Regulations & Safety
NTSB Preliminary Report on Fatal Carbon Cub Crash in Idaho
The NTSB released a preliminary report on the fatal CubCrafters Carbon Cub crash in Idaho involving a wire strike and two fatalities.

NTSB Releases Preliminary Findings on Fatal Carbon Cub Crash in Idaho
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its preliminary report regarding the fatal aviation accident that occurred on January 27, 2026, near Montour, Idaho. The crash of the CubCrafters CCX-1865 Carbon Cub, registered as N126C, resulted in the deaths of two individuals, including a prominent local meteorologist. The report confirms that the aircraft collided with power lines while operating in the rugged terrain of the Payette River’s Black Canyon.
According to the NTSB’s findings, the flight was part of a “Media Evaluation Program” conducted by the aircraft manufacturer, CubCrafters. The program, which allowed media figures to evaluate aircraft for content creation, has been suspended following the tragedy. Investigators have recovered data recording devices, including GoPro cameras, which may provide critical insight into the final moments of the flight.
Accident Sequence and Site Details
The preliminary report outlines the specific timeline and trajectory of the accident. On the morning of January 27, the aircraft was operating under Part 91 general aviation rules in Gem County, Idaho. The flight took place in the Black Canyon area, a region known for its scenic river views but also for the hazards presented by its complex terrain.
Wire Strike and Impact
Investigators determined that the accident sequence began at approximately 10:58 AM MST. The aircraft struck a set of power lines spanning the Payette River. The collision severed the lines, causing a significant power outage that affected an estimated 7,000 customers in Gem County and Garden Valley. Following the wire strike, the aircraft impacted the frozen surface of the river, coming to rest in the water and ice.
Wreckage Recovery
The wreckage was located within the icy river. During the recovery process, investigators secured GoPro cameras from the crash site. The NTSB has indicated that these devices could yield high-definition video evidence regarding the cockpit environment and flight parameters leading up to the collision.
Aircraft and Operational Context
The aircraft involved was a CubCrafters CCX-1865 Carbon Cub FX, a modern Short Takeoff and Landing (STOL) aircraft designed specifically for backcountry operations. The specific airframe, N126C, was owned by the manufacturer, CubCrafters, and had been loaned to the pilot for review purposes.
Media Evaluation Program Suspended
The flight was conducted under the auspices of CubCrafters’ “Media Evaluation Program.” This initiative provided aircraft to select aviation journalists and influencers for independent review. Following the accident, CubCrafters announced a temporary suspension of the program to review safety protocols. In a statement, the company expressed deep sadness regarding the loss of life and emphasized its cooperation with the NTSB and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Victim Profiles
The crash claimed the lives of two experienced members of the aviation community.
Roland Steadham, 67, was identified as the pilot. Steadham was a well-known figure in Boise, Idaho, serving as the Chief Meteorologist for KBOI-TV (CBS 2). Beyond his broadcasting career, Steadham was a veteran aviator with over 3,000 flight hours. He held a commercial pilot certificate and possessed experience in a variety of aircraft, including gliders and jets.
Dallin Laufenberg was identified as the passenger. Reports suggest Laufenberg was an active member of the local aviation community, with some sources linking him to operations at Nampa Airport, though the NTSB report focuses primarily on the factual circumstances of the crash rather than biographical details.
AirPro News Analysis
The preliminary details of this accident highlight the persistent danger of wire strikes in low-level backcountry flying. River canyons often present a “terrain trap” where power lines are strung across gaps, becoming nearly invisible against complex backgrounds like running water, rocks, or snow. While the Carbon Cub is a highly capable STOL aircraft designed for this environment, the visibility of obstacles remains a critical human factor challenge. The recovery of onboard video will likely be pivotal in determining whether the wires were marked or if environmental conditions contributed to the pilot’s inability to see the obstruction in time.
Investigation Timeline
The current document released by the NTSB is a preliminary report, which contains factual information gathered at the scene but does not determine a probable cause. The investigation will proceed through several phases:
- Factual Report: Expected in 12 to 18 months, this report will provide detailed technical analyses of the airframe, engine, pilot medical records, and weather data.
- Final Report: This document will officially determine the probable cause of the accident and may include safety recommendations to prevent similar occurrences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Preliminary Report?
An NTSB preliminary report is an initial document released shortly after an accident. It establishes the basic facts, such as time, location, and aircraft type, but does not analyze the cause or assign blame.
What is the Carbon Cub FX?
The Carbon Cub FX is a high-performance, lightweight aircraft modernized from the classic Piper Cub design. It is widely used for backcountry and off-airport operations due to its ability to take off and land in very short distances.
Is the investigation complete?
