Route Development
Dublin Airport Passenger Cap Limits Growth and Spurs Legal Disputes
Dublin Airport’s 32M passenger cap exceeded, causing economic impact, legal challenges, and calls for government action to support growth.
Dublin Airport Passenger Cap Controversy: Michael O’Leary’s Call for Government Action
The Dublin Airport passenger cap controversy has become a focal point in Irish aviation and economic policy. At the heart of the dispute is the 32 million passenger annual limit, imposed in 2007 as a planning condition for Terminal 2’s construction. This cap, now exceeded by surging passenger numbers, has triggered a cascade of legal, economic, and political challenges. Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary has emerged as the most prominent critic, accusing the Irish government of “doing nothing” to address the restriction, which he and other stakeholders argue is stifling growth, jobs, and Ireland’s international competitiveness.
The cap’s enforcement has broad implications, from potential job losses and reduced tourism to diplomatic tensions with the United States. As Dublin Airport serves as Ireland’s main gateway, handling around 80% of the nation’s air traffic, the outcome of this controversy will shape the country’s economic trajectory, connectivity, and reputation as a destination for global investment and travel. This article examines the background, current developments, stakeholder perspectives, economic impacts, legal complexities, and possible solutions surrounding the Dublin Airport passenger cap.
With airlines, local authorities, the Irish government, and international partners all weighing in, the resolution of this issue is set to define Ireland’s approach to balancing local planning, national interests, and global obligations in the years ahead.
Background and Historical Context of the Passenger Cap
The origins of the Dublin Airport passenger cap trace back to 2007, when it was introduced as a planning condition for the construction of Terminal 2. The cap, set at 32 million annual terminal passengers, was primarily intended to mitigate concerns about traffic congestion on surrounding road infrastructure. At the time, the local road network faced significant capacity constraints, and the planning authorities, specifically An Bord Pleanála, sought to ensure that airport expansion would not overwhelm local transport systems.
Over the intervening years, the infrastructure landscape has shifted. Significant upgrades to the local road network and a marked increase in public transport usage by airport passengers have altered the original context. Today, about one-third of passengers arrive at Dublin Airport via public transport, a trend that was not fully anticipated in 2007. These changes have prompted industry stakeholders and policymakers to question whether the cap remains justified or has become an outdated constraint.
The cap specifically applies to terminal passengers, those passing through the airport’s terminals, excluding transfer and transit passengers. This distinction has become increasingly relevant as the airport’s total annual passenger numbers, including all categories, reached 34.6 million in 2024, with 33.3 million terminal passengers. The cap’s continued enforcement, despite changes in infrastructure and travel patterns, has led to mounting calls for its removal, especially as national aviation policy and regional development plans now support airport growth to 40 million passengers annually.
“The rationale for the cap no longer reflects today’s transportation realities. Infrastructure improvements and evolving passenger behavior have fundamentally changed the equation.”
Current Status and Recent Developments
In 2024, Dublin Airport officially breached the 32 million passenger cap, recording 33.3 million terminal passengers, a 4% increase over the previous year. Including all passenger categories, total airport throughput reached 34.6 million. The airport operated above 100,000 passengers per day on 171 days in 2024, underscoring its operational capacity and the growing demand for air travel to and from Ireland.
This breach prompted Fingal County Council to issue a formal enforcement notice to the Dublin Airport Authority (daa) in June 2025. The notice, issued under Section 154 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, gives daa two years to either comply with the cap or secure new planning approval for increased capacity. The enforcement action followed complaints that the cap was exceeded in both 2023 and 2024, highlighting the tension between regulatory requirements and operational realities.
The enforcement notice has put daa in a difficult position: legally required to reduce passenger numbers, yet facing strong market demand and national economic imperatives for growth. Daa CEO Kenny Jacobs warned that enforcing the cap would mean turning away millions of passengers and would be akin to “hanging an ‘Ireland closed for business’ sign.” Despite removing incentives and encouraging airlines to shift operations to Cork Airport, passenger volumes at Dublin continue to rise, illustrating the inadequacy of current regulatory tools to manage demand effectively.
