This article summarizes reporting by Aviation Week, publicly available elements and industry data.

Dassault Sets March 10 for Falcon 10X Rollout

Dassault Aviation has officially scheduled the public debut of its flagship business jet, the Falcon 10X. According to reporting by Aviation Week, the French aerospace manufacturers has set March 10, 2026, as the date for the formal rollout of the ultra-long-range aircraft. This event represents a pivotal moment for the program, transitioning the jet from strict development secrecy to a physical reality before its anticipated maiden flight later this year.

The Falcon 10X is designed to be the largest purpose-built business jet in the industry, aiming to disrupt a market segment currently dominated by the Bombardier Global 7500 and the Gulfstream G700. While the program has faced schedule adjustments due to global supply chain constraints, the confirmation of a rollout date signals that the manufacturer is ready to showcase the fully assembled aircraft to the world.

The Rollout and Program Status

The March 10 event serves as the formal unveiling of the aircraft, a traditional milestone in aerospace that typically precedes the first flight. Industry observers note that this rollout is intended to demonstrate tangible progress to customers and stakeholders following previous delays.

According to data aggregated from industry reports, including updates from Flight Global and Dassault Aviation, the program timeline has shifted from its original targets. While the rollout is imminent, the Entry into Service (EIS) is now targeted for late 2027. This delay from the original 2025 target has been attributed to persistent supply chain disruptions and the lingering effects of the pandemic on tier-one vendors.

Production Progress

Despite the timeline shifts, physical production has advanced significantly. Reports indicate that three test aircraft are structurally complete at the manufacturer’s facility in Bordeaux-Mérignac. Furthermore, the Rolls-Royce Pearl 10X engines, which will power the massive jet, have been delivered for the test fleet. Ground tests, including power-on procedures, have already been observed on the prototypes.

Technical Specifications and Cabin Design

Dassault is positioning the Falcon 10X not just as a competitor, but as a category leader regarding interior volume. The manufacturer’s specifications highlight a cabin that prioritizes width and height over pure length, a strategy designed to offer superior passenger comfort on ultra-long-haul missions.

“The Falcon 10X is designed to be the largest and most capable purpose-built business jet on the market.”

, Industry Research Report

Advertisement

Cabin Dimensions

The cabin dimensions are the 10X’s primary selling point. Official specifications list the cabin width at 9 feet 1 inch (2.77 meters) and height at 6 feet 8 inches (2.03 meters). These figures place the 10X above its direct rivals:

• Falcon 10X: 9 ft 1 in wide
• Gulfstream G700: 8 ft 2 in wide
• Bombardier Global 7500: 8 ft 0 in wide

The aircraft also features a modular layout with four distinct cabin zones and 50% larger windows than the Falcon 8X, aiming to maximize natural light and reduce passenger fatigue.

Performance Capabilities

Performance metrics released by Dassault indicate the jet will be capable of flying 7,500 nautical miles (13,900 km) non-stop. This range allows for direct connections between city pairs such as New York to Shanghai or Los Angeles to Sydney. The aircraft will have a top speed of Mach 0.925, powered by two Rolls-Royce Pearl 10X engines, each producing over 18,000 lbs of thrust while maintaining compatibility with 100% Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF).

Market Context

The ultra-long-range segment is fiercely competitive. The Falcon 10X is entering a market where the Bombardier Global 7500 has been in service since 2018 and the Gulfstream G700 entered service in 2024. Dassault is effectively playing catch-up regarding delivery timelines, but the company is banking on the 10X’s superior physical dimensions and advanced flight deck technology, derived from the Rafale fighter jet, to persuade buyers to wait.

AirPro News Analysis

The confirmation of the March 10 rollout date is a critical strategic move for Dassault. With the Global 7500 already established and the G700 ramping up deliveries, Dassault risks losing market share to impatient buyers. By setting a firm date for the unveiling, Dassault is signaling to the market that the “paper plane” phase is over.

However, the late 2027 entry-into-service target remains a vulnerability. In the high-stakes world of business aviation, a two-year gap between rollout and delivery is substantial. The success of the Falcon 10X will likely depend on whether the market perceives the extra foot of cabin width as a luxury worth waiting for, or if the immediate availability of Gulfstream and Bombardier products will capture the current wave of fleet modernization.

Sources:

• Aviation Week
• Dassault Aviation
• Flight Global
• AIN Online

This article is based on an official press release from Bombardier.

