Regulations & Safety
TSA Introduces $45 Fee for Travelers Without REAL ID Starting 2026
From February 1, 2026, TSA will charge $45 for identity verification at airport security for travelers without REAL ID or acceptable ID.
This article is based on an official press release from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
Beginning this Sunday, February 1, 2026, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will implement a new financial enforcement policy for domestic travelers who arrive at airports security checkpoints without a REAL ID-compliant license or acceptable alternative identification. According to an official press release issued by the agency, travelers in this situation will now be required to pay a $45.00 fee to undergo identity verification.
The new program, formally titled TSA ConfirmID, marks a significant shift in how the agency handles non-compliant passengers. While the official regulatory deadline for REAL ID passed in May 2025, the agency has been operating under a phased enforcement period. As of February 1, the “grace period” of free manual identity verification officially ends, shifting the cost of these specialized checks directly to the traveler.
TSA officials state that the fee is designed to recover the operational costs associated with verifying the identity of passengers who do not possess standard, secure documentation. The agency emphasizes that this process is digital-only and will add significant time to the security screening process.
Under the new guidelines, travelers aged 18 and older who present a non-compliant driver’s license,or who have forgotten their ID entirely,must utilize the TSA ConfirmID option to proceed through security. The agency has established a flat fee of $45.00 per traveler for this service.
In a statement regarding the new policy, Adam Stahl, the Senior Official Performing the Duties of Deputy Administrator for TSA, explained the financial reasoning behind the change:
“Identity verification is essential to traveler safety… This fee ensures the cost to cover verification of an insufficient ID will come from the traveler, not the taxpayer.”
, Adam Stahl, TSA (December 1, 2025 Press Release)
The TSA has outlined a specific digital workflow for the new fee. Travelers cannot pay with cash at the checkpoint. Instead, the process involves: The $45 fee covers a 10-day travel window. According to the TSA, if a traveler’s return trip falls outside of this 10-day period, they may be required to pay the fee again for their return flight.
Beyond the financial cost, the TSA is warning travelers that the ConfirmID process will result in delays. Because the verification involves manual intervention and database checks, it is not instantaneous.
The agency advises that travelers utilizing this option should expect delays ranging from 10 to 30 minutes. This wait time is in addition to the standard security line wait times. Consequently, the TSA recommends that anyone planning to use the $45 option arrive at the airport at least 30 minutes earlier than typically recommended.
The introduction of the $45 fee represents a strategic “middle ground” between full enforcement and the previous grace period. With approximately 94% of U.S. travelers currently possessing a REAL ID or acceptable alternative, the agency is targeting the remaining 6% without immediately barring them from travel.
By attaching a financial penalty and a time penalty (the 30-minute delay) to non-compliance, the TSA appears to be creating a tangible incentive for holdouts to upgrade their identification before the projected “hard” deadline in May 2027, when non-compliant IDs may cease to be accepted entirely.
Not all travelers are subject to the new fee. The TSA press release clarifies that travelers under the age of 18 are exempt from the identification requirement when traveling domestically with an adult. Therefore, minors will not be charged the $45 fee.
Travelers can avoid the fee entirely by presenting any of the following acceptable forms of identification:
Can I pay the $45 fee with cash at the checkpoint? Does the fee cover my return trip? What happens if I refuse to pay? Is this the final deadline for REAL ID?
TSA Implements $45 Fee for Travelers Without REAL ID Starting Sunday
Understanding the TSA ConfirmID Fee
How the Payment Process Works
Operational Impact and Delays
AirPro News Analysis: The “Middle Ground” Strategy
Exemptions and Acceptable Alternatives
Frequently Asked Questions
No. The TSA describes the process as digital-only. Payments must be made via Pay.gov, accessible through a smartphone or credit card.
The fee covers a travel window of 10 days. If your return trip occurs more than 10 days after the initial payment, you will likely need to pay the fee again.
Travelers without a REAL ID or acceptable alternative who refuse to pay the fee for the TSA ConfirmID process will not be permitted to enter the secure area of the airport.
This is the start of financial enforcement. A “hard” deadline is projected for May 5, 2027, at which point non-compliant IDs may not be accepted regardless of willingness to pay a fee.
Sources
Photo Credit: TSA
Regulations & Safety
FAA Funding Lapse Amid Government Shutdown in Early 2026
The FAA faces a funding lapse starting January 31, 2026, due to a government shutdown from a House-Senate scheduling gap, impacting aviation operations.