Michael O’Leary’s Criticism and Ryanair’s Response
Michael O’Leary has been the most outspoken critic of the government’s handling of the cap. At Ryanair’s AGM in September 2025, he accused the government and Transport Minister Darragh O’Brien of “dither, delay and indecision,” citing broken promises to remove the cap “as soon as possible.” O’Leary’s frustration is rooted in the government’s inaction, despite acknowledging in its Programme for Government that the restriction should be lifted.
O’Leary’s criticism extends beyond the passenger cap. He has called the government’s €100 billion infrastructure plan “smoke and mirrors,” arguing that the state is failing to maximize existing assets. Ryanair has responded to the cap by cutting 2 million seats from its schedules and warning of further reductions if the situation is not resolved. O’Leary claims these cuts have already cost hundreds of aviation jobs and have forced the airline to redirect growth to other European markets, notably Poland.
Ryanair has also launched legal challenges, including a High Court judicial review of a separate night-time flight cap, which O’Leary describes as an “illegal second movements cap.” He argues that both the passenger and night-time restrictions are unlawful under EU law and the EU-US Open Skies Agreement. The airline’s legal and operational responses underscore the high stakes involved for both the company and the broader Irish economy.
“Here is infrastructure that is built and paid for that they won’t allow us to use.” , Michael O’Leary, Ryanair CEO
Economic, Legal, and International Implications
Economic Impact and Analysis
Dublin Airport is a cornerstone of the Irish economy, contributing an estimated €9.6 billion in gross value added, about 2.3% of national GDP. The airport directly supports nearly 20,000 jobs, with thousands more sustained indirectly through supply chains, tourism, and related sectors. The geographic reach of these benefits is nationwide, with significant impacts in Fingal, Dublin, Leinster, and the rest of the country.
Economic research indicates a direct link between passenger growth and job creation: every additional million passengers generates around 750 new aviation jobs. Conversely, maintaining the cap could cost the Irish economy between €500 million and €700 million annually, with lost opportunities in tourism, foreign direct investment, and trade. For example, tourist arrivals dropped by 25% in January 2025, and airlines have scaled back routes and capacity in response to the restriction.
The cap’s impact on tourism is particularly acute, given that Dublin Airport handles the vast majority of international visitors to Ireland. Industry estimates suggest that keeping the cap could result in the loss of up to 17,800 jobs and €1.5 billion in economic value by 2030. The restriction also risks undermining Ireland’s attractiveness to international investors, who rely on robust air connectivity for business operations.
Legal and Regulatory Challenges
The passenger cap has become the subject of complex legal disputes involving Irish courts, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and multiple regulatory authorities. In April 2025, the Irish High Court suspended enforcement of the cap pending a legal challenge by airlines, referring key questions to the ECJ. The central legal issue is whether local planning law can override EU aviation regulations, particularly in relation to slot allocation.
Ryanair has separately challenged a night-time movements cap imposed by An Coimisiún Pleanála, arguing that it violates EU rights and the EU-US Open Skies Agreement. The Dublin Airport Authority, meanwhile, has chosen not to pursue a judicial review of the night-time cap, citing the need for regulatory clarity after years of uncertainty.
Fingal County Council’s enforcement notice adds another layer of legal complexity, giving daa two years to comply or secure new planning permission. The interplay between local, national, and European law has created significant uncertainty for airlines, airport operators, and investors.
International Implications and US Concerns
The cap has attracted international attention, particularly from US airlines and authorities. Airlines for America (A4A), representing major US carriers, has warned that the restriction may violate the EU-US Open Skies Agreement, which prohibits artificial limitations on transatlantic aviation capacity. US officials are expected to visit Dublin to press for a resolution, highlighting the diplomatic stakes involved.
A4A and other stakeholders argue that the cap threatens Dublin Airport’s role as a vital transatlantic hub, with potential knock-on effects for business, tourism, and bilateral relations. The threat of reciprocal restrictions or formal trade disputes adds urgency to the resolution process and underscores the global significance of the issue.
O’Leary has speculated that US government intervention may ultimately force action, particularly if transatlantic flights are disrupted. The controversy has thus become a test case for how local planning decisions can escalate into international diplomatic and economic disputes.
“Removing the cap would not only strengthen Dublin Airport’s status as a vital hub for connectivity but would also unlock new opportunities for businesses, passengers and the broader economy.” , Keith Glatz, Airlines for America
Planning Applications, Solutions, and Future Outlook
Planning Applications and Legislative Options
To address the cap, the Dublin Airport Authority has submitted several planning applications. A “no build” Operational Application seeks to raise the cap to 36 million passengers, while a more comprehensive Infrastructure Application would support up to 40 million. Both are under review by Fingal County Council, with potential appeals to An Bord Pleanála that could delay final decisions by several years.