No. The investigation is ongoing. A full determination of probable cause typically takes more than a year to complete.
Sources: NTSB Preliminary Report, CubCrafters Official Statement, KBOI-TV (CBS 2), Gem County Sheriff’s Office
Photo Credit: CubCrafters
Regulations & Safety
Iberia A350 Winglet Damaged in Guayaquil Water Salute Incident
An Iberia A350-941 struck a fire vehicle during a water cannon salute at Guayaquil Airport, grounding the aircraft and cancelling Flight IB132.

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.
This article summarizes reporting by Agencia EFE, Primicias, and Ecuavisa.
An Iberia Airbus A350-941 sustained damage to its left winglet on June 4, 2026, after striking a fire department vehicle during a ceremonial water cannon salute at José JoaquÃn de Olmedo International Airport (GYE) in Guayaquil, Ecuador, forcing the cancellation of its scheduled transatlantic flight.
The incident occurred at 16:56 UTC (11:56 local time) as the widebody aircraft was preparing to operate Flight IB132 to Madrid. According to reporting by Agencia EFE and local Ecuadorian outlets, the water salute was arranged to mark a temporary equipment upgrade on the route, with the Airbus A350-900 replacing the Airbus A330-200 typically used by the Spanish flag carrier.
Ground collision during ceremonial salute
Terminal Aeroportuaria de Guayaquil S.A. (TAGSA), the airport operator, confirmed the sequence of events in an official statement. According to Primicias, TAGSA reported that during taxi, the tip of the aircraft’s wing made contact with the extension arm and turret of a fire engine belonging to the airport’s Fire Extinguishing Service (SEI).
Following the collision, the flight crew interrupted the departure sequence and returned the aircraft to the apron for a technical inspection. Agencia EFE reported that no injuries occurred among the passengers or crew. The aircraft, registered as EC-NXD, was grounded pending a full damage assessment, and passengers were subsequently rebooked on alternative flights.
Regulatory oversight and fleet implications
The Dirección General de Aviación Civil (DGAC) of Ecuador has initiated an investigation into the ground collision. The regulatory authority will examine the coordination between the flight crew, air traffic control, and the SEI personnel conducting the water arch maneuver. No official cause has been determined.
The grounding of the Airbus A350-941 disrupts Iberia’s planned capacity increase for the Guayaquil market. The aircraft swap from the Airbus A330-200 was intended to provide additional seats and cargo volume on the direct route to Spain. The airline has not yet specified how long the damaged airframe will remain out of service while repairs are evaluated and executed.
AirPro News analysis
Water cannon salutes are a long-standing aviation tradition used to celebrate inaugural flights, retiring captains, and new aircraft types. However, we note that these ceremonial events carry inherent operational risks. Positioning heavy fire apparatus near active taxiways and maneuvering large aircraft through restricted clearances requires precise coordination. While relatively rare, ground collisions during these salutes highlight the tension between marketing traditions and the strict safety margins required in commercial aviation operations. The resulting damage to a high-value asset like an Airbus A350 underscores the financial and operational exposure operators face during non-standard ground maneuvers.
Sources: @AviacionGYE (X)
Photo Credit: AviacionGYE – X
Regulations & Safety
NTSB Reports United Airlines Flight 169 Newark Approach Incident
NTSB preliminary report details United Airlines Flight 169 striking a light pole at Newark due to low airspeed and gusty winds during approach.

This article is based on an official press release from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
On June 4, 2026, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released its preliminary report detailing the May 3 accident involving United Airlines Flight 169 at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR). The incident highlights the operational challenges of landing heavy widebody aircraft during gusty conditions on constrained runways.
The Boeing 767-400ER, arriving from Venice, Italy, struck a light pole on the New Jersey Turnpike while on short final approach. According to the NTSB’s factual findings, the aircraft crossed the busy highway at an altitude of just 19 feet above the ground after its airspeed decayed during the descent.
The collision caused substantial damage to the aircraft and resulted in minor injuries to a commercial truck driver on the ground. The NTSB has officially classified the event as an accident, prompting immediate safety reviews and procedural updates from the airline.
Flight Details and the Approach
According to the NTSB preliminary report (DCA26FA194), United Airlines Flight 169 was operating from Venice Marco Polo Airport to Newark on May 3, 2026. The 23-year-old Boeing 767-424ER (registration N77066) was carrying 231 individuals, comprising 220 passengers, three flight crew members, and eight cabin crew members.
The flight proceeded normally until the descent phase. The NTSB notes that the flight crew initially planned to land on Runway 4R. However, air traffic control changed the runway assignment twice due to challenging weather conditions. Winds were reported at 19 knots and gusting up to 30 knots, leading controllers to ultimately clear the aircraft for Runway 29.
