Connect with us

Regulations & Safety

FAA Certifies Renishaw-Powered 3D Printed Aerospace Component

Tronosjet Manufacturing achieves FAA certification for titanium aircraft part using Renishaw additive manufacturing, advancing aerospace 3D printing adoption.

Published

on

Renishaw Helps Tronosjet Manufacturing Achieve FAA Certification: A Milestone in Aerospace Additive Manufacturing

The collaboration between Renishaw and Tronosjet Manufacturing marks a pivotal advancement in aerospace additive manufacturing. Tronosjet, a Canadian aerospace firm, successfully achieved Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification for a critical engine component produced using Renishaw’s metal 3D printing technology. This accomplishment represents one of the first FAA-approved metallic additive manufacturing (AM) parts under the Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) framework, signaling a significant step forward in the integration of AM in regulated aerospace applications.

The certified component, an engine thrust control pulley bracket, is a Class 1 critical part used in BAe 146 and AVRO RJ series aircraft. Manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), the part demonstrated mechanical performance far exceeding its original magnesium counterpart. This achievement not only validates the technical capabilities of additive manufacturing but also demonstrates a viable certification pathway for future AM components in aerospace.

Tronosjet Manufacturing: Pioneering Aerospace Additive Manufacturing

Founded in 2001, Tronosjet began as an aircraft leasing and maintenance company, managing a fleet of over 60 BAe 146/Avro RJ aircraft. With a foundation in aircraft conversions and regulatory compliance, the company expanded into manufacturing in 2016, launching an additive manufacturing division focused on aerospace applications. The facility in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, is certified under Transport Canada and AS9100 standards, enabling it to design, produce, and certify aerospace components.

Tronosjet’s transition to additive manufacturing was driven by the need to address limitations in traditional manufacturing, particularly for legacy aircraft with diminishing parts availability. Using metal AM, Tronosjet sought to produce complex, low-volume components with reduced lead times and no need for tooling. The company strategically chose a high-impact demonstrator project to validate its AM capabilities and regulatory strategy, the engine thrust control pulley bracket.

The bracket, responsible for redirecting engine control cables, was originally cast in magnesium, a material prone to corrosion and mechanical degradation. By redesigning the part in titanium and manufacturing it using laser powder bed fusion, Tronosjet aimed to improve performance, reduce maintenance, and demonstrate compliance with stringent FAA safety standards.

Material Upgrade and Design Optimization

The shift from magnesium to titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) was a critical component of the project. Titanium offers superior strength, corrosion resistance, and fatigue life, all crucial for aerospace applications. The additive manufacturing process allowed Tronosjet to maintain the original geometry while improving material properties, enabling a direct replacement without requiring changes to the aircraft structure or systems.

Material testing confirmed that the titanium bracket could withstand over 22,000 pounds of force, compared to the original part’s limit of 4,000 pounds. This fivefold increase in load-bearing capacity provided compelling evidence to the FAA of the part’s robustness and reliability, especially given its role in engine control systems.

Additionally, additive manufacturing enabled Tronosjet to eliminate casting defects and streamline the supply chain, offering a scalable solution for other critical components facing similar obsolescence challenges.

“The bracket’s superior tensile strength shows that the titanium print is capable of withstanding significantly higher loads than required when the aircraft is in flight.”, Jeff Campbell, Tronosjet

FAA Certification: Navigating Regulatory Challenges

Achieving FAA certification for a Class 1 critical component is no small feat. Under the PMA process, applicants must demonstrate that their parts meet or exceed the performance of original components. Tronosjet pursued the most rigorous pathway, compliance by test and computation, requiring exhaustive documentation and testing.

The FAA’s evaluation included scrutiny of powder material properties, build consistency, and post-processing. Tronosjet had to prove that its manufacturing process could reliably produce parts with consistent mechanical properties, despite the inherent variability of additive manufacturing. This involved developing a controlled, repeatable process using Renishaw’s AM systems and submitting over 2,000 pages of supporting data.

Key challenges included managing anisotropy in the printed metal, ensuring defect-free builds, and validating long-term performance under operational stresses. Tronosjet addressed these through rigorous mechanical testing, including fatigue and tensile tests, as well as non-destructive evaluation techniques like CT scanning and ultrasonic inspection.

Renishaw’s Role in the Certification Journey

Renishaw provided three advanced AM machines to Tronosjet, including the RenAM 500M, which was used to produce the certified bracket. These systems offer high-precision laser melting capabilities, inert gas environments for reactive materials like titanium, and integrated monitoring tools for quality assurance.

Working closely with Tronosjet, Renishaw’s engineering team helped optimize build parameters, reduce internal defects, and develop post-processing workflows that met aerospace standards. The collaboration extended to documentation and process validation, which were critical to satisfying FAA requirements.

Renishaw’s systems also enabled Tronosjet to avoid powder recirculation, enhancing traceability and reducing contamination risks. This meticulous approach to process control played a key role in the successful certification of the bracket.

“We’re grateful for Renishaw’s engineering prowess and support, it delivered great products, which have been critical for us achieving certification.”, Jeff Campbell, Tronosjet

Impact on Aerospace and Beyond

The FAA certification of an additively manufactured Class 1 component sets a new benchmark for the aerospace industry. It demonstrates that with the right processes, materials, and validation, AM can meet the highest safety standards. This milestone is likely to accelerate the adoption of AM for other critical components, particularly in legacy aircraft platforms where traditional supply chains are no longer viable.

Industry experts view this achievement as a turning point. The ability to produce certified, high-performance parts on-demand opens new possibilities for fleet maintenance, design innovation, and cost reduction. It also supports sustainability goals by minimizing material waste and enabling lightweight designs that improve fuel efficiency.

Beyond aerospace, the success of the Tronosjet-Renishaw project has implications for other regulated sectors such as medical devices and defense, where certification remains a barrier to AM adoption. The methodologies and documentation developed through this project offer a roadmap for future efforts across industries.

Conclusion

Tronosjet’s collaboration with Renishaw marks a major milestone in the journey toward fully certified additive manufacturing in aerospace. By achieving FAA certification for a critical titanium component, the project has proven that AM can deliver not only technical performance but also meet the most stringent regulatory standards.

This success story sets the stage for broader adoption of AM in aerospace and other industries. It highlights the importance of strategic partnerships, rigorous validation, and a commitment to quality. As technology advances and regulatory frameworks evolve, the Tronosjet-Renishaw achievement will remain a reference point for what is possible when innovation meets discipline.

FAQ

What part did Tronosjet get certified by the FAA?
The engine thrust control pulley bracket for BAe 146 and AVRO RJ series aircraft.

What material was used for the certified part?
Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V (Grade 5), replacing the original magnesium component.

Why is this certification significant?
It is one of the first FAA-certified metallic AM parts for a Class 1 critical application, setting a precedent for future certifications.

What role did Renishaw play?
Renishaw supplied the AM systems and supported process optimization, quality assurance, and documentation for FAA compliance.

What are the broader implications of this achievement?
It paves the way for increased use of additive manufacturing in regulated industries, improving supply chain resilience and enabling design innovation.

Sources

Design Development Today, MTDCNC, OneStopNDT, EPMA, Tronosjet, Renishaw Case Study

Photo Credit: Tronosjet Manufacturing

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Regulations & Safety

NTSB Releases Preliminary Report on Carlisle Airport Midair Collision

NTSB preliminary report details a fatal midair collision between a Cessna 150H and a PA State Police helicopter at Carlisle Airport.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its preliminary report on an August 19, 2026, midair collision at Carlisle Airports (N94) in Pennsylvania that resulted in the death of a civilian pilot and injuries to two state troopers. The collision involved a Cessna 150H and a hovering Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) Bell 407GX Helicopters during mixed-aircraft operations at the non-towered airfield.

Released on September 2, 2026, the preliminary investigation record outlines the sequence of events leading up to the 6:52 p.m. local time collision. The NTSB report confirms that both aircraft were in communication via the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF) prior to the event. The exact cause of the collision remains under Investigation by the NTSB and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Flight path and collision sequence

According to the NTSB preliminary report and statements from the PSP, the Bell 407GX helicopter was conducting a training exercise. The helicopter crossed the runway threshold at an altitude of 50 feet before descending into a hover taxi. At the same time, the Cessna 150H was approaching the airport to land.