The government is also considering legislative options to bypass the lengthy planning process. Emergency legislation, similar to measures enacted for the energy sector in 2022, has been discussed as a way to override local restrictions. However, this approach carries legal and political risks, including possible challenges from local residents concerned about noise and environmental impacts.
The clock is ticking for a resolution: daa faces a two-year compliance deadline, while airlines and international partners are pressing for urgent action. The complexity of the planning and legal environment underscores the need for a balanced solution that addresses local, national, and international interests.
Future Outlook and Industry Implications
Forecasts suggest that Dublin Airport could accommodate nearly 40 million passengers by the decade’s end, with longer-term projections reaching 46.6 million by 2040 and 55 million by 2055. The outcome of the cap controversy will set important precedents for how Ireland balances local planning with national economic imperatives and international obligations.
The European Court of Justice’s ruling will clarify the relationship between EU aviation law and local planning, potentially influencing regulatory approaches across the continent. The controversy also highlights the need for performance-based regulatory frameworks that account for technological advances in quieter, more efficient aircraft, rather than relying solely on blunt operational caps.
Ultimately, the cap’s resolution will shape Ireland’s competitiveness as an aviation hub, its attractiveness to foreign investors, and its ability to participate fully in the global economy. The stakes for jobs, connectivity, and Ireland’s international reputation could not be higher.
Conclusion
The Dublin Airport passenger cap controversy exemplifies the challenges of aligning local planning authority with national economic strategy and international obligations. Michael O’Leary’s campaign has brought the issue to the forefront, highlighting the disconnect between outdated regulatory constraints and Ireland’s current economic needs. The 32 million passenger cap, rooted in concerns that have largely been addressed, now stands as a barrier to growth, jobs, and global engagement.
The path forward will require decisive leadership and a willingness to balance local concerns with the broader public good. Whether through planning approvals, legislative intervention, or diplomatic negotiation, the resolution of this issue will shape Ireland’s infrastructure policy for years to come. The outcome will not only determine the future of Dublin Airport but will also serve as a benchmark for how Ireland manages the intersection of local, national, and international interests in an increasingly interconnected world.
FAQ
What is the Dublin Airport passenger cap and why was it introduced?
The cap limits terminal passengers at Dublin Airport to 32 million annually, introduced in 2007 as a planning condition to address concerns about road congestion during the construction of Terminal 2.
Why is the cap controversial now?
Passenger demand has exceeded the cap, and improvements to infrastructure and public transport have addressed many of the original concerns. Stakeholders argue the cap is now hampering economic growth and international connectivity.
What are the economic impacts of the cap?
Studies estimate the cap costs Ireland between €500 million and €700 million annually, threatens thousands of jobs, and reduces tourism and investment opportunities.
What legal actions have been taken?
The cap is subject to legal challenges in Irish and European courts, with questions about the primacy of EU aviation law over local planning rules and potential violations of international agreements.
How might the issue be resolved?
Possible solutions include new planning permissions to raise the cap, emergency legislation, or diplomatic intervention if international agreements are found to be violated.
Sources: RTÉ News
Photo Credit: Ireland By Locals
Route Development
Miami Airport Launches AI Cargo Community System in 2026
Miami International Airport deploys AI-powered ACCS, targeting $250M in savings and 2-hour truck turnaround reductions.
Miami International Airport (MIA) has launched an artificial intelligence-powered digital platform designed to streamline supply chain logistics, decrease traffic congestion, and reduce carbon emissions across its freight operations.
Announced on October 27, 2026, at The International Air Cargo Association (TIACA) Air Cargo Forum in Miami, Florida, the deployment makes the facility the busiest cargo hub globally to implement an AI-driven communications platform. The Airport Cargo Community System (ACCS), developed in partnership with Kalé Logistics Systems, replaces fragmented, manual, and paper-based information exchanges with a centralized online portal for freight forwarders, cargo handlers, trucking companies, and ground handlers.
