 to 35 percent of total costs. In response to the March price spikes, several international carriers immediately raised fares and fuel surcharges to protect their profit margins. Industry research indicates that Cathay Pacific doubled its long-haul fuel surcharge to $149, while Air India and Air France-KLM also implemented significant surcharge increases for international flights.
Air Cargo Declines
The Middle East disruptions and rising operational costs have heavily impacted global logistics. According to IATA data, there was a 4.8 percent year-over-year decline in global air cargo demand in March 2026. Middle Eastern carriers experienced a severe 54.3 percent drop in demand due to airspace and hub disruptions.
General Aviation Hits $10 per Gallon
While the BTS reported an average of $3.13 per gallon for commercial airlines, the retail market saw even more extreme spikes. Retail jet fuel prices at some U.S. Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) for private and general aviation reached as high as $10 per gallon in the Northeast by early March, driven by the market’s risk premium.
The Push for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
Achieving Price Parity
The vulnerability of conventional jet fuel supply chains has accelerated interest in alternative energy sources. With conventional jet fuel spiking to a record $1,800 per metric ton in Europe in mid-March, Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has inadvertently become more economically viable. Airlines holding pre-crisis, long-term SAF offtake agreements are now finding those contracts priced at or near parity with current spot conventional jet fuel prices.
AirPro News analysis
We assess that the financial toll of the Strait of Hormuz closure, evidenced by the $5.06 billion spent by U.S. airlines in a single month, will likely serve as a permanent catalyst for the aviation industry’s green transition. The crisis has laid bare the urgent need for energy independence in the aviation sector. As governments and defense sectors invest more heavily in rapidly deployable synthetic fuel production and SAF infrastructure, airlines will likely shift their long-term procurement strategies to mitigate exposure to future geopolitical shocks. Furthermore, consumers should brace for these elevated costs to trickle down into summer travel plans via higher base fares and sustained fuel surcharges.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did U.S. airline fuel costs spike in March 2026?
The 30.9 percent increase in the cost per gallon was primarily driven by the outbreak of the 2026 Iran War in late February, which led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and disrupted 20 percent of the global oil supply.
How much did U.S. airlines spend on fuel in March 2026?
According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. scheduled service airlines spent $5.06 billion on fuel in March 2026, a 56.4 percent increase from February 2026.
Will this affect passenger airfares?
Yes. Jet fuel is a major operating expense for airlines. Several international carriers have already raised fares and fuel surcharges to offset the rising costs, and these increases are expected to impact upcoming summer travel.
Sources
Photo Credit: Envato
Route Development
Ontario International Airport Launches ONT BOLD Expansion Project
Ontario International Airport begins environmental review for ONT BOLD, a project including a new Terminal 3 and upgrades to meet growing passenger demand.

This article is based on an official press release from Ontario International Airport.
Airports (ONT) has officially initiated the environmental review process for a comprehensive expansion program named ONT BOLD (“Building Our Legacy & Destiny”). Announced on May 7, 2026, the project is designed to address rapid passenger growth and modernize the airport’s infrastructure to serve the expanding Inland Empire region.
According to the official press release from the Ontario International Airport Authority (OIAA), the airport has issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This regulatory milestone marks the first formal step in a phased development timeline that officials project could span up to 10 years following the receipt of environmental approvals.
The proposed expansion will feature a new 650,000-square-foot Terminal 3, the modernization of existing facilities, and the integration of advanced aviation technologies. By launching the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process, the OIAA aims to solidify ONT’s position as a premier Southern California passenger gateway and global supply chain hub.
Addressing Unprecedented Regional Growth
Surging Passenger Demand
The necessity for the ONT BOLD project is driven by significant growth since the airport returned to local control in 2016. According to project data, passenger volume has increased by nearly 70% over the past decade, with the airport now handling over 7 million passengers annually. During peak travel periods, current demand already exceeds the design capacity of the existing terminal facilities.
This surge mirrors the broader demographic trends of the Inland Empire, which is currently home to over 4.5 million residents and is projected to grow by another million by 2050. Airport officials note that when factoring in regional drive times, more than 10 million Southern Californians live or work closer to ONT than any other commercial airport.
Interim Upgrades Underway
While the ONT BOLD project represents a long-term solution, the OIAA is already executing interim improvements. An $11 million Transportation Security Administration (TSA) security expansion project is currently underway in Terminals 2 and 4. This interim project, which began in Spring 2025, is slated for completion in Fall 2026 to help manage immediate capacity constraints.
The ONT BOLD Master Plan
Terminal 3 and International Capacity
The centerpiece of the ONT BOLD program is the proposed Terminal 3. As detailed in the project announcement, this new three-level, 650,000-square-foot facility is designed to serve both domestic and international passengers. Crucially, Terminal 3 will feature a new Federal Inspection Services (FIS) facility. This addition is essential for processing international arrivals and securing certification from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which will significantly boost ONT’s capacity as an international gateway.