This article summarizes reporting by Politico and Sam Ogozalek.
A partial government shutdown officially began at midnight on Saturday, January 31, 2026, triggering a funding lapse for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and other key agencies. As reported by Politico, this latest disruption follows a chaotic period for the U.S. aviation sector, which is still recovering from widespread operational failures experienced late last year.
The lapse is technically the result of a scheduling disconnect between the two chambers of Congress. While the Senate successfully passed a “minibus” spending package (H.R. 7148) on Friday night by a vote of 71-29, the House of Representatives had already adjourned for the weekend. Consequently, the FAA lacks appropriated funds until the House returns to vote on the measure, which is currently scheduled for Monday, February 3.
While immediate travel disruptions are expected to be minimal over the weekend, the aviation industry remains on high alert. This anxiety stems from the lingering trauma of the record-breaking 43-day shutdown in the fall of 2025, which caused billions in losses and thousands of flight cancellations.
According to legislative reports, the current funding battle is not centered on aviation policy but rather on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Negotiations reportedly collapsed following a controversial incident in Minneapolis on January 24 involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
In response to the deadlock, the Senate passed a compromise bill that fully funds the Department of Transportation and the FAA for the fiscal year but restricts DHS to a two-week stopgap extension. This maneuver is intended to allow a “cooling off” period for immigration policy disputes while keeping the rest of the government running. However, because the House did not remain in session to ratify this amendment, the funding gap occurred automatically at midnight.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has directed federal employees to prepare for shutdown procedures, though officials remain optimistic about a quick resolution. In a statement regarding the lapse, OMB Director Russell Vought emphasized the administration’s intent to resolve the issue quickly.
“The Administration will continue working with Congress to address recently raised concerns… it is our hope that this lapse will be short.”
, Russell Vought, OMB Director
Despite the funding lapse, the immediate impact on passengers this weekend is expected to be limited. Under federal law, air traffic controllers and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents are classified as “essential” workers. They are required to report for duty even when their agencies are technically unfunded.
According to industry analysis, the following operations remain active:
However, non-essential activities, such as pilot and controller training programs and non-critical aviation research, have been suspended. The National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) expressed frustration at the recurring uncertainty facing its members.
“It would be incredibly unfair to the hardworking, patriotic American air traffic controllers… to face another pay disruption just three months after the last one.”
, National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA)
FAA employees are still scheduled to receive their full paychecks on Tuesday, February 3, as that pay period concluded prior to the lapse. However, if the shutdown extends beyond the immediate weekend, future pay cycles would be jeopardized.
The aviation sector’s heightened sensitivity to this shutdown is directly linked to the events of late 2025. As noted in the Politico report, the industry is still reeling from “widespread airport disruption last fall.”
Data from that 43-day shutdown, the longest in U.S. history, illustrates the potential risks if the current lapse is not resolved quickly:
Airlines for America, the trade group representing major U.S. carriers, issued a statement urging Congress to avoid repeating history.
“We implore Congress to protect the FAA… Their jobs are too important to the safety and modernization of our National Aviation System to be used as political leverage.”
, Airlines for America
While the current lapse appears to be a procedural hiccup rather than a deeply entrenched standoff regarding the FAA itself, the frequency of these funding gaps poses a long-term threat to the U.S. aviation system. The “essential” designation for controllers and TSA agents relies on the workforce’s willingness to work without immediate pay. The Fall 2025 shutdown demonstrated that this willingness has a breaking point. Furthermore, even if the House passes the Senate package on Monday, the underlying dispute regarding DHS remains unresolved. With only a two-week extension for Homeland Security on the table, the aviation industry, specifically the TSA, could face another shutdown threat in mid-February. The separation of FAA funding from DHS funding in the Senate bill offers some protection for air traffic control, but security screening operations remain tethered to the volatile immigration debate.
Will my flight be canceled this weekend? Are air traffic controllers getting paid? When will the shutdown end?
FAA Funding Lapses as House Adjourns; Aviation Industry Braces for Uncertainty
The Legislative Impasse: DHS at the Center
White House Response
Operational Impact on Air Travel
Context: The Shadow of Fall 2025
AirPro News Analysis
Frequently Asked Questions
It is unlikely. Air traffic controllers and TSA agents are working. Unless the shutdown drags on for weeks, causing absenteeism to spike, schedules should remain normal.