Operational and environmental targets
The ACCS was developed to address historical inefficiencies at the airport, where cargo trucks frequently arrived with limited advance information regarding arrival times and cargo types. According to the Miami-Dade Aviation Department, which operates the airport, this lack of data previously led to increased landside congestion, operational delays, and higher carbon emissions.
By creating a shared digital infrastructure, the platform connects the various stakeholders in the air cargo supply chain. Industry data indicates that full adoption of the system across the airport’s entire cargo operation could yield $250 million in annual operating cost savings. Additional projected benefits include a 15% savings in paper handling and an estimated average reduction of two hours in truck turnaround time.
Environmentally, the system has the potential to save 5,900 U.S. tons of carbon emissions through optimized routing and reduced vehicle idling.
“I am thrilled that MIA is now the busiest cargo hub in the world to leverage this cutting-edge technology. Most importantly, this is about making MIA more future-ready: simplifying and expediting the movement of goods through our global gateway, supporting the businesses and jobs that depend on international trade, and ensuring that our airport remains an industry leader not just in cargo volume, but also in efficiency and sustainability.”
The statement was provided by Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava in a press release issued today.
Integration with broader digital modernization
The launch of the ACCS follows a series of technology investments by Miami-Dade County aimed at modernizing the airport’s infrastructure. On April 20, 2026, the county unveiled an AI-powered hologram chatbot, deploying large-scale geo-aware, agentic AI across the digital infrastructure of the airport to assist passengers and streamline terminal operations.
In May 2026, the airport announced plans for a $33 million, 13,254-square-foot Airport Operations Center (AOC) and Digital Monitoring Hub. Scheduled for completion in 2027, the facility will feature AI-powered cameras and real-time digital tower technology to enhance situational awareness and operational efficiency across the airfield and terminals.
Scaling the global cargo landscape
Miami International Airport is the busiest freight airport in the United States and the third busiest globally, trailing only Hong Kong and Shanghai. Its cargo ecosystem handles an average of 190 cargo-only flights and over 1,600 truck trips daily. In 2025, the airport processed a record 3.4 million U.S. tons of freight.
The technology provider for the new platform, Kalé Logistics Systems, develops cargo community and management systems utilized by ground handling companies at 125 airports and more than 75 maritime ports globally. The digital infrastructure established by the ACCS is intended to eventually connect the Miami hub with international partner airports, facilitating more transparent and efficient global trade routes.
AirPro News analysis
The Cargo aircraft industry has traditionally lagged behind passenger aviation in digital transformation, relying heavily on manual scheduling and siloed, paper-based documentation. By implementing a centralized community system, Miami International Airport is addressing the critical bottleneck of landside congestion that plagues major freight hubs. If the projected two-hour reduction in truck turnaround times materializes, we expect this deployment to pressure other major North American cargo airports to adopt similar integrated platforms to remain competitive in both operational efficiency and sustainability metrics.
Photo Credit: Miami International Airport
Route Development
Air Greenland Launches Copenhagen to Ilulissat Direct Flights
Air Greenland inaugurated direct widebody service to Ilulissat on Oct 29, 2026, completing Greenland’s three-airport expansion.
Air Greenland inaugurated direct widebody service between Copenhagen Airport (CPH) and Ilulissat International Airport (JAV) on October 29, 2026, marking the completion of a multi-year infrastructure project to modernize the territory’s aviation gateways.
The arrival of the flag carrier’s Airbus A330-800neo coincided with the official opening of Ilulissat’s new 2,200-meter runway and 5,000-square-meter terminal. According to a press release from Air Greenland, the new facility establishes Ilulissat as Greenland’s second international hub, enabling direct jet flights from Europe to the Disko Bay region and bypassing the historical transfer point at Kangerlussuaq.
Opening the gateway to Disko Bay
The Danish Civil Aviation and Railway Authority granted final approval for the new airport overnight before the October 29 opening, following months of inspections and testing. The new 2,200-meter runway replaces the previous 845-meter strip, allowing the facility to accommodate larger jet aircraft and handle increased passenger volumes.
“We can now welcome the first passengers at the new Ilulissat International Airport. We have been looking forward to this for years, and hundreds of people have worked hard so that we can now complete a historic expansion of Greenland’s infrastructure,” said Jens Lauridsen, CEO of Greenland Airports.
The terminal design incorporates the local environment, prioritizing the passenger experience upon arrival at the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Ilulissat Icefjord.