In tandem with the new construction, the project outlines the modernization and expansion of Terminals 2 and 4, which were not originally designed to meet modern security and accessibility standards. The broader infrastructure overhaul also includes a new multi-story parking garage, optimized terminal roadways, upgraded taxiways, and a new Central Utility Plant and Fuel Farm.
Technological Innovation: MARS Gates
A standout feature planned for the new Terminal 3 is the implementation of Multiple Aircraft Ramp System (MARS) stands. Breaking from the conventional model of fixed aircraft-gate assignments, MARS gates utilize a network of adjustable walkways and overlapping stands. This flexible configuration can accommodate either two narrowbody aircraft or a single widebody jet simultaneously.
According to industry data provided in the project overview, this technology maximizes the utilization of existing tarmac space, effectively increasing airport capacity without requiring sprawling additional infrastructure. Furthermore, the system utilizes two passenger boarding bridges per gate, which is expected to drastically reduce boarding and deplaning times and improve the overall passenger experience.
Environmental Review and Community Engagement
The issuance of the NOP officially opens the public scoping phase of the CEQA review process. The OIAA has scheduled a Public Scoping Meeting for Thursday, May 21, 2026, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the OIAA Boardroom to gather community and stakeholder feedback. Written responses to the NOP must be submitted by June 8, 2026.
Local leaders emphasized the importance of community collaboration during this phase. Alan D. Wapner, President of the OIAA Board of Commissioners and Ontario Mayor pro Tem, highlighted the project’s regional significance in the official release:
“Project BOLD is about more than building facilities, it’s about building the future of this airport and the region we serve. As demand continues to grow, we have a responsibility to ensure ONT remains convenient, accessible and ready to connect the Inland Empire with the world. This is the first step in a transparent and collaborative effort to shape ONT’s next chapter.”
Curt Hagman, San Bernardino County Supervisor and OIAA Board Vice President, echoed this sentiment, noting the strategic nature of the expansion:
“ONT BOLD represents a thoughtful, phased approach to meeting the demands of a fast-growing region. We’re investing in infrastructure that strengthens our role as a major passenger gateway and global supply chain hub, while maintaining the ease and efficiency travelers value.”
Atif Elkadi, CEO of the Ontario International Airport Authority, also commented on the airport’s trajectory:
“We are proud of the trajectory we’re on, and even more excited about where we’re headed. We serve one of the most dynamic economic and population centers in the United States, and that gives us a unique opportunity, and responsibility, to lead.”
AirPro News analysis
The launch of the ONT BOLD environmental review signals a critical maturation point for Ontario International Airport. By investing heavily in international processing capabilities (the new FIS facility) and high-efficiency infrastructure like MARS gates, ONT is positioning itself to compete more directly with larger hubs such as Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). The emphasis on maintaining its reputation for convenience while scaling up operations will be a delicate balancing act over the projected 10-year construction period.
Financially, the OIAA has made it clear that projects of this scale are typically funded through a combination of airport revenues, debt, passenger facility charges (PFCs), and federal or state grants. By explicitly stating that no local tax dollars will be used, airport leadership is likely aiming to preempt local financial concerns ahead of the May 21 public scoping meeting. We will continue to monitor the CEQA process as specific designs and cost estimates are refined.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ONT BOLD project?
ONT BOLD (“Building Our Legacy & Destiny”) is a proposed expansion program at Ontario International Airport. It includes the construction of a new 650,000-square-foot Terminal 3, modernization of Terminals 2 and 4, and various infrastructure upgrades including new roadways, parking, and a Central Utility Plant.
When will the expansion be completed?
The project is currently entering its environmental review phase. Once environmental approvals are secured, construction is projected to take up to 10 years.
How is the project being funded?
According to airport officials, the expansion will be funded through airport revenues, debt, passenger facility charges (PFCs), and federal/state grants. No local tax dollars will be used.
How can the public participate in the review process?
A Public Scoping Meeting is scheduled for May 21, 2026, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the OIAA Boardroom. The deadline for written public comments on the Notice of Preparation is June 8, 2026.
Photo Credit: Ontario International Airport
-
Regulations & Safety2 days agoFrontier Flight Hits Pedestrian on Denver Runway Causing Emergency Evacuation
-
MRO & Manufacturing2 days agoBoeing Proposes Fix for Grounded MD-11 Fleet with FedEx Return Plan
-
Regulations & Safety1 day agoDelta Worker Dies in Aircraft Tug Accident at Orlando Airport
-
Defense & Military5 days agoTAI and GE Aerospace Finalize F404 Engine Deal for Hürjet Jet Trainer
-
Defense & Military7 days agoUS Air Force to Acquire Five Additional Boeing E-7A Wedgetail Aircraft