Cockpit Dynamics and Warnings
The NTSB report provides critical insight into the cockpit environment during the final moments of the flight. The captain was the pilot flying, while the first officer monitored the flight instruments.
As the aircraft descended toward the runway, its airspeed began to decay. The first officer issued verbal warnings to the captain regarding the aircraft’s energy state.
“hey you are slow… you are still slow and a little low”
According to the NTSB, the captain acknowledged hearing the “airspeed slow” callout but stated he felt the airplane remained in a safe position to continue the landing.
The Collision and Aftermath
The decaying airspeed and low glide path culminated in the aircraft crossing the New Jersey Turnpike at an altitude of just 19 feet above the ground. During this low pass, the aircraft’s landing gear and underside struck a light pole located on the highway.
The NTSB report states that the captain recalled hearing a “thump” just before touchdown, while the first officer felt a “mild jolt” as they neared the runway threshold. Despite the impact, the Boeing 767 landed safely and taxied to the gate under its own power.
Ground Impact and Injuries
Debris from the severed light pole fell onto the southbound lanes of the turnpike, striking a commercial tractor-trailer operated by Baltimore-based H&S Bakery, as well as a Jeep traveling on the highway.
While no passengers or crew members on the aircraft were harmed, the NTSB confirmed that the truck driver, Warren Boardley, sustained minor injuries from shattered glass. He was treated at a local hospital and subsequently released. The truck sustained damage to its windshield and aluminum siding.
Post-flight inspections of the Boeing 767 revealed substantial damage, including three punctures on the fuselage and slash marks on one of the landing gear tires. This damage led the NTSB to officially classify the event as an accident.
Industry Response and Safety Measures
Following the accident, United Airlines took immediate administrative and procedural actions. The airline removed the involved flight crew from service pending an internal safety review.
Furthermore, United Flight Operations issued an Operations Alert to its pilots regarding arrivals at EWR’s Runway 29. The alert emphasized the importance of relying on visual glideslope indicators (VGSI/PAPI) to ensure safe obstruction clearance. A subsequent Pilot Bulletin was also issued regarding short runway landing guidance.
AirPro News analysis
We note that Runway 29 is the shortest runway at Newark Liberty International Airport, measuring 6,725 feet. It features a displaced threshold designed specifically to provide a safety buffer from the adjacent, highly congested Interstate 95. Aircraft landing on this runway routinely pass at low altitudes over the highway.
Aviation analysts frequently point out that the Boeing 767-400ER’s extended fuselage can create visual illusions for pilots during the landing flare. Because the pilot’s eye level sits high in the cockpit while the main landing gear hangs significantly lower, precise glide path management is absolutely critical to ensure obstacle clearance. The combination of gusty winds, a late runway change, and the specific ergonomics of the 767 likely compounded the difficulty of this approach.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Was anyone injured in the United Airlines Flight 169 accident?
No passengers or crew members on the aircraft were injured. However, a truck driver on the New Jersey Turnpike sustained minor injuries from shattered glass when debris from a struck light pole hit his vehicle.
What caused the aircraft to fly so low?
The NTSB’s preliminary report indicates that the aircraft’s airspeed decayed during a gusty approach, leading to a low glide path. The first officer warned the captain that they were “slow and a little low.” The investigation is still ongoing to determine the official probable cause.
What is the current status of the investigation?
The NTSB has released its preliminary report (DCA26FA194) and officially classified the event as an accident due to substantial aircraft damage. A final report detailing the probable cause will be released at a later date.
Photo Credit: NTSB
Regulations & Safety
Lufthansa Boeing 787 Nose-Gear Collapse at Frankfurt Airport
Lufthansa’s Boeing 787-9 suffered a nose-gear collapse at Frankfurt Airport, injuring crew and ground staff and canceling Flight LH450 to Los Angeles.

This article summarizes reporting by Reuters.
A Lufthansa Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner suffered a sudden nose-gear collapse at Frankfurt Airport (FRA) on Thursday afternoon. According to reporting by Reuters, the incident occurred on the airport’s apron, with an airport spokesperson confirming that details are still being assessed by authorities.
The aircraft was actively being prepared for a transatlantic flight to Los Angeles when the nose abruptly dropped to the tarmac. While no passengers were on board at the time of the collapse, industry research and incident reports indicate that several crew members and ground staff sustained injuries and required immediate medical treatment.
This event marks a significant operational disruption for the German flag carrier. The aircraft involved is a nearly brand-new jet featuring the airline’s flagship cabin product. Emergency services quickly responded to secure the scene, and ground teams immediately began preparing for defueling operations to ensure the safety of the surrounding apron.
