Defense & Military
India’s Aging Jaguar Fighter Jets Face Safety Crisis After Rajasthan Crash
Analysis of recurring Jaguar crashes highlights technical vulnerabilities in India’s 45-year-old fighter fleet and modernization challenges.

Analysis of the Jaguar Fighter Jet Crash in Rajasthan and the Future of India’s Aging Fleet
On July 9, 2025, an Indian Air Force Jaguar fighter jet crashed during a routine training mission near Bhanoda village in Rajasthan’s Churu district, claiming the lives of both pilots onboard, Squadron Leader Lokendra Singh Sindhu (44) and Flight Lieutenant Rishi Raj Singh (23). This incident marks the third Jaguar crash in 2025 alone, following similar accidents in Ambala, Haryana (March) and Jamnagar, Gujarat (April). Eyewitness accounts suggest the pilots maneuvered the aircraft away from populated areas, preventing civilian casualties. The Indian Air Force has initiated a court of inquiry to determine the cause, while defense analysts raise urgent questions about the safety of India’s aging Jaguar fleet, aircraft first inducted in 1979 that remain operational despite global retirement by other air forces. This report examines the crash’s circumstances, historical context of the Jaguar platform, technical vulnerabilities, modernization efforts, and strategic implications for India’s air defense capabilities.
Incident Overview and Immediate Aftermath
Chronology and Impact
The ill-fated Jaguar trainer aircraft took off from Suratgarh airbase around noon on July 9 for a routine training sortie before crashing in an agricultural field near Bhanoda village at approximately 1:25 PM local time. Local residents reported hearing a thunderous explosion followed by plumes of thick black smoke, prompting immediate panic in surrounding villages. Police teams and emergency responders cordoned off the area, recovering severely mutilated human remains from the wreckage. The aircraft’s complete disintegration upon impact, visible in ground footage, indicates high-velocity collision with minimal ejection time. Notably, an eyewitness asserted the pilot attempted to steer the jet away from habitation, stating: “Pilot tried his best to protect the village, I can say it for sure.”
Institutional Response and Investigation
The Indian Air Force confirmed the fatalities within hours via an official statement on X (formerly Twitter): “An IAF Jaguar Trainer aircraft met with an accident during a routine training mission and crashed near Churu in Rajasthan today. Both pilots sustained fatal injuries in the accident. No damage to any civil property has been reported.” The IAF expressed regret over the loss and announced a court of inquiry to ascertain causation. Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma offered condolences while mobilizing local administration for rescue coordination. Forensic analysis faces challenges due to the aircraft’s fragmentation, though investigators will examine recovered components including an IAF diary handed to police. This protocol-driven response mirrors procedures following the April Jamnagar crash that killed Squadron Leader Siddharth Yadav.
Historical Context of the SEPECAT Jaguar in Indian Service
Acquisition and Operational History
The SEPECAT Jaguar, a British-French supersonic jet attack aircraft, entered IAF service in 1979 through a $1 billion deal involving loaned Royal Air Force jets followed by licensed production by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). Designed for low-altitude strike and nuclear delivery, India ultimately inducted over 160 Jaguars across variants: single-seat Jaguar IS (strike), two-seat Jaguar IB (trainer), and naval Jaguar IM. The aircraft played pivotal roles in the 1999 Kargil War (precision bombing and reconnaissance) and 2019 Balakot operations (as decoys against Pakistani F-16s). With other operators like Britain, France, Oman, Ecuador, and Nigeria retiring their fleets by the mid-2000s, the IAF became the world’s sole major Jaguar operator. Currently, approximately 120 Jaguars serve across six squadrons, though International Institute for Strategic Studies data cites 115 operational airframes (28 IB, 79 IS, 8 IM).
Safety Record and Incident Trends
The Jaguar’s 45-year IAF service reveals troubling safety patterns, with over 50 recorded incidents including 65+ airframes lost since induction. Engine failures constitute a recurring factor, particularly involving the underpowered Rolls-Royce Turbomeca Adour Mk.804/811 engines ill-suited for India’s hot-high operating conditions. The 2025 crashes alone demonstrate alarming frequency:
- March 7, 2025: Jaguar crashed near Ambala, Haryana; pilot ejected safely after technical malfunction.
- April 2, 2025: Jaguar crashed near Jamnagar, Gujarat; one pilot (Sqn Ldr Siddharth Yadav) died during ejection.
- July 9, 2025: Current Churu crash with dual fatalities.
This concentration of incidents within five months exceeds the fleet’s historical accident rate, signaling escalating airframe fatigue or maintenance gaps.
Technical and Operational Challenges
Engine Vulnerabilities and Performance Limitations
The Jaguar’s Adour engines, producing 32.5 kN thrust with afterburners, are critically underpowered for modern combat loads, especially given India’s high-altitude bases and hot climate. Rolls-Royce Turbomeca Adour Mk.804/811 variants suffer from thrust degradation, cooling inefficiencies, and spares scarcity. These limitations manifest operationally through reduced climb rates, diminished payload capacity, and compromised maneuverability during critical phases like takeoff and low-level penetration. The absence of auto-ejection systems, a standard in modern jets like Rafale, further compounds risks, as pilots must manually initiate ejection even when disoriented or unconscious.
Structural Fatigue and Maintenance Hurdles
With airframes averaging 40+ years, structural integrity concerns escalate. The Jaguar’s “hard-wired” analog systems resist seamless digital upgrades, while airframe-engine compatibility constraints complicate re-engining proposals. Maintenance data reveals that parts availability is limited, with 30% of grounded Jaguars awaiting spares. HAL technicians require specialized training for legacy systems, and only 60% of fleet maintenance is performed in-house. Engine changes cost significantly, nearly 70% of a new Tejas Mk1A’s price, making upgrades economically unviable.
Modernization Efforts and Strategic Upgrades
DARIN Upgrade Programs
To extend serviceability, the IAF initiated phased avionics modernization. DARIN I introduced digital navigation-attack systems in the 1990s. DARIN II added multi-mode radar and electronic warfare suites. DARIN III, currently underway, includes Israeli EL/M-2052 AESA radars, AI-enabled mission computers, and compatibility with ASRAAM missiles. Approximately 60 Jaguars are undergoing DARIN III retrofits, featuring glass cockpits, helmet-mounted displays, and secure datalinks, extending service life to 2040 for upgraded units.
Re-engining Debates and Alternatives
The IAF’s stalled re-engining initiative reflects systemic procurement challenges. Honeywell’s F-125IN turbofan proposal, offering 40% more thrust, was abandoned due to prohibitive costs. Rolls-Royce countered with refurbishment using Adour 871 components from retired Hawk trainers, but technical feasibility remains unproven. HAL now explores indigenous solutions, though project delays leave the fleet reliant on legacy powerplants. Consequently, the IAF accelerated Jaguar retirement timelines from 2040 to 2030–2035, contingent on Tejas Mk2 and MRFA induction.
Expert Assessments and Strategic Implications
Safety and Operational Risk Analysis
Defense experts universally flag the Jaguar’s escalating risks. Former RAF instructor Tim Davis notes: “The Jaguar is a difficult aircraft to fly. It takes immense talent and skill… but there comes a time when you must ask, how long can we keep this going safely?” Air Marshal Sanjeev Kapoor (Retd), ex-Director General of Flight Safety, identifies low-altitude operations as particularly hazardous: “At treetop level, pilots have milliseconds to react. CFIT [Controlled Flight Into Terrain] becomes probable during technical failures.” IAF internal assessments acknowledge that a significant portion of Jaguar incidents originate from engine malfunctions.
Fleet Management and Future Projections
With Jaguars forming a substantial portion of the IAF’s strike capacity, phased retirement requires careful calibration to operational gaps. Projected timelines include initial phase-out of non-upgraded airframes by 2027–2028 and complete retirement by 2030–2035, contingent on Tejas Mk2 and MRFA deliveries. Interim solutions involve restricting Jaguars to medium-altitude missions and enhancing simulator training to reduce airframe stress. However, squadron strength remains precarious, with the IAF projected to operate just 28 fighter squadrons by 2030 versus the 42 needed for two-front readiness.
Synthesis and Recommendations
The Churu Jaguar crash underscores systemic challenges in sustaining legacy combat platforms amid delayed modernization. While the Jaguar’s combat performance, evidenced in Kargil and Balakot, remains commendable, its aging airframes and underpowered engines now pose unacceptable risks to aircrew. The IAF’s DARIN III upgrades and weapon integrations provide temporary capability boosts but cannot resolve fundamental airworthiness concerns.
Strategic recommendations include: accelerated retirement of non-upgraded Jaguars by 2027, leasing of interim platforms to cover strike-role gaps, mandating terrain-avoidance systems and auto-ejection retrofits, and expanding HAL’s cannibalization program using retired foreign airframes. The IAF must balance operational necessity against pilot safety, a calculus demanding urgent procurement reforms and candid risk reassessment.
FAQ
What caused the Jaguar crash in Churu?
The cause is under investigation by a court of inquiry, though technical failure is suspected.
How old are the Jaguar aircraft in the IAF?
Jaguars have been in service since 1979, with many airframes over 40 years old.
Are there plans to replace the Jaguar fleet?
Yes, the IAF plans to retire Jaguars by 2030–2035, replacing them with Tejas Mk2 and other platforms.
Sources:
The Hindu,
NDTV,
Indian Express,
Hindustan Times,
BBC News,
Defense News,
IISS
Photo Credit: The National Interest
Defense & Military
USAF Launches EPAWSS Speedline to Accelerate F-15E Modernization
The USAF establishes an EPAWSS Speedline at Warner Robins to rapidly upgrade F-15E Strike Eagles with advanced electronic warfare systems starting June 2026.

This article is based on an official press release from the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.
Air Force Launches EPAWSS Speedline to Accelerate F-15E Modernization
On May 26, 2026, the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) announced the establishment of a dedicated “Speedline” facility at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex (WR-ALC) in Georgia. This new initiative is designed to rapidly accelerate the installation of the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (EPAWSS) on the U.S. Air Force’s F-15E Strike Eagle fleet.
According to the official press release, the Speedline facility is slated to receive its first F-15E aircraft for installation in June 2026. By decoupling these critical electronic warfare upgrades from standard Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) schedules, the Air Force aims to field advanced defensive capabilities much faster than previously possible.
We note that this shift in maintenance strategy allows the military to upgrade jets up to five to seven years ahead of their routine maintenance cycles. This collaborative effort between the AFLCMC’s F-15 System Program Office and the WR-ALC is expected to significantly boost fleet readiness against modern electromagnetic threats.
Breaking the Maintenance Bottleneck
Operational Independence
Historically, major system upgrades for fighter aircraft have been tied to their routine depot maintenance schedules, which can create bottlenecks for fielding urgent technology. The AFLCMC’s new Speedline operates entirely independently of the standard PDM line.
This operational independence provides the F-15 System Program Office and WR-ALC the flexibility to install the EPAWSS on aircraft that are not due for routine maintenance for another five to seven years. By treating the electronic warfare upgrade as a standalone priority, the Air Force can modernize its fleet at a pace dictated by tactical necessity rather than logistical routine.
Understanding the EPAWSS Upgrade
Replacing Cold War-Era Technology
The Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System is a next-generation, all-digital electronic warfare suite. Based on the provided research data, it is designed to replace the legacy Tactical Electronic Warfare System (TEWS), which relies on Cold War-era analog equipment.
Developed by prime contractor BAE Systems, with Boeing serving as the prime contractor for integration, EPAWSS provides fully integrated radar warning, geolocation, situational awareness, and self-protection solutions. The system allows the aircraft to detect, identify, and defeat surface and airborne threats in highly contested, dense signal environments.
Financial and Production Milestones
The U.S. Air Force officially cleared EPAWSS for full-rate production in early 2025. Concurrently, the Air Force awarded a $615.8 million contract to Boeing to cover the installation of these systems. Shortly after this award, the first fully equipped F-15E was delivered to the 48th Fighter Wing at RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom, marking a major milestone in the modernization of the 4th-generation fleet.
Strategic Importance and Lethality
Expanding the F-15E’s Capabilities
The integration of EPAWSS is not merely a defensive measure; it is a comprehensive upgrade to the aircraft’s survivability and lethality. In the official AFLCMC release, military leadership emphasized the strategic necessity of the system.
“The F-15E Strike Eagle remains a cornerstone of our tactical airpower and deep strike capabilities. The integration of advanced electronic warfare suites, such as the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, ensures the F-15E will not just survive, but actively disrupt and dismantle adversary kill chains in the most highly contested, electromagnetically dense environments.”
