Emirates Bans Power Bank Use on Flights to Enhance Safety

Emirates Implements Comprehensive Power Bank Restrictions: Industry Response to Rising Lithium Battery Fire Incidents

The aviation industry is facing a new set of challenges as incidents involving lithium battery fires have surged, prompting airlines to rethink safety protocols for passenger electronics. Emirates, one of the world’s largest and most profitable airlines, has responded by introducing the strictest power bank policy to date, effective October 1, 2025. This move comes amid a dramatic rise in lithium battery-related incidents, including a high-profile aircraft destruction in South Korea earlier this year. The new Emirates policy, which bans all use of power banks during flight, is poised to set a new standard for airline safety and may signal broader changes across the sector.

The significance of this development extends beyond operational adjustments for a single airline. With lithium-ion batteries now ubiquitous in personal devices, the risks associated with their use at altitude have become a focal point for regulators and industry leaders. Emirates’ decision reflects both a response to recent catastrophic events and a proactive stance on passenger safety, likely influencing regulatory and competitive dynamics in the global aviation market.

This article examines the context, details, and implications of Emirates’ new power bank policy, exploring the technical, regulatory, and economic dimensions of lithium battery safety in modern air travel.

The Escalating Crisis of Lithium Battery Incidents in Aviation

Lithium battery fires have become an alarming trend in aviation, with data showing a 388% increase in such incidents since 2015. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), there are now, on average, two lithium battery-related thermal runaway events per week on commercial flights worldwide. The FAA’s Thermal Runaway Incident Program documented 579 aviation-related lithium battery accidents between 2006 and 2024, with 69 incidents in the first eleven months of 2024 alone, one of the highest annual totals on record.

The root cause of these incidents is often “thermal runaway,” a process where a battery’s temperature rises uncontrollably due to internal faults, physical damage, or overcharging. This can result in fires, explosions, and the release of toxic gases. The confined environment of an aircraft cabin, combined with limited firefighting resources at high altitude, makes such events particularly hazardous. Experts from UL Standards & Engagement highlight the unique challenge posed by lithium-ion battery fires, which can burn hotter and faster than conventional material fires, often overwhelming standard suppression tools.

Surveys among flight attendants reveal a high level of concern, with 87% expressing significant worry about lithium-ion battery risks. Compounding the issue, a notable percentage of passengers (38%) admit to packing lithium-powered devices in checked luggage, despite regulations requiring such items to be carried in the cabin. Furthermore, many airlines have been inconsistent in enforcing these rules, particularly during busy travel periods when gate-checked bags may not be properly screened for battery-powered devices.

“Lithium battery fires on aircraft have increased by 388% since 2015, with incidents now occurring twice weekly on average.” — FAA Thermal Runaway Incident Program

Emirates’ Comprehensive New Power Bank Policy

In response to these safety concerns, Emirates has introduced a new policy that goes beyond industry norms. Effective October 1, 2025, all use of power banks during flight is prohibited. This includes charging devices from power banks and recharging power banks using the aircraft’s power supply. Passengers are still allowed to carry power banks under 100 Watt-hours, in line with international guidelines, but these must be visibly labeled with their capacity and stored in a seat pocket or under-seat bag, never in overhead bins or checked luggage.

The policy is a direct response to the technical realities of battery safety. Emirates notes that while many modern devices have built-in safety mechanisms to prevent overcharging, basic power banks often lack such features, increasing the risk of thermal runaway. By restricting both the use and storage of power banks, the airline aims to reduce the likelihood of undetected fires and improve the crew’s ability to respond quickly if an incident does occur.

Emirates has also launched a passenger education campaign to ensure travelers are aware of the new rules. The airline emphasizes that while safety is the primary concern, it is also committed to minimizing inconvenience by providing ample in-seat charging options for passenger devices. This approach underscores the balance between enhanced safety protocols and maintaining a high level of passenger service.

“The new Emirates policy prohibits all power bank use during flight and requires these devices to be stored only in seat pockets or under-seat bags, not overhead bins.” — AeroTime

The Air Busan Incident: Catalyst for Change

The urgency behind Emirates’ policy shift can be traced to a catastrophic event involving Air Busan Flight 391 in January 2025. While parked at Gimhae International Airport in South Korea, a fire broke out in the aircraft’s tail section, rapidly destroying half the fuselage. Investigators determined the fire originated from a power bank stored in an overhead compartment. Although all 176 passengers and crew evacuated safely, the aircraft was declared a total loss, the first recorded hull loss caused by a passenger’s power bank.

