This article is based on official government documents and public notices from the Federal Aviation Administration.

FAA Proposes “Post-Activity Survey” to Monitor Designated Pilot Examiners

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has initiated a public comment period for a new oversight program designed to gather data on Designated Pilot Examiners (DPEs). In a move mandated by Congress, the agency proposes a voluntary “Post-Activity Survey” for pilots immediately following their practical tests. The initiative aims to address long-standing industry concerns regarding consistency, professionalism, and the availability of examiners.

According to the official docket (FAA-2025-5568), published on December 29, 2025, the survey is a direct requirement of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024. Specifically, Section 833 of the Act directs the agency to implement a system that tracks the “performance and merit” of examiners. The FAA is currently soliciting public feedback on the proposed information collection methods until the comment deadline of February 27, 2026.

This proposal represents a significant shift in how the FAA oversees the thousands of private contractors who conduct the vast majority of pilot certification events in the United States. By soliciting direct feedback from applicants, the agency hopes to standardize a system that has historically suffered from regional disparities and sporadic oversight.

Survey Mechanics and Scope

The proposed information collection is designed to be a high-volume, low-burden digital survey. The FAA estimates that approximately 49,000 respondents will participate annually. The target audience includes any applicant who has recently completed a practical test for a certificate or rating, regardless of the outcome of the exam.

According to the proposal details, the survey will consist of approximately 12 yes-or-no questions. The agency estimates the time burden for each respondent will be roughly 7 minutes. The questions are structured to gather objective data in four specific categories:

• Professionalism: Evaluating the conduct and demeanor of the examiner during the test.
• Environment: Assessing the suitability of the testing location and atmosphere.
• Content: Verifying whether the exam adhered strictly to the applicable Airman Certification Standards (ACS).
• Duration: Recording the length of both the ground (oral) and flight portions of the exam.

The FAA’s stated objective is to deploy a data-driven system. Rather than relying on anecdotal complaints or random inspections, the agency intends to use this aggregate data to identify outliers, examiners who consistently deviate from the norm in terms of pass rates, exam duration, or professional conduct.

Context: Addressing Systemic Friction

To understand the significance of this proposal, it is necessary to examine the current state of the DPE system. Designated Pilot Examiners are not FAA employees; they are senior pilots authorized to conduct exams on the agency’s behalf. They operate as private contractors and charge market rates for their services.

The reliance on private contractors has created what many in the industry describe as a bottleneck. With fees often ranging from $1,000 to over $2,000 per test, and some examiners demanding cash-only payments, the financial burden on students is substantial. Furthermore, the “customer” dynamic can create conflicts of interest.

The “Santa Claus” Effect vs. Unfair Standards

A primary driver for this legislation is the inconsistency in testing standards. In the aviation community, some examiners are known as “Santa Claus” for their leniency, while others are viewed as unnecessarily harsh or unprofessional. Organizations like the Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) have previously noted that “minimal standards” pose a safety risk, citing instances where examiners might skip required maneuvers, such as a “slip to land,” to save time.

Conversely, students have historically lacked a safe, standardized channel to report unprofessional behavior. While the FAA has conducted random phone calls to applicants in the past, there was no systemic mechanism for feedback. This survey aims to close that loop.

Industry Reaction and Concerns

Initial reactions from the pilot community and flight education organizations have been mixed. While there is broad support for weeding out “bad apple” examiners, significant concerns remain regarding the implementation of the survey.

The primary concern among pilots is anonymity. Given that many DPEs operate in small geographic regions and may conduct only a few exams per week, applicants fear that negative feedback could be easily traced back to them. This fear of retaliation could skew the data, as students may hesitate to report honest feedback about an examiner who holds the power to pass or fail them in future ratings.

From the examiner’s perspective, there is apprehension regarding “revenge reviews.” DPEs are concerned that applicants who fail a practical test due to their own lack of preparation might use the survey to punish the examiner. The FAA has stated the system is intended to track “merit,” but the mechanism for filtering out retaliatory complaints remains a point of discussion.

AirPro News Analysis

The introduction of a “Post-Activity Survey” signals that the FAA is moving toward a customer-service model of oversight, similar to feedback loops seen in the private sector. However, the effectiveness of this tool will depend entirely on the nuance of the data collected.

We observe a potential weakness in the “yes/no” question format proposed. A check ride is a complex, dynamic event. Reducing the evaluation of an examiner’s conduct to binary choices may fail to capture the context of a disagreement in the cockpit. Furthermore, while the survey addresses “Professionalism,” it is unclear if it will address the “cash economy” and scheduling behaviors that frustrate many applicants.

Additionally, the volume of data, 49,000 responses annually, will require sophisticated processing to be useful. If the FAA merely collects the data without a robust team to investigate the flags raised, the survey may become a bureaucratic exercise rather than a safety enhancement. The success of Section 833 will be measured not by the number of surveys filled out, but by the tangible standardization of check rides nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the survey mandatory?
No. The proposal indicates that the survey is voluntary for applicants.

Will the survey affect my check ride result?
The survey is a “Post-Activity” measure, meaning it is completed after the exam is concluded. It is designed to oversee the examiner, not re-evaluate the pilot.

When does the comment period end?
Public comments on this proposal must be submitted by February 27, 2026.

What is the legal basis for this survey?
The survey is mandated by Section 833 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, titled “National coordination and oversight of designated pilot examiners.”

Sources

• Regulations.gov (Docket FAA-2025-5568)