Bombardier Defends U.S. Footprint Following Presidential Tariff Threats

On January 29, 2026, Bombardier issued a firm response to recent statements made by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding the certification of Canadian aircraft and the potential imposition of significant tariffs. The Montreal-based manufacturer emphasized its extensive integration into the American economy and the full regulatory compliance of its fleet in an effort to counter threats of a 50% tariff and “decertification” of its jets.

The company’s statement comes immediately after President Trump took to social media to criticize Canada’s trade practices. According to reports on the President’s comments, the administration is targeting Bombardier in retaliation for Canada’s alleged refusal to certify rival U.S.-manufactured Gulfstream jets. Bombardier’s response, however, pivoted away from the political dispute to highlight its role as a major U.S. employer and industrial partner.

Economic Impact and U.S. Integration

In its official release, Bombardier argued that penalizing its operations would inadvertently harm the U.S. aviation sector and the thousands of American workers it employs. The manufacturer positioned itself not merely as a foreign exporter, but as a deeply embedded stakeholder in the U.S. aerospace ecosystem.

According to the press release, Bombardier’s U.S. presence includes:

• Direct Employment: Over 3,000 employees working within the United States.
• Facilities: Operations spread across nine major facilities nationwide.
• Supply Chain: A network of approximately 2,800 U.S.-based suppliers supporting its manufacturing and service lines.

The company also pointed to its continued investment in American infrastructure. Specifically, the statement referenced a recent announcement regarding a new facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Industry data indicates this 64,500-square-foot service center, announced in late 2025, is projected to create approximately 100 high-wage jobs in the Midwest.

“Bombardier is a major U.S. employer… We have a significant footprint in the United States with more than 3,000 employees and 9 facilities.”

, Bombardier Official Statement

Certification and Safety Standards

A central element of the President’s threat was the “decertification” of the Bombardier Global Express and other Canadian-made aircraft. In response, Bombardier explicitly defended the safety and regulatory standing of its fleet.

The company stated that all its aircraft, facilities, and technicians are “fully certified to FAA standards.” By emphasizing its compliance with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Bombardier aims to reassure operators and the flying public that its jets remain safe and legal to fly, despite the political rhetoric.

The manufacturer warned that any move to ground these aircraft or block their sale would have immediate negative consequences for U.S. air traffic. With thousands of Bombardier jets currently in service, many owned by U.S. corporations and individuals, the company cautioned that the proposed measures would disrupt the national airspace system.

AirPro News Analysis: The Feasibility of Executive Decertification

While the threat to “decertify” an aircraft type via executive order is politically potent, the legal and regulatory reality is complex. Aircraft certification in the United States is governed by the FAA, a body that bases airworthiness directives on technical safety data rather than executive decree.

Historically, the grounding or decertification of an aircraft type (such as the Boeing 737 MAX) occurs only after rigorous technical review identifies a specific safety hazard. A summary decertification of a proven platform like the Global Express, absent any safety data, would likely face immediate legal challenges from operators, the manufacturer, and potentially the regulator itself. Furthermore, the reciprocity of certification between Transport Canada and the FAA is a foundational element of North American aviation; dismantling it could stall cross-border aerospace trade entirely.

Context: The Gulfstream Dispute

While Bombardier’s statement focused on its own economic contributions, the catalyst for this escalation lies in a separate regulatory dispute. President Trump’s comments explicitly cited Canada’s refusal to certify specific Gulfstream models, the G500, G600, G700, and G800, as the rationale for the threatened tariffs.

The U.S. administration views the certification delays for these Savannah-built jets as a protectionist measure designed to shield Bombardier from competition. By threatening a 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft, the President appears to be leveraging Bombardier’s market access to force a regulatory concession from Ottawa regarding the Gulfstream fleet.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific threats did the President make against Bombardier?

President Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on all Canadian aircraft sold into the U.S. and stated he would “decertify” the Bombardier Global Express and other Canadian-made jets.

How many people does Bombardier employ in the U.S.?

According to their official statement, Bombardier directly employs over 3,000 people in the United States across nine facilities.

Why is the U.S. threatening these tariffs?

The threats are a retaliatory measure against Canada’s alleged refusal to certify U.S.-made Gulfstream jets (models G500 through G800) for sale in Canada.

Can the President unilaterally decertify an aircraft?

While the President has broad powers over trade and tariffs, aircraft certification is a technical process managed by the FAA. Unilateral decertification without safety justification would be unprecedented and likely subject to legal challenge.

Sources

• Bombardier Statement

This article summarizes reporting by Reuters and journalists David Shepardson and Bhargav Acharya.

Trump Threatens to Decertify Bombardier Jets in Escalating Trade Dispute

In a significant escalation of trade tensions between the United States and Canada, President Donald Trump announced on Thursday that the U.S. intends to “decertify” Bombardier Global Express business jets. According to reporting by Reuters, the President also threatened to impose a 50% import tariff on all Canadian-made aircraft unless Transport Canada immediately certifies a range of jets produced by U.S. rival Gulfstream.

The ultimatum, delivered via the President’s Truth Social platform, explicitly links the continued operation of Canada’s flagship business jets in the U.S. to the regulatory approval of American aircraft in Canada. The President accused Canadian regulators of “wrongfully, illegally, and steadfastly” blocking the entry of Gulfstream aircraft to protect Bombardier, a claim that threatens to disrupt the North American aerospace supply chain.

The Certification Standoff

At the heart of the dispute is the regulatory status of Gulfstream’s latest ultra-long-range business jets. The Trump administration contends that Transport Canada has delayed the validation of type certificates for the Gulfstream G500, G600, G700, and G800 models. These aircraft are direct competitors to Bombardier’s Global 6500, 7500, and 8000 series jets.

According to industry data, the Gulfstream G500 and G600 received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification in 2018 and 2019, respectively, and are in service globally. However, they lack the necessary Canadian validation to be sold to Canadian customers. The administration views this delay not as a standard regulatory process, but as a non-tariff trade barrier designed to shield Bombardier’s domestic market share.

“The U.S. was decertifying Bombardier Global Express business jets… until the country certified a number of planes produced by U.S. rival Gulfstream.”

, Summary of remarks via Reuters

Impact on Business Aviation

The threat to “decertify” the Global Express series is unprecedented in modern aviation. The United States is the world’s largest market for business jets, and a revocation of the type certificate would effectively ground U.S.-registered Global Express aircraft and halt new deliveries. This would likely devastate Bombardier’s revenue, as the Global 7500 and 8000 are the company’s marquee products.

“All Aircraft” and Commercial Fallout

While the dispute originated in the business aviation sector, the President’s threat extends to “any and all aircraft sold into the United States from Canada.” This broad phrasing implicates the commercial aviation sector, specifically the Airbus A220 (formerly the Bombardier CSeries).

The Airbus A220 is assembled in Mirabel, Quebec, as well as Mobile, Alabama. A 50% tariff on Canadian-made airframes or components could have severe consequences for U.S. carriers. Major operators such as Delta Air Lines, JetBlue, and Breeze Airways rely heavily on the A220 for their domestic networks. In previous trade disputes, Delta has warned that tariffs on these aircraft would reduce capacity and increase costs for American travelers.

AirPro News Analysis

The Feasibility of Executive Decertification

President Trump’s threat to unilaterally “decertify” an aircraft raises significant legal and technical questions. Aircraft certification is a rigorous technical process governed by the FAA, based strictly on safety data and engineering standards. Historically, decertification, such as the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX, is reserved for clear safety failures.

We assess that using certification revocation as an economic lever would likely face immediate challenges in U.S. federal court. While the President has broad authority to impose tariffs under Section 232 (national security) or Section 301 (unfair trade practices), ordering the FAA to revoke a safety certificate for political reasons would compromise the agency’s independence and global standing. However, the mere threat may be sufficient to freeze sales and force diplomatic concessions.

Political Context: Trump vs. Carney

This aerospace dispute occurs against a backdrop of deteriorating relations between Washington and Ottawa. Tensions have spiked since Mark Carney assumed the role of Prime Minister of Canada in March 2025. Following a speech by PM Carney at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier this month, where he declared the “old world order is dead”, President Trump withdrew an invitation for Canada to join a U.S.-led “Board of Peace.”

The President has previously threatened 100% tariffs on Canadian goods regarding trade deals with China. This latest move against the aerospace sector appears to be a continuation of a strategy to apply maximum economic pressure on the Carney administration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does “decertifying” an aircraft mean?

Decertification means the FAA revokes the “Type Certificate” that allows an aircraft model to fly legally in U.S. airspace. If enacted, U.S. operators would be unable to fly their Bombardier Global Express jets.

Which Gulfstream jets are involved?

The dispute centers on the Gulfstream G500, G600, G700, and G800. The U.S. claims Canada is delaying their certification to protect Bombardier.

Will this affect commercial airline passengers?

Potentially. If the 50% tariff applies to “all aircraft,” it could impact the Airbus A220 fleets flown by Delta, JetBlue, and Breeze, potentially leading to higher fares or schedule disruptions.

Sources

• Reuters