The incident exposed several vulnerabilities. The fire started just minutes after a takeoff delay was announced, and initial attempts to suppress it with handheld extinguishers proved insufficient. Crew protocols prevented passengers from opening the overhead bin, as increased oxygen would have intensified the fire. The event’s outcome could have been far graver had it occurred mid-flight, highlighting the need for preventive measures rather than reliance on emergency response.

In the aftermath, South Korea and several Asian carriers, including EVA Air and Singapore Airlines, rapidly introduced new restrictions: banning power bank storage in overhead bins, prohibiting in-flight charging, and capping the number of power banks per passenger. These regional actions provided a blueprint for Emirates and other global airlines to follow.

“The Air Busan incident was the first total aircraft loss attributed to a passenger power bank fire, prompting immediate regulatory changes across Asia.” — South Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

Industry-Wide Policy Evolution and Technical Considerations

Emirates’ new rules are part of a broader trend. Southwest Airlines was the first major U.S. carrier to restrict power bank usage, requiring devices to remain visible and accessible during charging. Lufthansa and its subsidiary Eurowings in Europe soon followed, banning in-seat power bank charging and mandating special crew announcements about battery safety.

These policies reflect growing recognition of the technical challenges posed by lithium batteries. Unlike smartphones and laptops, many power banks lack advanced circuitry to prevent thermal runaway. The variability in manufacturing standards, especially among counterfeit or low-cost devices, further complicates risk assessment for airlines. Regulatory bodies like the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) have responded by tightening guidelines, including new state-of-charge limits and enhanced labeling requirements.

Technological innovation is also underway. NASA has developed carbon fiber sleeves that contain thermal runaway events within individual battery cells, and researchers are exploring solid-state batteries with inherently safer chemistries. However, these solutions are not yet widely available, making policy restrictions the most immediate tool for risk mitigation.

“Battery design variations and lack of safety features in many power banks are a central concern for airlines and regulators.” — UL Standards & Engagement

Economic and Operational Implications

Implementing comprehensive power bank restrictions has both operational and financial implications for airlines. Emirates, with its strong profitability and global reach, is well positioned to absorb the costs of crew training, passenger education, and safety equipment upgrades. The airline reported pre-tax profits of $6.2 billion in the 2024–25 financial year, providing resources for extensive safety investments.

For other carriers, especially those under financial stress, the costs of similar policy rollouts may be more challenging. Enhanced crew training, specialized fire suppression equipment, and increased passenger communication all require ongoing investment. Airlines must also balance safety with passenger expectations for device connectivity, especially on long-haul flights where power banks have become a travel staple.

The competitive landscape may shift as a result. Passengers who prioritize safety may gravitate toward airlines with stricter policies, while others may seek out carriers with more lenient rules. Ultimately, industry-wide harmonization and technological innovation are likely to shape the future of lithium battery management in aviation.

Conclusion

Emirates’ decision to ban all power bank use during flights marks a turning point in aviation safety, reflecting both the scale of the lithium battery challenge and the airline’s commitment to proactive risk management. The policy is grounded in recent incident data and technical analysis, and it sets a new benchmark that other carriers and regulators may soon follow.

As the industry awaits breakthroughs in battery technology and fire suppression, comprehensive policy restrictions remain the most effective tool for minimizing risk. The future of air travel will depend on the ability of airlines, regulators, and passengers to adapt to evolving safety standards, balancing technological convenience with the imperative of protecting lives at 30,000 feet.

FAQ

Q: Can I still bring a power bank on Emirates flights?
A: Yes, but it must be under 100 Watt-hours, visibly labeled with capacity, and stored in a seat pocket or under-seat bag. It cannot be used or charged during the flight.

Q: Why are power banks now banned from use on Emirates flights?
A: The ban is a response to a significant increase in lithium battery fires and a catastrophic incident in South Korea. The policy aims to reduce the risk of onboard fires and improve safety.

Q: Are other airlines implementing similar policies?
A: Yes, several major airlines including Southwest, Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, and others have introduced similar restrictions on power bank usage and storage.

Q: What should I do if my device overheats on a flight?
A: Immediately notify the cabin crew. Do not attempt to handle or open the device yourself, as lithium battery fires can escalate quickly.

Q: Will Emirates provide alternative charging options?
A: Emirates is committed to offering in-seat charging for passenger devices, minimizing inconvenience from the power bank ban.

Sources: Emirates, UL Standards & Engagement, IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations