India’s 114 Rafale Jet Deal Raises Cost and Strategic Questions

This article summarizes reporting by The Wire.

India’s Potential 114-Jet Rafale Deal Draws Scrutiny Over Cost and Strategy

The Indian government’s recent moves to approve the procurement of 114 Dassault Rafale fighter jets have sparked significant debate regarding financial prudence and strategic planning. According to reporting by The Wire, the proposed acquisition, aimed at bolstering the Indian Air-Forces (IAF), essentially revives the framework of a tender cancelled nearly a decade ago, but at a significantly higher cost to the taxpayer.

The deal, which is expected to be executed through an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA), seeks to address the IAF’s critical shortage of fighter squadrons. However, critics argue that the decision represents a “U-turn” that brings India back to its 2007 starting point after years of delays and interim purchases. As noted in the source report, the new arrangement raises difficult questions about why the original, cheaper negotiations were scrapped in favor of a piecemeal approach that has ultimately led to a more expensive conclusion.

Financial Implications: A Steep Price Hike

From $10 Billion to $35 Billion

One of the central critiques highlighted by The Wire is the massive escalation in cost. The original Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender, initiated in 2007 for 126 Military-Aircraft, was estimated to cost between $10 billion and $12 billion. In contrast, the current proposal for 114 jets is projected to cost between $30 billion and $35 billion (approximately ₹3.25 lakh crore).

While inflation and technological upgrades account for some of this increase, the report suggests the premium is disproportionately high. The publication questions the logic of scrapping the original tender, which was won by Airbus on the basis of being the lowest bidder, only to return to the same supplier years later with a price tag that has nearly tripled.

The “Sunk Cost” Argument

Proponents of the deal often cite the “India Specific Enhancements” (ISE) paid for during the 2016 emergency purchase of 36 Rafales as a justification for continuing with the same platform. Since India has already invested approximately €1.3 billion in these modifications, spreading that cost over a larger order of 114 jets theoretically lowers the development cost per unit. However, The Wire argues that this efficiency does not fully offset the sheer scale of the total expenditure, which they characterize as a heavy burden for “political bravado.”

Strategic Inconsistencies and Delays

The “U-Turn” on Procurement

The procurement saga began with the 2007 MMRCA tender, which was cancelled in 2015 by the current administration. At the time, the government cited the process as “unwieldy” and opted instead for a direct purchase of 36 fly-away jets to meet urgent operational needs. According to The Wire, reverting to a plan for 114 locally manufactured jets effectively admits that the original strategic logic was sound, despite the decade-long detour.

“The government is returning to the same aircraft nearly two decades later… resulting in a delay that has left the IAF with a critical shortage.”

, Summary of reporting by The Wire

Advertisement

Production and Delivery Timelines

Operational readiness remains a major concern. Dassault Aviation is currently managing a substantial backlog, with Orders from France, the UAE, Indonesia, and others totaling over 220 aircraft. With a production rate of roughly four jets per month, industry observers question whether the Manufacturers can deliver India’s 114 jets within a timeframe that arrests the IAF’s depleting squadron strength.

If the deal is finalized, deliveries could potentially stretch into the mid-2030s. By that time, the 4.5-generation Rafale may face obsolescence against 5th and 6th-generation platforms operated by regional adversaries.

Industrial Disputes: HAL vs. Private Sector

A recurring point of contention in India’s defense procurement is the choice of domestic manufacturing partners. The original MMRCA deal stalled in part because Dassault refused to guarantee the quality of jets produced by the state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). The new proposal involves a “Strategic Partner” model, likely favoring private sector entities.

The Wire notes that while Tata Advanced Systems has existing agreements for component manufacturing, the final assembly line is reportedly planned for a facility in Nagpur associated with the Reliance group. This revives controversies from the 2016 deal regarding the preference for private conglomerates over the experienced public sector unit, HAL, despite the private sector’s relative lack of aerospace integration experience.

AirPro News Analysis

While the critiques regarding cost and delay are substantial, the operational argument for the Rafale remains grounded in logistics. The IAF already operates the platform, meaning the infrastructure for training, maintenance, and weaponry is established. Introducing a new aircraft type, such as the Gripen or F-21, would require billions in parallel infrastructure investment.

However, the transparency of the “Make in India” component is critical. If the private sector partner struggles to absorb the technology transfer, a challenge HAL has navigated for decades, the timeline for these jets could slip further, exacerbating the very security gaps the deal is meant to close.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the new deal so much more expensive than the 2007 tender?
The price increase is attributed to nearly 20 years of inflation, the inclusion of advanced weaponry (like Meteor and SCALP missiles), and upgrades to the latest F4/F5 standards. However, critics argue these factors do not fully justify a near-300% cost hike.

How many fighter squadrons does India currently have?
The Indian Air Force currently operates approximately 30 squadrons, well below the sanctioned strength of 42 required for a two-front war scenario.

Will the jets be built in India?
The proposal outlines that 18 jets would be imported in “fly-away” condition, while the remaining 96 would be manufactured in India by a Strategic Partner, likely a private sector firm.

Sources

• The Wire