Incident Details and Immediate Aftermath
Flight LH450 Grounded
The incident took place at approximately 12:45 PM local time (10:45 GMT) on Thursday, June 4, 2026. The aircraft, which had previously arrived as flight LH469, was scheduled to operate as Flight LH450 departing Frankfurt for Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). It was parked at the gate undergoing standard pre-flight preparations when the failure occurred.
Visual evidence from the scene shows the aircraft resting on its belly with the nose landing gear wheels buckled forward. Reports note visible structural damage, including a ripped panel near the forward fuselage where the gear assembly meets the airframe. Consequently, Flight LH450 was canceled immediately. Despite the severity of the localized incident, Frankfurt Airport reported no broader operational disruptions to other flights.
Casualties and Safety Response
Safety protocols were swiftly enacted following the collapse. Lufthansa confirmed in public statements that passenger boarding had not yet commenced, preventing a potentially larger mass-casualty event. However, personnel working on and around the aircraft were caught off guard by the sudden drop.
Several Lufthansa employees, specifically cabin crew members and ground handling staff who were on board preparing the aircraft, were injured. A company spokesperson confirmed they are currently receiving medical care. While the exact severity of the injuries remains officially undisclosed, emergency response teams were commended for their rapid deployment to the gate.
Aircraft Profile and Fleet Impact
A Brand-New Dreamliner
The aircraft involved in Thursday’s incident is registered as D-ABPQ and named “Herne.” It is a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner that was delivered to Lufthansa in early 2026. The jet had only been in regular long-haul service for a few months, having commenced operations around mid-January or February of this year.
Notably, this specific jet is equipped with Lufthansa’s highly anticipated “Allegris” cabin interior. The Boeing 787-9 is a crucial component of Lufthansa’s ongoing fleet renewal program, designed to replace older, less fuel-efficient four-engine jets. Losing a brand-new aircraft equipped with their flagship product for an “extended repair period” represents a notable operational setback for the carrier. Aviation experts project the aircraft will be out of service for several weeks, as it will require extensive structural inspections and complex repairs before it can be cleared to fly again.
Investigations and Historical Context
Search for the Cause
Lufthansa has activated a crisis management team to investigate the exact circumstances surrounding the gear retraction, working in tandem with relevant aviation authorities. Technicians and support staff were immediately dispatched to the site to begin assessing the mechanical and digital logs.
“A Boeing 787 jetliner operated by Lufthansa experienced a nose-wheel collapse at Frankfurt airport’s apron early Thursday afternoon,”
reported Reuters, citing an airport spokesperson who noted that the situation was still developing.
At this stage, it remains undetermined whether the failure stems from a mechanical fault, a hydraulic anomaly, or human error during ground handling procedures.
AirPro News analysis
While the exact cause of Thursday’s collapse remains under active investigation, aviation professionals often look to historical precedents when assessing ground-based gear failures. In June 2021, a British Airways Boeing 787-8 suffered a similar nose-gear collapse at London Heathrow (LHR). The UK’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) later determined that a maintenance worker had inadvertently inserted a landing gear downlock pin into the wrong hole, the apex pin hole instead of the downlock pin hole, due to the two being located very close together.
We note that while Boeing is currently facing heightened global media scrutiny regarding manufacturing quality, landing gear systems are typically produced by third-party suppliers, such as Safran. Furthermore, ground-based gear collapses on modern widebody aircraft are exceedingly rare and frequently point to maintenance or ground handling protocols rather than inherent manufacturing defects. Until the official investigation by German authorities concludes, any direct parallels to the 2021 Heathrow incident remain speculative.
Frequently Asked Questions
Were any passengers injured in the Lufthansa 787 incident?
No. Lufthansa confirmed that no passengers had boarded the aircraft at the time of the nose-gear collapse. However, several crew members and ground staff were injured and received medical treatment.
Which flight was affected by the gear collapse?
Flight LH450, which was scheduled to fly from Frankfurt (FRA) to Los Angeles (LAX), was canceled as a result of the incident.
How old is the aircraft involved?
The Boeing 787-9, registered as D-ABPQ, is practically brand new. It was delivered to Lufthansa in early 2026 and features the airline’s new “Allegris” cabin interior.
Sources:
Photo Credit: X
-
Regulations & Safety2 days agoNTSB Reports United Airlines Flight 169 Newark Approach Incident
-
Technology & Innovation4 days agoGE Aerospace Completes Ground Test of Hybrid Electric Engine System
-
Regulations & Safety6 days agoFAA Proposes $336,000 Fine Against Planet Nine Private Air
-
Space & Satellites7 days agoNASA X-59 Set for First Supersonic Flight in June 2026
-
Defense & Military6 days agoUSAF Launches EPAWSS Speedline to Accelerate F-15E Modernization