, Lt. Col. Matthew Heil, F-15 Program Office, EPAWSS Materiel Leader
AirPro News analysis
We observe that the creation of the EPAWSS Speedline reflects a broader Department of Defense trend toward agile logistics and sustainment. By separating critical combat upgrades from time-consuming depot maintenance, the military is demonstrating a commitment to fielding new technologies to the warfighter at a much faster pace.
Furthermore, as the U.S. Air Force continues to develop and field 5th-generation fighters like the F-35 and F-22, alongside future 6th-generation platforms, maintaining the survivability of 4th-generation “workhorse” aircraft is a strategic priority. EPAWSS ensures that older airframes like the F-15E can safely and effectively operate alongside stealth fighters in modern, highly contested combat scenarios, bridging the gap between legacy platforms and future air dominance initiatives.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the EPAWSS Speedline?
The EPAWSS Speedline is a dedicated installation facility at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex designed to rapidly equip F-15E Strike Eagles with the new Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, independent of standard maintenance schedules.
When will the first aircraft be upgraded at the Speedline?
According to the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, the facility is slated to receive its first F-15E aircraft for installation in June 2026.
Who are the primary contractors for EPAWSS?
BAE Systems is the prime contractor that developed the EPAWSS, while Boeing serves as the prime contractor for the system’s integration and installation on the F-15E.
Sources
Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Codie Trimble
Defense & Military
Final A-10 Engine Build Marks End of Davis-Monthan Maintenance Era
Davis-Monthan AFB completes last A-10 engine build as USAF extends aircraft service life through 2030, ending a 50-year maintenance mission.

This article is based on an official press release from Air Combat Command.
On May 21, 2026, Airmen at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Arizona officially completed their final A-10 Thunderbolt II engine build. According to an official release from Air Combat Command, this milestone marks the end of a decades-long maintenance mission for the 355th Component Maintenance Squadron (CMS) and serves as a symbolic closing chapter for the base’s 50-year legacy with the iconic close-air-support aircraft.
While the U.S. Air-Forces recently announced a partial extension of the A-10’s operational life through 2030, the formal training and heavy maintenance pipelines, including the dedicated Davis-Monthan engine shop, are officially shutting down. As the military transitions to future platforms, the completion of this final General Electric TF34 turbofan engine represents the end of an era for the maintainers who kept the “Warthog” flying.
We at AirPro News have reviewed the official military releases and supplementary research to provide a comprehensive look at what this final build means for the U.S. Air Force, the maintainers on the ground, and the future of the A-10 fleet.
A Historic Final Build for the 355th CMS
A standard A-10 engine build is a rigorous, multi-stage operation that typically takes 30 days to complete. The process involves meticulous inspection, repair, rebuilding, and testing of the General Electric TF34 turbofan engines that power the A-10C Thunderbolt II. According to military reports, a single crew of five maintainers usually handles the entire process for a given engine.
Hands-On Participation
For this historic final build, the 355th CMS broke from tradition. Every member of the shop participated, ensuring that all personnel had the opportunity to put their hands on the final engine throughout its diagnostic runs and final inspection. The final engine test was successfully conducted in the test cell on April 30, 2026, verifying its performance and flight readiness.
The process officially concluded on May 21, 2026, when Tech. Sgt. Logan Lamb, a 355th Maintenance Group quality assurance inspector, stamped the final inspection form. Wing leadership and the 355th CMS gathered to celebrate the completion, reflecting on the gravity of their work.
“Some, if not all these engines have saved lives on the ground through close air support missions, and some have carried pilots home while the other engine was damaged. All members of the shop put eyes and hands on this engine throughout the build, testing, diagnostic runs and final inspection. Typically, only one crew of five would work on any one engine, but this engine has been touched by everyone.”
The Warthog’s Legacy and Future Operations
Davis-Monthan AFB has served as the primary hub for A-10 operations and training for nearly 50 years. However, the base began divesting its A-10 fleet in February 2024, sending the first aircraft to the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group, commonly known as the “Boneyard.” On April 3, 2026, the 357th Fighter Squadron at Davis-Monthan graduated its final class of A-10 pilots, permanently closing the formal training pipeline for the aircraft.
Service Extension Through 2030
Despite the closures at Davis-Monthan, the A-10 will continue to fly. On April 20, 2026, Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink announced that the Air Force will extend the service life of the remaining A-10 fleet through 2030, reversing a previous plan to retire the aircraft by 2029. According to defense reports, this decision was heavily influenced by the A-10’s recent combat performance in Operation Epic Fury, a U.S. campaign against Iran in late March and April 2026, where the aircraft successfully struck naval vessels and provided critical close air support.
AirPro News analysis
The decision to extend the A-10’s service life through 2030 while simultaneously closing its primary heavy maintenance and training facilities presents a unique logistical scenario. The Air Force is utilizing what it calls a “fleet management strategy.” Because the Davis-Monthan engine shop and the pilot “schoolhouse” are now closed, operational squadrons at bases like Moody AFB and Whiteman AFB will be operating on borrowed time. They will have to rely entirely on existing experienced personnel, stockpiled parts, and the durability of engines like the one just completed by the 355th CMS to sustain operations until the final retirement date. This strategy underscores the military’s confidence in the robust engineering of the TF34 engines and the meticulous groundwork laid by aerospace Propulsion Airmen over the past decades.
The Unsung Heroes of Aerospace Propulsion
The longevity and survivability of the A-10 Thunderbolt II are directly tied to the expertise of aerospace propulsion Airmen. These maintainers are responsible for ensuring the aircraft remains lethal and capable of returning pilots home safely, even after taking heavy fire.
Their daily responsibilities include conducting borescope inspections to identify internal engine issues early and prevent catastrophic failures. They also manage test cell operations, running the engines in a controlled environment while monitoring critical readings from a control cab to verify performance before the engine is ever attached to an airframe.
“I think the legacy of the A-10 is going to be remembered for generations. The A-10 will be missed here in Arizona.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What engine does the A-10 Thunderbolt II use?
The A-10 is powered by twin General Electric TF34 turbofan engines. These engines are renowned for their durability and ability to sustain damage while still bringing pilots home safely.
Why is the A-10’s service life being extended to 2030?
Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink announced the extension on April 20, 2026, following the aircraft’s highly successful combat performance during Operation Epic Fury in early 2026. The extension reverses previous plans to retire the fleet by 2029.
Is Davis-Monthan AFB still training A-10 pilots?
No. The 357th Fighter Squadron at Davis-Monthan graduated its final class of A-10 pilots on April 3, 2026, officially closing the formal training pipeline for the aircraft.
Sources: Air Combat Command
Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Christopher Ornelas Jr.
Defense & Military
Airbus Explores Helicopter Manufacturing in Canada for Global Export
Airbus SE is evaluating manufacturing helicopters in Canada to support federal defense contracts amid Canada’s $81B defense investment and new industrial strategy.

This article summarizes reporting by Bloomberg and Laura Dhillon Kane. This article summarizes publicly available elements and public remarks.
According to reporting by Bloomberg, Airbus SE is evaluating the potential to manufacture helicopters in Canada for the global export market, provided the European aerospace giant secures upcoming federal procurement contracts. This strategic proposition arrives as Canada embarks on an unprecedented defense spending expansion aimed at modernizing its military and stimulating domestic manufacturing jobs.
We note that Airbus is leveraging a unique political and economic window. By pitching a “local for global” manufacturing approach, the company hopes to decentralize its production while satisfying the Canadian government’s increasingly stringent demands for domestic economic benefits in exchange for lucrative defense contracts.
Canada’s Historic Defense Spending Surge
Following years of underfunding, the Canadian government has recently injected an $81.1 billion multi-year investment into national defense, according to comprehensive industry research. Under the administration of Prime Minister Mark Carney, Canada officially reached the 2% NATO spending benchmark in March 2026 and has committed to escalating defense expenditures to 5% of GDP by 2035.
The 2026 Defence Industrial Strategy
A major catalyst for Airbus’s proposal is the Canadian government’s first-ever Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), launched in February 2026. Research reports indicate that the DIS introduced a strict “Build-Partner-Buy” framework designed to maximize domestic economic activity. The strategy ambitiously aims to direct 70% of defense contracts to Canadian firms, create 125,000 jobs, and boost defense exports by 50%.
To win contracts under this new framework, foreign vendors are required to provide sustainable domestic economic activity and transfer intellectual property. Furthermore, Canada is actively seeking to diversify its defense procurement to reduce its historical reliance on U.S. suppliers, pivoting toward European partnerships and joining the EU’s €150 billion Security Action for Europe (SAFE) fund.
Airbus’s “Local for Global” Pitch
Airbus is no stranger to the Canadian aerospace sector, having operated in the country for over 40 years. According to industry data, the company currently employs over 5,300 people in Canada. Its helicopter division, based in Fort Erie, Ontario, is already a recognized center of excellence for composite manufacturing, shipping approximately 34,000 parts globally each year to support Airbus’s worldwide supply chain.
Targeting Key Government Contracts
Airbus is actively pursuing three major helicopter procurement projects in Canada: fleet replacements for the Canadian Armed Forces, the Canadian Coast Guard, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). To bolster its position, Transport Canada officially certified the Airbus H175 helicopter in February 2026, a super-medium aircraft tailored for search and rescue and defense missions in harsh environments. Additionally, Airbus is currently delivering 19 H135 helicopters to the Royal Canadian Air Force for the Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) program.
Airbus executives have made it clear that winning these new contracts would justify expanding their Canadian manufacturing base to assemble complete helicopters for the global market.
“Clearly, if Airbus helicopters are selected for any of the big upcoming campaigns and there is an industrial project which is tied to this contract, it’s an opportunity to export what would be manufactured here to the worldwide market.”
“We see that the H175 is very well positioned for several of those ambitions… We really see that as an aircraft for Canada, but… it would also be a helicopter from Canada.”
Balancing Economic Demands with Aerospace Realities
While Airbus is willing to expand its manufacturing footprint, company leadership has cautioned against overly transactional government demands. Michalon noted that while Airbus can offer research, development, and local procurement, there are practical limits to quid-pro-quo arrangements in aerospace manufacturing.
“If you ask us, ‘Can you bring a car plant in exchange for us selecting [an Airbus helicopter]?’ the answer is ‘Probably not, no.'”
AirPro News analysis
We observe that Canada’s deliberate pivot toward European defense partnerships represents a significant geopolitical shift. Historically, over 90% of Canada’s military helicopters and 100% of its fighter aircraft have been sourced from the United States. While diversifying procurement builds sovereign capacity and integrates Canada into European supply chains, defense experts suggest it could introduce interoperability friction with U.S. forces, particularly concerning joint North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) operations.
Furthermore, establishing a Canadian export hub would provide Airbus with much-needed supply chain redundancy. By decentralizing production from its primary plants in France and Germany, Airbus can better insulate itself from European supply chain bottlenecks. Canada’s 2025 entry into the NATO Next Generation Rotorcraft Capability (NGRC) initiative also positions the country as a long-term collaborator alongside European nations to manage the rising development costs of future military rotorcraft.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Why is Airbus considering building helicopters in Canada?
According to Bloomberg reporting, Airbus is exploring Canadian manufacturing for global export as a strategic incentive to win upcoming federal procurement contracts for the Canadian Armed Forces, Coast Guard, and RCMP.
What is Canada’s current defense spending target?
Under Prime Prime Minister Mark Carney, Canada officially hit the 2% NATO spending benchmark in March 2026 and has committed to reaching 5% of GDP by 2035, backed by an $81.1 billion multi-year investment.
What is the Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS)?
Launched in February 2026, the DIS is a Canadian government framework aiming to direct 70% of defense contracts to domestic firms, create 125,000 jobs, and boost defense exports by 50% by requiring foreign vendors to invest locally.
Sources:
Bloomberg
Provided Industry Research Report
Photo Credit: Airbus
-
Regulations & Safety6 days agoNTSB Urges FAA to Update Runway Condition Assessment Matrix for Heavy Rain
-
Space & Satellites4 days agoFAA Orders SpaceX Investigation After Starship Flight 12 Booster Mishap
-
Space & Satellites4 days agoUS Space Force Awards SpaceX $2.29B Contract for Military Satellite Network
-
Space & Satellites2 days agoBlue Origin’s New Glenn Rocket Explodes During Test at Cape Canaveral
-
Route Development5 days agoHong Kong International Airport Opens Expanded Terminal 2 for Departures