Radio communications detailed in the report indicate that the helicopter crew instructed the Cessna pilot to extend his downwind leg. The Cessna pilot acknowledged the instruction, stating his intention to land after the helicopter. However, as the helicopter hovered off the runway, the Cessna veered off its intended landing path to the north side of the runway. The fixed-wing aircraft subsequently collided with the rear of the hovering helicopter, striking its tail and main rotors.

Casualties and ongoing investigation

The collision resulted in one confirmed fatality. The pilot of the Cessna 150H, identified by his employer Penn State Health as 57-year-old Dr. Paul William Sokoloski, sustained fatal injuries. The two occupants of the PSP helicopter, identified as Corporal Bryce Corman and Trooper Jason Mills, sustained injuries in the collision.

NTSB aviation Accident investigator Aaron McCarter is leading the inquiry. While surveillance video captured the collision, the NTSB has not yet determined why the Cessna deviated from its landing path. A final report detailing the probable cause is not expected for several months.

AirPro News analysis

We note that mixed-aircraft operations at non-towered airports inherently require precise communication and situational awareness, particularly when fixed-wing aircraft and rotorcraft share the same traffic pattern. While some aviation commentators have speculated that rotor wash or wake turbulence from the hovering Bell 407GX may have contributed to the Cessna 150H veering off course, this remains entirely unverified. The NTSB has explicitly stated that it is too early to attribute the Cessna’s flight path deviation to any specific factor. Investigators will likely examine environmental conditions, aircraft performance data, and pilot actions as they work toward a final probable cause determination.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: NTSB

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

NTSB: Thermal Plugs Caused AA Flight 3023 Tire Failure

NTSB determines melted thermal relief plugs caused tire failure on American Airlines 737-8 at Denver, triggering emergency evacuation.

Published

on

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has determined that melted thermal relief plugs caused the left main landing gear tires to fail on an American Airlines Boeing 737-8 during a July 2025 takeoff roll at Denver International Airport (DEN), prompting a high-speed rejected takeoff and emergency evacuation.

The final aviation investigation report, published on August 26, 2026, officially closes the inquiry into American Airlines Flight 3023. The document details the mechanical sequence that led to the tire failure while highlighting significant passenger noncompliance during the subsequent evacuation, as travelers ignored crew commands and retrieved carry-on baggage.

Mechanical sequence and rejected takeoff

The incident occurred on July 26, 2025, involving a Boeing 737-8, registration N306SW, equipped with CFM International LEAP-1B28 engines. According to the NTSB, the flight experienced an approximate 25-minute delay while awaiting departure at runway 34L.

During the subsequent takeoff roll, as the aircraft reached an indicated airspeed between 90 and 100 knots, the captain reported hearing a loud pop accompanied by a noticeable bump. The flight crew initiated a rejected takeoff at speeds above 80 knots.

The NTSB determined the probable cause of the incident was the melting of thermal relief plugs in the left main landing gear. This melting released tire pressure and caused the tires and wheels to fail during the takeoff roll. The agency noted that this failure resulted in abnormal airplane handling characteristics, which prompted the flight crew to reject the takeoff. Debris from the fractured wheels caused minor damage to the aircraft, including a three-inch dent on the lower skin of the left wing.

Emergency evacuation and passenger behavior

Following the rejected takeoff, the flight crew initially instructed the cabin to remain seated. Between 30 and 45 seconds later, after identifying smoke and fire originating from the left main landing gear, the crew ordered an emergency evacuation.

The aircraft carried 175 occupants, comprising 169 passengers and six crew members. The NTSB final report confirms that zero injuries occurred during the event. This official casualty figure supersedes preliminary media reports from July 2025 that had indicated minor injuries and hospital evaluations.

The investigation report draws specific attention to passenger behavior during the emergency egress. The NTSB stated that the cabin crew described the evacuation as rapid but hindered by significant passenger confusion and noncompliance. Despite flight attendants repeatedly commanding passengers to leave their belongings behind, multiple individuals retrieved their carry-on baggage. The NTSB concluded that this noncompliance directly slowed the flow of egress from the aircraft.