“The terminal is built for the place it stands in. From the moment you step inside, the building opens towards Disko Bay, and arriving passengers see the ice before they see anything else,” said Ole Damgaard, Airport Manager at Ilulissat Airport.
Air Greenland’s fleet transition and route expansion
The inaugural flight was operated by Air Greenland’s flagship Airbus A330-800neo, named “Tuukkaq.” Moving forward, the carrier will adjust its capacity to match seasonal demand. In November 2026, Jettime will begin operating the winter schedule between Copenhagen and Ilulissat using a Boeing 737-800.
Air Greenland is preparing to introduce its own narrowbody capacity on the route. The airline’s first Airbus A320neo, named “Unaaq,” was recently painted in Tallinn, Estonia, and flown to Oslo, Norway, for cabin installation. The aircraft is scheduled for delivery in December 2026 and will enter commercial service on the Copenhagen to Ilulissat route in April 2027. During the peak summer season in 2027, Air Greenland plans to offer up to six weekly direct flights between the two cities.
Greenland’s strategic aviation overhaul
The opening of Ilulissat International Airport represents the final phase of a major infrastructure initiative initiated by the Greenlandic self-government. The project began with the opening of Nuuk’s new international airport on November 28, 2024, followed by a new regional airport in Qaqortoq in April 2026.
The primary objective of the expansion program was to reduce reliance on the former US military base at Kangerlussuaq as the territory’s main transit hub. By accommodating direct international flights at Nuuk and Ilulissat, travel times from Europe have been reduced to five to six hours.
The improved access is expected to attract additional operators to the region. Icelandair plans to connect Ilulissat with Keflavík International Airport (KEF) during the summer season starting in 2027.
Air Greenland has operated as a wholly owned entity of the Greenlandic Government since 2019, when Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) and the Danish government sold their respective shares in the carrier. The airline operates a mixed fleet of fixed-wing aircraft and Helicopters to connect Greenland’s communities and provide international links.
AirPro News analysis
The completion of the Ilulissat runway fundamentally alters the air traffic architecture of the North Atlantic. For decades, Greenland’s aviation model relied on funneling international passengers through Kangerlussuaq before distributing them on a domestic network of turboprops and helicopters. By enabling direct narrowbody and widebody access to the Disko Bay region, Greenland Airports has removed a major bottleneck for tourism and cargo. We expect this shift will pressure Kangerlussuaq’s long-term viability as a commercial hub while testing the local infrastructure in Ilulissat as passenger volumes increase with the arrival of operators like Icelandair.
Photo Credit: Air Greenland
Route Development
IndiGo and Air India Express to Shift Flights to Navi Mumbai Airport
IndiGo and Air India Express begin phased moves to NMIA from Dec 2026, enabling CSMIA Terminal 1 redevelopment by 2030.
IndiGo and Air India Express will begin shifting domestic and international flights to the newly constructed Navi Mumbai International Airport (NMIA) starting in December 2026, resolving a slot dispute and clearing the way for a major redevelopment of Mumbai’s existing aviation infrastructure.
The phased transition, announced in a joint press release by the airlines and Adani Airport Holdings Limited (AAHL) on October 25, 2026, operationalizes Mumbai’s dual-airport system. The move frees up critical capacity at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (CSMIA) to allow for the structural overhaul of Terminal 1 by 2030 while preserving historical operating slots for the carriers.
Phased transition timeline and route details
The operational shift will occur in stages, beginning with domestic services. Hindustan Times reported that Air India Express will commence operations at NMIA in December 2026 with four daily domestic flights. The carrier plans to introduce international services to Kuwait and Oman from the new airport in January 2027, subject to pending regulatory approvals. By the IATA Northern Summer 2027 season, Air India Express is expected to complete the transition of its West Asia services, including flights to Jeddah, Riyadh, Dammam, Doha, Muscat, and Sharjah.
IndiGo will commence its international operations from NMIA in February 2027. Between February and July 2027, the carrier will progressively transfer 12 daily international departures from CSMIA to the new facility. By July 2027, IndiGo will serve 12 international destinations from NMIA, comprising 11 transferred routes and one new daily service to Kathmandu.
The transferred IndiGo routes will include services to Bahrain, Riyadh, Dammam, Jeddah, Madinah, Kuwait, Ras Al Khaimah, Fujairah, Muscat, Dhaka, and Jakarta.