They will receive their paycheck on Tuesday, February 3, for work completed before the shutdown. Pay for work performed this weekend is delayed until funding is restored.
The House is expected to vote on the Senate-passed funding package on Monday, February 3. If passed, normal operations would resume by Tuesday.
Sources
Photo Credit: National Affairs
Regulations & Safety
FAA and FBI Enforce No Drone Zones for Super Bowl LX Security
FAA and FBI implement strict no drone zones with heavy penalties for Super Bowl LX at Levi’s Stadium and downtown San Francisco in 2026.
This article is based on an official press release from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have jointly announced comprehensive airspace restrictions for Super Bowl LX. As preparations finalize for the event at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, California, federal agencies are implementing a “zero tolerance” policy regarding unauthorized unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). These measures are designed to secure the airspace over the stadium and key areas of downtown San Francisco leading up to and during the game on Sunday, February 8, 2026.
According to the official announcement, the restrictions classify the area as a “No Drone Zone,” a designation standard for National Security Special Events (NSSE). The agencies have emphasized that violations will result in severe consequences, including substantial civil fines and potential criminal prosecution. The primary goal is to ensure the safety of fans, players, and critical infrastructure during one of the most-watched sporting events of the year.
The FAA has outlined specific Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) that affect two primary locations: the immediate vicinity of Levi’s Stadium on game day and downtown San Francisco during the week leading up to the event. Pilots are strongly advised to check Notices to Air Missions (NOTAMs) frequently, as specific coordinates and times are subject to strict enforcement.
On Super Bowl Sunday, restrictions will be enforced in phases to accommodate the influx of air traffic and security requirements. The FAA has detailed the following schedule for the area surrounding Levi’s Stadium (Coordinates: 37°24’12″N 121°58’12″W):
In addition to the stadium restrictions, the FAA has established a “No Drone Zone” over downtown San Francisco to secure fan events. These restrictions cover a 1-nautical-mile radius up to 1,000 feet AGL during the following times:
Federal agencies have made it clear that these restrictions are not merely guidelines but enforceable federal law. The FBI is authorized to utilize specialized mitigation technology to detect, track, and, if necessary, disable or seize drones that pose a safety threat to the event.
Agencies are employing a “zero tolerance” policy for unauthorized drone operations. Penalties include civil fines up to $75,000 for violating airspace restrictions, potential federal criminal prosecution, and the suspension or revocation of drone pilot licenses.
, Summary of FAA & FBI Joint Announcement
Historically, the FBI has not hesitated to act during similar events. During Super Bowl LIII in Atlanta (2019) and Super Bowl LIX in New Orleans (2025), federal agents confiscated multiple drones that violated airspace rules. For Super Bowl LX, FAA and FBI agents will be deployed full-time to monitor the airspace, ensuring that general aviation pilots and drone operators adhere to the strict reservation programs and flight plan requirements.
The escalation of fines to $75,000 represents a significant increase in the financial risk for non-compliant drone operators. In previous years, warnings were often the first line of defense, but the shift toward “zero tolerance” language suggests that federal authorities are moving toward immediate enforcement actions. This aligns with the broader trend of securing “soft targets” against asymmetric aerial threats. For commercial operators, this reinforces the necessity of using LAANC (Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability) systems and checking TFRs well in advance, as ignorance of a TFR is rarely accepted as a valid defense by the FAA. Sources: FAA Press Release
FAA and FBI Establish Strict “No Drone Zones” for Super Bowl LX
Detailed Airspace Restrictions
Levi’s Stadium (Game Day: Feb 8, 2026)
Downtown San Francisco (Feb 3 – Feb 7, 2026)
Enforcement and Penalties
AirPro News Analysis
Sources
Photo Credit: FAA
Regulations & Safety
NTSB Preliminary Report on Statesville Cessna Citation Crash
NTSB releases preliminary findings on the December 2025 Cessna Citation crash in Statesville, NC, involving engine issues and pilot certification questions.
This article is based on an official preliminary report and investigation details released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Preliminary Report.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has issued its preliminary report regarding the December 18, 2025, crash of a Cessna Citation 550 in Statesville, North Carolina. The accident resulted in the fatalities of all seven occupants, including former NASCAR driver Greg Biffle and members of his family.