AirPro News analysis

The NTSB findings regarding American Airlines Flight 3023 add to a well-documented and growing safety concern within the commercial aviation sector. Passenger retrieval of carry-on baggage during emergency evacuations is a recurring issue that compromises the 90-second evacuation standard mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

When passengers stop to open overhead bins and carry luggage down escape slides, they not only slow the egress rate for those behind them but also introduce the risk of puncturing the evacuation slides or injuring fellow passengers. We continue to see official accident reports cite passenger noncompliance as a negative factor in evacuation efficiency. This recurring behavioral pattern has prompted safety advocates and lawmakers to question whether current FAA evacuation certification tests, which rely on compliant participants, accurately reflect real-world human behavior during an emergency.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board

Continue Reading

Regulations & Safety

Marine One Loss of Separation at DCA: NTSB Preliminary Report

NTSB cites radio line-of-sight failure after Marine One and Envoy Air E-170 came within 0.82 NM at Reagan National.

Published

on

This is a developing story. Information may change as official details are released.

This is original reporting and analysis by AirPro News.

A loss of separation occurred on August 4, 2026, between a Sikorsky VH-3D operating as Marine One and an Envoy Air Embraer E-170 departing Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). The incident took place approximately two miles north of the airport at 14:34 EDT and prompted an immediate Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) relocation of radio equipment after investigators identified a communication failure.

According to a preliminary report released on August 27, 2026, by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), air traffic controllers at DCA did not receive a required three-minute pre-departure warning from the helicopter. The event triggered a review of strict Safety protocols implemented following a fatal midair collision in the same airspace in January 2025.

Incident timeline and separation data

The loss of separation occurred when Marine One departed The Ellipse simultaneously with Envoy Air flight 3742 departing runway 1 at DCA. Preliminary FAA estimates indicate the aircraft came within 0.82 nautical miles (NM) laterally and 700 feet vertically. The NTSB is currently analyzing surveillance data to establish the exact closest point of approach.

President Donald Trump was on board the Sikorsky VH-3D at the time of the incident. In a statement provided to CBS News, White House spokesman Kush Desai confirmed the President was never in danger.

Marine One flights are piloted by the finest aviators in the world, and the White House maintains the utmost confidence in these patriots and other security officials who are responsible for ensuring the President’s safety.

No injuries were reported among the occupants of either aircraft, and both flights continued to their respective destinations without further incident.

Communication failure and FAA response

The NTSB preliminary report points to inadequate radio line-of-sight coverage between The Ellipse and the DCA tower as the primary factor in the missed pre-departure warning. A DCA tower controller reported that the transmission attempt from the helicopter was “broken and unreadable,” according to CBS News.

Following the August 4 incident, FAA technicians evaluated the infrastructure and confirmed the line-of-sight deficiency. To resolve the issue, the agency relocated the helicopter-control radio equipment to the top of the DCA control tower. Subsequent communication checks were successful.

CBS News also reported that recent construction at the White House may have contributed to the radio line-of-sight degradation, though the NTSB has not yet issued a final determination on the cause.

Regulatory context and prior airspace changes

The airspace surrounding DCA operates under highly specific procedural rules designed to deconflict fixed-wing airline traffic from frequent VIP helicopter movements. These procedures were significantly tightened following a fatal midair collision on January 29, 2025, involving an airliner and an Army Black Hawk helicopter near the airport.

Following the 2025 accident, regulators instituted a requirement for a ground stop at DCA anytime a Helicopters passes on a conflicting route. The failure of the three-minute warning on August 4 prevented controllers from initiating this required ground stop for the Envoy Air departure.

Air traffic controllers and Marine One pilots had previously met on July 28, 2026, exactly one week prior to the incident, to discuss ongoing communication challenges in the sector.

AirPro News analysis

The August 4 loss of separation highlights the fragility of procedural deconfliction in the Washington, D.C. airspace. While the FAA characterized the event as a momentary loss of separation, the failure of a critical communication link reveals a single point of failure in the safety protocols established after the 2025 collision. We note that the rapid relocation of the radio equipment by the FAA demonstrates an acknowledgment of the infrastructure gap. As the NTSB continues its Investigation, we will monitor the docket for potential systemic recommendations regarding how VIP helicopter movements integrate with high-volume Commercial-Aircraft traffic at DCA, particularly concerning redundant communication systems.

Sources: National Transportation Safety Board

Photo Credit: National Transportation Safety Board

Continue Reading
Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Advertisement

Follow Us

newsletter

Latest

Categories

Tags

Every coffee directly supports the work behind the headlines.

Support AirPro News!

Popular News