The phased transition is intended to support a transparent, equitable and proportionate rebalancing of capacity across Mumbai’s dual airport system, taking into account each airline’s presence at CSMIA.
The joint statement from IndiGo and AAHL noted that this balanced approach will facilitate an orderly transition, minimize operational disruption, and provide planning certainty for airlines and passengers as NMIA scales up its operations.
Resolving the Mumbai slot dispute
The transition agreement follows weeks of negotiations between airline operators and AAHL regarding capacity constraints at CSMIA. According to reporting by Mint, the Airline Operators Committee of Mumbai formally rejected an initial AAHL proposal earlier in October 2026. That proposal sought to temporarily cut 265 of the 770 weekly international departures at CSMIA’s Terminal 2 to accommodate the Terminal 1 redevelopment project.
The Ministry of Civil Aviation intervened in the standoff, leading to the phased relocation compromise announced by IndiGo and Air India Group. While the Indian carriers have formally agreed to the transition, Mint noted that earlier reports indicated ongoing resistance from several foreign carriers regarding the relocation of their international flights to NMIA. It remains unconfirmed if foreign carriers will be mandated to shift operations.
Infrastructure expansion and CSMIA Terminal 1 redevelopment
CSMIA has operated under severe capacity constraints for years, necessitating the structural redevelopment of Terminal 1. According to The Hindu, the T1 redevelopment project is designed to modernize passenger facilities, upgrade safety systems, and increase the terminal’s annual capacity by 33 percent, growing from 15 million to 20 million passengers. The target completion date for the redevelopment is 2030.
Navi Mumbai International Airport, which officially welcomed its first passengers on December 25, 2025, was developed as a greenfield project specifically to relieve congestion at CSMIA. The Hindu reported that NMIA features an initial annual passenger capacity of 20 million, with future expansion phases planned to accommodate up to 90 million passengers annually. The facility incorporates automated baggage handling, digital passenger-processing systems, and multimodal transport links to the broader Mumbai Metropolitan Region.
AAHL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Adani Enterprises Limited, is India‘s largest operator of Public-Private Partnership airports, managing eight facilities across the country. In September 2026, the company secured approximately $1 billion in primary equity capital from a consortium of global investors, including Temasek and BlackRock, at an $18 billion valuation. The capital is earmarked for airport modernization and capacity expansion to serve 200 million passengers annually across the AAHL portfolio.
IndiGo’s international growth strategy
The transition of flights to NMIA aligns with IndiGo’s broader fleet and network strategy. As India’s largest airline by market share, IndiGo is currently executing a major international expansion. The carrier is preparing to induct long-range Airbus A321XLRs and widebody Airbus A350s to reach deeper into Asia, Africa, and Europe.
Shifting a portion of its international departures to NMIA allows IndiGo to continue its aggressive 2027 international expansion using its incoming Airbus A320, A321, and A321XLR fleet without exacerbating the existing slot constraints at CSMIA. IndiGo stated it will announce the exact dates for the transition of individual services to NMIA once final project coordination is complete and relevant operating approvals are secured.
AirPro News analysis
The successful operationalization of a dual-airport system in Mumbai represents a critical milestone for Indian aviation infrastructure. The compromise brokered by the Ministry of Civil Aviation avoids a damaging capacity reduction at CSMIA that would have severely impacted international connectivity and airline revenues. For IndiGo and Air India Express, securing a strong early foothold at NMIA provides the runway needed for their respective fleet expansions, turning a potential infrastructure bottleneck into a strategic growth opportunity. The lingering question is how AAHL and the civil aviation ministry will manage foreign carriers, who have historically resisted moving operations away from established primary hubs.
Photo Credit: Adani
-
Regulations & Safety6 days agoFAA Launches MedGuide Medication Database for Aviators
-
Business Aviation7 days agoDTA Aircraft JP1 eVTOL Targets April 2027 US Flight Testing
-
Technology & Innovation5 days agoSkyfly Technologies Raises $10M to Certify Axe eVTOL
-
Space & Satellites7 days agoBAE Systems Acquires Colorado Facility for Space Hardware
-
Route Development3 days agoIndiGo and Air India Express to Shift Flights to Navi Mumbai Airport