Released on January 30, 2026, the report (Investigation ID WPR26MA063) provides the first official factual account of the flight’s final minutes. According to investigators, the Private-Jets was attempting to return to Statesville Regional Airport (KSVH) shortly after takeoff due to a reported engine issue when it impacted ground obstacles significantly short of the runway threshold.
While the preliminary document does not determine a probable cause, it establishes critical data points regarding the weather conditions, the pilot’s credentials, and the aircraft’s configuration at the time of impact.
The flight departed Statesville Regional Airport at approximately 10:05 AM EST, intended for Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport (KSRQ). The NTSB report indicates that the flight lasted only about 10 minutes.
Shortly after departure, the pilot contacted air traffic control to report an issue. According to the NTSB findings, witnesses described the problem as a “rough engine.” Consequently, the pilot requested an immediate return to Statesville.
Investigators confirmed that a passenger on board sent a text message to a family member during the brief flight. The message contained only two words:
“Emergency landing.”
, Text message sent by a passenger, as cited in the NTSB Preliminary Report
The NTSB confirmed that the crash occurred under Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC). Weather reports from the time of the accident indicate low cloud ceilings and heavy drizzle, which would have required the pilot to rely heavily on aircraft instruments for the approach.
According to the preliminary data, the aircraft was configured for landing with its gear down and landing lights illuminated. However, the plane was flying below the standard glide path for the runway.
The report details the impact sequence:
A significant portion of the NTSB’s factual gathering has focused on the crew composition and certification. The Cessna Citation 550 is certified for a two-pilot crew, though it can be operated by a single pilot if that pilot holds a specific “Single Pilot Exemption” and the aircraft is equipped with the necessary Avionics.
The pilot in command, Dennis Dutton, held an Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate and a type rating for the Cessna Citation (CE-500). He was a commercial captain for a major airline. Seated in the co-pilot seat was his son, Jack Dutton.
However, the NTSB noted that Jack Dutton was a student pilot and did not hold a multi-engine rating or a type rating for the Citation. Therefore, he was not legally qualified to serve as Second-in-Command (SIC) for this specific aircraft.
Investigators are currently verifying whether Dennis Dutton held the required Single Pilot Exemption. If he did not hold this specific exemption, the flight would have legally required a qualified second pilot, which was not present.
Authorities and the NTSB have confirmed the identities of the seven individuals lost in the Accident:
The distinction between a “rough engine” report and the final impact location is likely to be a central focus of the ongoing investigation. While engine trouble precipitates an emergency return, it does not automatically result in a crash short of the runway. The presence of Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC) adds a layer of complexity.
In low-visibility approaches, altitude management is critical. The NTSB’s notation that the aircraft was stable but “lower than the standard glide path” suggests investigators will look closely at whether the engine issue affected the aircraft’s performance capabilities or if the high-workload environment of a single-pilot emergency return in bad weather contributed to spatial disorientation. Furthermore, the regulatory scrutiny regarding the Single Pilot Exemption highlights the rigid Standards of corporate aviation. Even highly experienced airline captains must adhere to specific type-rating requirements when flying light jets alone. The absence of a qualified Second-in-Command, if an exemption was not in place, would be a significant regulatory finding.
The NTSB has recovered the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and transported it to their laboratory in Washington, D.C., for analysis. The aircraft was not equipped with a Flight Data Recorder (FDR), nor was it required to be.
A final report, which will determine the probable cause of the accident, is expected to take between 12 and 24 months to complete. Future investigative phases will include engine teardowns to verify the reported roughness and a detailed review of the pilot’s Training records.
Sources: NTSB Preliminary Report (WPR26MA063), NTSB
NTSB Releases Preliminary Report on Statesville Cessna Citation Crash
Flight Sequence and “Rough Engine” Report
Crash Circumstances and Weather Conditions
Crew Certification and Single-Pilot Investigation
Victim Identification
AirPro News Analysis
Next Steps
Photo Credit: NTSB
-
Business Aviation3 days agoBombardier Responds to U.S. Tariff and Certification Threats
-
Business Aviation3 days agoUS Threatens to Decertify Bombardier Jets in Canada Trade Dispute
-
Technology & Innovation7 days agoGE Aerospace Tests Battery-Less Hybrid Electric Engine for Narrowbody Jets
-
Aircraft Orders & Deliveries6 days agoAdani and Embraer to Launch India’s First Private Regional Jet Assembly Line
-
Regulations & Safety5 days agoNTSB Attributes Fatal 2025 DCA Mid-Air Collision to Systemic Failures
